因應數位化與行動裝置的普及，網頁程式設計已成為一種重要技能，尤其是不受螢幕尺寸差異干擾瀏覽體驗的響應式網頁設計。然而，鮮少研究探討如何透過數位輔具提升學生此一技能，本研究設計了一款能夠在不同裝置預覽網頁作品的同儕互評系統，旨在探討使用此一系統對學生在學習網頁程式設計之學習動機、學習成就與批判思考的影響，希望幫助學生掌握各種裝置的網頁設計。本研究採用準實驗設計，實驗對象為國中生，實驗組和控制組各28人，分別學習網頁程式設計，其中實驗組在完成專題後，使用「同儕互評系統」給予同儕評分和回饋；控制組則採用傳統教師給予回饋的評分方式。由實驗結果發現，使用同儕互評系統更能夠提升學生的學習成就，在學習動機與批判思考意向的部分則無顯著差異。

With the popularity of digital and mobile devices, web programming has become an important skill nowadays, especially RWD (responsive web design) which can prevent user not to be interfere by bad browsing experience due to screen size differences. However, few studies have discussed how to improve students' skills through digital aids. This study designed a peer review system which can preview web pages on different devices. The goal for this study is to know the influence for student’s learning motivation, learning achievement and critical thinking during the time that they’re using this web programming system, hoping to teach students to master various devices in web design. In this study, a quasi-experimental design was used. We chose junior high school student as test subjects, and each of the experimental group and control group are both 28 people, and they learned web programming separately. After completing the project, the experimental group used peer review and evaluation system to give peer ratings and feedbacks. On the other hand, the control group used the general feedback grading method. The result for the experiment shows that the use of peer assessment system can enhance students' learning achievements, however, there is no significant difference in the aspects of learning motivation and critical thinking.

葉玉珠(1999)。代理(課)教師批判思考教學專業知識、個人教學效能及教學行為之現況及關係之研究。國立政治大學學報，78，55-84。
葉玉珠(2003)。批判思考測驗—第一級。台北市：心理。
張春興(1996)。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐。臺灣東華。
王千倖(2001)。Web 科技應用之教學行動研究。廿一世紀教育改革與教育發展 國際學術論文研討會，215-236。
張林煌、黃國鴻、許志宇(2001)。自評與同儕互評之網路學習系統。
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Princeton-Hall.
Cakir, N. A., Gass, A., Foster, A., & Lee, F. J. (2017). Development of a game-design workshop girls' interest towards computing through exploration to promote young identity. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 108, 115-130.
Chang, C. C., Tseng, K. H., & Lou, S. J. (2012). A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a Web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students. Computers & Education, 58(1), 303-320.
Chao, P. Y. (2016). Exploring students' computational practice, design and performance of problem-solving through a visual programming environment. Computers & Education, 95, 202-215.
Chen, C. H. (2010). The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self-and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education, 55(1), 229-236.
Chen, Y. L., Liu, E. Z. F., Shih, R. C., Wu, C. T., & Yuan, S. M. (2011). Use of peer feedback to enhance elementary students' writing through blogging. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), E1-E4.
Cisco, C. V. N. I. (2015). Global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2014–2019. white paper.
East, J. P., & Wallingford, E. (1997, March). Pattern-based programming in initial instruction (seminar). In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin (Vol. 29, No. 1, p. 393). ACM.
Frank, J. A., & Kapila, V. (2017). Mixed-reality learning environments: Integrating mobile interfaces with laboratory test-beds. Computers & Education, 110, 88-104.
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and instruction, 20(4), 304-315.
Heywood, J. (2000). Assessment in higher education: Student learning, teaching, programmes and institutions (Vol. 56). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Howland, K., & Good, J. (2015). Learning to communicate computationally with Flip: A bi-modal programming language for game creation. Computers & Education, 80, 224-240.
Hsia, L. H., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. J. (2015). A web‐based peer‐assessment approach to improving junior high school students' performance, self‐efficacy and motivation in performing arts courses. British Journal of Educational Technology.
Hsia, L. H., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). Effects of different online peer-feedback approaches on students' performance skills, motivation and self-efficacy in a dance course. Computers & Education, 96, 55-71.
Hung, S. T. A. (2016). Enhancing feedback provision through multimodal video technology. Computers & Education, 98, 90-101.
Hwang, G. J., Hung, C. M., & Chen, N. S. (2014). Improving learning achievements, motivations and problem-solving skills through a peer assessment-based game development approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(2), 129-145.
Jenkins, M. (2005). Unfulfilled promise: formative assessment using computer-aided assessment. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, (1), 67-80.
Jeno, L. M., Grytnes, J. A., & Vandvik, V. (2017). The effect of a mobile-application tool on biology students' motivation and achievement in species identification: A Self-Determination Theory perspective. Computers & Education, 107, 1-12.
Joo-Nagata, J., Abad, F. M., Giner, J. G. B., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). Augmented reality and pedestrian navigation through its implementation in m-learning and e-learning: Evaluation of an educational program in Chile. Computers & Education, 111, 1-17.
Lahtinen, E., Ala-Mutka, K., & Järvinen, H. M. (2005, June). A study of the difficulties of novice programmers. In Acm Sigcse Bulletin (Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 14-18). ACM.
Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2015). An interactive peer-assessment criteria development approach to improving students' art design performance using handheld devices. Computers & Education, 85, 149-159.
Lai, C. Y. (2016). Training nursing students' communication skills with online video peer assessment. Computers & Education, 97, 21-30.
Magin, D. J. (2001). A novel technique for comparing the reliability of multiple peer assessments with that of single teacher assessments of group process work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(2), 139-152.
Makino, T., & Phan, D. (2015). Rolling out the mobile-friendly update. Official Google Webmaster Central Blog.
Marcotte, E. (2013). Responsive web design (No. 4). Editions Eyrolles.
Mayer, R. E., Dyck, J. L., & Vilberg, W. (1986). Learning to program and learning to think: what's the connection?. Communications of the ACM, 29(7), 605-610.
Ng, E. M. (2016). Fostering pre-service teachers' self-regulated learning through self-and peer assessment of wiki projects. Computers & Education, 98, 180-191.
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017). Mobile-based assessment: Investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use. Computers & Education, 109, 56-73.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 33.
Planas Lladó, A., Soley, L. F., Fraguell Sansbelló, R. M., Pujolras, G. A., Planella, J. P., Roura-Pascual, N., ... & Moreno, L. M. (2014). Student perceptions of peer assessment: an interdisciplinary study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(5), 592-610.
Resnick, M. (1996, July). Distributed constructionism. In Proceedings of the 1996 international conference on Learning sciences (pp. 280-284). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Robins, A., Rountree, J., & Rountree, N. (2003). Learning and teaching programming: A review and discussion. Computer science education, 13(2), 137-172.
Sáez-López, J. M., Román-González, M., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2016). Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using “Scratch” in five schools. Computers & Education, 97, 129-141.
Schunk, D. H. (1987). Peer models and children’s behavioral change. Review of educational research, 57(2), 149-174.
Spencer, D., Wolf, D., & Sams, A. (2011). Are you ready to flip. The Daily Riff.
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., Chiou, S. K., & Hou, H. T. (2005). The design and application of a web-based self-and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education, 45(2), 187-202.
Tsai, C. C., Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, S. S., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). A networked peer assessment system based on a Vee heuristic. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(3), 220-230.
Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S., & Yuan, S. M. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38(1), 241-252.
Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161-1174.
Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Taiwan college students' self-efficacy and motivation of learning in online peer assessment environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 164-169.
Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
Vanderhoven, E., Raes, A., Montrieux, H., Rotsaert, T., & Schellens, T. (2015). What if pupils can assess their peers anonymously? A quasi-experimental study. Computers & Education, 81, 123-132.
VanLengen, C., & Maddux, C. (1990). Does instruction in computer programming improve problem solving ability. Journal of IS Education, 12.
Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & Van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270-279.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Language and thought. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Ontario, Canada.
Yang, Y. F. (2011). A reciprocal peer review system to support college students' writing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 687-700.
Yu, F. Y. (2011). Multiple peer-assessment modes to augment online student question-generation processes. Computers & Education, 56(2), 484-494.