簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃文龍
Wen-Lung Huang
論文名稱: 藉由自動攝影探索大學生的學習概念: 橫斷面分析
Exploring Undergraduate Students’ Conceptions of Learning via Auto-Photography: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
指導教授: 蔡今中
Chin-Chung Tsai
口試委員: 黃國禎
Gwo-Jen Hwang
梁至中
Jyh-Chong Liang
張欣怡
HSIN-YI CHANG
李旻憲
Min-Hsien Lee
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 應用科技學院 - 應用科技研究所
Graduate Institute of Applied Science and Technology
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 104
中文關鍵詞: 學習概念橫斷面分析跨學科研究自動攝影分析高等教育
外文關鍵詞: Conceptions of learning, Cross-sectional analysis, Cross-subjects study, Auto-photography analysis, Higher education
相關次數: 點閱:407下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

自從Säljö(1979)研究學習概念以來,在不同的研究領域和教育上,已經廣泛的使用量化和質性方法對學生的學習概念進行研究。然而,很少有研究使用視覺方法來探索大學生的學習概念。因此,本研究採用自動攝影的視覺方法來收集大學生對學習的想法。首先,這個研究藉由自動攝影進行跨年級學習概念的分析,
共有549名台灣大學生(男性:187名,女性:362名,年齡:18至25歲)被要求用拍照方式以及結合文字描述來說明他們對學習的想法。這個研究採用具有信度的編碼表分析學生所拍攝的照片,來揭示學生對學習的主要觀點,結果顯示大部分學生認為學習地點發生在校外,學習活動主要是透過觀察/體驗/思考。接著,使用內容分析方法分析學生所描述的文字資料,結果揭示了九個學習概念,即:學習是記憶、獲得更好的狀況、動手實作練習、不受時間、地點約束的學習、增加知識、應用、自主學習、理解、以及用新的方式看待事情。另外,還有兩個主要發現:(1)學生的學習概念在低年級以傳統陳規的學習來獲取知識的方式(例如教師在課堂上講課)到高年級後轉向以校外的觀察/體驗的學習為主、(2)高年級學生的自主學習概念較低年級學生弱。再來,本研究將所有參與者(即549名參與者)根據學生主修的科目分為三組(即藝術和設計,傳播和教育)。最後共有495名台灣大學生(藝術與設計學科:277,傳播學科:100和教育學科:118)的照片和文字描述被進行分析,結果顯示了三個主要發現:(1)藝術與設計類的學生持有比其他兩科的學生更多的”動手實作練習”的學習概念; (2)傳播學科的學生顯示出比其它兩個學科的學生較少的自主學習概念; (3)三個學科的學生在高階的學習概念(即應用和理解)顯示不足。經由本研究的結果,顯示自動攝影可能是探究學生學習概念的一種潛在方式。


Since the study on learning conceptions by Säljö (1979), the conceptions of learning have been extensively studied using quantitative and qualitative methods in different research fields and at different levels of education. However, few studies have used visual methods to explore the learning conceptions of college students. Therefore, this study adopted visual method of auto-photography to collect college students’ learning ideas. First, this across grade levels study probed conceptions of learning via auto-photography analysis. A total of 549 Taiwanese college students (male: 187, female: 362, ages: 18 to 25) were asked to take photographs combined with textual description to illustrate how they conceptualize learning. A coding checklist was developed to analyze the characteristics of the students’ auto-photography, and showed that their main view of learning was alone by themselves, the main learning contexts were outside of school, and observing/experiencing/thinking were the main learning activities. The textual data analyzed using the content analysis method revealed nine categories of conceptions of learning, namely: learning as memorizing, gaining higher status, practicing tutorial problems, the increase of knowledge, applying, understanding, seeing in a new way, a process not bound by context or time, and autonomous learning. Additionally, two main findings were revealed: (1) students’ views of learning shifted from stereotypes of acquiring knowledge (e.g., teachers lecturing in classrooms) in the lower grade level to observing/experiencing/thinking learning outside of school in the higher grade level; (2) higher grade level students possessed weaker autonomous learning conceptions than lower grade level students.
Second, this across subjects study probed conceptions of learning via auto-photography analysis. All participants (i.e., 549 participants) were categorized into three groups (i.e., art and design, communication and education) according to their major subjects. A total of 495 Taiwan college students’ (art and design: 277, communication: 100 and education: 118) photographs and textual description data were analyzed, and showed that three main findings were revealed: (1) art and design subjects’ students hold more learning conceptions of practicing tutorial problems than the other subjects’ students; (2) communication subject students possessed weaker autonomous learning conceptions than the other two subjects’ students; (3) the three subjects’ students showed weaker qualitative learning conceptions (i.e., applying and understanding). The present study suggests that auto-photography might be a potential way of probing students’ learning conceptions.

1. Introduction 2. Literature review 2.1 Conceptions of learning 2.2 Auto-photography as a main research tool 2.3 Role of photo elicitation and textual description in auto-photography 2.4 Research questions 3. Method 3.1 Participants 3.2 Data collection procedure 3.3 Photograph data analysis and checklist 3.4 Photographs data analysis procedure 3.5 Textual data analysis procedure and coding categories 3.6 The interview content of the metaphorical photographs 4. Results 4.1 Analyzing the results of cross grade students’ photographs data by the coding checklist 4.1.1 The role of “subject domains” in learning 4.1.2 The role of “people involved” in learning 4.1.3 The role of “location” in learning 4.1.4 The role of “activities” in learning 4.1.5 The role of “objects” in learning 4.1.6 The role of “emotions and attitudes” in learning 4.2 Analyzing conceptions of learning of cross grade students by textual data 4.2.1 Learning as memorizing (called “memorizing”) 4.2.2 Learning as gaining a better status (called “status”) 4.2.3 Learning as practicing tutorial problems (called “practicing”) 4.2.4 Learning as the increase of knowledge (called “increase”) 4.2.5 Learning as applying (called “applying”) 4.2.6 Learning as understanding (called “understanding”) 4.2.7 Learning as seeing in a new way (called “seeing in a new way”) 4.2.8 Learning as a process not bound by context or time (called “a process not bound by context or time”) 4.2.9 Learning as autonomous learning (called “autonomous”) 4.3 Distribution of cross grade students’ conceptions of learning 4.4 Students’ photograph data versus the main conceptions of learning 4.5 Analyzing the results of photograph data for students taking different subjects by the coding checklist 4.5.1 The role of “people involved” in learning 4.5.2 The role of “location” in learning 4.5.3 The role of “activities” in learning 4.5.4 The role of “objects” in learning 4.5.5 The role of “Emotions and attitudes” in learning 4.6 Distribution of conceptions of learning among students from different subjects 5. Discussion and conclusions 5.1 The role of context dependency among the college students’ learning conceptions 5.2 The role of different majors or educational contexts among the college students’ conceptions of learning 6. Limitations References Appendix 1

Ali, R., Khurshid, K., Shahzad, A., Hussain, I., & Bakar, Z. A. (2018). Nature of Conceptions of Learning in a Collectivistic Society: A Qualitative Case Study of Pakistan. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1175-1187.
Ashong, C., & Commander, N. (2017). Brazilian and Nigerian international students' conceptions of learning in higher education. Journal of International Students, 7(2), 163.
Ashwin, P., & Trigwell, K. (2012). Evoked prior experiences in first-year university student learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(4), 449-463.
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching learner autonomy in language learning.
London, England: Longman.
Benson, P., & Lor, W. (1999). Conceptions of language and language learning. System, 27(4), 459-472.
Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing (Vol. 1): London: Penguin Books. Dove, J. E., Everett, L., & Preece, P. (1999). Exploring a hydrological concept through children's drawings. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 485-497.
Chalfen, R. (1998). Interpreting family photography as pictorial communication. Image-based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers, 214-234.
Chiou, G.-L., Lee, M.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). High school students’ approaches to learning physics with relationship to epistemic views on physics and conceptions of learning physics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(1), 1-15.
Chiou, G.-L., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2012). Undergraduate students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning in biology: A study of their structural models and gender differences. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 167-195.
Collier, J. J., & Collier, M. (1986). Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Eklund-Myrskog, G. (1998). Students’ conceptions of learning in different educational contexts. Higher Education, 35(3), 299–316.
Gold, S. J. (2004). Using photography in studies of immigrant communities. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(12), 1551-1572.
Glaw, X., Inder, K., Kable, A., & Hazelton, M. (2017). Visual Methodologies in Qualitative Research: Autophotography and Photo Elicitation Applied to Mental Health Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). doi:10.1177/1609406917748215
Gourlay, L. (2010) Multimodality, visual methodologies and higher education. In M. Savin-Baden & C. HowellMajor (Eds.), New Approaches to Qualitative Research. (pp. 80-88). London: Routledge.
Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 233.
Hall, J., & Mitchell, M. (2008). Exploring student midwives creative expression of the meaning of birth. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(1), 1-14.
Harper, D. (1986). Meaning and work: A study in photo elicitation. Current sociology, 34(3), 24-46.
Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17, 13–26.
Hemati Alamdarloo, G., & Moradi, S. (2013). The relationship between students’ conceptions of learning and their academic achievement. Psychology, 4(1), 44-49.
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Hsieh, W. M., & Tsai, C. -C. (2018). Learning illustrated: An exploratory cross-sectional drawing analysis of students' conceptions of learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 139-150.
Hsieh, W. M., & Tsai, C. -C. (2017). Exploring students’ conceptions of science learning via drawing: a cross-sectional analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 274-298.
Hu, Y., Manikonda, L., & Kambhampati, S. (2014). What we instagram: A first
analysis of instagram photo content and user types. Association for the
Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Arizona: ICWSM
Kember D., (2000), Action Learning and Action Research: improving the quality of teaching and learning, London: Kogan Page.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
Lee, M. H., Johanson, R. E., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Exploring Taiwanese high school students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning science through a structural equation modeling analysis. Science Education, 92(2), 191-220.
Liang, J.-C., Lee, M.-H., & Tsai, C. -C. (2010). The relations between scientific epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning science among science-major undergraduates in Taiwan. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19, 43-59.
Liang, J.-C., Su, Y.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2015). The assessment of Taiwanese college students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning computer science and their relationships. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(4), 557-567.
Lin, H. M., & Tsai, C. -C. (2008). Conceptions of learning management among undergraduate students in Taiwan. Management Learning, 39(5), 561-578.
Lin, H.-M., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). The development of the Conceptions of Learning
Management inventory. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 741-757.
Lin, T.-J., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2015). Identifying Taiwanese university
students’ physics learning profiles and their role in physics learning self-efficacy.
Research in Science Education, 45(4), 605-624.
Loads, D. J. (2009). Putting ourselves in the picture: Art workshops in the professional development of university lecturers. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(1), 59-67.
Mannay, D. (2013). ‘Who put that on there… why why why?’Power games and participatory techniques of visual data production. Visual studies, 28(2), 136-146.
Marton, F., Dall'Alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19(3), 277-300.
Marton, F., Watkins, D., & Tang, C. (1997). Discontinuities and continuities in the experience of learning: An interview study of high-school students in Hong Kong. Learning and Instruction, 7(1), 21–48.
McCallum, B., Hargreaves, E., & Gipps, C. (2000). Learning: The pupil's voice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(2), 275-289.
Meo, A. I. (2010). Picturing students' habitus: The advantages and limitations of photo-elicitation interviewing in a qualitative study in the city of Buenos Aires. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9(2), 149-171.
Moilanen, S. (2017). The context-specific conceptions of learning in case-based accounting assignments, students’ characteristics and performance. Accounting Education, 26(3), 191-212.
Moreland, J., & Cowie, B. (2005). Exploring the methods of auto-photography and photo-interviews: Children taking pictures of science and technology. Waikato Journal of Education, 11(1), 73-87.
Pain, H. (2012). A literature review to evaluate the choice and use of visual methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), 303-319.
Müller, F. H., & Palekčić, M. (2005). Continuity of motivation in higher education: A three-year follow-up study. Review of Psychology, 12(1), 31-43.
Negovan, V., Sterian, M., & Colesniuc, G.-M. (2015). Conceptions of learning and intrinsic motivation in different learning environments. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 187, 642-646.
Noland, C. M. (2006). Auto-photography as research practice: Identity and self-esteem research. Journal of research Practice, 2(1), 1.
Pan, Y., & Gauvain, M. (2012). The continuity of college students’ autonomous learning motivation and its predictors: A three-year longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(1), 92-99.
Pain, H. (2012). A literature review to evaluate the choice and use of visual methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), 303-319.
Peterson, E. R., Brown, G. T., & Irving, S. E. (2010). Secondary school students' conceptions of learning and their relationship to achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 167-176.
Pink, S. (2007) Doing Visual Ethnography, 2nd edn, London: Sage.
Purdie, N., Hattie, J., & Douglas, G. (1996). Student conceptions of learning and their use of self-regulated learning strategies: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of educational psychology, 88(1), 87.
Rosário, P., Nunez, J. C., Azevedo, R., Cunha, J., Pereira, A., & Mourao, R. (2014). Understanding gypsy children’s conceptions of learning: A phenomenographic study. School Psychology International, 35(2), 152-166.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness: Guilford Publications.
Säljö, R. (1979). Learning in the learner’s perspective I: Some commonsense conceptions. Gothenburg, Sweden: Institute of Education, University of Gothenburg
Spouse, J. (2000). Talking pictures: Investigating personal knowledge through illuminative art-work. NT Research, 5(4), 253-261.
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2008). Students’ likes and dislikes regarding student-activating and lecture-based educational settings: Consequences for students’ perceptions of the learning environment, student learning and performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(3), 295-317.
Trigwell, K., & Ashwin, P. (2006). An exploratory study of situated conceptions of learning and learning environments. Higher Education, 51(2), 243-258.B
Thomas, M. E. (2009). Auto-photography. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
Tsai, C.-C. (2004). Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: a phenomenographic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1733- 1750.
Tsai, C.-C. (2006). “Biological knowledge is more tentative than physics knowledge”: Taiwan high school adolescents’ views about the nature of biology and physics. Adolescenceal, 41(164), 691–703.
Tsai, C.-C. (2009). Conceptions of learning versus conceptions of web-based learning:
The differences revealed by college students. Computers & Education, 53(4),
1092-1103.
Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational psychology review, 16(4), 359-384.
Vezzani, C., Vettori, G., & Pinto, G. (2018). University students’ conceptions of learning across multiple domains. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(4), 665-684.
Wang, H.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2012). An Exploration of Elementary School Students' Conceptions of Learning: A Drawing Analysis. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher (De La Salle University Manila), 21(3).
Ziller, R., & Rorer, B. (1985). Shyness-environment interaction: A view from the shy side through auto-photography. Journal of Personality, 534, 626-639.
Zheng, C., Liang, J.-C., Yang, Y.-F., & Tsai, C.-C. (2016). The relationship between Chinese university students' conceptions of language learning and their online self-regulation. System, 57, 66-78.

無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2024/02/09 (校內網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
QR CODE