隨著科技的進步，互聯網的興起，逐漸改變人類的生活，因為互聯網的需求快速成長，對於伺服器的需求成倍數增加，也造就許多企業因雲端而起飛，諸如：美國四大雲端服務公司AWS、Google、Facebook、Microsoft。在整個伺服器產業快速發展與產業激烈競爭的環境，企業在面對日漸增加的競爭壓力下，必須更加了解企業內部資源，發展一套模組化設計的系統，並提升企業敏捷性，以快速反應客戶的需求。

資源基礎理論的基本思想是將企業看成資源的集合體將目標集中在資源的特性和戰略要素市場上，並以此來解釋企業的可持續的優勢和相互間的差異，企業應集中資源於優勢的強化，並持續創造差異性，以維持企業在市場上的競爭力。

在模組化管理的策略下，企業研發產品將具有更好的彈性，模組化的好處可以將客戶各種需求快速應對，同時也可以節省研發資源、減少浪費。企業組織也因為具有更大的彈性，得以提供其敏捷性，不斷提升競爭力。
本研究以資源基礎理論來發展出一套研發模組化整合平台，提供企業面對資源整合時，可以透過模組化做法來增加企業彈性，同時提升研發效率，持續讓企業保持競爭力，以最佳的敏捷性對不斷變化的環境做出快速反應。
並希望可以透過分析此個案，提供企業做為未來模組平台化時的參考依據。

Technology changes people life. People behavior also change depend on technology. The IoT (Internet of Things) is one of the best real case. The IoT create a lot of possibility as well as create huge demand for server. Today, most of people can not live without internet. Thus, CSP (Cloud Service Provider) business growth up rapidly. Such as AWS, Google, Facebook, Microsoft…etc. Not only CSP but the others cloud service company increase investment on server product. In the past few years, the server industry became more and more competition. The enterprise has to find out internal resource carefully and establish a modularize system in order to enhance agility and fulfill customer requirement quickly.

The RBV (Resource-Based View) theory is assume the enterprise is a collection of resources. The enterprise always assume resource is limited, so the use of resource must be aligned with strategic goals. The enterprise can continuous keep advantages and differentiation in order to sustainable competitive.

According to strategy of modular management, the enterprise will have better product flexibility and fulfill client’s requirement quickly. The modularize design can help enterprise saving engineer resource as well as reduce waste. Therefore, enterprise organization will provide greater agility and continuously enhance competitiveness.

This thesis is based on theory of RBV to development a R&D modularity integration platform. To provide enterprise go through practice of modularity to increase flexibility of organization as well as enhance R&D efficiency. Hence, enterprise always can make quick response for dynamic business environment.

To expect this case study can provide a reference of modularity platform for the enterprise.

1. 司徒達賢（1995），「資源基礎理論與企業競爭優勢關係之探討」，行政院國科會專題研究計劃成果報告。
2. 司徒達賢（2000），「策略管理」，台北市- 遠流。
3. 吳思華（1994），「策略九說-資源說」，世界經理文摘89期，頁74-87頁。
4. 呂宜芳，「資源基礎觀之策略分析與經營績效關係之研究-以國內個人電腦產業為例」，台北市，臺灣工業技術學院，民國86年。
5. 呂廣英(1985)，「簡介模組化設計與應用」，機械月刊，頁121-125。
6. 林晉寬 (2007)，「應用策略群組分析探討世界主要港口之競爭:資源基礎觀點」，國立屏東科技大學工業管理研究所碩士論文。
7. 黃瑞榮，「以模組化資源配置提升敏捷性之個案研究-以專業電腦代工廠為例」，國立臺灣科技大學管理研究所碩士學位論文，民國101年。
8. 楊坤木，「商業生態資源模組化管理之研究」，國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理系碩士學位論文，民國101年。
9. 楊忠直，第七章 商業生態系統分析，「企業生態學引論」
10. 鄭育明，「筆記型電腦產品研發的模組化設計之探討-以藍天電腦為例」，國立臺灣科技大學工業管理系碩士學位論文，民國97年。
11. 鍾文傑，「模組化設計在研發管理的應用-以行動通訊產業為例」，國立臺灣科技大學工業管理系碩士學位論文，民國95年。

1. Aitken, J., Christopher Martin & Denis Towill (2002), “Understanding, Implementing and Exploiting Agility and Leanness,” International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 5(1), pp.59-74.
2. Baldwin & Clark (1997), “Managing in an age of modularity. “Harvard Business Review, 75(5):84-93.
3. Barney, J.B. (1991),” Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,” Journal of Management, Vol.17, No.1, pp.99-120.
4. Benjaafar, Saifallah & Rajesh Ramakrishnan (1996), “Modeling, Measurement and Evaluation of Sequencing Flexibility in Manufacturing Systems,” International Journal of Production Research.
5. Christopher, Martin (2000), “The Agile Supply Chain: Competing in Volatile Markets, “Industrial Marketing Management, 29, pp.37-44.
6. Dove, Rick (2001), Response Ability: The Language, Structure, and Culture of the Agile Enterprise, Wiley.
7. Eggen, Oystein (2003), “Modular Product Development, “Product Design Course at the Department of Product Design Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
8. Fleidner, G.& Robert J. Vokurka (1997), “Agility: Competitive Weapon of the 1990s and Beyond,” Production and Inventory Management Journal, 3rd quarter, pp.19-24.
9. Gaynor, Gerard H. (1996), Handbook of Technology Management, McGraw HILL, p.387.
10. Goldman, Steven L., Roger N. Nagel & Kenneth Preiss (1995), Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
11. Goldhar, J. (1986), “In the Factory of the Future, Innovation is Productivity,” Research Management, 29(2), pp.26-33.
12. Gunneson, Alvin O. (1997), Transitioning to agility: Creating the 21st century enterprise, Addison-Wesley.
13. Highsmith, Jim (2004), Agile Project Management: Creating Innovative Products, Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
14. Katayama, Hiroshi & David Bennett (1999), “Agility, adaptability and leanness: A comparison of concepts and a study of practice,” International Journal of Production Economics, 60, pp.43-51.
15. Kidd, P.T. (1995),” Agile Manufacturing: a strategy for the 21st century, “Agile Manufacturing IEE Colloquium, Oct.
16. Malecki, Edard J. & Franz Todtling (1994), “The New Flexibility Economy: Shaping Regional and Local Institutions for Global Competition,” Technological Innovation: Economic Development and Space, Berlin: Springer, in press.
17. Maskell, B. (2001). “The Age of Agile Manufacturing Supply Chain Management,” An International Journal, 6(1), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.5-11.
18. Nagel, Roger N & Rick Dove (1991),21st Century Manufacturing Enterprise Strategy: An Industry-Led View of Agile Manufacturing, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
19. Pine, B.J. (1993), Mass Customerization: The New Frontier of Business Competition, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
20. Preiss, Kenneth, Steven L. Goldman, Roger N. Nagel (1996), Cooperate to Compete: Building Agile Business Relationships, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
21. Gershenson et al. (2003), Product modularity: Definitions and benefits. Article in Journal of Engineering Design 14(3):295-313 · September 2003
22. Plant, Robert & Stephen Murrell (1997), “The Agile Organization: Technology & Innovation,” AAAI Technical Report, WS-97-02, pp. 26-32.
23. Sahin, F. (2000), “Manufacturing Competitiveness: Different Systems to Achieve the Same Results,” Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol.41, No.1, pp.135-159.
24. Sanchez, Ron (1995),” Strategic Flexibility in Product Competition, “Strategic Management Journal,16, pp. 135-159.
25. Sperber, D. (1994). The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (p. 39–67). Cambridge University Press
26. Tolone, W.J. (2000), “Virtual Situation Rooms: Connecting People Across Enterprises for Supply Chain Agility, “Computer Aided Design, 32, pp.109-117.
27. Upton, D. (1994), “The Management of Manufacturing Flexibility,” California Management Review, 36(2), pp.70-89.
28. Yaghoubi, Nour Mohammad, Seyyed Ali Banihashemi & Parisa Saraband (2011), “Strategies for Improving Agility in Organizations,” European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol 7, No.1 (Special Issue).