簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張國豪
Guo-Hao Jhang
論文名稱: 行銷人員績效考核制度
A Study of Performance Appraisal on Marketing Employees
指導教授: 林維熊
Wei-Shong Lin
口試委員: 葉明義
Ming-Yi Yeh
陳崇文
Chung-Wen Chen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 70
中文關鍵詞: 行銷人員新產品開發績效評估誘因報償產品生命週期涉入程度
外文關鍵詞: marketing employee, new product development process, performance appraisal, incentive compensation principles, product life cycle, involvement
相關次數: 點閱:268下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在競爭的市場環境之下,越來越多的企業領悟到行銷為決定新產品成功或失敗的一項關鍵性因素。因此,關於行銷績效制度建立的主題在實務和學術界中越來越受重視。本研究將重心放在行銷人員績效制度的建立與新產品績效之間的關係。首先,利用產品生命週期與消費者涉入程度將新產品分類為四大象限,接著使用Milgrom and Roberts在1992年所提出的誘因報償準則設計出有效的績效管理制度。
    根據113份有效問卷的回收,得知在偏好品象限中,競爭者績效指標對於新產品績效有顯著的正向影響。接著在選購品象限中得知,消費者績效指標對於新產品績效有顯著的正向影響。最後在便利品象限中得知,財務績效指標對於新產品績效有顯著的正向影響。


    In the competitive business environment, more companies realize that marketing is a critical factor in determining a new product’s success or failure. Hence, the subject of setting up marketing metrics has become increasingly important to both practices and academics. This research focuses on the relationship between estimating marketing metrics and the new product's performance. The framework first uses the theory of product life cycle and consumer involvement to classify new products into four categories. Next, we apply the incentive contract theory (Milgrom and Roberts 1992)to devise an effective performance management system.
    Based on a survey of 113 marketers, the result in preference product category is that the competition Key Performance Indication(KPI)has a positive effect on the performance of new products. The result in shopping product category is that the consumer KPI has a positive effect on the performance of new products. The result in convenience product category is that the financial KPI has a positive effect on the performance of new products.

    中文摘要 i Abstract ii 誌謝 iii 目次 iv 表次 vi 圖次 vii 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節、研究背景與動機 1 第二節、研究目的 3 第三節、研究流程 4 第貳章 文獻探討 5 第一節、行銷人員工作分析 5 第二節、新產品開發流程 8 第三節、新產品績效指標 10 第四節、產品生命週期 11 第五節、消費者涉入程度 15 第六節、代理理論 18 第七節、誘因報償 20 第八節、行銷人員績效指標 22 第参章 研究方法 25 第一節、研究架構 25 第二節、行銷人員工作任務與績效指標 26 第三節、誘因強度準則假說推論 34 第四節、變數定義與衡量 42 第五節、研究設計 44 第肆章 研究結果 45 第一節、資料分析方法 45 第二節、樣本之基本資料分析 46 第三節、信度與效度分析 47 第四節、常態分配檢定 49 第五節、誘因強度準則分析 49 第六節、實證結果探討 56 第伍章 結論與建議 58 第一節、研究結論 58 第二節、管理意涵 60 第三節、研究限制與建議 60 參考文獻 62 附錄---問卷 65

    1.Ambler T., Kokkinaki F. and Puntoni S. (2004), “Assessing Marketing Performance: Reasons for Metric Selection,” Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 20, pp. 475-498.
    2.Ambler T. and Reily D. (2000), “Marketing Metrics: A Review of Performance Measure in Use in the UK and Spain,” Lodon Business School, working paper.
    3.Barczak G. (1995),” New Product Strategy, Structure, Process, and Performance in the Telecommunications Industry,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 12, pp. 224-234.
    4.Besanko D., Dranove D., Shanley M. and Schaefer S. (2006), Economics of strategy, 4th ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
    5.Brendan J. G., Geir G. O., Jim B., Cassandra C. and Jemma W. (2007), “What are the essential capabilities of marketers: A comparative of managers, academics’ and students’ perceptions, ” Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 25, pp. 271-295.
    6.Calantone R., Vickery S. and Droge C. (1995), “Business Performance and
    Strategic New Product Development Activities: An Empirical Investigation,”
    Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 12, pp. 214-223.
    7.Calantone R. J., Schmidt J. B. and Song X. M. (1996),“Controllable Factors of New Product Success: A cross-National Comparison,” Marketing Science, Vol. 15, pp. 341-358
    8.Clark B. H. (1999), “Marketing Performance Measures: History and Interrelationships,” Journal of Marketing Management Vol. 15, pp. 711-732.
    9.Cox W. E. (1967), “Product Life Cycle as Marketing Models,” Journal of Business, Vol. 40, pp. 385-400.
    10.Cooper R. G. and Kleinschrnidt E. J. (1986), “Investigation into the New Product Process: Steps, Deficiencies and Impact,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 3, pp. 71-85.
    11.Danneels E. and Kleinschmidt J. (2001), “Product Innovativeness from
    the firm’s perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 18, pp.357-373.
    12.Dess G. G. and Robinson Jr. (1984), “Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of privately held firms and conglomerate business units,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, pp. 265-273.

    13.Farris P. and David R. (2005), “Marketing Dashboards: A Point of View,” unpublished working paper.
    14.Franchi Francesco (2006), “The Value of Marketing Metrics,” Cranfield School of Management Strategic Marketing Group.
    15.Houston M. J. and Rothschild M. L. (1978), “Conceptual and Methodological
    Perspective in Involvement, Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and
    Directions,” S. Jain, ed. Chicago: American Marketing Associate, pp. 184-187.
    16.Jesen M. C., and Meckling W. H. (1976), “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 305-360.
    17.Kwaku A. G. (1995), “An exploratory analysis of the impact of market orientation on new product performance a contingency approach,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 12, pp. 275-293.
    18.Kotler Philip (2000), Marketing Management, 10th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    19.Kotler Philip and Keller L. Kevin (2007), Marketing Management, 3th ed., New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
    20.Levitt T. (1965), “Exploit the Product Life Cycle,”Harvard Business Review, Vol. 14, pp. 81-94.
    21.Milgrom P. and Roberts J. (1992), Economics, Organization and Management, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    22.Norgan S. (1994), Marketing Management: A European Perspective, Cambridge: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
    23.Patrick E. M. and Ben M. E. (1986), “Classifying Products Strategically,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 50, pp. 24-42.
    24.Reinartz W. J., Kumar V. (2000), “On the Profitability of Long-Life Customers in a Noncontractual Setting: An Empirical Investigation and Implications for Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64, pp. 17-35.
    25.Robertson S. T., Zielinski J. and Scott W. J. (1985), Consumer Behavior Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company.
    26.Schoell W. F., Guiltinan J. P. (1993), Marketing Essentials, Kluwer Academic Publishers Press.
    27.Sheth N. J., Sisodia R. S. (2002), “Marketing Productivity Issues and Analysis,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 55, pp. 349-362.
    28.Song X. M. and Parry M. E. (1997), “The Determinants of Japanese New Product Successes,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 34, pp. 64-76.
    29.Song X. M. and Montoya-Weiss M. (1998), “Critical Development Activities for Really New versus Incremental Products,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 15, pp. 124-135.
    30.Swinyard W. R. (1993), “The Effects of Mood, Involvement, and Quality of Store Experience on Shopping Intentions,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 20, pp. 271-280.
    31.Zaichkowsky J. L. (1985), “Measuring the Involvement Construct,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 12, pp. 341-352.
    32.Zaichkowsky J. L. (1986), “Conceptualizing Involvement,” Journal of Advertising, Vol. 15, pp. 4-15.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2014/07/24 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE