英文繪本之參與式高低互動性設計教學對學生之參與動機、故事理解能力及電子繪本創作成果之影響

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	黃馨儀 Xing-Yi Huang
論文名稱：	英文繪本之參與式高低互動性設計教學對學生之參與動機、故事理解能力及電子繪本創作成果之影響 Effects of Participatory Interactive Design Instructions on Participatory Motivation, Story Comprehension, and Picture E-Book Performance in English Picture E-Books
指導教授：	高宜敏 Gloria Yi-Ming Kao
口試委員:	陳志銘 Chih-Ming Chen 黃博聖 Po-Sheng Huang 林志鴻 Jr-Hung Lin
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	人文社會學院 - 數位學習與教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education
論文出版年：	2020
畢業學年度：	108
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	85
中文關鍵詞：	電子繪本、參與式創作、互動性、參與動機、故事理解力、電子繪本創作成果、批判性思考意向
外文關鍵詞：	picture e-book, participatory design, interactivity, participatory motivation, story comprehension, picture e-book performance, critical thinking tendency
相關次數：	點閱：534 下載：0
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

上一筆

電子繪本閱讀與參與式創作皆能有效促進學生的學習經驗與學習成果。然而，過去很少有實驗將電子繪本閱讀與參與式創作結合，去分析這樣的活動對學習的效益。因此，本研究會將電子繪本閱讀結合參與式創作，來去檢驗他們對參與式創作動機、故事理解力及電子繪本創作成果的影響力。我們會設計兩種不同的繪本互動性參與式創作設計教學引導，並讓兩組學生接受不同的教學引導。學生接受完教學引導後，將會為他們閱讀的繪本加入互動特效。結果顯示，當學生被引導去設計具有故事內容一致性與故事內容說明效力的互動特效時，他們確實會使用較多故事內容相關且有引導意義的互動性特性。並且，他們有較好的故事理解力表現，也在電子繪本創作成果得到高分。總結來說，我們推論，介紹具故事內容一致性與具故事內容解釋力的互動特效之教學引導不只能提升學生的故事理解力，也能提升他們設計電子繪本互動特效的得分。我們建議若要進行繪本參與式創作活動，可以教導學生在繪本中加入具有故事一致性及故事解釋效果的互動特效。

Picture e-book reading and participatory design can both facilitate learning experience and learning outcomes. However, few had combined picture e-book reading and participatory design to analyze their effects on learning. In this study, we designed a picture e-book participatory design activity to examine their effects on participatory motivation, story comprehension, and picture e-book performances. Different participatory picture e-book interactive design instructions were given to two groups. Participants were asked to design the interactive effects of the picture book they read after taking the instructions. Results showed that participants who were instructed to design congruent and explanatory interactive features did apply more story-related and instructive interactive effects. Moreover, they performed better on story comprehension and got higher school for picture e-book performance. In conclusion, we inferred that proper interactivity design instruction introducing congruent, explanatory, and instructive interactive effects would not only improve learners’ story comprehension but also enhance learners’ ability in designing picture e-book interactive effects. We suggest that we can instruct students to use congruent and explanatory interactive effects while holding picture e-book design activities.

ABSTRACT.................................................................................................................    ii
摘要.............................................................................................................................iii
ACKNOWLEGEMENT..............................................................................................    iv
致謝.............................................................................................................................v
TABLE OF CONTENTS.............................................................................................    vi
LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................    viii
LIST OF FIGURES......................................................................................................    x
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION...........................................................................    1
　　1.1 Background and motivation...........................................................................    1
　　1.2 Purposes of the study .....................................................................................    4
　　1.3 Research questions.........................................................................................    4
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW................................................................    6
　　2.1 Picture e-book reading and its benefits..........................................................    6
　　2.2 Participatory design as a learning approach...................................................    7
　　2.3 Interactivity and its role in picture e-book......................................................    8
　　2.4 Critical thinking, critical thinking tendency, and participatory design..........    11
CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY......................................................................    13
　　3.1 Research Framework......................................................................................    13
　　　3.1.1 Independent variables..............................................................................    14
　　　3.1.2 Dependent variables................................................................................    15
　　　3.1.3 Covariates................................................................................................    15
　　3.2 Research Design.............................................................................................    15
　　　3.2.1 Participants..............................................................................................    16
　　3.3 Research Procedure........................................................................................    17
　　　3.3.1 Procedure of the pilot study.....................................................................    18
　　　3.3.2 Procedure of the formal study..................................................................    19
　　3.4 Research Tools................................................................................................    22
　　　3.4.1 The high and low interactive design instructions....................................    22
　　　3.4.2 Picture e-book editor and system operation instruction..........................    29
　　　3.4.3 Picture e-books........................................................................................    30
　　　3.4.4 Critical thinking tendency test.................................................................    32
　　　3.4.5 The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS)................................................    33
　　　3.4.6 Story comprehension test.........................................................................    33
　　　3.4.7 E-book interactive effects design assessment..........................................    36
　　3.5 Data Analysis..................................................................................................    38
　　3.6 Pilot study results...........................................................................................    39
　　　3.6.1 Participatory motivation..........................................................................    39
　　　3.6.2 Story comprehension...............................................................................    40
CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSION....................................................    42
　　4.1 High and low interactivity using frequency between high and low interactivity groups........................................................................................    42
　　4.2 Participatory motivation of high and low interactivity groups.......................    43
　　4.3 Story comprehension between high and low interactivity groups..................    44
　　4.4 Picture e-book performance between high and low interactivity groups.......    45
　　4.5 Data sorting....................................................................................................    51
　　4.6 High and low interactivity using frequency of HG-HT and LG-LT...............    52
　　4.7 Participatory motivation of HG-HT and LG-LT.............................................    53
　　4.8 Story comprehension of HG-HT and LG-LT..................................................    53
　　4.9 Picture e-book performance of HG-HT and LG-LT.......................................    54
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION...............................................................................    62
　　5.1 Conclusion.....................................................................................................    62
　　5.2 Limitations and future works..........................................................................    63
REFERENCES............................................................................................................    64
APPENDIXES.............................................................................................................    69

                                

Bus, A. G., Takacs, Z. K., & Kegel, C. A. (2015). Affordances and limitations of electronic storybooks for young children's emergent literacy. Developmental Review, 35, 79-97.
Chen, C. M., & Chen, F. Y. (2014). Enhancing digital reading performance with a collaborative reading annotation system. Computers & Education, 77, 67-81.
Clemensen, J., Rothmann, M. J., Smith, A. C., Caffery, L. J., & Danbjorg, D. B. (2017). Participatory design methods in telemedicine research. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 23(9), 780-785.
Davies, M., & Barnett, R. (Eds.). (2015). The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education. Springer.
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment, 2007(1), 1-23.
Fessakis, G., Tatsis, K., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2008). Supporting “learning by design” activities using group blogs. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 199-212.Flood, J., & Lapp, D. (1981). Language/reading instruction for the young child. Macmillan Publishing Company.
Flack, Z. M., Field, A. P., & Horst, J. S. (2018). The effects of shared storybook reading on word learning: A meta-analysis. Developmental psychology, 54(7), 1334-1346.
Flood, J., & Lapp, D. (1981). Language/reading instruction for the young child. Macmillan Publishing Company.
Grimshaw, S., Dungworth, N., McKnight, C., & Morris, A. (2007). Electronic books: Children’s reading and comprehension. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 583-599.
Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24(3), 175-213.
Hwang, G. J., Tu, N. T., & Wang, X. M. (2018). Creating interactive E-books through learning by design: The impacts of guided peer-feedback on students’ learning achievements and project outcomes in science courses. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 25-36.
Janssen, F., & Waarlo, A. J. (2010). Learning biology by designing. Journal of Biological Education, 44(2), 88-92.
Kaefer, T. (2018). The role of topic‐related background knowledge in visual attention to illustration and children’s word learning during shared book reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(3), 582-596.
Kang, M., Choo, P., & Watters, C. E. (2015). Design for experiencing: participatory design approach with multidisciplinary perspectives. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 830-833.
Kangas, M. (2010). Creative and playful learning: Learning through game co-creation and games in a playful learning environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(1), 1-15.
Kao, G. Y. M., Chiang, X. Z., & Foulsham, T. (2019). Reading behavior and the effect of embedded selfies in role-playing picture e-books: An eye-tracking investigation. Computers & Education, 136, 99-112.
Kao, G. Y. M., Tsai, C. C., Liu, C. Y., & Yang, C. H. (2016). The effects of high/low interactive electronic storybooks on elementary school students’ reading motivation, story comprehension and chromatics concepts. Computers & Education, 100, 56-70.
Korat, O. (2010). Reading electronic books as a support for vocabulary, story comprehension and word reading in kindergarten and first grade. Computers & Education, 55(1), 24-31.
Liu, K. P., Tai, S. J. D., & Liu, C. C. (2018). Enhancing language learning through creation: The effect of digital storytelling on student learning motivation and performance in a school English course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(4), 913-935.
Lysenko, L. V., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). Promoting reading comprehension with the use of technology. Computers & Education, 75, 162-172.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 41, 31-48.
Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schuun, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 71-85.
Miele, D. B., & Wigfield, A. (2014). Quantitative and qualitative relations between motivation and critical-analytic thinking. Educational Psychology Review, 26(4), 519-541.
Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science, 32(1-2), 99-113.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2005). Role of guidance, reflection, and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 117.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326.
Pearman, C. J. (2008). Independent reading of CD-ROM storybooks: Measuring comprehension with oral retellings. The Reading Teacher, 61(8), 594-602.
Pearman, C. J., & Chang, C. W. (2010). Scaffolding or distracting: CD-ROM storybooks and young readers. TechTrends, 54(4), 52-57.
Piotrowski, J. T., & Krcmar, M. (2017). Reading with hotspots: Young children's responses to touchscreen stories. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 328-334.
Rabi, J. A., & Caneppele, F. L. (2018). Numerical methods to biosystems and food engineering students: Hands-on practices and cross-disciplinary integration. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(5), 1120-1133.Schugar, H. R., Smith, C. A., & Schugar, J. T. (2013). Teaching with interactive picture e-books in grades K–6. The Reading Teacher, 66(8), 615-624.
Schugar, H. R., Smith, C. A., & Schugar, J. T. (2013). Teaching with interactive picture e-books in grades K–6. The Reading Teacher, 66(8), 615-624.
Smeets, D. J., & Bus, A. G. (2015). The interactive animated e-book as a word learning device for kindergartners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(4), 899-920.
Takacs, Z. K., & Bus, A. G. (2018). How pictures in picture storybooks support young children’s story comprehension: An eye-tracking experiment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 174, 1-12.
Takacs, Z. K., Swart, E. K., & Bus, A. G. (2015). Benefits and pitfalls of multimedia and interactive features in technology-enhanced storybooks: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 698-739.
Wang, P. Y., & Yang, H. C. (2016). The impact of e-book interactivity design on children's Chinese character acquisition. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(4), 784-798.
Wechsler, S. M., Saiz, C., Rivas, S. F., Vendramini, C. M. M., Almeida, L. S., Mundim, M. C., & Franco, A. (2018). Creative and critical thinking: Independent or overlapping components?. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 114-122.
Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis effect size calculator. Retrieved from https://campbellcollaboration.org/escalc/html/EffectSizeCalculator-SMD-main.php
Yeh, Y. C. (1999). A Study of Substitute Teachers' Professional Knowledge, Personal Teaching- Efficacy, and Teaching Behavior in Critical-thinking Instruction. The National Chengchi University Journal, 78, 55-84.
【葉玉珠（1999）。代理(課)教師批判思考教學專業知識、個人教學效能及教學行為之現況及關係之研究。國立政治大學學報，78，55-84。】
Yu, K. C., Wu, P. H., & Fan, S. C. (2019). Structural relationships among high school students’ scientific knowledge, critical thinking, engineering design process, and design product. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-22.

全文公開日期 2025/08/31 (校內網路)
全文公開日期 2027/08/31 (校外網路)
全文公開日期 2027/08/31 (國家圖書館：臺灣博碩士論文系統)

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文