簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃琮皓
Cong-Hao Huang
論文名稱: 以眼動輔測認知風格、控制信念與自我效能對數位閱讀策略與表現之影響
The Role of Cognitive Styles, Locus of Control and Self-efficacy in Digital Reading Strategy Use and Performance: An Eye-tracking Study
指導教授: 王淑玲
Shu-ling Wang
口試委員: 林珊如
Shan-Ju Lin
邱國力
Guo-Li Chiou
翁楊絲茜
Cathy Weng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 數位學習與教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 105
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 125
中文關鍵詞: 數位閱讀全面/序列認知風格控制信念自我效能先廣後深閱讀選擇性閱讀眼動追蹤
外文關鍵詞: Digital reading, Holistic/ Serialistic cognitive styles, Locus of control, Self-efficacy, Width-first reading strategy, Selective reading strategy, Eye-tracking
相關次數: 點閱:605下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要探討在數位閱讀環境中,全面/序列認知風格、控制信念與自我效能對數位閱讀策略與表現之影響。本研究之樣本共計73人,除透過問卷量測受試者之個人特質外,本研究亦採用眼動追蹤技術記錄受試者之數位閱讀行為。本研究採用質化與量化方法來檢驗各項研究假設。
    本研究結果顯示,在數位閱讀環境中,(1)全面與序列者在先廣後深(如:引導概述)的閱讀策略上無顯著差異。(2)全面與序列型者在選擇性閱讀策略上有顯著差異,特別是全面型者較序列型者常進行標題的閱讀。(3)控制信念對數位閱讀策略及表現皆無顯著預測力。(4)自我效能對數位閱讀策略無顯著預測力,但對數位閱讀表現則有正向預測力。(5)先廣後深閱讀策略(如:引導概述)與選擇性閱讀策略(如:標題與重點內容閱讀)對閱讀表現皆有正向預測力。最後,根據研究結果,本研究提出教學與研究建議以供教學者與後續研究參考。


    The present study aimed at exploring the roles of Holistic/Serialistic cognitive styles, locus of control, and self-efficacy in digital reading strategy use and performance. Senventy three college students from a vocational university in northern Taiwan participated in this study. Questionnaires were utilized to investigate the participants’ characteristics (e.g. cognitive styles, locus of control, self-efficacy). Also, the participants’ reading behaviors were recorded via eye-tracking system. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used to examine the hypotheses.
    The results indicated that (1) no significant difference in the width-first reading strategy (e.g. hierarchical overview) between Holists and Serialists. (2) There was a significant difference in selective reading strategy use, such as reading of headlines, between Holists and Serialists, but no difference was found in reading important contents between the two groups. (3) Locus of control did not predict digital reading strategies and performance. (4) Self-efficacy did not predict digital reading strategies, but it positively predicted reading performance significantly. (5) Both width-first and selective reading strategies (e.g. reading headlines and important contents) positively predicted reading performance. Suggestions for teaching and future research were provided.

    目錄 摘要..........................................................I Abstract......................................................II 誌謝.........................................................III 目錄.........................................................IV 表目錄.......................................................VI 圖目錄......................................................VIII 第壹章 緒論...................................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機......................................1 第二節 研究問題............................................5 第三節 研究架構............................................6 第四節 名詞釋義............................................7 第五節 研究之重要性........................................9 第貳章 文獻探討..............................................10 第一節 數位閱讀環境之相關研究.............................10 第二節 認知風格與學習之相關研究...........................14 第三節 控制信念與學習之相關研究...........................17 第四節 自我效能與學習之相關研究...........................21 第五節 眼動追蹤技術與數位閱讀之相關研究...................24 第參章 研究方法..............................................27 第一節 研究架構...........................................27 第二節 研究對象...........................................28 第三節 研究工具...........................................28 第四節 數位閱讀任務.......................................35 第五節 實驗流程...........................................36 第六節 資料處理與分析.....................................40 第肆章 研究結果..............................................46 第一節 描述性統計分析.....................................46 第二節 研究假設之統計分析................................52 第伍章 結論與討論...........................................72 第一節 結論與討論........................................72 第二節 研究限制..........................................80 第三節 研究建議..........................................81 參考文獻.....................................................85 一、中文部份.............................................85 二、英文部份.............................................85 附錄一 學習傾向量表(未刪題).................................. 99 附錄二 學習傾向量表(刪題後) .................................100 附錄三 控制信念量表.........................................101 附錄四 自我效能量表.........................................102 附錄五 閱讀實驗頁面.........................................103 附錄六 實驗同意書...........................................108 附錄七 個人基本資料與個人特質問卷...........................109 附錄八 閱讀任務指導頁面.....................................110 附錄九 眼動校正步驟.........................................112 附錄十 閱讀測驗..........................................114 附錄十一 控制信念與自我效能問卷.............................115 附錄十二 閱讀測驗評分標準...................................116   表目錄 表3-3-1 各量表信度摘要表......................................30 表3-3-2 各量表因素負荷量摘要表................................31 表3-6-1閱讀測驗第一題評分標準................................41 表3-6-2閱讀測驗第二題評分標準................................41 表3-6-3閱讀測驗第三題評分標準................................42 表4-1-1各量表與數位閱讀表現平均與標準差一覽表................46 表4-1-2全面/序列認知風格之比較一覽表........................47 表4-1-3認知風格與數位閱讀策略(凝視時間)之描述性統計...........48 表4-1-4認知風格與數位閱讀策略(凝視次數)之描述性統計...........49 表4-1-5各變項與凝視時間及凝視次數之相關分析..................51 表4-2-1認知風格對先廣後深閱讀策略之t考驗摘要表...............52 表4-2-2認知風格對選擇性閱讀策略(標題)之t考驗摘要表...........53 表4-2-3認知風格對選擇性閱讀策略(重點內容)之t考驗摘要表.......54 表4-2-4認知風格對數位閱讀表現t考驗摘要表.....................54 表4-2-5控制信念對先廣後深閱讀策略簡單迴歸摘要表..............55 表4-2-6控制信念對先廣後深閱讀策略t考驗摘要表................56 表4-2-7控制信念對選擇性(標題)閱讀策略之簡單迴歸摘要表.........57 表4-2-8外控信念對選擇性閱讀策略(標題) t考驗摘要表.............58 表4-2-9控制信念對選擇性閱讀策略(重點閱讀內容)之簡單迴歸摘要表.59 表4-2-10外控信念對選擇性閱讀策略(重點內容) t考驗摘要表........60 表4-2-11內控信念對選擇性閱讀策略(重點內容) t考驗摘要表........61 表4-2-12控制信念對數位閱讀表現之簡單迴歸分析摘要表...........62 表4-2-13控制信念對數位閱讀表現 t考驗摘要表...................62 表4-2-14自我效能對選擇性閱讀策略之簡單迴歸摘要表.............63 表4-2-15自我效能對選擇性閱讀策略(標題)之t考驗摘要表..........64 表4-2-16自我效能對先廣後深閱讀策略之簡單迴歸摘要表...........65 表4-2-17自我效能對先廣後先閱讀策略之t考驗摘要表..............65 表4-2-18自我效能對數位閱讀表現之簡單迴歸摘要表...............66 表4-2-19先廣後深閱讀策略對數位閱讀表現之簡單迴歸摘要表.......67 表4-2-20選擇性閱讀策略(標題)對數位閱讀表現之簡單迴歸摘要表....68 表4-2-21選擇性閱讀策略(重點內容)對數位閱讀表現之簡單迴歸摘要表.69   圖目錄 圖1-3-1 研究架構圖............................................6 圖3-1-1 研究架構圖...........................................27 圖3-3-1 人機配置圖...........................................32 圖3-3-2 實驗閱讀介面配置圖(網址與書籤列及階層性引導概述).....34 圖3-3-3 實驗閱讀介面配置圖(主要內容學習區及上/下頁按鈕).... 34 圖3-5-1 實驗流程.............................................36 圖3-5-2 實驗頁面配置.........................................38 圖3-6-1 興趣區域定義圖.......................................43 圖4-2-1全面型者在標題之視線熱圖(第七頁) ...................53 圖4-2-2序列型者在標題之視線熱圖(第七頁) ...................53 圖4-2-3表現佳者在引導概述之視線熱圖(第五頁) ...............67 圖4-2-4表現差者在引導概述之視線熱圖(第五頁) ...............67 圖4-2-5表現佳者在標題之視線熱圖(第五頁) ...................68 圖4-2-6表現差者在標題之視線熱圖(第五頁) ...................68 圖4-2-6表現佳者在重點內容之視線熱圖(第二頁) ...............70 圖4-2-7表現差者在重點內容之視線熱圖(第二頁) ...............70

    一、中文部份
    王逸萍(2011)。自我效能、控制信念與焦慮對網路學習之自我障礙策略知覺、網路自我障礙行為與問題性網路使用之影響。國立臺灣科技大學數位學習與教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。

    二、英文部份
    AbuShanab, E., Pearson, J. M., & Setterstrom, A. J. (2010). Internet banking and customers’ acceptance in Jordan: The unified model’s perspective. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 26(23), 493-524.
    Acharya, A., & Sinha, D. (2017). An intelligent web-based system for
    diagnosing achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1-13.
    Akyel, A., & Ercetin, G. (2009). Hypermedia reading strategies employed by advanced learners of English. System, 37(1), 136–152.
    Allport, G.W. (1937) Personality: A psychological interpretation. Holt, New York.
    Amadieu, F., Tricot, A., & Marine, C. (2009). Prior knowledge in learning from a nonlinear electronic document: Disorientation and coherence of the reading sequences. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 381-388.
    Arslan, S., & Akin, A. (2014). Metacognition: As a predictor of one’s academic locus of control. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 33-39.
    Aspelmeier, J. E., Love, M. M., McGill, L. A., Elliott, A. N., & Pierce, T. W. (2012). Self-esteem, locus of control, college adjustment, and GPA among first-and continuing-generation students: A moderator model of generational status. Research in Higher Education, 53(7), 755-781.
    Aukerman, M., & Schuldt, L. C. (2015). Children’s perceptions of their reading ability and epistemic roles in monologically and dialogically organized bilingual classrooms. Journal of Literacy Research, 47(1), 115-145.
    Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.
    Berger, J. L., & Karabenick, S. A. (2011). Motivation and students’ use of learning strategies: Evidence of unidirectional effects in mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 416-428.
    Blythe, H. I., Liang, F., Zang, C., Wang, J., Yan, G., Bai, X., & Liversedge, S. P. (2012). Inserting spaces into Chinese text helps readers to learn new words: An eye movement study. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 241-254.
    Bodner, R. C., Chignell, M. H., Charoenkitkarn, N., Golovchinsky, G., & Kopak, R.W. (2001). The impact of text browsing on text retrieval performance. Information Processing & Management, 37(3), 507-520.
    Bozpolat, E. (2016). Investigation of the self-regulated learning strategies of students from the faculty of education using ordinal logistic regression analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(1).
    Bråten, I., Ferguson, L. E., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Strømsø, H. I. (2013). Prediction of learning and comprehension when adolescents read multiple texts: The roles of word-level processing, strategic approach, and reading motivation. Reading and Writing, 1-28.
    Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1-13.
    Brockmole, J. R., & Le-Hoa Vo, M. (2010). Semantic memory for contextual regularities within and across scene categories: Evidence from eye movements. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(7), 1803-1813.
    Bulus, M. (2011). Goal orientations, locus of control and academic achievement in prospective teachers: An individual differences perspective. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(2), 540-546.
    Calcaterra, A., Antonietti, A., & Underwood, J. (2005). Cognitive style, hypermedia navigation and learning. Computers & Education, 44(4), 441-457.
    Calderwood, C., Ackerman, P. L., & Conklin, E. M. (2014). What else do college students “do” while studying? An investigation of multitasking. Computers & Education, 75, 19-29.
    Cappella, E., & Weinstein, R. (2001). Turning around reading achievement: Predictors of high school students’ academic resilience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 758-771.
    Cassidy, S. (2012). Exploring individual differences as determining factors in student academic achievement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 37(7), 793-810.
    Celik, V., & Yesilyurt, E. (2013). Attitudes to technology, perceived computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education. Computers & Education, 60(1), 148-158.
    Chan, C. H., Hsieh, C.W., Chen, S. Y. (2014) Cognitive styles and the use of electronic journals in a mobile context. Journal of Documentation. 70(6), 997-1014.
    Chang, M. (2005). Instructional strategy application in web-based language teaching and learning. Taipei: Crane Publishing Company.
    Chang, M. M., & Ho, C. M. (2009). Effects of locus of control and learner-control on web-based language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(3), 189-206.
    Chen, C. M., & Huang, S. H. (2014). Web‐based reading annotation system with an attention‐based self‐regulated learning mechanism for promoting reading performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(5), 959-980.
    Chen, S. C., She, H. C., Chuang, M. H., Wu, J. Y., Tsai, J. L., & Jung, T. P. (2014). Eye movements predict students' computer-based assessment performance of physics concepts in different presentation modalities. Computers & Education, 74, 61-72.
    Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. (2002). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: Development of a learning model. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 53(1), 3-15.
    Chen, S. Y., Huang, P. R., Shih, Y. C., & Chang, L. P. (2016). Investigation of multiple human factors in personalized learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 119-141.
    Cheng, H. Y., & Zhang, S. Q. (2016). Examining the relationship between holistic/analytic style and classroom learning behaviors of high school students. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1-18.
    Chiou, G. L., & Liang, J. C. (2012). Exploring the Structure of Science Self-efficacy: A Model Built on High School Students' Conceptions of Learning and Approaches to Learning in Science. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(1).
    Clark, R. E., & Clark, V. P. (2010). From neo-behaviorism to neuroscience: Perspectives on the origins and future contributions of cognitive load research. Cognitive load theory. 203-228.
    Clarke, J. A. (1993). Cognitive style and computer-assisted learning: Problems and a possible solution. Research in Learning Technology, 1(1) 47-59.
    Clewley, N., Chen, S.Y., & Liu, X. (2011). Mining learning preferences in web-based instruction: Holists vs serialists. Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 266-277.
    Coiro, J. L., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214-257.
    Dalmaijer E. (2014) Is the low-cost EyeTribe eye tracker any good for research? PeerJ PrePrints, 2, 1-35. Retrieved from https://peerj.com/preprints/585v1.
    Demirören, M., Turan, S., & Öztuna, D. (2016). Medical students’ self-efficacy in problem-based learning and its relationship with self-regulated learning. Medical education online, 21.
    DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J. A. (2007). Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1616–1641.
    Dollinger, S. J. (2000). Locus of control and incidental learning: An application to college student success. College Student Journal, 34(4), 537-540.
    Dong, Y., & Lee, K. P. (2008). A cross-cultural comparative study of users' perceptions of a webpage: With a focus on the cognitive styles of Chinese, Koreans and Americans. International Journal of Design, 2(2).
    Drennan, J., Kennedy, J., & Pisarski, A. (2005). Factors affecting student attitudes toward flexible online learning in management education. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(6), 331-338.
    Eggert, S., Nitsch, A., Boone, W. J., Nückles, M., & Bögeholz, S. (2016).
    Supporting electronic journals in a mobile context. Journal of Documentation. 70(6), 997-1014.
    Eyuboglu, F., & Orhan, F. (2011). Paging and scrolling: Cognitive styles inlearning from hypermedia. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 50-65.
    Fadlelmula, F. K., Cakiroglu, E., & Sungur, S. (2015). Developing a structural model on the relationship among motivational beliefs, self-regulated learning strategies, and achievement in mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1355-1375.
    Ford, N., & Chen, S. Y. (2001). Matching/ mismatching revisited: An empirical study of learning and teaching styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 5-22.
    Ford, N., & Ford, R. (1993). Towards a cognitive theory of information accessing: an empirical study. Information Processing and Management, 29(5), 569-585.
    Geitz, G., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., & Kirschner, P. A. (2016). Changing learning behaviour: Self-efficacy and goal orientation in PBL groups in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 75, 146-158.
    Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. The Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211.
    Gökçearslan, Ş., & Alper, A. (2015). The effect of locus of control on learners' sense of community and academic success in the context of online learning communities. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 64-73.
    Goldman, S., Braasch, J., Wiley, J., Graesser, A., & Brodwinska, K. (2012). Comprehending and learning from internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 356–381.
    Graf, S., Liu, T. C., & Kinshuk. (2010). Analysis of learners’ navigational behaviour and their learning styles in an online course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(2), 116-131.
    Guerard, K., Saint-Aubin, J., Boucher, P., & Tremblay, S. (2011). The role of awareness in anticipation and recall performance in the hebb repetition paradigm: Implications for sequence learning. Memory & Cognition, 39, 1012-1022.
    Hadwin, A. F., & Webster, E. A. (2013). Calibration in goal setting: Examining the nature of judgments of confidence. Learning and Instruction, 24, 37-47.
    Herwig, A., & Horstmann, G. (2011). Action-effect associations revealed by eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 531-537.
    Hillesund, T. (2010). Digital reading spaces: How expert readers handle books, the Web and electronic paper. First Monday, 15(4).
    Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., and Schlosser, A. E. (2003). Locus of control, web use, and consumer attitudes toward Internet regulation. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 22 (1), 41-57.
    Hsia, J. W. (2016). The effects of locus of control on university students’ mobile learning adoption. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(1), 1-17.
    Hsia, J. W., Chang, C. C., & Tseng, A. H. (2014). Effects of individuals' locus of control and computer self-efficacy on their e-learning acceptance in high-tech companies. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(1), 51-64.
    Hsieh, P. H., & Dwyer, F. M. (2009). The instructional effect of online reading strategies and learning styles on student scademic achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 36-50.
    Hsu, Y. C., Lin, H., Ching, Y. H., & Dwyer, F. M. (2009). The effects of web-based instruction navigation modes on undergraduates' learning outcomes. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 271-284.
    Huang, C. T., & Yang, S. C. (2015). Effects of online reciprocal teaching on reading strategies, comprehension, self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(3), 381-407.
    Huang, H., Chern, C., & Lin, C. (2009). EFL learners’ use of online reading strategies and comprehension of texts: an exploratory study. Computers & Education, 52, 13-26.
    Huang, Y. H. (2012). Designing task-oriented online reading activities: Taiwanese EFL students’ experiences and views on online EFL reading activities. In Proceedings of the extensive reading world congress, 1, 4-7.
    Hudson, A. K. & Williams J. A. (2015) Reading every single day: A Journey to Authentic Reading. The reading teacher, 68(7), 530-538.
    Huestegge, L., & Koch, I. (2012). Eye movements as a gatekeeper for memorization: evidence for the persistence of attentional sets in visual memory search. Psychological Research, 76, 270-279.
    Hyönä, J. (2010). The use of eye movements in the study of multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 172-176.
    Hyönä, J., Lorch Jr, R. F., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2002). Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: Evidence from eye fixation patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 44.
    Jeske, D., Backhaus, J., & Roßnagel, C. S. (2014). Evaluation and revision of the Study Preference Questionnaire: Creating a user-friendly tool for nontraditional learners and learning environments. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 133-139.
    Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (2012). Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning and Instruction, Routledge. New York, NY.
    Joo, Y. J., Joung, S., & Sim, W. J. (2011). Structural relationships among internal locus of control, institutional support, flow, and learner persistence in cyber universities. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 714-722.
    Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, J. (2013). Locus of control, self-efficacy, and task value as predictors of learning outcome in an online university context. Computers & Education, 62, 149-158.
    Jung, H. J. (2014). Ubiquitous learning: Determinants impacting learners’ satisfaction and performance with smartphones. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 97-119.
    Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.
    Karich, A. C., Burns, M. K., & Maki, K. E. (2014). Updated meta-analysis of learner control within educational technology. Review of Educational Research, 84(3), 392-410.
    Katuk N. & Zakaria N. H. (2015). Linear and non-linear navigations of learning content: Effects on engagement within Web-based instruction. International Journal of Computer System and Industrial Management Application, 7, 22-31.
    Khodadad, M., & Kaur, J. (2016). Causal relationships between integrative motivation, self-efficacy, strategy use and English language achievement. Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(3).
    Kim, C., Park, S. W., & Cozart, J. (2014). Affective and motivational factors of learning in online mathematics courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 171-185.
    Kirkpatrick, M. A., Stant, K., Downes, S., & Gaither, L. (2008). Perceived locus of control and academic performance: Broadening the construct's applicability. Journal of College Student Development, 49(5), 486-496.
    Kollöffel, B. (2012) Exploring the relation between visualizer-verbalizer cognitive styles and performance with visual or verbal learning material. Computers & education, 58(2). 697-706.
    Kovenklioglu, G. & Greenhaus, J. H. (1978). Causal attributions, expectations, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 698-705.
    Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16-39.
    Lagerwerf, L., Cornelis, L., de Geus, J., & Jansen, P. (2008). Advance organizers in advisory reports selective reading, recall, and perception. Written Communication, 25(1), 53-75.
    Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126-140.
    Lai, M. L., Tsai, M. J., Yang, F. Y., Hsu, C. Y., Liu, T. C., Lee, S. W. Y., Chiou, G. L. , Liang, J. C. (2013). A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. Educational Research Review, 10, 90-115.
    Lawless, K. A., Brown, S. W., Mills, R., & Mayall, H. J. (2003). Knowledge, interest, recall and navigation: A look at hypertext processing. Journal of Literacy Research, 35(3), 911-934.
    Lee, J.,& Boling, E. (2008). Information-conveying approaches and cognitive styles of mental modeling in a hypermedia-based learning environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 644-661.
    Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2013). A structural equation model of predictors of online learning retention. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 36-42.
    Lee, Y., Choi, J., & Kim, T. (2013). Discriminating factors between completers of and dropouts from online learning courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 328-337.
    Lefcourt, H. M. (1982). Locus of Control. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum.
    Lepper, M. R. (1985). Microcomputers in education: Motivational and social issues. American Psychologist, 40(1), 1-18.
    Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Timbrell, N., & Maykel, C. (2015). Seeing the forest, not the trees. The Reading Teacher, 69(2), 139-145.
    Li, L. Y., Chen, G. D., & Yang, S. J. (2013). Construction of cognitive maps to improve e-book reading and navigation. Computers & Education, 60(1), 32-39.
    Li, Y., & Ranieri, M. (2013). Educational and social correlates of the digital divide for rural and urban children: A study on primary school students in a provincial city of China. Computers & Education, 60(1), 197-209.
    Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 14-24.
    Liu, P. L. (2014). Using eye tracking to understand learners' reading process through the concept-mapping learning strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 237-249.
    Liu, Z. (2005), Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the last ten years, Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700-712.
    Lorch, R. F., & Lorch, P. E. (1996). Effects of organizational signals on free recall of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 38-48.
    Mampadi, F., Chen, S. Y. H., Ghinea, G., & Chen, M. P. (2011). Design of adaptive hypermedia learning systems: A cognitive style approach. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1003-1011.
    Manichander, T. (2014). Locus of Control and Performance: Widening Applicabilities. Online Submission, 3(2), 84-86.
    Marakas, G. M., Johnson, M. D., & Palmer, J. W. (2000). A theoretical model of differential social attributions towards computing technology: When the metaphor becomes the model. International Journal of Human– Computer Studies, 45, 529-552.
    Marinak, B. A., Malloy, J. A., Gambrell, L. B., & Mazzoni, S. A. (2015). Me and my reading profile: A tool for assessing early reading motivation. Reading Teacher, 69(1), 51-62.
    Martin, F. (2008). Effects of practice in a linear and non-linear web-based learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 81-93.
    Mayer, R. E. (1979). Twenty years of research on advance organizers: Assimilation theory is still the best predictor of results. Instructional Science, 8, 133-167.
    Mayer, R. E. (2010). Unique contributions of eye-tracking research to the study of learning with graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20, 167-171.
    Mendolia, S., & Walker, I. (2014). The effect of personality traits on subject choice and performance in high school: Evidence from an English cohort. Economics of Education Review, 43, 47-65.
    Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Kwok, O. M., Cifuentes, L., & Davis, T. J. (2012). The learner characteristics, features of desktop 3D virtual reality environments, and college chemistry instruction: A structural equation modeling analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 551-568.
    Mesgar, M., Bakar, N. A., & Amir, Z. (2014). Online metacognitive and interactional strategy use: Iranian students’ internal locus of control. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 288-295.
    Messick, S. (1976). Personality consistencies in cognition and creativity. In S. Messick (Ed.), Individuality in learning (pp. 4 –23). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational psychologist, 19(2), 59-74.
    Minguela, M., Solé, I., & Pieschl, S. (2015). Flexible self-regulated reading as a cue for deep comprehension: Evidence from online and offline measures. Reading and Writing, 28(5), 721-744.
    Nakabayashi, K., Jones, T. J., Butcher, N., & Liu, C. H. (2012). Independent influences of verbalization and race on the configural and featural processing of faces: A behavioral and eye movement study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(1), 61-77.
    Nguyen, K. V., Binder, K. S., Nemier, C., & Ardoin, S. P. (2014). Gotcha! Catching kids during mindless reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(4), 274-290.
    Nordstrom, C. R., & Segrist, D. J. (2009). Predicting the likelihood of going to graduate school: The importance of locus of control. College Student Journal, 43, 200-206.
    OECD (2011). PISA 2009 results: Students on line. Digital technologies and performance (Vol. VI). Paris, France: OECD Publications.
    OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do—Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol. I). PISA: OECD Publishing.
    Ooms, K., Dupont, L., Lapon, L., & Popelka, S. (2015). Accuracy and precision of fixation locations recorded with the low-cost Eye Tribe tracker in different experimental set-ups. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 8(1), 1-20.
    Pask, G. (1972). A fresh look at cognition and the individual. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 4(3), 211-216.
    Pask, G., & Scott, B. C. E. (1972). Learning strategies and individual competence. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 4(3), 217-253.
    Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2015). Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1-34.
    Peterson, E. R., & Meissel, K. (2015). The effect of Cognitive Style Analysis (CSA) test on achievement: A meta-analytic review. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 115-122.
    Peterson, E. R., Rayner, S. G., & Armstrong, S. J. (2009). Researching the psychology of cognitive style and learning style: Is there really a future? Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 518–523.
    Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, Michigian: National Centerfor Research to Improve Teaching and Learning, School of Education, The University Michigan.
    Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G., & Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital literacy and self efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning behavior. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 91-97.
    Puntambekar, S., & Goldstein, J. (2007). Effect of visual representation of the conceptual structure of the domain on science learning and navigation in a hypertext environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16, 429-459.
    Puntambekar, S., & Stylianou, A. (2005). Designing navigation support in hypertext systems based on navigation patterns. Instructional Science, 33(5-6), 451-481.
    Rasmusson, M., & Eklund, M. (2013). It’s easier to read on the Internet—you just click on what you want to read. Education and Information Technologies, 18(3), 401-419.
    Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457-1506.
    Rayner, K., (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.
    Rayner, K., Schotter, E. R., Masson, M. E., Potter, M. C., & Treiman, R. (2016). So much to read, so little time how do we read, and can speed reading help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4-34.
    Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles—an overview and integration. Educational psychology, 11(3-4), 193-215.
    Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. In J. B. Rotter (Ed.), The development and applications of social learning theory: Selected papers. New York: Praeger.
    Sadi, Ö., & Çakiroglu, J. (2014). Relations of cognitive and motivational variables with students' human circulatory system achievement in traditional and learning cycle classrooms. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(5), 1997-2012.
    Sagone, E., & De Caroli, M. E. (2014). Locus of control and academic self-efficacy in university students: The effects of self-concepts. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114, 222-228.
    Salmerón, L., & García, V. (2011). Reading skills and children’s navigation strategies in hypertext. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1143-1151.
    Sanders, M. S., & McCormick, E. J. (1987). Human Factors in Engineering
    and Design. New York: McGraw Hill.
    Severino, S., Aiello, F., Cascio,M., Ficarra, L., & Messina, R. (2011). Distance education: The role of self-efficacy and locus of control in lifelong learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28(2), 705-717.
    Shang, H. F. (2015). Email dialogue journaling: Attitudes and impact on L2 reading performance. Educational studies, 31(2), 197-212.
    Shang, H. F. (2016). Online metacognitive strategies, hypermedia annotations, and motivation on hypertext comprehension. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3).
    She, H. C., & Chen, Y. Z. (2009). The impact of multimedia effect on science learning: Evidence from eye movements. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1297-1307.
    Shen, K. M., Lee, M. H., Tsai, C. C., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). Undergraduate students’ earth science learning: Relationships among conceptions, approaches, and learning self-efficacy in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 38(9), 1527-1547.
    Shi, C. (2011). A study of the relationship between cognitive styles and learning strategies. Higher Education Studies, 1(1), 20.
    Su, Y., & Klein, J. D. (2006). Effects of navigation tools and computer confidence on performance and attitudes in a hypermedia learning environment.Journal of Educational Multimedia and hypermedia, 15(1), 87-106.
    Subrahmanyam, K., Michikyan, M., Clemmons, C., Carrillo, R., Uhls, Y. T., & Greenfield, P. M. (2013). Learning from paper, learning from screens: Impact of screen reading and multitasking conditions on reading and writing among college students. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 3(4), 1-27.
    Sullivan, S. A., & Puntambekar, S. (2015). Learning with digital texts: Exploring the impact of prior domain knowledge and reading comprehension ability on navigation and learning outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 299-313.
    Sung, Y. T., Wu, M. D., Chen, C. K. & Chang, K. E. (2015). Examining the online reading behavior and performance of fifth-graders: evidence from eye-movement data. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1-15.
    Tavakoli, H., & Koosha, M. (2016). The effect of explicit metacognitive strategy instruction on reading comprehension and self-efficacy beliefs: The case of Iranian University EFL students. Porta Linguarun, 119, 133.
    Tekedere, H., & Mahiroglu, A. (2014). The effect of locus of control in Web based problem based learning on attitute to web based and problem based learning. Egitim ve Bilim, 39(171).
    Tsai, M. J., Huang, L. J., Hou, H. T., Hsu, C. Y., & Chiou, G. L. (2016). Visual behavior, flow and achievement in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 98, 115-129.
    van der Meij, H., van der Meij, J., & Farkas, D. K. (2013). QuikScan formatting as a means to improve text recall. Journal of documentation, 69(1), 81-97.
    van Gog, T. & Scheiter, K. (2010). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 95-99.
    Vörös, Z., Rouet, J. F., & Pléh, C. (2011). Effect of high-level content organizers on hypertext learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 2047-2055.
    Voßkühler, A., Nordmeier, V., Kuchinke, L., & Jacobs, A. M. (2008). OGAMA – Open Gaze And Mouse Analyzer: Open source software designed to analyze eye and mouse movements in slideshow study designs. Behavior Research Methods, 40(4), 1150-1162.
    Wang, C.H. (2005). Questioning skills facilitate online synchronous discussions.
    Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 303–313.
    Wang, H. Y., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). Effects of a question prompt-based concept mapping approach on students' learning achievements, attitudes and 5C competences in project-based computer course activities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 351.
    Wang, S. L., & Lin, S. S. J. (2000). The cross-cultural validation of motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. In Annual Conference of American Psychological Association, Washington DC.
    Wang, X. (2009). Baccalaureate attainment and college persistence of community college transfer students at four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 570-588.
    Wäschle, K., Allgaier, A., Lachner, A., Fink, S., & Nückles, M. (2014). Procrastination and self-efficacy: Tracing vicious and virtuous circles in self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 103-114.
    Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., & Hemmerich, J. A. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 1060-1106.
    Williams, S. L., & French, D. P. (2011). What are the most effective intervention techniques for changing physical activity self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour-and are they the same? Health education research, 26(2), 308-322.
    Wilson, K., & Narayan, A. (2014). Relationships among individual task self-efficacy, self-regulated learning strategy use and academic performance in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Educational Psychology, 1-18.
    Wu, S. Y. & Hou, H. T. (2015). How cognitive styles affect the learning behaviors of online problem-solving-based discussion activity: A lag sequential analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(2), 277-298.
    Xie, I. & Joo, S. (2012). Factors affecting the selection of search tactics during the Web-based searching process. Information Processing and Management, 48(2), 254-270.
    Yang, Y. F. (2015). Automatic scaffolding and measurement of concept mapping for EFL students to write summaries. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4).
    Yuan, X., & Liu, J. (2013). Relationship between cognitive styles and users' task performance in two information systems. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(1), 1-10.
    Ziefle, M., Bay, S., and Schwade, A. (2006). On keys’ meanings and modes: The impact of different key solutions on children’s efficiency using a mobile phone. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(5), 413-431.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 82-91.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2022/08/14 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 2024/08/14 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 2027/08/14 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE