簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 高于絜
Yu-Chieh Kao
論文名稱: 基於擬題引導的合作概念構圖對學生線上跨領域知識學習表現及行為之影響
Effects of Problem Posing-Based Collaborative Concept Mapping Approach on Students’ Online Interdisciplinary Learning Performances and Behaviors
指導教授: 黃國禎
Gwo-Jen Hwang
口試委員: 孫之元
Chih-Yuan Sun
林奇臻
Chi-Jen Lin
陳志鴻
Chih-Hung Chen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 數位學習與教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 82
中文關鍵詞: 概念構圖擬題策略網路學習合作學習
外文關鍵詞: concept-mapping, problem-posing, web-based learning, collaborative learning
相關次數: 點閱:467下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究提出「基於擬題引導的合作概念構圖學習模式」,以擬題策略作為合作概念構圖的輔助鷹架,藉此提高學生線上跨領域知識學習表現及行為。為瞭解學生的學習成就、學習動機、合作學習傾向、批判思考傾向及線上討論行為之情形,本研究採用準實驗設計,針對國中八年級地理課程進行實驗。研究結果顯示,導入擬題策略於概念構圖活動中,對學生在學習成就、學習動機、合作學習傾向及批判思考傾向方面的表現並無顯著影響。另外,由實驗數據也發現,基於擬題引導的合作概念構圖學習模式,學生在「尋求答案」的討論行為與學習動機、合作學習傾向和批判思考傾向具有相關性;同時,採用一般合作概念構圖學習模式的學生,「批評」的線上討論行為面向顯著高於實驗組,而在「讚美」的討論行為則與學習動機具有相關性。基於實驗結果及參考過去的文獻,本研究推論擬題策略的導入,學生於討論過程中較常提出具有建設性的建議或是建議的答案,對於組員提出的想法亦能給予正面或支持性的語句,且應可降低學生負面、消極或對於組員提出的答案存有疑義之討論行為。然而,導入擬題策略未能對學習表現、情意面及相關技能發揮功效,可知擬題策略對於學生而言應具有一定的困難度,未來研究建議加入認知負荷問卷或質性訪談,以期提供後續研究與改進教學之參考。


    The present study explored the impact of an integrated problem-posing strategy and concept mapping approach on students’ online interdisciplinary learning performances and behaviors. Using problem-posing strategy as scaffolding for collaborative online concept mapping to improve students’ learning achievement, motivation, cooperative tendency and critical tendency and investigate the online discussion behaviors. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, a quasi-experiment was conducted in an eight-grade social science curriculum. The experiment results show there is no significant difference between learning achievement, learning motivation, collaboration tendency and critical thinking tendency of the students learning with the proposed problem posing-based collaborative concept mapping approach. Moreover, there is a correlation between students’ “seeking answers” discussion behavior and learning motivation, cooperative learning tendency and critical thinking tendency in the proposed approach. On the other hand, in the control group, students’ “criticism” behavior is significantly more than experimental group and there is a correlation between students’ “praise” behavior and learning motivation. It is inferred that problem-posing strategy is helpful for students to provide constructive suggestions or answers, give supportive response and may reduce negative discussion behaviors. However, the proposed strategy has no significant effect on learning performance, probably because students have difficulties with problem-posing strategy. For further studies, it is suggested that cognitive load questionnaire or interview should be adopted to provide references for future research and teaching improvement.

    摘要 I 目錄 III 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 VII 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的與研究問題 5 1.3 名詞釋義 7 1.3.1 跨領域學習 (Interdisciplinary learning) 7 1.3.2 擬題策略 (Problem posing) 7 1.3.3 合作式概念圖 (Collaborative concept mapping) 7 1.3.4 學習成就 (Learning achievement) 8 1.3.5 學習動機 (Learning motivation) 8 1.3.6 合作學習傾向 (Collaboration tendency) 8 1.3.7 批判思考傾向 (Critical thinking tendency) 8 1.3.8 線上討論行為 (Online discussion behavior) 9 第二章 文獻探討 10 2.1 概念圖 (Concept mapping) 10 2.2 擬題策略 (Problem posing) 12 2.3 網路合作學習 (Web-based cooperative learning) 15 2.4 批判思考 (Critical thinking) 17 第三章 實驗設計 20 3.1 研究架構 20 3.2 研究對象 22 3.3 研究課程 22 3.4 學習工具介紹 22 3.5 實驗流程 25 3.6 研究工具 26 3.6.1 中國西部地區學習成就測驗 26 3.6.2 學習動機量表 26 3.6.3 合作學習傾向量表 27 3.6.4 批判思考傾向量表 27 3.6.5 線上討論行為 28 3.6.6 合作擬題架構 28 3.6.7 課後學習單 29 3.7 資料處理與分析 29 第四章 研究結果與分析 31 4.1 學習成就 31 4.2 學習動機 32 4.3 合作學習傾向 33 4.4 批判思考傾向 34 4.5 線上討論行為 35 4.6 線上討論行為與學習行為之相關性 37 第五章 結論與未來展望 39 5.1 研究結果與討論 39 5.1.1 學習成就 39 5.1.2 學習動機 40 5.1.3 合作學習傾向 42 5.1.4 批判思考傾向 42 5.1.5 線上討論行為 43 5.1.6 群組互動與其學習行為之間的相關性 44 5.2 未來研究建議與展望 46 參考文獻 48 附錄一、108學年第二學期第一次段考試卷(前測) 60 附錄二、中國西部地區學習成就測驗(後測) 65 附錄三、學習動機量表 68 附錄四、合作學習傾向量表 69 附錄五、批判思考傾向量表 70 附錄六、合作擬題架構 71 附錄七、課後學習單 72

    中文部分
    王秀鶯(2014)。概念構圖融入專題式學習對不同學習風格學生學習成效之影響。國立臺南大學教育學系課程與教學碩博士班博士論文,台南市。
    英文部分
    Akay, H., & Boz, N. (2010). The Effect of Problem Posing Oriented Analyses-II Course on the Attitudes toward Mathematics and Mathematics Self-Efficacy of Elementary Prospective Mathematics Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 59-75.
    Ammer, J. J. (1998). Peer evaluation model for enhancing writing performance of students with learning disabilities. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 14(3), 263-276.
    Ancliff, M., & Kang, A. (2017). Flipping an EMI physics class: Implications of student motivation and learning strategies for the design of course contents. International Journal of Contents, 13(4), 1–11.
    Balajthy, E. (1984). Using student-constructed questions to encourage active reading. Journal of reading, 27(5), 408-411.
    Bannan-Ritland, B. 2002. Computer-mediated communication, e-learning, and interactivity. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 161-179.
    Barkley, E. F., Cross, K. P., & Major, C. H. (2014). Collaborative Learning Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    Beal, C. R., & Cohen, P. R. (2012). Teach ourselves: Technology to support problem posing in the STEM classroom. Creative Education, 3(04), 513-519.
    Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., Hamilton, R.L., & Kucan, L. (1997). Questioning the Author: An Approach for Enhancing Student Engagement with Text. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
    Benbunan-Fich, R., Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (2003). A comparative content analysis of face-to-face vs. asynchronous group decision making. Decision Support Systems, 34(4), 457–469.
    Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2006). Education for the Knowledge Age: Design-Centered Models of Teaching and Instruction. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology . Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
    Bowen, C. W. (2000). A Quantitative Literature Review of Cooperative Learning Effects on High School and College Chemistry Achievement. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(1), 116-119.
    Brinkmann, A. (2003). Graphical knowledge display–mind mapping and concept mapping as efficient tools in mathematics education. Mathematics Education Review, 16(4), 35-48.
    Bruner, J. (1985). The role of interaction formats in language acquisition. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Language and situations. New York: Springer.
    Chai, C. S., Deng, F., Tsai, P. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Assessing multidimensional students’ perceptions of twenty-first-century learning practices. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(3), 389-398.
    Chang, C., Liu, G., Chen, K., Huang, C., Lai, Y., & Yeh, T. (2017). The effects of a collaborative computer-based concept mapping strategy on Geographic Science performance in junior high school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13 (8), 5049-5060.
    Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Chen, S. F. (2001). Learning through computer-based concept mapping with scaffolding aid. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(1), 21-33.
    Cheng, S. C., Hwang, G. J., & Lai, C. L. (2020). Effects of the group leadership promotion approach on students’ higher order thinking awareness and online interactive behavioral patterns in a blended learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(2), 246-263.
    Chien, S.Y., Hwang, G. J., & Jong, Morris S.Y. (2020). Effects of peer assessment within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-speaking performance and learning perceptions. Computers & Education ,146.
    Chiou, C.C., Huang, H.S., & Hsieh, J.H. (2004). Applying hypermedia assisted concept maps to construct accounting inventory teaching material. Journal of National Taipei Teachers College, 17(2), 57-84.
    Chou, P. N., & Chen, H. H. (2008). Engagement in online collaborative learning: a case study using a web 2.0 tool. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 574-582.
    Christidamayani, A. P., & Kristanto, Y. D. (2020). The Effects of Problem Posing Learning Model on Students’ Learning Achievement and Motivation. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 2(2), 100-108.
    Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
    Cunningham, R. (2004). Problem posing: an opportunity for increasing student responsibility, Mathematics and Computer Education, 38(1), 83-89.
    Dillon, J. T. (1990). The Practice of Questioning, Routledge, New York.
    Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. Handbook of research on teaching, 3, 392-431.
    Dwyer, C.P., Hogan, M.J., & Stewart, I. (2011). The promotion of critical thinking skills through argument mapping. In C.P. Horvart & J.M. Forte (Eds.), Critical Thinking. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
    Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the learning sciences, 8(3-4), 391-450.
    Elder, L., & Paul, R. (1994). Critical thinking: Why we must transform our teaching. Journal of Developmental Education, 18(1), 34–35.
    English, L. D. (1997a). Promoting a problem-posing classroom. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4(3), 172-179.
    English, L. D. (1997b). The development of fifth-grade children's problem-posing abilities. Educational studies in Mathematics, 34(3), 183-217.
    Ennis, R. H. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational leadership, 43(2), 44-48.
    Erdogan, Y. (2009). Paper‐based and computer‐based concept mappings: The effects on computer achievement, computer anxiety and computer attitude. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), 821-836.
    Faja, S. (2013). Collaborative learning in online courses: Exploring students perceptions. Information Systems Education Journal, 11(3), 42-51.
    Fallows, S. & Chandramohan, B. (2001). Multiple approaches to assessment: Reflections on use of tutor, peer and self-assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 229-246.
    Faure, E., Herrera, F., Kaddoura, A., Lopes, H., Petrovsky, A., Rahnema, M., et al. (1973). Learning to be: The world of education today and tomorrow. Paris: UNESCO.
    Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109.
    Gelmini-Hornsby, G., Ainsworth, S., & O'Malley, C. (2011). Guided reciprocal questioning to support children’s collaborative storytelling. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 577-600.
    Ghasempour, Z, Bakar, MN, & Jahanshahloo, GR. (2013). Innovation in teaching and learning through problem posing tasks and metacognitive strategies. International Journal of Pedagogical Innovations, 1(1), 57–66.
    Gibbs, G., Habeshaw, S. & Habeshaw, T. (1993). 53 Interesting Ways to Assess your Students. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services.
    Gopalan, V., Bakar, J. A. A., Zulkifli, A. N., Alwi, A., & Mat, R. C. (2017). A review of the motivation theories in learning. AIPC, 1891(1), 1-7.
    Graesser, A., Otero, J., Corbett, A., Flickinger, D., Joshi, A., & Vanderwende, L. (2008). Guidelines for question generation shared task evaluation campaigns. In The Question Generation Shared Task & Evaluation Challenge Workshop Report, University of Memphis.
    Graham, M., & Scarborough, H. (1999). Computer mediated communication and collaborative learning in an undergraduate distance education environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), 20-46.
    Gurley, L. I. (1982). Use of Gowin's vee and concept mapping strategies to teach responsibility for learning in high school biological sciences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
    Hou, H. T., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2009). Exploring the behavioral patterns of an online knowledge-sharing discussion activity among teachers with problem-solving strategy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 101-108.
    Hsiao, J. Y., Hung, C. L., Lan, Y. F., & Jeng, Y. C. (2013). Integrating Worked Examples into Problem Posing in a WebBased Learning Environment. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 12(2), 166–176.
    Huang, C. (2005). Designing high-quality interactive multimedia learning modules. Journal of Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 29(2), 223–233.
    Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023-1031.
    Hwang, G. J., Huang, H., Wang, R. X., & Zhu, L. L. (2020). Effects of a concept mapping‐based problem‐posing approach on students’ learning achievements and critical thinking tendency: An application in Classical Chinese learning contexts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1-20.
    Hwang, G. J., Kuo, F. R., Chen, N. S., & Ho, H. J. (2014). Effects of an integrated concept mapping and web-based problem-solving approach on students’ learning achievements, perceptions and cognitive loads. Computers & Education, 71, 77-86.
    Hwang, G. J., Shi, Y. R., & Chu, H. C. (2011). A concept map approach to developing collaborative Mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 778-789.
    Hwang, G. J., Sung, H. Y., & Chang, H. (2017). Effects of concept-mapping-based interactive e-books on active and reflective-style students’ learning performances in junior high school law courses. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(7) 877-888.
    Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, N. 4. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
    Kar, T., Özdemir, E., _Ipek, A. S., & Albayrak, M. (2010). The relation between the problem posing and problem solving skill of prospective elementary mathematics teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2 (2), 1577–1583.
    King, A. (1989) Verbal interaction and problem-solving within computer-assisted cooperative learning groups. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(1), 1–15.
    Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Lan, Y. F., & Lin, P. C. (2011). Evaluation and improvement of student’s question-posing ability in a web-based learning environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 581–599.
    Laveault, P., & Corbeil, P. (1990). Assessing the impact of simulation games on learning: a step-by-step approach. Simulation/Games for Learning, 20(1), 42–54.
    Lavy, I.; Bershadsky, I. (2002). “What if not?” Problem posing and spatial geometry - A case study, Proceedings of the 26th PME Conference 3, 281-288.
    Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103-122.
    Lee, S., Bonk, C., Magjuka, R., Su, B., & Liu, X. 2006. Understanding the dimensions of virtual teams. International Journal on ELearning, 5(4), 507-523.
    Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of educational psychology, 97(2), 184-196.
    Leung, S. S. (1993). The relation of mathematical knowledge and creative thinking to the mathematical problem posing of prospective elementary school teachers on tasks differing in numerical information content. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
    Leung, S. S., & Silver, E. A. (1997). The role of task format, mathematics knowledge, and creative thinking on the arithmetic problem posing of prospective elementary school teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9(1), 5-24.
    Li, T., & Lynch, R. (2016). The relationship between motivation for learning and academic achievement among basic and advanced level students studying Chinese as a foreign language in years 3 to 6 at Ascot International School in Bangkok, Thailand. Scholar: Human Sciences, 8(1), 1-13.
    Lin, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Hsu, Y. D. (2019). Effects of ASQ-based flipped learning on nurse practitioner learners' nursing skills, learning achievement and learning perceptions. Computers & Education, 139(1), 207-221.
    Lin, P. C., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2020). The development of a collaborative problem solving environment that integrates a scaffolding mind tool and simulation-based learning: an analysis of learners’ performance and their cognitive process in discussion. Interactive Learning Environments.
    Liu, P. L., Chen,C.J., & Chang,Y.J. (2010). Effects of a computer-assisted concept mapping strategy on EFL college students’ English reading comprehension. Computers & Education, 54(2). 436-445.
    Marksberry, M. L. (1979). Student questioning: An instructional strategy. Educational Horizons, 57, 190-195.
    Mestre, J. P. (2002). Probing adults' conceptual understanding and transfer of learning via problem posing. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23(1), 9-50.
    Mishra, S., & Iyer, S. (2015). An exploration of problem posing-based activities as an assessment tool and as an instructional strategy. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 10(5). 1-19.
    Moses, B. M., Bjork, E., & Goldenberg, E. P. (1993). Beyond problem solving: Problem posing. Problem posing: Reflections and applications, 178-188.
    Nam, C.W. & Zellner, R.D. (2011). The relative effects of positive interdependence and group processing on student achievement and attitude in online cooperative learning. Computers & Education, 56(3), 680-688.
    Nardone, C. F., & Lee, R. G. (2011). Critical inquiry across the disciplines: Strategies for student-generated problem posing. College Teaching, 59(1), 13-22.
    Nicolaou, A. A., & Philippou, G. N. (2004). Efficacy beliefs, ability in problem posing, and mathematics achievement, proceeding of the 3rd international biennial self-research conference, self-concept, motivation and identity: where to from here. Berlin, Germany.
    Novak, J. D. & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Concept mapping for meaningful learning. Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Novak, T. (1995). Thinking about a new social work curriculum. Social Work Education, 14(4), 4–10.
    Okebukola, P.A., & Jegede, O.J. (1988), Cognitive preference and learning mode as determinants of meaningful learning through concept mapping. Science Education, 72(4), 489-500.
    Paige, J. B., & Daley, B. J. (2009). Situated cognition: A learning framework to support and guide high-fidelity simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 5(3), 97–103.
    Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual review of psychology, 49(1), 345-375.
    Parker, R. E. (1985). Small-group cooperative learning—Improving academic, social gains in the classroom. Nassp Bulletin, 69(479), 48-57.
    Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and   predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801-813.
    Poehler, B., & Prediger, S. (2015). Intertwining Lexical and Conceptual Learning Trajectories - A Design Research Study on Dual Macro-Scaffolding towards Percentages. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 11(6), 1697-1722.
    Qin, Z., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1995). Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 65(2), 129-143.
    Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65-83.
    Rickey, M.G., & Bein, F.L. (1996). Students' Learning Difficulties in Geography and Teachers' Interventions: Teaching Cases from K-12 Classrooms. Journal of Geography, 95(3), 118-125.
    Repko, A. F. (2009). Transforming an Experimental Innovation into a Sustainable Mainstream Academic Program: The New Interdisciplinary Studies Program at the University of Texas at Arlington. In T. Augsburg & S. Henry (eds.), The politics of interdisciplinary studies: Essays on transformations in American undergraduate programs. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
    Rustina, Ratna. (2016). Efektivitas Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Problem Posing terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Matematika. 2(1), 770-778.
    Schmid, R. F., & Telaro, G. (1990). Concept mapping as an instructional strategy for high school biology. Journal of Educational Research, 84(2), 78–85.
    Şendağ, S., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2009). Effects of an online problem based learning course on content knowledge acquisition and critical thinking skills. Computers & Education, 53(1), 132-141.
    Shaw, R.-S. (2010). A study of learning performance of e-learning materials design with knowledge maps. Computers & Eduction, 54(1), 253–264.
    Shukor, N.A., Tasir, Z., Van der Meijden, H., & Harun, J. (2014). Exploring students’ knowledge construction strategies in computer-supported collaborative learning discussions using sequential analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 216-228.
    Silverman, F. L., Winograd, K., & Strohauer, D. (1992). Student-generated story problems. The Arithmetic Teacher, 39(8), 6.
    Silver, H. (1994). Social Exclusion and Social Solidarity: Three Paradigms. International Labour Review, 133(5-6), 531-578.
    Skinner, P. (1991). What’s your problem: Posing and solving mathematical problems, K-2. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51.
    Steffe, L. P. (1991). The constructivist teaching experiment: illustrations and implications. In Radical constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 177–194). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Stoyanova, E., & Ellerton, N. F. (1996). A framework for research into students’ problem posing in school mathematics. Technology in mathematics education, 518-525.
    Stracke, E., & Kumar, V. (2010). Feedback and self-regulated learning: insights from supervisors' and PhD examiners' reports. Reflective Practice, 11(1), 19-32.
    Sund, P., & Gericke, N. (2020). Teaching contributions from secondary school subject areas to education for sustainable development–a comparative study of science, social science and language teachers. Environmental Education Research, 26(6), 772-794.
    Sung, H. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Chang, Y. C. (2016). Development of a mobile learning system based on a collaborative problem-posing strategy. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 456-471.
    Sung, H. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Chen, S. F. (2019). Effects of embedding a problem-posing-based learning guiding strategy into interactive e-books on students’ learning performance and higher order thinking tendency. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(3), 389-401.
    Tanner, C. A. , Benner, P. , Chelsa, C. , & Gordon, D. (1993). The phenomenology of knowing the patient. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 25(4), 273-280.
    Tsubota, E.(1987). On children’s problem posing (grade 1 to 3). Tokyo: Japan Society of Mathematics Education.
    Vreman-de Olde, C., & de Jong, T. (2006). Scaffolding learners in designing investigation assignments for a computer simulation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 63–73.
    Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Wallerstein, N. (1987). Problem-posing education: Freire’s method for transformation. Freire for the classroom: A source-book for liberatory teaching, 33, 44.
    Wang, Cixiao & Fang, Ting & Gu, Yinxuan. (2019). Learning performance and behavioral patterns of online collaborative learning: Impact of cognitive load and affordances of different multimedia. Computers & Education. 143.
    Wang, L. C., & Chen, M. P. (2010). The effects of game strategy and preference‐matching on flow experience and programming performance in game‐based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 39-52.
    Wang, S. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2012). The role of collective efficacy, cognitive quality, and task cohesion in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). Computers & Education, 58(2), 679-687.
    Wegerif, R. (2006). Towards a dialogic understanding of the relationship between teaching thinking and CSCL. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 143–157.
    Wheeler, L. A., & Collins, S. K. (2003). The influence of concept mapping on critical thinking in baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of professional Nursing, 19(6), 339-346.
    Whiten, D. J. (2004). Exploring the strategy of problem posing. Professional development guidebook for perspectives on the teaching of mathematics: Companion to the sixty-sixth yearbook, 1-4.
    Widjaja, A.E. & Chen, J.V. (2018). Online Learners' Motivation in Online Learning: The Effect of Online Participation, Social Presence, and Collaboration, Learning Technologies in Education: Issues and Trends. Murniati, Cecilia T., Sanjaya, Ridwan (Eds). Soegijapranata Catholic University, Semarang, Indonesia.
    Wu, P. H., Hwang, G. J., Milrad, M., Ke, H. R., & Huang, Y. M. (2012). An innovative concept map approach for improving students' learning performance with an instant feedback mechanism. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 217-232.
    Wu, S. Y., Chen, S. Y., & Hou, H. T. (2016). Exploring the interactive patterns of concept map-based online discussion: a sequential analysis of users’ operations, cognitive processing, and knowledge construction. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1778-1794.
    Yu, F. Y., Liu, Y. H., & Chan, T.W. (2005). Aweb-based learning systemfor question-posing and peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(4), 337–348.
    Yu, F. Y., & Liu, Y. H. (2009). Creating a psychologically safe online space for a student-generated questions learning activity via different identity revelation modes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 1109-1123.
    Yu, F. Y., & Yang, Y. T. (2014). To see or not to see: Effects of online access to peer-generated questions on performance. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(3), 27-39.
    Yu, F. Y., & Wu, W. S. (2020). Effects of student-generated feedback corresponding to answers to online student-generated questions on learning: What, why, and how? Computers & Education, 145.
    Zoller, U. (1999). Scaling-Up of Higher-Order Cognitive Skills-Oriented College Chemistry Teaching: An Action-Oriented Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 583-596.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2025/07/29 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE