本研究在動態能力理論的框架下，以跨層次觀點探討公司層次社會資本與單位層次單位績效之間的關係。以結合動態能力與創業導向的單位層次「動態創業能力」為中介變項，並以公司層次公司改善為調節變項。單位績效包含單位表現和單位業務成長。資料收集的方法為問卷調查法，蒐集來自台灣的30家企業及60家單位的資料，其中有60位高階管理職、120位管理職、240位非管理職員工。研究結果顯示，動態創業能力顯著中介社會資本到單位績效的關係，公司改善對於社會資本到動態創業能力的調節關係不顯著，公司改善對於動態創業能力到單位績效是顯著的負向調節關係。

This study explores the relationship between firm-level social capital and unit-level performance from a cross-level perspective within the framework of dynamic capability theory. With the novel concept—the combination of dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial-orientation—unit-level “dynamic entrepreneurial capabilities” as an mediating variable, and firm-level company improvisation as a moderating variable. Unit performance includes overall performance of unit and unit business growth. The data collection method is questionnaire survey. Data collected from 30 companies and 60 units in Taiwan, including 60 top management team(TMT) ,120 managers and 240 employees. The results show that the dynamic entrepreneurial capabilities significantly mediates the relationship between social capital and unit performance. However, the moderating effect of the company improvisation on social capital to dynamic entrepreneurial capability is not significant. Surprisingly, the company improvisation is negatively and significantly moderates the relationship between dynamic entrepreneurial capability and unit performance.

Andrea Lanza and Mariacarmela Passarelli. Technology Change and Dynamic Entrepreneurial Capabilities. Journal of Small Business Management. 2014. 52(3), pp. 427–450

Anne S. Miner, Paula Bassoff and Christine Moorman. Organizational Improvisation and Learning: A Field Study. Administrative Science Quarterly Vol. 46, No. 2 (Jun., 2001), pp. 304-337

Barney, J.B., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Advances in Strategic Management,17(1):3-10

Birger Wernerfelt, 1984 , A resource‐based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5(2) 171-180

Bourdieu, P. (1986) The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (New York, Greenwood), 241-258.

Niels Bosma, Mirjam van Praag, Roy Thurik, Gerrit de Wit. The Value of Human and Social Capital Investments for the Business Performance of Startups. Small Business Economics. October 2004, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 227–236

Burt RS. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.

Charles Perreault, Gabrielle A. Brenner, Teresa V. Menzies, Louis Jacques Filion, Charles Ramangalahy. Social Capital and Business Performance: Ethnic Enterprises in Canada.HEC Montréal. Working Paper # 2007-02

Chen G, Bliese PD. The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002 Jun;87(3):549-56.

Christine Moorman, Anne S. Miner. Organizational Improvisation and Organizational Memory. The Academy of Management Review 23(4):698 · October 1998 

David M. Townsend, Lowell W. Busenitz. Turning water into wine? Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in early-stage capitalization processes. Journal of Business Venturing 30 (2015) 292–306

Dusya Vera, Mary Crossan. Improvisation and Innovative Performance in Teams. Organization Science Vol. 16, No. 3, May–June 2005, pp. 203–224

Edivandro Carlos Conforto, Eric Rebentisch, Daniel Amaral. 2016. Learning the Art
of Business Improvisation. MIT Sloan Management Review. Vol. 57, No. 3

Eisenhardt, K.M., & Martin, J.A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.

Frederick Owusu Agyapong, Ahmed Agyapong and Kofi Poku. Nexus between social capital and performance of micro and small firms in an emerging economy: The mediating role of innovation. Cogent Business & Management (2017), 4: 1309784

Grant, R. (1996). Toward A Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal 17(S2):109-122

G. T. Lumpkin and Gregory G. Dess. Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. The Academy of Management Review
Vol. 21, No. 1 (Jan., 1996), pp. 135-172

James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85-98.

James, L. Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 67, 1982, pp. 219-229.

Job Rodrigo-Alarcon, Pedro M. García-Villaverde, María J. Ruiz-Ortega, Gloria Parra-Requena. From social capital to entrepreneurial orientation: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities. European Management Journal 36 (2018) 195-209

José Carlos M.R. Pinho. Social capital and dynamic capabilities in international performance of SMEs. Journal of Strategy and Management. Vol. 4, (2011): 404-421.

Maureen Blyler and Russell W. Coff. Dynamic Capabilities, Social Capital, and Rent Appropriation: Ties That Split Pies. Strategic Management Journal Vol. 24, No. 7 (Jul., 2003), pp. 677-686

Michael E. Porter, 2008, The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review. 86(1):78-93

Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(2): 242–266.

Noor Hazlina Ahmad, Carlene Wilson, Liz Kummerow. Assessing the Dimensionality of Business Success: The Perspectives of Malaysian SME Owner-Managers. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business. 12(3):207-224 · July 2011

Portes A. 1998. Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 1–24.

Priem, R.L., & Butler, J.E. (2001), Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, no 1, p. 22–40.

Robert Lamb, Competitive Strategic Management, Prentice-Hall, 1984
Ron Adner, Constance E. Helfat. Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal. 24: 1011–1025 (2003)

Stam, W. and T. Elfring (2008). Entrepreneurial Orientation and New Venture
Performance: The Moderating Role of Intra- And Extraindustry Social Capital.
Academy of Management Journal 51(1): 97-111.

Stav Fainshmidt, M. Lance Frazier. What Facilitates Dynamic Capabilities? The Role of Organizational Climate for Trust. Long Range Planning 50(2017)550-566

Teece, D. J. 2014. The foundations of enterprise performance: dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms, Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 28, no. 4, 328–52

Teece, D.J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319–1350.

Teece, D. J. 2014. A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 8–37

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic
management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–33.

Teece, D.J. (2012). Dynamic Capabilities: Routines versus Entrepreneurial Action. Journal of Management Studies 49:8

Teece, D.J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for
integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15(6): 285-305

Teece, D.J. (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations
of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 28(13):1319-1350

Tsai W, Ghoshal S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal 41(4): 464–476.

Wilden, R., et al. (2013). Dynamic Capabilities and Performance: Strategy, Structure
and Environment. Long Range Planning 46(1): 72-96.

Wales, W., et al. (2011). Empirical Research on Entrepreneurial Orientation: An
Assessment and Suggestions for Future Research. International Small Business
Journal.31(4): 357 – 383.

Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal,24(10), 991–995.