簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 徐慧霞
Huei-Hsia Hsu
論文名稱: 行動商務採用之社會技術觀點研究
Mobile application acceptance: a sociotechnical perspective
指導教授: 盧希鵬
Hsi-Peng Lu
口試委員: 陳鴻基
Houn-Gee Chen
翁崇雄
Chorng-Shyong Ong
楊亨利
Heng-Li Yang
欒斌
Pin Luarn
李國光
Gwo-Guang Lee
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 資訊管理系
Department of Information Management
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 93
中文關鍵詞: 行動應用多媒體訊息服務(MMS)技術接受模型(TAM)社會規範社會情緒
外文關鍵詞: Mobile internet, Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), social norm, social emotion
相關次數: 點閱:332下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著即時業務需求、軟體功能品質提昇、大量資金投入、快速建置基礎設備與顧客使用意願提昇等關鍵因素影響,市場已由電子商務或電子商業進入到多裝置與多網路的行動化商業模式. 多媒體訊息服務(MMS)儼然成為行動應用產業中最具潛力的明日之星,而探索何種因素影響使用者接受MMS為電信業者最想了解的議題。本研究以技術接受理論(TAM)為基礎,建構使用者對MMS使用的技術層面認知信念,包括:認知有用、認知易用,此外,加入認知成本因素以了解使用者對新行動科技應用所擁有的資源考量。在社會因素方面,以社會心理學理論,建構使用者對MMS使用的社會層面認知信念,包括:社會規範、社會情緒與認知關鍵多數。研究使用網路問卷調查方式收集資料,並針對238個已使用與潛在使用者二個族群樣本,採用結構化方程模式進行資料分析,進而了解何種因素影響已使用者與潛在使用者對MMS接受的認知因素. 研究結果發現認知有用性與社會情緒對於所有使用者使用MMS意願,達到顯著的影響性。學術與管理上的意涵將提供給研究者與行動服務經營者參考。


    The rapid growth of wireless communication technology, together with the increasingly high diffusion rate of the Internet, is promoting mobile commerce (MC) as a significant application for both business and users. Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) may be one of the killer applications in mobile internet. While past studies using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to predict acceptance behavior from a technology perspective, little is known about the report of social perspective on acceptance behavior. This study presents an extended TAM that integrates social influence theory, perceived user resource into the TAM to investigate what determines the MMS acceptance of pre-adopters and post-adopters. The proposed model was empirically tested using data collected from a survey of 238 mms post-adopters and post-adopters. The findings indicate pre-adopters were mainly attracted by technological factors, whereas post-adopters were influenced by social determinants. The result suggests that the practitioner should make efforts to societal motivation as well as technology motivation.

    1. Introduction 11 1.1 Background and motivation 11 1.2 Research questions 13 1.3 Research purposes 14 1.4 Organization of the dissertation .. 15 2. Literature review 16 2.1 Mobile internet service and multimedia message service (MMS) 16 2.1.1 Empirical studies related to mobile internet service 19 2.2 Technology context 24 2.2.1 Technology acceptance model (TAM) 24 2.2.2 Perceived user resource 39 2.3 Social context 41 2.3.1 Perceived critical mass.....……..…………..………… ...……..........43 2.3.2 Social norm.…..…..........................................................................47 2.3.3 Social emotion……….……………………………………………..….49 2.4 Behavior difference between pre-adoptor vs. post-adopter…………....…52 3. Research model and hypotheses 55 3.1 Research model 55 3.2 Hypotheses 56 4. Research methodology 58 4.1 Measurement development 58 4.2 Data collection 60 5. Result 62 5.1 Descriptive statistic and ANOVA 62 5.2 Measurement model 63 5.3 Structural model 66 6. Discussion 66 7. Conclusion 68 7.1 Implications for MMS practitioners 69 7.2 Implications for academic researchers 70 8. Limitation and future research 71 9. References 72 Appendix : Research constructs and scale items 86 Appendix: Questionnaire ……………………………………………………………88

    9. References
    1. Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R., and Todd, P.A. (1992), “Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information”, MIS Quarterly 16, pp. 227–247.
    2. Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. (2000), “Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage”, MIS Quarterly 24, pp. 665–694.
    3. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1997), “The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntaries in the Acceptance of Information Technologies”, Decision Sciences, 28(3), pp. 557-582.
    4. Ajzen, I. (1985), “From intention to actions: a theory of planned behavior”, in: J. Kuhl, Bechmann (Eds.), Action Control from cognition to Behavior, Springer, New York, pp.11-39.
    5. Ajzen, I. (1991), “The theory of planned behavior”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process 50, pp.179-211.
    6. Al-Khaldi, M.A. and Al-Jabri, I.M. (1998), “The relationship of attitudes to computer utilization: new evidence from a developing nation”, Computers in Human Behavior 14 (1), pp. 23–42.
    7. Al-Khaldi, M.A. and Wallace, R. S. O. (1999), “The influence of attitudes on personal computer utilization among knowledge workers: the case of Saudi Arabia”, Information & Management, Vol. 36, Issue 4, pp.185-204.
    8. Allen J. P. (2003), “The evolution of new mobile applications: a sociotechnical perspective”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(1), pp.23-36.
    9. Anandarajan, M., Igbariam, M. and Anakwe, U.P. (2002), “IT acceptance in a less-developed country: a motivational factor perspective”, International Journal of Information Management 22 (1), pp. 47–65.
    10. Atkinson, M.A. and Kydd, C. (1997), “Individual characteristics associated with World Wide Web use: an empirical study of playfulness and motivation”, The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 28 (2), pp. 53–61.
    11. Beatty, R. C., Shim, J. P. and Jones, M.C. (2001), “Factors influencing corporate web site adoption: a time-based assessment”, Information & Management, Vol. 38, Issue 6, pp.337-354.
    9. Bernheim, B Douglas (2000), “A Theory of Conformity”, Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 102(5), pages 841-77.
    10. Blanchard A.L. and Henle, C.A.(2007) , “Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The role of norms and external locus of control”, Computers in Human Behavior, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 22 May 2007.
    11. Brave,S., Nass, C. and Hutchinson, K. (2005) , “Computers that care: investigating the effects of orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied computer agent”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 62, Issue 2, pp.161-178.
    12. Burnkrant, R. E. and Cousineau, A. (1975), “Informational and Normative Social Influence in Buyer Behavior”, Journal of Consumer Research (2), pp.206-215.
    13. CalverleyG. and Shephard, K. (2003) , “Assisting the uptake of on-line resources: why good learning resources are not enough”, Computers & Education, Vol. 41, Issue 3, pp.205-224.
    14. Castaeda, J.A., Muoz-Leiva, F. and Luque, T. (2007), “Web Acceptance Model (WAM): Moderating effects of user experience”, Information & Management, Vol. 44, Issue 4, June, pp.384-396.
    15. Chau, P.Y.K. (1996), “An empirical assessment of modified technology acceptance model”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, pp.185-204.
    16. Chau, P.Y.K. and Hu, P.J.H. (2002), “Investigating healthcare professionals’ decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories”, Information & Management 39 (4), pp. 297–311.
    17. Chen L., Gillenson M. L, and Sherrell D. L. (2002), “Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective”, Information and Management, pp. 705-719.
    18. Chen, P. Y. and Hitt, L. M. (2002), “Measuring switching costs and the determinants of customer retention in Internet-enabled businesses: a study of the online brokerage industry”, Information Systems Research 13, pp. 255–274.
    19. Chin W.W. (1995), “Partial least squares is to LISREL as principal components analysis is to common factor analysis”, Technology Studies, Vol.: 2, pp. 315—319.
    20. Cyr, D., Head, M. and Ivanov, A (2006), “Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce”, Information & Management, Vol. 43, Issue 8, pp.950-963.
    21. Daft, R.L. and Lengel, R.H. (1984), “Information Richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design”, In B. M. Staw and L.L. Cummings, Research in Organization Behavior, 6, pp.191-233.
    22. Davis, F. (1986), “A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results”, Doctoral Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1986.
    23. Davis, F. D. (1989), “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology”, MIS Quarterly, pp.319-340.
    24. Davis, F. D. (1993), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technologies”, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), pp.475-487.
    25. Eastlick, M. A. and Lotz, S. (1999), “Profiling potential adopters and non-adopters of an interactive electronic shopping medium”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp.209-223.
    26. Delfino, M. and Manca, S. (2007), “The expression of social presence through the use of figurative language in a web-based learning environment”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.23, Issue 5, pp.2190-2211.
    27. Derks D., Bos, A.E.R. and Grumbkow, J.V. (2007), “Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: the importance of social context”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 23, Issue 1, pp.842-849.
    28. ePaynews.com, Statistics for Mobile Commerce (2004), http://www.epaynews.com/statistics/mcommstats.html.
    29. Featherman, M.S. and Pavlou, P.A. (2003), “Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59 (4), pp. 451–474.
    30. FIND (2004), http://www.find.org.tw/0105/howmany/howmany_disp.asp?id=93.
    31. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), “Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research”, Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley.
    32. Fornell, C. (1982), “A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis Methods”, I an II, Praeger Special Studies, New York.
    33. Fornell, C. and Larcker, C. (1981), “Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”, Journal of Marketing Research 18, pp. 39-50.
    34. Fulk, J., Schmitz, J. and Steinfield, C.W. (1990), “A social Influence model technology use”, Organizations and Communication Technology, pp.117-140.
    35. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D. W. (2003), “Trust and TAM in online shopping: AN integrated model”, MIS Quarterly, 27(1), pp.51-90.
    36. Gelderman, M. (1998), “The relation between user satisfaction, usage of information systems and performance”, Information & Management 34 (1), pp. 11–18.
    37. Ha,I,, Yoon, Y. and Choi, M. (2007) , “Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment”, Information & Management, Vol. 44, Issue 3, pp.276-286.
    38. Hair, Jr., J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., and Black, W.C. (1995), Multivariate Data Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
    39. Han, S., Mustonen, P., Seppanen, M., and Kallio, M. (2006), “Physicians' acceptance of mobile communication technology: an exploratory study”, International Journal of Mobile Communications, Vol.4, No.2, pp. 210-230.
    40. Harrison T. and Waite K. (2006), “A time-based assessment of the influences, uses and benefits of intermediary website adoption”, Information & Management, Vol. 43, Issue 8, pp.1002-1013.
    41. Hedges, L.V. and Olkin, I. (1985), “Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis”, Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
    42. Henderson, R. and Divett, M.J. (2003), “Perceived usefulness, ease of use and electronic supermarket use”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59 (3), pp. 383–395.
    43. Henderson, R., Rickwood, D. and Roberts, P. (1998), “The beta test of an electronic supermarket ”, Interacting with Computers 10 (4), pp. 385–399.
    44. Hong W. and Kevin Zhu, K. (2006), “Migrating to internet-based e-commerce: Factors affecting e-commerce adoption and migration at the firm level”, Information & Management, Vol. 43, Issue 2, pp.204-221.
    45. Hsu, C. L. and Lu, H. P. (2004), “Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience”, Information and Management, pp. 853-868.
    46. Hung M. C., Hwang H.G., Hsieh T.C. (2007) , “An exploratory study on the continuance of mobile commerce: an extended expectation-confirmation model of information system use”, International Journal of Mobile Communications , Vol. 5, No.4, pp. 409-422.
    47. IDC, 2005. http://www.idc.com./
    48. Igbaria, M. and Iivari, J. (1995), “The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage”‘, Omega 23 (6), pp. 587–605.
    49. Igbaria, M., Iivari , J. and Maragahh, H. (1995) , “Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study”, Information & Management 29 (5), pp. 227–238.
    50. Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P.and Cavaye, A.L.M. (1997), “Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: a structural equation model”, MIS Quarterly 21 (3), pp. 279–305.
    51. ITU (2001) ‘ITU Internet Reports 2001: IP Telephony’, ITU.
    52. Jackson, C.M., Chow, S., and Leitch, R.A. (1997), “Toward and Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use an Information System”, Decision Sciences, 28(2), spring.
    53. Junglas (2007), “On the usefulness and ease of use of location-based services: insights into the information system innovator's dilemma”, International Journal of Mobile Communications, Vol. 5, No.4, pp. 389-408.
    54. Kalakota, R. and Robinson, M. (2001), “E-business 2.0: roadmap for success, 2nd Ed”, Boston: Addison Wesldy.
    55. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., and Chervany, N.L. (1999), “Information Technology Adoption across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, Issue 2, pp.183-213.
    56. Krogh G.V.(2002), “The communal resource and information systems”, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 2, 1, pp. 85-107.
    57. Kleijnen, M. K., Ruyter and Wetzels,M. (2004) , “Consumer adoption of wireless services: discovering the rules, while playing the game”, Journal of Interactive Marketing 18, pp. 51–61.
    58. Klein,J., Moon, Y. and Picard, R.W. (2004) , “This computer responds to user frustration: Theory, design, and results”, Interacting with Computers, Vol. 14, Issue 2, pp.119-140.
    59. Kuan, K. K. Y. and Chau, P. Y.K (2001), “A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology–organization–environment framework”, Information & Management, Vol. 38, Issue 8, pp.507-521.
    60. Lai, V.S. and Li, H.L. (2005), “Technology acceptance model for internet banking: an invariance analysis”, Information and Management, 42(2), pp. 373-386.
    61. Luarn, P. and Lin, H. (2005) , “Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking”, Computers in Human Behavior 21, pp. 873–891.
    62. Lee, T. and Jun, J. (2007), “The role of contextual marketing offer in Mobile Commerce acceptance: comparison between Mobile Commerce users and nonusers”, International Journal of Mobile Communications, Vol. 5, No.3, pp. 339-356.
    63. Lederer,A.L., Maupin,D.J., Sena, M.P. and Zhuang, Y.L.(2000) , “The technology acceptance model in the world wide web”, Decision Support Systems 29, pp. 269–282.
    64. Legris P., Ingham J. and Collerette P.(2003) , “Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, Vol. 40, Issue 3, pp.191-204.
    65. Liaw, S.S. and Huang, H.M. (2003), “An investigation of user attitudes toward search engines as an information retrival tool”, Computers in Human Behavior 19 (6), pp. 751–765.
    66. Liker, J. K. and Sindi, A. A. (1997), “User Acceptance of Expert systems: A Test of the Theory of Reasoned Action”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14, pp. 147-173.
    67. Lim, B.L., Choi, M. and Park, M.C. (2003), “The late take-off phenomenon in the diffusion of telecommunication services: network effect and the critical mass”, Information Economics and Policy, Vol.15, Issue 4, December 2003, Pages 537-557.
    68. Lin, H.H. and Wang Y.S.(2006) , “An examination of the determinants of customer loyalty in mobile commerce contexts”, Information & Management, Vol. 43, Issue 3, pp.271-282.
    69. Liu, L. and Ma, Q. (2005) , “The impact of service level on the acceptance of application service oriented medical records”, Information & Management, Vol. 42, Issue 8, pp.1121-1135.
    70. Lu, J., Wand, L.Z., and Yu, C.S. (2007) , “Is TAM for wireless mobile data services applicable in China? A survey report from Zhejiang China”, International Journal of Mobile Communications, Vol.5, No.1, pp.11- 31.
    71. Lucas, H. C. and Spitler, V. K. (2000), “Implementation in a world of workstations and networks”, Information and Management, 38(2), pp. 119-128.
    72. Mahatanankoon, P., Wen, H. J., and Bill, B.L. (2006), “Evaluating the technological characteristics and trust affecting mobile device usage”, International Journal of Mobile Communications, Vol. 4, No.6, pp. 662-681.
    73. Mahler A. and Rogers, E.M. (1999), “The diffusion of interactive communication innovations and the critical mass: the adoption of telecommunications services by German banks”, Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 23, Issues 10-11, pp.719-740.
    74. Markus, M.L. (1990), “Toward a critical mass theory of interactive media: universal access, interdependence a diffusion”, Organizations and Communication Technology, pp.194-218.
    75. Mathieson, K., Peacock, E. and Chin, W. (2001), “Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: The Influence of Perceived User Resources”, DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3), pp. 86-112.
    76. Moon, J. W. and Kim, Y.G. (2001), “Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context”, Information and Management, 38, pp.217-230.
    77. Moon, S. K. and Kim, H. (2007), “Is there early take-off phenomenon in diffusion of IP-based telecommunications services?”, Omega, Vol.35, Issue 6, pp. 727-739.
    78. Moore, G. C. and Benbasat, I. (1991), “Development Of An Instrument To Measure The Perceptions Of Adopting And Information Technology Innovation”, Information Systems Research, September, pp. 192-222.
    79. Oatley K. (2004), “The bug in the salad: the uses of emotions in computer interfaces”, Interacting with Computers, Vol.16, Issue 4, pp.693-696.
    80. Okazaki, S. (2006), “What do we know about mobile Internet adopters? A cluster analysis”, Information & Management, Vol.43, Issue 2, pp.127-141.
    81. Onwumechili, C. (2001) , “Dream or reality: providing universal access to basic telecommunications in Nigeria? ”,Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 25, Issue 4, pp.219-231.
    82. Ovum, 2003. http://www.find.org.tw/0105/news/0105_news_disp.asp?news_id=2520.
    83. Ozdemir Z. D. and Abrevaya J. (2007), “Adoption of Technology-Mediated Distance Education: A longitudinal analysis”, Information & Management, Vol. 44, Issue 5, pp.467-479.
    84. Pagani,M.,(2004) , “Determinants of adoption of third generation mobile multimedia services ”, Journal of Interactive Marketing 18 (3), pp. 46–59.
    85. Partala, T., Surakka, V. and Vanhala, T. (2006), “Real-time estimation of emotional experiences from facial expressions”, Interacting with Computers, Vol. 18, Issue 2, pp208-226.
    86. Pedersen, P.E. (2005), “Adoption of mobile Internet services: an exploratory study of mobile commerce early adopters”, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 15, pp. 203–222.
    87. Peffers, K. and Tuunanen, T.(2005) , “Planning for IS applications: a practical, information theoretical method and case study in mobile financial services”, Information & Management, Vol. 42, Issue 3, pp. 483-501.
    88. Poon, S. and Swatman, P,M.C. (1999) , “An exploratory study of small business Internet commerce issues”, Information & Management, Vol.35, Issue 1, pp.9-18.
    89. Raafat Saad and Bouchaib Bahli, (2005), “The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, Vol. 42, Issue 2, pp.317-327.
    90. Rogers, E.M. (1995), Diffusion of Innovations, 4th Ed., The Free Press, New York.
    91. Rice, R.E. and Love, G. (1987), “Electronic emotion: socio-emotion content in a computer-mediated communication network”, Communication Research, No.14, pp.85-108.
    92. Riemenschneider, C.K., Harrison, D.A. and Mykytn Jr., P.P. (2003), “Understanding IT adoption decisions in small business: Integrating current theories”, Information & Management 40 (4), pp. 269–285.
    93. Roberts, P. and Henderson, R. (2000), “Information technology acceptance in a sample of government employees: a test of the technology acceptance model”, Interacting with Computers 12 (5), pp. 427–443.
    94. Salancik, G.R. and Pfeffer, J.A. (1978), “social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design”, Administrative Science Quarterly, No.23, pp. 224-253.
    95. Schmitz, J. and Fulk, J. (1991), “Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic mail: A test of the social influence model of technology use”, Communication Research, 18(4), pp.39-54.
    96. Selim, H.M. (2003), “An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites”, Computers & Education 40 (4), pp. 343–360.
    97. Shih, H.P. (2004) , “Extended technology acceptance model of Internet utilization behavior”, Information and Management, Vol. 41, Issue 6, pp. 719-729.
    98. Shintaro Okazaki (2006), “What do we know about mobile internet adopters? A cluster analysis, Information and Management, Vol.43, Issue 2, pp.127 - 141.
    99. Short, J., Ederyn, W., and Bruce C. (1976), “The Social Psychology of Telecommunications”, John Wiley and Sons.
    100. Sharrard,J., Kafka, S. J. and Tavilla, M. J.(2001), “Global Online Trade Will Climb to 18% of Sales”, Business View Brief at Forrester Research, http://www.forrester.com/find
    101. Spears, R. and Lea, M. (1991), “Social Influence and the Influence of the Social in Computer-Mediated Communication”, Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communization (Lea M, Ed) ,pp.30-65
    102. Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1986), “Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication”, Management Science, 32(11), pp.1492-1512.
    103. Suh, B. and Han, I. (2002), “Effect of trust on customer acceptance of Internet banking”, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 1 (3), pp. 247–263.
    104. Szajna, B. (1994), “Software Evaluation and Choice: Predictive Malidation of the Technology Acceptance Instrument”, MIS Quarterly, pp. 319-324.
    105. Tan, M. and Teo T.S.H. (2000), “Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(5), pp. 1-42.
    106. Teo, H.H. , Chan, H.C. Wei, K.K. and Zhang, Z. (2003), “Evaluating information accessibility and community adaptivity features for sustaining virtual learning communities”, International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 59 (5), pp. 671–697.
    107. Teo, T. and Ranganathan, C. (2004), “Adopters and non-adopters of business-to-business electronic commerce in Singapore”, Information and Management, 42, pp. 89-102.
    108. Teo, T., Tan, M., and Peck, S. N. (2004), “Adopters and non-adopters of internet stock trading in Singapore”, Behavior and Information Technology, 23, 3, pp. 211-233.
    109. Teo, T.S.H. , Lim, V.K.G. and Lai, R.Y.C. (1999), “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage”‘, Omega 27 (1), pp. 25–37.
    110. Teo, T.S.H. and Ranganathan, C. (2004), “Adopters and non-adopters of business-to-business electronic commerce in Singapore”, Information & Management, Vol. 42, Issue 1, pp.89-102.
    111. Teo, T.S.H. and Tan, M. (1998), “An empirical study of adoptors and non-adopters of the Internet in Singapore”, Information & Management, Vol.34, Issue 6, 21, pp.339-345.
    112. Timo, K., Annu R., and Manne K. (2006), “Predicting consumer acceptance in mobile services: empirical evidence from an experimental end user environment”, International Journal of Mobile Communications, Vol. 4, No.4, pp.418-435.
    113. Truman, G. E., Sandoe, K. and Rifkin, T. (2003), “An empirical study of smart card technology”, Information & Management, Vol. 40, Issue 6, pp.591-606.
    114. Turel, O., Serenko, A. and Bontis N. (2007), “User acceptance of wireless short messaging services: Deconstructing perceived value”, Information & Management, Vol. 44, Issue 1, pp.63-73.
    115. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000), “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies”, Management Science, 46(2), pp. 186-204.
    116. Wu, J. H. and, Wang S. C. (2005), “What drives mobile commerce? : An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model”, Information and Management, Vol. 42, Issue 5, pp. 719-729.
    117. Yang, H. L.(1999), “Adoption and implementation of CASE tools in Taiwan” ,Information & Management, Vol. 35, Issue 2, 8 ,pp.89-112.
    118. Yi, M.Y. and Hwang, Y. (2003), “Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning, goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model”, International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 59 (4), pp. 431–449.
    119. Yu, H. C. , Lee Z.Y. and Chang, S.C.(2005), “Using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate alternative licensing mechanisms”, Information & Management, Vol. 42, Issue 4, pp.517-531.
    120. Yu, J., Ha, I, Choi, I. and Rho, J. (2005), “Extending the TAM for a t-commerce”, Information & Management, Vol. 42, Issue 7, pp.965-976.
    121. Vijayasarathy, L.R., (2004), “Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: the case for an augmented technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, Vol. 41, Issue 6, pp.747-762.

    QR CODE