現今少子化的社會，每個小孩的出生都是父母最重要的寶貝，父母們也都會想隨時記錄孩子的成長，保存珍貴的回憶的同時也能與親朋好友分享寶貝們每個重要的時刻。透過手機應用程式，可更迅速且即時的來記錄孩子的成長，及解決紙本不易攜帶的痛點。本研究目的在探討親子成長紀錄應用程式的使用性，了解其介面是否能讓使用者快速且容易達到各項紀錄之目的，進而有效完成操作任務。並依研究結果對親子成長紀錄應用程式提供介面操作上的修改建議。
　　本研究包含兩部分實驗：(1)前導性實驗設計：調查現有親子成長紀錄應用程式做為前導性實驗樣本，了解目前親子成長紀錄應用程式之優缺點，包含功能操作及系統使用性與介面互動滿意度，並透過訪談與觀察得知使用者需求與建議；(2)驗證實驗：透過文獻探討之理論為依據，驗證實驗採3 (功能選單介面配置) X 2 (使用者經驗之高、低) 之雙因子組間方式進行模擬與驗證，包含任務操作時間績效、系統使用性尺度量表(SUS)、使用者互動滿意度問卷(QUIS)、使用者主觀感受量表，再將實驗結果作個別與整體的分析探討，並提出結論與建議。
　　由研究結果可歸納出以下結論：(1)介面上應經過整理分類，可將常用功能統整並精簡，以提供使用者於行動裝置上，更直覺地瀏覽及使用互動；(2)功能選單置於首頁明顯處，可讓使用者快速理解應用程式所提供之功能並開始進行操作；(3)圖示與說明文字、及擺放位置等細節，皆需以明顯、易懂作為設計主要因素，讓使用者易於理解各項功能之服務；(4)「日記」功能是親子成長紀錄應用程式最重要的功能，置於首頁可讓使用者易於使用，其介面可以類似Facebook等社群網站進行設計以符合使用者的心智模式；(5)操作步驟與資訊層級的排列應簡化，類似功能可置於同頁面，減少頁面跳轉所需耗費的時間，讓使用者能快速完成所需的操作任務。

　　Under the lower birth rate in today’s society, each child is the most precious gift for parents. Parents also want to record the growth of their children to save precious memories, and share every important moment with their relatives and friends. Through the mobile APPlication, parents can promptly record children's growth. In this way, the pain point of papers, namely the portability is solved. The purpose of this study is to explore the usability of child's growth record mobile APPlications, to understand whether its interface allows users to quickly and easily achieve various record purposes, and thereby effectively completes operational tasks. In addition, this study provides suggestions for future redersign on the operation of the child's growth record mobile APPlications based on the research results.
　　This study is composed of two experiments. (1) Pilot experiment: Investigate the existing child's growth record mobile APPlications as the pilot experiment samples to understand the advantages and disadvantages of the current mobile APPlications, including functional operation, system usability, and satisfaction of interface interaction. A better understanding of user needs and suggestions is gained through interviews and observations. (2) Confirmatory experiment: Based on the theory of literature discussion, the confirmatory experiment uses two-way analysis of variance, i.e., 3 (function menu interface configuration) X 2 (high and low user experience) for simulation and confirmation, including time-based task performance, system usability scale (SUS), the questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction (QUIS), and user subjective perception scale. The results are analyzed individually and as a whole. Conclusions and recommendations are further proposed.
　　The following conclusions can be drawn from the research results. (1) The interface should be sorted and classified, and common functions can be unified and streamlined to provide users with a more intuitive browsing experience and interaction on mobile devices; (2) Function menus placed on a prominent place on the homepage can allow users to quickly understand the functions provided by the mobile APPlication; (3) The interface design details, such as icons, explanatory texts, and the placement, need to be obvious and easy for users to understand to provide a user-friendly service; (4) "Diary" function is the most important function of the child's growth record mobile APPlications. It is placed on the homepage to make it easy for users to use, and its interface can be similar to social networking websites, such as Facebook. It is designed in order to match the user's mental models; (5) The arrangement of operational steps and information levels should be simplified. Similar functions can be placed on the same page to reduce the time required for page jumps, allowing users to quickly complete the required operational tasks.

[中文]
1. 方裕民 (2003)。人與物的對話: 互動介面設計理論與實務。台北市：田園城市出版社。
2. 互動設計概論 (2013)。2013年12月12日，取自https://blog.akanelee.me/posts/166419-an-introduction-to-interaction-design/
3. 內政部統計處 (2019)。https://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/index.aspx
4. 少子化開創寵愛商機 親子餐廳蔚為風潮 (2018)。2018年8月15日，取自https://www.brain.com.tw/news/articlecontent?ID=46851#1C74QJwa
5. 天下雜誌612期 (2016)。生愈少，愈敢花　爸媽變身創業家。2016年12月7日，取自https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5079803&utm_source=Facebook&utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=Social&utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=Daily&utm_campaign=Daily&_branch_match_id=482786920604901836
6. 行政院性別平等會 (2019)。http://www.gec.ey.gov.tw/
7. 艾瑞諮詢，2019年中國年輕育兒家庭用戶洞察報告 (2019) 。2019年10月18日，取自http://report.iresearch.cn/report_pdf.aspx?id=3457
8. 唐納·諾曼 (2005)。情感設計：我們為何喜歡(或討厭)日常用品 (Emotional design：Why we love(or hate)everyday things)。(王鴻祥、翁鵲嵐、鄭 玉屏、張志傑譯)。台北市：田園城市出版社。
9. 唐納·諾曼 (2017)。設計的心理學 人性化的產品設計如何改變世界 (初版十刷) (陳宜秀譯)。遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
10. 速途研究院，2018年Q3育兒類APP行業研究報告 (2018)。2018年12月4日，取自https://www.sootoo.com/content/678093.shtml
11. 創市際市場研究顧問公司，市調解析親子育兒篇 (2018)。2018年11月15日，取自https://www.ixresearch.com/reports/創市際雙週刊第一二一期-20181115
12. 貿易雜誌電子報202期 (2008)。不能錯過的少子化商機。2008年4月1日，取自http://www.ieatpe.org.tw/magazine/202-1.htm

[英文]
1. Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean：Adding an adjective rating scale”. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114-123
2. Brooke. J. (1996). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In Jordan, P. W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B. A., & McClelland, A, L. (Eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry. Londan: Taylor and Francis.
3. Cox, K., & Walker, D. (1993). User Interface Design (2nd ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
4. Cushman, W.H., Rosenberg, D.J. (1991). Human Factors in Product Design. Amsterdam: Elsevier
5. Global Digital Report 2018 (2018)。From：https://digitalreport.wearesocial.com/
6. Nielsen, J. (1995). 10 usability heuristics for user interface design. Nielsen Norman Group, 1(1).
7. Norman, D. A. (2013). Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded. New York: Basic Books.
8. Rogers, Y., Sharps, H., & Preece, J. (2007). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction (2ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
9. Saffer, D. (2009). Designing for Interaction: Creating Innovative APPlications and Devices. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.