簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳聖方
Sheng-fang Chen
論文名稱: 探討主管與部屬的關係品質對主管協助部屬處理工作家庭衝突的影響
The impact of Leader-member exchange quality supervisor work-family supporting behaviors.
指導教授: 葉穎蓉
Ying-Jung Yeh
口試委員: 陸洛
Luo Lu
吳宗祐
Tsung-Yu Wu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 61
中文關鍵詞: 領導者-成員交換理論(LMX)工作家庭衝突處理主管地位相似性
外文關鍵詞: LMX, Work-family conflict, Social status, Simila
相關次數: 點閱:411下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究欲探討主管與部屬的關係品質(LMX)和主管對部屬的工作家庭衝突的協助,主要研究目的如下:(一) 探討LMX是否會影響主管如何協助部屬工作家庭衝突的處理,其協助是實務導向或是情緒導向。(二) 探討主管地位是否會調節LMX和主管提供協助兩者之間的關係。(三) 探討主管與部屬的相似性是否會調節LMX和主管協助部屬工作家庭衝突的處理。

    本研究的問卷樣本為全職工作者,共回收360份有效問卷。研究結果發現:(一) LMX與主管提供的實務導向與情緒導向協助皆為正相關。(二) 主管地位越高,LMX與主管提供的實務導向協助的關係越強。(三) 主管與部屬的小孩狀況相似性越高,LMX與主管提供的實務導向與情緒導向協助的關係也會越強。主管與部屬的婚姻相似性愈高,LMX與主管提供的實務導向協助的關係也越強。

    本研究提醒管理者除了對關係較好的部屬給予工作家庭衝突的幫助外,也須適時的關心外團體的部屬。另外,也讓部屬瞭解到與主管維持高品質關係的重要性。主管會對關係較好的部屬提供較多實務與情緒上的幫助,協助部屬去處理工作家庭所帶來的負面的結果。本研究在最後也提出了限制與建議,讓後續的研究者可以更進一步的去探討。


    This study examines the relationship between LMX and supervisor work-family supporting behaviors. There are three purposes of my research. First, exploring whether the quality of LMX influence supervisor’s support. Second, exploring whether social status will influence the relationship between LMX and supervisor’s support. Third, examining the similarity of supervisor and subordinate will moderate the relationship of LMX and supervisor support

    Survey data were collected from 360 full-time employees. The study discovered that LMX is positively related with supervisor’s practical and emotional support. Moreover, when the supervisor’s position is higher, the relationship between LMX and supervisor’s practical support is higher. The result also indicated whether having child between supervisor and subordinate has the same moderate effect, the relationship between LMX and supervisor’s practical and emotional support is higher. And the marital condition similarity of supervisor and subordinated is the same, the relationship between LMX and supervisor’s practical support is higher, too.

    Such results reminded of the supervisors not only helping the in-group subordinate but also concern about the out-group subordinate. Also, subordinates should realize the importance of maintaining good relationship with supervisor. Managerial implications of the study were discussed, and suggestions were also provided for future studies.

    目錄 中文摘要 I Abstract II 誌謝 III 目錄 IV 圖目錄 V 表目錄 VI 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 領導者-成員交換理論 4 第二節 工作家庭衝突與處理方式 6 第三節 領導者-成員交換理論與主管提供協助的關係 9 第四節 主管地位為調節模式 11 第五節 相似性為調節模式 12 第三章 研究方法 15 第一節、研究架構與假說 15 第二節、研究變項的定義與衡量 16 第三節、研究對象與程序 18 第四節、資料分析方法 19 第四章 研究結果 21 第一節、樣本基本資料分析 21 第二節、量表信度分析 22 第三節、敘述統計與相關係數分析 23 第四節、研究假說之檢驗 26 第五章 研究結論與建議 46 第一節、研究結論 46 第二節、管理意涵 48 第三節、研究限制與未來建議 50 參考文獻 52 附件一 56 附件二 59

    邱皓政(2005),『量化研究與統計分析』,五南文化。
    李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬譯(2006) Robbins S.P著,『組織行為學』,華泰文化。

    Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 414–435.
    Allen, T.D., Herst, D. E. L., Bruck, C.S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict:A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 278-308.
    Anderson, S. E., Coffey, B. S., & Byerly, R. T. (2002). Formal organizational initiatives and informal workplace practices: Links to work-family conflict and job-related outcomes. Journal of Management, 28, 787–810.
    Anderson, C., John, O.P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 116-132.
    Baure, T.N., & Green, S.G. (1996). Development of Leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1538-1567.
    Breaugh J. A., & Frye N.K. (2008). Work-family conflict: The important of family-friendly employment practices and family-supportive supervisor. Journal of Business & Psychology, 22, 345-353.
    Brough, P., O’Driscoll, M. P., & Kalliath, T. J. (2005). The ability of ‘‘family friendly’’ organizational resources to predict work–family conflict and job and family satisfaction. Stress and Health, 21, 223–234.
    Byron, K.(2005). A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169-198.
    Cohen, J., & Cohen. (1983). Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.): Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Cogliser, C. C., Schriesheim, C. A., Scandura, T. A., & Gardner, W. L. (2009). Balance in leader and followerperceptions of leader-member exchange: Relationships with performance and work attitudes. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 452-465.
    Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874-900.
    Culbertson, S., Huffman, A., & Alden-Anderson, R. (2010). Leader-member exchange and work-family interactions: The mediating role of self-reported challenge- and hindrance-related stress. The Journal of Psychology, 144(1), 15-36.
    Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11, 618–634.
    Eby, L. T., Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. (2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124–197.
    Flynn F.J. (2003). How much should I give and how often? The effect of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5) 539–553.
    Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219–239.
    Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2004). Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 745–774.
    Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes ofwork–family conflict: Testing a model of the work–family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 65–78.
    Frye, N.K., & Breaugh, J.A. (2004). Family-Friendly Policies, Supervisor Support, Work–Family Conflict, Family-Work Conflict, and Satisfaction: A Test of a Conceptual Model. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19, 197-220.
    Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995) Relationship-based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-level Multi-domain Perspective, Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247.
    Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88.
    Goff, S. J., Mount, M. K., & Jamison, R. L. (1990). Employer supported child care, work/family conflict, and absenteeism: A field study. Personnel Psychology, 43, 793–809.
    Lambert, S.J. (2000). Added benefits: the links between work life benefits and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 43 801–815.
    Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. B. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 451–465.
    Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of Leader–member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development, Journal of Management, 24, 43–72.
    Lingard H., & Francis V. (2006). Does a supportive work environment moderate the relationship between work-family conflict and burnout among construction professionals? Construction Management and Economics, 24, 185-196.
    Michel, J. S., Kotrba, L. M., Mitchelon, J. K., Clar,k M. A., & Baltes, B. B., (2011). Antecedents of work–family conflict: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 32, 689-725.
    Major, D. A. (2003). Utilizing role theory to help employed parents cope with children’s chronic illness. Health Education Research: Theory and Practice, 18, 45–57.
    Major, D. A., Fletcher, T. D., Davis, D. D., & Germano, L. M. (2008). The influence of work-family culture and workplace relationships on work interference with family: A multilevel model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 881–897.
    Major, D.A., & Morganson, V.J. (2011). Coping with work-family conflict: A Leader-member exchange perspective. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 16, 126-138.
    Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric Theory, NY: McGraw-Hill Inc.
    O’Driscoll, M.P., Poelmans, S., Kalliath, T., Allen, T.D., Cooper, C.L. & Sanchez, J.L. (2003). Family-responsive interventions, perceived organizational and supervisor support, work-family conflict and psychological strain. International Journal of Stress Management, 10, 326–344.
    Portoghese I., Galletta M., & Battistelli A. (2011). The Effects of Work-Family Conflict and Community Embeddedness on Employee Satisfaction: The Role of Leader-Member Exchange. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(4), 39-48.
    Rotondo, D.M., Carson, D.S., & Kincaid, J.F. (2003). Coping with multiple dimensions of work-family conflict. Personnel Review, 32, 275-296.
    Shanock, L.R., & Eisenberger R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 689-695.
    Shockley, K., & Allen, T. (2007). When flexibility helps: Another look at the availability of flexible work arrangements and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71, 479–493.
    Thomas, L. T., & Ganster, D. C. (1995). Impact of family supportive work variables on work-family conflict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 6–15.
    Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Lyness, K. S. (1999). When work-family benefits are not enough: The influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work-family conflict. Journalof Vocational Behavior, 53, 392–415.
    Thompson, C. A., Poelmans, S. A. Y., Allen, T. D., & Andreassi, J. K. (2007). On the importance of coping: A model and new directions for research on work and family. In P. Perrewe´ & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Exploring the work and non-work interface: Vol. 6. Research in occupational stress and well being (pp. 73–113). Oxford: Elsevier JAI.
    Turban D. B., & Jones A. P. (1988). Supervisor-Subordinate Similarity: Types, Effects, and Mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 228-234.
    Tsui, A. S. & O’Reilly, C. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32,402-423.
    Vecchio, R. P., & Brazil, D. M., (2007). Leadership and Sex-Similarity:A Compariosn in a Military Setting. Personnel Psychology, 60, 303-335.
    Wayne, S. J., Liden, R.C., & Sparrowe, R. T. (1994). Developing leader-member exchanges: The influence of gender and ingratiation. American Behavioral Scientist, 37(5), 697-714.
    Yrle, A., Hartman, S., & Galle, W. (2002). An investigation of relationships between communication style and leader-member exchange. Journal of Communication Management, 6, 257–268.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2013/06/22 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE