簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李慧珍
Hui-jen Lee
論文名稱: 大學生的學習風格與英文單字學習策略在手機行動學習的應用研究
A Study of College Students’ Learning Styles and Strategy Use on English Vocabulary Learning with mobile Phones
指導教授: 翁楊絲茜
Sz-Chien Wengyang
口試委員: 朱子君
Zi-Chun Chu
朱如君
Ju-Chun Chu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 數位學習與教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 106
中文關鍵詞: 行動學習學習風格記憶術
外文關鍵詞: learning style, mnemonic technique, mobile learning
相關次數: 點閱:494下載:27
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討大學生參與為期一個月的「英文字彙記憶術課程」學習活動時,其學習風格、學習環境與學習成效之間的影響,以及學習成效(測驗成績、課程滿意度、課程參與度)之間的相關情形。因「英文字彙記憶術課程」強調記憶術策略對英文單字學習之重要性,故本研究之教材是運用心像和語音結合的關鍵字法(Keyword)編製而成
    採用量化之「準實驗設計」,將126名受試者分為手機學習環境(實驗組)與傳統學習環境(對照組),經由二因子變異數分析探討不同風格的學習者在運用手機簡訊或傳統紙本方式學習英文字彙成效上是否有交互作用,並以皮爾森相關分析了解學習成效之間的相關情形,最後再將受試者於量表填答之意見進行質化分析,研究結果顯示:
    一、 手機與傳統學習環境的學生,其課程滿意度、課程參與程度沒有差別,但手機學習環境之學習者,其測驗成績得分較傳統學習環境學習者高。
    二、 英文字彙記憶術課程適合所有學習風格類型之學習者進行學習,僅管各類型學習風格的學習者,在課程滿意度、課程參與度沒有差別,但偏向「反思觀察」之學習者,其對英文字彙記憶術課程感到越滿意,且對英文字彙記憶術課程參與度越高。
    三、 以客觀評量方式測量學習成效,與主觀評量方式不具相關性
    四、 學習者在課程參與程度越高,則對記憶術課程越感到滿意。
    本研究依據以上研究結果提出建議以供教育研究者和有關當局、簡訊課程設計者與後續研究者之參考。


    The main purpose of this study was to explore the effects of students’ learning styles, and learning environment on learning achievement, and the correlations among different learning outcome measurements for college students who participated in “English vocabulary mnemonic course”. The course was launched from April 2010 to May 2010 with one month duration, and since the study’s emphasis was on the importance of mnemonic techniques for students’ English vocabulary learning, the “keyword method” associated with acoustic and mental image in the materials were applied.
    In this study, the author used quasi-experimental design and 126 subjects were divided into two groups: the mobile learnig environment (the experimental group) and the traditional learnig environment (the control group). The data were analyzed through 2-way ANOVA to view the difference of learning achievement between students learning with the text messages and with traditional materials and the effects of their learning styles. Further Pearson’s product-moment correlation was used to describe the linear realationships between different measurements of students’ learning achievement (posttest score, course satisfaction, and course participation). Finally, subjects’ qualitative opinions of the course and learning experiences were analyzed and the study results were revealed as the following:
    (1)There were no significant differences in the course satisfaction and participation between the control and the experimental groups; however, the posttest scores for those learned in mobile environment are higer than those learned in the traditional environment.
    (2) “English vocabulary mnemonic course”is appropriate for students with all types of learning styles. Even though the result revealed no differences in students’ course satisfaction and participation among those four learning styles, students with higher scores on “Reflective Observantion” would have higher levels of course satisfaction and preference to participate in this course.
    (3)The objective learning achievement measure (posttest score) was not significantly correclated to any subjective evaluation measures (course satisfaction and participation).
    (4) Students with higher levels of participation in the course, felt more satisfied with the experiences.
    Finally, according to the results of the study, suggestions were provided for the education centers, and future researches.

    中文摘要 I 英文摘要 II 謝誌 IV 目錄 V 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 VIII 壹、緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與重要性 7 第三節 研究問題 9 第四節 重要名詞釋義 10 第五節 研究範圍與限制 11 貳、文獻探討 13 第一節 學習策略與相關研究 13 第二節 學習風格與相關研究 20 第三節 行動學習及相關研究 23 參、研究方法與實施 27 第一節 研究架構 27 第二節 研究變項 28 第三節 研究假設 30 第四節 研究對象 31 第五節 研究工具 33 第六節 研究實施流程 42 第七節 資料分析與處理 43 肆、研究結果 44 第一節、問卷回收情形與學習者背景現況分析 44 第二節、學習環境、學習風格與學習成效之描述性統計 47 第三節、學習環境、學習風格與學習成效影響 56 第四節 學習環境、四構念學習風格與學習成效之相關分析 61 第五節 英文字彙記憶術課程調查分析 66 伍、結論與建議 71 第一節 結論與討論 71 第二節 建議 78 參考文獻 83 附錄一 【多益字彙前測】 93 附錄二【學習風格量表】 96 附錄三「記憶術課程學習成效量表」專家效度名單 99 附錄四【專家效度諮詢量表】 100 附錄五【英文字彙記憶術學習成效量表】 103 附錄六 【多益字彙後測】 106

    一、中文部分
    王孟紹(2001)。無線應用簡短訊息服務之廣告效果研究,國立台灣科技大學企業管
    理系碩士學位論文。
    王淑真(1995)。行動學習融入教學模式初探,國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育研究
    所碩士論文。
    王志忠、黃天佑(2009)行動英語學習系統建置與教學研究。建國科大學報,43-
    63。
    行政院(2003)。挑戰2008,國家重點發展計畫。2010年10月2日,取
    自: http://www.cepd.gov.tw/m1
    伍全裕(1997)。過目不忘的記憶法。台北市:漢湘文化
    巫靜宜(1999)。比較網路教學與傳統教學對學習效果之研究---以Word
    2000 之教學為例,私立淡江大學資訊管理學系研究所碩士論文。
    何東墀、陳莉莉(1991)。智優學生與並通學生記憶策略之比較研究。特殊教育學
    報,6,247-284。
    李爽、何字娟(2010)。基於學習參與度調查對遠程學習支持服務的反思。中國遠
    程教育,2010(3),24-29。
    吳明隆(2005)。統計應用學習實務。台北市:知城數位科技股份有限公司。
    林俊佑(1994)。行動學習環境練習系統之設計與研究,國立台灣師範大學資訊教育
    研究所碩士論文。
    林茂松(2003)。技職英語教育挑戰及回應。「2003國際應用英語教學研討會暨工
    作坊」論文集,519。
    林敏(2003)。非英語專業本科生詞匯記憶與觀念、策略。四川外語學院學報,
    19(1),156-160。
    邱皓政(2007)。量化研究與統計分析,台北,五南圖書出版公司。
    周碩貴(2005)。技職校院英語教學之困境與突破。教育研究月刊,138,86-94。
    周碩貴、吳庶任(1996年5月)。技職ESP教學--字彙的觀點。英語教學與通識教育
    國際研討會。
    松本幸夫(1999)。有效的超學習法。台北:日之昇文化。
    杭菊、李瑞芳(2002)。清華大學大一學生詞匯學習觀念與策略調查。清華大學教育
    研究,1,107-113。
    陳學志(主譯) (2004)。認知心理學。臺北:學富。
    教育部(2000)。大學教育政策白皮書。台北:作者。
    教育部(2003)。我國高等教育素質與亞洲鄰近國家之比較。台北:作者
    張秋芸(2009)。淺談英文詞彙學習策略教學。雄工學報,9,121-126。
    張新仁(2001)。學習策略的知識管理。知識管理與教育革新發展研討會,國
    立政治大學教育系。趙貞怡(2005)。國立歷史博物館行動學習之發展與應用。國
    民教育,45(6),62-68。
    黃自來(1990)。高級職業學校英文教學研究。英語教學新象,285-304。
    黃國楨(2005)。U-learning 時代的來臨與挑戰,數位學習觀點,第32 期。
    黃意雯、劉姍姍(2011)。數位說故事在成語教學的創新應用。數位學習科技期刊,
    3(2),1-19。
    曾靜玫、黃美珍與劉怡佳(2009)。大學生對空中英語教室不同媒介出版品的版面編排方式與學習滿意度之研究。國立臺灣藝術大學圖文傳播藝術學報,15-28。
    楊敏(2002)。如何改善大學英語詞匯教學。北京第二外國語學院學報,2,88-91。
    資策會FIND中心(2008)。電信平台整合資通訊應用推動計畫。線上檢索:2010年
    12月29日,取自:http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?
    page=many&id=266
    資策會FIND中心(2010)。2010年第二季我國行動上網觀測。線上檢索:2010
    年10月18日,取自:http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?
    page=many&id=202
    趙貞怡、陳瑞烜、陳亭吟與徐若婷 (2010)。手機簡訊應用於國中成語行動學習之
    研究。2010電腦與網路科技在教育上的應用國際學術研討會論文集。國立新竹教
    育大學,新竹市。
    鄭麗玉(1993)。認知心理學─ 理論與應用。台北:五南。
    蕭顯勝、蔡福興與游光昭(2005)。在行動學習環境中實施科技教育教學活動之初
    探。生活科技教育月刊,38(6),40-57。
    羅引宏(2009)。學習策略:串聯法記憶術。

    二、英文部分
    Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and
    retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational
    Psychology,51,5,267-272.
    Atkinson, R. C. (1975). Mnemotechnics in second-language learning. American Psychologist, 30, 821–828
    Ashcraft, M. H (1989). Human Memory and Cognition, Scott, Foresman and
    Company, Glenview, Ill.
    Al-Ansari, S. (2000). Sheltered curricular exposure and unsheltered extra-curricular exposure as factors influencing the development of academic proficiency in ESL.International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 38, 175-194.
    Amiryousefi, M. (2011)Mnemonic Instruction: A Way to Boost Vocabulary Learning and Recall,Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(1), 178-182, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
    Bower, G. H. (1970). Analysis of a mnemonic device. American Scientist,
    58,496-510.
    Baddeley, A. (2004). Working memory: looking back and looking forward.
    Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829-839.
    Cohen, A.D. (1990). Language learning: Insights for learners, teachers, and
    researchers. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
    Cobb, K.J. (2002). Facilitating second language acquisition through computer assisted language learning, Action Research Exchange, 1 (1),
    Davis, K. (1989) Toward a Hypertext on Writing.
    DeWitt, K. C. (2010)Keyword Mnemonic Strategy: A Study of SAT Vocabulary in
    High School English,George Mason University.
    Drummond, R. J. (2000). Appraisal Procedures for Counselors and Helping
    Professionals (4th ed). Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Fan, M.Y. (2003) Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness
    of second language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners, The
    Modern Language Journal
    Gu, Y.-q. (1994). Vocabulary learning strategies of good and poor Chinese EFL
    Learners. In N. Bird, P.Messick, S. (Ed.) (1976). Individuality in
    learning.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System
    31,367-383.
    Griffiths, C. (2006). Language learning strategies: Theory and research. Iran.
    ILI Language Teaching Journal 2,1.
    International Society for Technology in Education (2007). Three K-12
    leadership groups urge broad and intensive use of technology to improve
    education.
    KESKİNKILIC,G., & SUNBUL, A. M(2011). THE EFFECTS OF MNEMONIC KEY WORD METHOD
    ON SCIENCE LESSONS: ACCESS AND ATTITUDE OF STUDENTS, International Journal
    on New Trends in Education and Their Implications,2 (4),1, 1309-6249
    Kadirire, J.(2005). The short message service (SMS) for schools/conferences,
    International Conference on Multimedia and ICT in Education. April 2009 22-
    24, Lisbon, Portugal.
    Levin, J.R. (1993). Mnemonic strategies and classroom learning: A twenty-year
    report card. The Elementary School Journal, 94(2), 235-244.
    Liao,Y.F. (2004). A Survey Study of Taiwan EFL Freshmen's Vocabulary Learning
    Strategies-Journal of Pingtung Teachers College.
    Schmidt, J. (2011) Technology Integration and Its Impact on Student
    Participation in the Classroom, University of Wisconsin.
    Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits
    on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
    Mayer,R .E.(1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the questions?
    Educational Psychologist, 32, 1-19.
    Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge:
    Cambridge University Press.
    Oxford, R. L. (1990). Learning strategies: What every teacher should know.
    Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
    Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart &
    Winston
    Skehan, P. (1989). Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. NY:
    Routledge,Chapman and Hall.
    Parreren,C (1992). Individual differences in vocabulary acquisition: A
    qualitative experiment in the first phase of secondary education.Vocabulary
    and applied linguistics
    Quinn, C. (2000) mLearning: Mobile, Wireless and In-Your-Pocket Learning. Line
    ZineMagazine. http://www.linezine.com/2.1/features/cqmmwiyp.htm
    Rigney, J. W. (1978) Learning Strategies: A Theoretical Persepctive. In O’Neill, H.F. Jr. (Ed) Learning Stretegies.New York: Academic Press.
    Rubin, J. (1981). Study of cognitive processes in second language learning.
    Applied Linguistics, 11, 117-31.
    Rubin, J. (1987).Learner Strategies; Theoretical Assumption, Research History
    and Typology. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (eds.) Learner Strategies in Language
    Learning. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice/ Hall.
    Read,J. (1993) The Development ofa New Measure ofT2 Vocabulary Knowledge.
    Language Testing,10, 355-71.
    Sanaoui, R. (1995). Adult learners’ approaches to learning vocabulary in
    second languages. Modern Language Journal, 79, 15-28.
    Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M.
    McCarthy (Eds.),Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy.
    Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity Press.
    Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge
    University Press.
    Su, M.l. (2003). Comparison of English learning attitudes, motivation and
    strategies betweenvocation-oriented students and college-oriented students.
    Unpublished master thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan.
    Wharton, G. (2000). Language learning strategy use of bilingual foreign
    language learners inSingapore. Language Learning, 50, 203-243.
    Yates, F.A. (1966). The art of memory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Yeh, H.J. (2006) An empirical study of English vocabulary memory strategies
    embedded in Phonics, National University of Tainan,Taiwan
    Arthur, W., Bennett, W., Edens, P.S., & Bell, S.T. (2003). Effectiveness of
    training in organizations:A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features.
    Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 234–245
    Arthur, J.B., & Boyles, T. (2007). Validating the human resource structure: A
    levels-based strategic HRM approach. Human Resource Management Review, 17,
    77–92.
    Craik, F., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of
    words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 268-294
    Canale, M. & Swain. M.(1980). ‘Theoretical bases of communicative approaches
    to Second language teaching and testing.’ Applied Linguistics I/1: 1-47.
    Coady, J., & Huckin, T. (Eds.). (1997). Second Language Vocabulary
    Acquisition: A Rationale for Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Chen, G. D., Chang, C. K., & Wang, C. Y. (2008). Ubiquitous learning website:
    Scaffold learners by mobile devices with information-aware techniques.
    Computers and Education, 50(1), 77–90.
    Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Huang, S. X., & Wu, T. T. (2008). A knowledge
    engineering approach to developing e-libraries for mobile learning. The
    Electronic Library, 26(3), 303–317.
    Chen, Y. S. , Kao, T. C. & Sheu, J. P. (2003). A Mobile learning system for
    scaffolding bird watching learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,
    19, 347-359.
    Chen C.M. & Chung C.J. (2008) Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning
    system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers &
    Education 51,624–645.
    Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). A knowledge engineering
    approach to developing Mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning.
    Computers & Education, 54(1), 289-297.
    Dysvik, A. & Martinsen, O. L. (2008). The relationship between trainees’
    evaluation of teaching and trainee performance among , ,Educational
    Psychology, 28(7) , Oslo, Norway, 747–756
    Dono, Joanne, Webb, Janine and Richardson, Ben (2010). The relationship
    between environmental activism, pro-environmental behaviour and social
    identity, Journal of environmental psychology, vol. 30, no. 2, 178-186,
    Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    Dijksterhuis, A,& Meurs, T. (2006) Where creativity resides: The generative
    power of unconscious thought.Consciousness and Cognition, 15(1), 135-146.
    Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2
    proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261-296.
    Gass, S. (1999). Discussion: Incidental vocabulary learning. Sdudeis of Secon
    Language Acquisition 21, 319-333.
    Gu, Y.-q., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language
    learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46, 643-679.
    Hunt, A. & Beglar, D. (2002). Current research and practice in teaching
    vocabulary.In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in
    language teaching: An anthology of current practice ,258-266. Cambridge:
    Cambridge University Press.
    Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile
    learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of
    students.Computers & Education, 56(1), 1023-1031.
    Just, M.A.; Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of
    comprehension:Individual differences in working memory. Psychological
    Review, 99(1), 122-149.
    Jonassen, D.H., Peck, K.L., & Wilson, B.G. (1999). Learning with technology: A
    constructivist perspective.Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.
    Jones V. & Jo J.H. (2004) Ubiquitous learning environment: an adaptive
    teaching Joseph, S., Binstead K. & Suthers,K. (2005). PhotoStudy: Vocabulary
    Learning and Collaboration on Fixed & Mobile Devices. Proceedings of the
    third IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in
    Education 2005, 206- 210system using ubiquitous technology. In Proceedings
    of the 21st ASCILITE Conference, 468–474. ASCILITE, Perth, Australia.
    Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2005). Mobile Learning: A Handbook for
    Educators and Trainers. London: Routledge.
    Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). The Kolb learning style inventory-version
    3.1 (2005 technical specifications). HayGroup: Experience Based Learning
    Systems, Inc
    Kost, C. R., Foss, P., & Lenzini, J. J. (1999). Textual and pictorial glosses:
    Effectiveness on incidental vocabulary growth when reading in a foreign
    language. Foreign Language Annals, 32 (1), 89-113.
    Kirkpatrick, D. L.(1998). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San
    Francisco:
    Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language
    acquisition in the classroom. Hayward, CA: The Alemany Press.
    Lehner, F. & H. Nosekabel.(2002) "The Role Of Mobile Devices In E-Learning -
    First Experiences With A Wireless E-Learning Environment". in IEEE
    International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education
    (WMTE'02). 2002. Vaxjo, Sweden: IEEE.
    Lan Y.J., Sung Y.T. & Chang K.E. (2007) A mobile-devicesupported peer assisted
    learning system for collaborative early EFL reading. Language Learning &
    Technology ,11,130–151.
    Moir, J. & Nation,P. (2008). Vocabulary and good language learners. Lessons
    from good language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Newstrom, J.W. (1978). Catch-22: The problems of incomplete evaluation of
    training. Training and Development Journal, 32(11), 22–24.
    O'Malley, J.M. & Chamot, A.U., (1990): Learning Strategies in Second Language
    Acquisition. Cambridge, U.K.Cambridge University Press.
    Oxford, R & Scarcella, R. (1994). Second Language vocabulary learning among
    adults:State of the art in vocabulary instruction . System, 22;2, 231-243.
    Pintrich, R. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated
    learning components ofclassroom academic performance, Journal of Educational
    Psychology, 82, 33-40.MSLQ(Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire)
    Richardson, Peter, Dellaportas, Steven, Perera, Luckmika and Richardson, Ben (2010). M-learning in an off-campus environment : using iPods in accounting
    education, in AFAANZ 2010 : Accounting and Finance Association of Australia
    and New Zealand Annual Conference, AFAANZ, Christchurch,New Zealand, 1-33.
    Smith,S.M., & Blankenship, S.E. (1989).Incubation effects. Bulletin of the
    Psychonomic Sociery, 27, 311-314.
    Sarica G.N. and Cavus(2009) N., New Trends in 21st Century English learning.
    Procedia — Social And Behavioral Sciences, 1,434–438.
    Scholler,J.W., & Melcher, J. (1995). The ineffability of insight. In S.M.
    Smith, T.B.
    Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.). The creative cognition approach , 97-134.
    Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Segler, T.M., Pain, H. & Sorace,A.(2002). Second Language Vocabulary
    Acquisition and Learning Steategies in ICALL Environments. Computer Assisted
    Language Learning, 15(4), 409-422.
    Shaw R. S.(2011)A study of the relationships among learning styles,
    participation types,and performance in programming language learning
    supported by online forums.Computers & Education,58, 111–120.
    Tabatabaei1.O. & Hejazi1, N. H. (2011)Gender Differences in Vocabulary
    Instruction Using Keyword Method (Linguistic Mnemonics),Canadian Social
    Science,7(5),198-204
    Wang, T., Su, X., Ma, P., Wang, Y., & Wang, K. (2011). Ability-training-
    oriented automated assessment in introductory programming course. Computers
    &Education, 56(1),220–226.
    Weinstein, C. E. & MacDonald, J. D. (1986) Why does a school psychologist need
    to know about learning strategies? Journal of School Psychology, 24, 257-265.

    QR CODE