簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 麥雁鈴
Ngan-leng Mak
論文名稱: 以第二語言社會化角度對成人英語學習者雙人練習模式及鷹架方式偏好之探討
Adult EFL Pair Work Pattern and Scaffolding Features: A Second Language Socialization Perspective
指導教授: 王啟琳
Chi-lin Wang
口試委員: 鄧彗君
Huei-chun Teng
吳凱琳
Kai-lin Wu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 應用外語系
Department of Applied Foreign Languages
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 126
中文關鍵詞: 語言社會化第二語言社會化鷹架雙人練習模式
外文關鍵詞: Language Socialization, Second Language Socialization, Scaffolding, Pair work pattern
相關次數: 點閱:431下載:11
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 中文摘要
    本研究以第二語言社會化之觀點,剖析成人學生在雙人對話練習活動中的互動模式、鷹架互相支持的特性、學習者對雙人對話練習之看法,以及在此互動性活動中透過鷹架、語言社會化增進第二語言口說表現的情形。
    本研究以五十名在台北一所語言中心進修基礎英語會話的成人學生為研究對象,採用質性研究參與觀察法,蒐集學習者雙人對話對談內容,並利用課後深度訪談逐字稿、問卷及研究者觀察報告進行整理、歸納與分析。研究期間為2010年四月至十二月,研究結果摘述如後。
    (一) 在雙人對話練習活動中,成人學生的互動模式普遍呈現合作模式,他們傾向視對方反應調整自己的態度,以順利完成指派任務。
    (二) 成人學生認為雙人對話練習是一種「討論」跟「分享」。
    (三) 不論搭檔是同性或異性,抑或認識時間的長短,成人學生普遍自發性提供鷹架,鷹架頻率高,且鷹架方式以針對搭檔的錯誤提出疑問為主。
    (四) 成人學生普遍認為雙人對話練習活動有助於語言學習,能提升說英語的信心。
    綜上所述,本研究的結果顯示,雙人對話練習活動的應用是成功的,學習者的反應是正向的,最重要的是,研究者證實成人學習者的成熟度及彈性,是促進他們成功獲得第二語言社會化的重要因素。


    ABSTRACT
    Adopting the second language socialization (SLS) perspective, the present study explored the dyadic patterns and scaffolding features among adult English as foreign language (EFL) learners. Fifty working adults from beginning level English conversation classes were examined over an 8-month period. Learners were randomly paired up to work on in-class role plays and guided dialogues during which their dialogues were audio-taped. Data collected in this study were categorized in terms of Storch’s (2002) patterns of interaction in ESL pair work and scaffolding features were located in accordance with Wood et al.'s (1976) proposed scaffolding traits. In addition, participants were interviewed to reflect their perceptions of pair work and its effect on their use of L2. Results showed that collaborative pattern were prevalent in working adults and they were likely to scaffold each other regardless of gender and length of acquaintance. Participants viewed pair work as discussion and sharing. Their spontaneous and positive intense attitude in scaffolding resulted in a general success of SLS among these working adult EFL learners. More importantly, it was observed that learners would adjust their roles to fit in and achieve the required task. And even a passive partner in a pair is able to partly contribute to a collaborative pattern. The researcher argues that adult learners' maturity and flexibility construed as major factors for their SLS.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS 中文摘要 i ABSTRACT ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of the study 1 1.2 Purpose of the study 8 1.3 Motivation of the study 8 1.4 Significance of the study 10 1.5 Thesis organization 11 1.6 Definition of terms 11 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Language Socialization 13 2.2 Second Language Socialization 15 2.3 Adult Education 22 2.4 Scaffolding 27 2.4.1 Scaffolding strategies and features 30 2.4.2 Studies on scaffolding 33 2.4.3 Scaffolding and Adult learning 36 2.4.4 Scaffolding and dialogue pedagogy 38 2.5 Patterns of interaction 39 CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY 3.1 Research approach 46 3.2 Research site 47 3.3 Participants 48 3.4 Procedures 51 3.4.1 Tasks 51 3.4.1.1 Role plays 51 3.4.1.2 Guided dialogues 51 3.4.2 Data collection 53 3.4.2.1 Classroom observations 55 3.4.2.2 Dyads recording 56 3.4.2.3 Interview and questionnaire 58 3.4.3 Data analysis 58 CHAPTER FOUR: FINDINGS 4.1 Patterns of dyadic interaction 61 4.2 Scaffolding features 71 4.3 Learner perception 79 4.4 Other findings 84 CHAPTER FIVE: DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 5.1 Discussion 86 5.1.1 Patterns of peer interaction 86 5.1.2 Scaffolding features 89 5.1.3 Learner perceptions 92 5.1.4 Language Socialization 94 5.2 Implications 97 5.3 Limitations 97 5.4 Suggestions for future research 98 5.5 Conclusion 99 REFERENCES 100 APPENDIX A Background information of participants 116 APPENDIX B Dialogue of the role plays taught and assigned for pair-work tasks 119 APPENDIX C Number of scaffolding features marked in each dyad in Term 1 and 2 121 APPENDIX D Questionnaire in Chinese 124 APPENDIX E Questionnaire in English 125 APPENDIX F List of interview questions 126 LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 Number of registered cram schools nationwide and in Taipei City (2002, 2010) 4 Table 1.2 Number of theses and dissertations on language learning/English learning (1968-2010) 7 Table 2.1 A summary of major studies of LS/SLS 21 Table 2.2 Research foci and types of parties involved in scaffolding studies 35 Table 3.1 Number of participants observed in two terms 50 Table 3.2 An example of role play from the textbook 52 Table 3.3 Opening sentences of the five guided dialogues 53 Table 3.4 Total number of recorded role play dialogues in Classes A, B, C, and D 54 Table 3.5 The guided dialogues recorded in A, B, C, and D in Term 1 and 2 55 Table 3.6 Storch’s peer interaction pattern framework 59 Table 3.7 Wood, Bruner and Ross’ successful scaffolding features 59 Table 4.1 Patterns of peer interaction identified in recorded dyads 62 Table 4.2 Number of pairs observed on the first lesson of each class 70 Table 4.3 Number of scaffolding features observed in the 73 dyads 72 Table 4.4 Number of scaffolding features marked in 3 classes in Term 1 and 2 72 Table 4.5 Participants interviewed 80 Table 4.6 Findings from the questionnaire 85 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 5.1 The interplay of SLS, scaffolding and pair work 96

    REFERENCES

    Anderson, G., Herr, K., & Nihlen, A. (1994). Studying your own school. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
    Angelova, M., Gunawardena, D., & Volk, D. (2006). Peer teaching and learning: Co-constructing language in a dual language first grade. Language and Education, 20(3), 173-190.
    Anning, A., & Edwards, A. (1999). Promoting Children’s Learning from Birth to Five: developing the new early years professional. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    Anton, M. (1999). The discourse of a learner-centred classroom. Sociocultural perspectives on teacher–learner interaction in the second language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 83, 303–318.
    Barnard, R. (2002). Peer tutoring in the primary classroom: A sociocultural interpretation of classroom interaction. New Zealand of Educational Studies, 37(1), 57-72.
    Barnard, R., & Torres-Guzmán, M. (Eds.). (2009). Creating communities of learning in schools. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    Beed, P., Hawkins, M., & Roller, C. (1991). Moving learners towards independence: the power of scaffolded instruction. The Reading Teacher, 44(9), 648–655.
    Blakely, P. N., & Tomlin, A. H. (2008). Adult Education Issues and Developments. Nova Science Publishes, Inc.
    Breeze, R. (1998). EFL Pairwork: Ethnographic and neo-Vygotskian perspectives.
    Atlantis XX, 2, 5-16.
    Brown, T. (1988). Why Vygotsky? The role of social interaction in constructing knowledge. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative human Cognition, 10(4), 111-117.
    Brown, K. M. (2006). Leadership for social justice and equity: Evaluating a transformative framework and andragogy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(5), 700-745.
    Bruner, J. S. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In: Jarvella, S. R., & Levelt, W. J. M. (Eds.), The child´s conception of language (pp. 214-256). New York: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
    Bruner, J. (1984). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development: The hidden agenda. In Rogoff, B., & Wertsch, J. (Eds.), Children's learning in the "Zone of proximal development: New directions for child development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Burt, M., Fischer, L., & Peyton, J. K. (2003). Adult English language instruction in the 21st century. Washington, DC: The National Center for ESL Literacy and Center for Applied Linguistics.
    Center for Adult English Language Acquisition (CAELA). (2007). Frequently asked questions (FAQ # 20): What are factors to consider when planning for, setting up, and evaluating a workplace program for immigrant workers? Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/caela/esl_resources/faqs.html#Two
    Campbell, R., & Wales, R. (1970). The study of language acquisition. In Lyons, J. (Eds.), New horizons in linguistics. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.
    Cauce, A. M., Felner, R. D., & Primavera, J. (1982). Social support in high-risk adolescents: Structural components and adaptive impact. American Journal of Community Psychology, 10, 417–428.
    Cazden, C. B. (1979). Peekaboo as an instructional model: Discourse development athomeand at school (Papers and Reports on Child Language Development PRCLD No. 17). Retrieved from Stanford University, Department of Linguistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 191274).
    Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.). Carrboro, NC: Heinle & Heinle.
    Cercone, K. (2008). Characteristics of adult learners with implications for
    online learning design, AACE Journal, 16(2), 137-159.
    Chen, D. B. (2004). Applying scaffolding to teaching adults: Using the guidance class in statistics of the National Open University as a case study (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan.
    Chen, Y., & Gregory, E. (2004). ‘How do I read these words?’: Bilingual exchange teaching between Cantonese-speaking peers. In E. Gregory, S. L., &Volk, D. (Eds.), Many Pathways to Literacy: Young Children Learning with Siblings, Grandparents, Peers, and Communities. London: Routledge Falmer.
    Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining: The dual processes of generating inference and repairing mental models. In Glaser, R. (Eds.), Advances in Instructional Psychology: Educational Design and Cognitive Science (Vol. 5, pp. 161–238). NJ: Mahwah.
    Chi, F. M. (2007). Scaffolding EFL learners' comprehension of texts. Paper presented at the 2007 ALAA Congress, University of Wollonggong, Wollongong, Australia.
    Clay, M. M., & Cazden, C. B. (1990). A Vygotskian interpretation of Reading
    Recovery. In Moll, L. C. (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 206–222). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Coltman, P., Anghileri, J., & Petyaeva, D. (2002). Scaffolding learning through meaningful tasks and adult interaction. Early Years, 22(1), 39–49.

    Community Colleges' Web of Taipei. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.ccwt.tp.edu.tw/bin/home.php
    Cook, H. M. (1999). Language socialization in Japanese elementary schools: attentive listening and reaction turn. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1443-1465.
    Cowie, N. (2009). Observation. In Heigham, J., & Croker, R. A. (Eds.), Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics (pp. 165-181), Palgrave Macmillan.
    Crago, B. M. (1992). Communicative interaction and second language acquisition: An Inuit example. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 487-505.
    Damon, W. (1996). The lifelong transformation of moral goals through social influence. In Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (Eds.), Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundations of cognition (pp. 198–220). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 9–19.
    Darbyshire, P. (1993). In defence of pedagogy: A critique of the notion of andragogy. Nurse Education Today, 13, 328-335.
    Davenport, J., & Davenport, J. A. (1985). A chronology and analysis of the andragogy debate. Adult Education Quarterly, 35(3), 152-159.
    Davis, R. (1997). Group work is NOT busy work: Maximizing success of group work in the L2 classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 265–279.
    DÍAZ, N. R. (2009). A comparative study of native and non-native teachers' scaffolding techniques in SLA at an early age. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 17, 57-73.
    Department of Education, Taipei City. (2011). Information management system of Taipei cram schools. Retrieved from http://bsb.edu.tw/afterschool/?usercity=20
    Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. London: Collier Macmillan
    Donaldson, M. (1978). Children’s minds. New York: W. W. Norton.
    Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In Lantolf, J., & Appel, G. (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The Social Development of the Intellect. In International Series in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 10). Pergamon Press.
    Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In Lantolf, J., & Appel, G. (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Duff, P. A. (1995). An ethnography of communication in immersion classrooms in Hungary. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 505-37.
    Duff, P. A. (2009). Language socialization in a Canadian secondary school: Talking about current events. In Barnard, R., & Torres-Guzman. M. (Eds.), Creating Communities of learning in schools (pp. 165–185). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    Duff, P. A. (2010a). Language socialization. In Hornberger, N. H., & McKay, S. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 427–452). Bristol, UK:
    Multilingual Matters.
    Duff, P. A. (2010b). Language socialization into academic discourse communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 169-192.
    Duff, P. A. (in press). Second language socialization. In Duranti, A., Ochs, E., &. Schieffelin, B. B (Eds.), Handbook of language socialization. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: In The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Methuen.
    Edwards, A., & Knight, P. (1994). Effective Early Years Education Teaching Young Children. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    Elbers, E., Maier, R., Hoekstra, T., & Hoogsteder, M. (1992). Internalization and adult–child interaction. Learning and Instruction, 2, 101–118.
    Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    English National Board. (1987). Managing change in nursing education. Pack 1. English National Board. Milton Keynes.
    Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1986). Activity structure as scaffolding for children's second language learning. In Corsaro, W., Cook-Gumperz, J., & Streeck, J. (Eds.), Children's language and children's worlds (Vol. 1, pp. 327-358). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    Fassler, R. (1998). Room for talk: Peer support for getting into English in an ESL kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13(3), 379-409.
    Fawcett, L. M., & Garton, A. F. (2005). The effect of peer collaboration on children's problem-solving ability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 157-169.
    Ferreira, M. M. (2008). Constraints to peer scaffolding. Trab. Ling. Aplic., Campinas, 47(1), 9-29.
    Fox, B. (1991). Cognitive and interactional aspects of correction in tutoring. In Goodyear, P. (Ed.), Teaching knowledge and intelligent tutoring (pp. 149–172). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
    Frawley, W., & Lantolf, J. P. (1985). Second language discourse: A Vygotskian perspective. Applied Linguistics, 6, 19–44.

    Garrett, P. B. (2006). Language socialization. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 604-613.
    Garrett, P. B. (2008). Researching language socialization. In King, K.A., & Hornberger, N.H. (Eds.), Research methods. Encyclopedia of language and education (Vol. 10, pp. 189-201). New York: Springer.
    Garrett, P. B., & Baquedano-Lopez, P. (2002). Language socialization: Reproduction and continuity, transformation and change. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 339 - 361.
    Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1985). Task variation and nonnative/nonnative negotiations of meaning. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 149–161). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    Gavelek, J. R. (1986). The social contexts of literacy and schooling: A developmental perspective. In Raphael, T. (Ed.), The Contexts of School Based Literacy (pp. 3-26). New York: Random House.
    Ge, Xun., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 51(1), 21-38.
    Gee, J. P. (2007). Learning to read as a cultural process. In Belzer, A. (Ed.), Toward defining and improving quality in adult basic education (pp.141-157). NJ: Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding Language. Scaffolding Learning: Teaching Second Language Learners in the Mainstream Classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 247-274.
    Gnadinger, C. M. (2008). Peer-mediated instruction: Assisted performance in the primary classroom. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 14(2), 12-142.
    Grace, A, P. (1996). Striking a critical pose: andragogy-missing links, missing values. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 15(5), 382-392.
    Graesser, A.C., Bowers, C.A., Hacker, D.J., & Person, N.K. (1997). An anatomy of naturalistic tutoring. In Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (Eds.), Effective Scaffolding of Instruction. Brookline Books.
    Granott, N. (2005). Scaffolding dynamically toward change: Previous and new perspectives. New Ideas in Psychology, 23, 140-151.
    Greene, B.A., & Land, S.M. (2000). A qualitative analysis of scaffolding use in a resource-based learningenvironment involving with the World Wide Web. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(2),151-180.
    Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(i), 51-68.
    Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Guttman, L. (1944). A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review, 9, 139-150.
    Hatano, G. (1993). Time to merge Vygotskian and constructivist conceptions of knowledge acquisition. In Forman, E. A., Minick, N., & Stone, C. A. (Eds.), Contexts for Learning: Sociocultural Dynamics in Children’s Development (pp. 153-166). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Hartree, A. (1984). Malcolm Knowles' theory of andragogy: A
    critique. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 3(3), 203-210.
    Hartup, W. W. (1989). Social relationships and their development significance. American Psychologist, 44, 120-126.
    Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Hitchcock, G., & Hughes, D. (1995). Research and the teacher (2nd Ed.). London: Routledge.
    Holland, T., Pithers, R., & Morgan, L. (2008). Teaching Chinese leaders the Western way: A cross-cultural challenge. In Reischmann, J., & Bron jr., M. (Eds.), Studies in Pedagogy, Andragogy, and Gerontagogy (pp. 61). Peter Lang GmbH.
    Houle, C. O. (1972). The Design of Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Huang, J. (2004). Socialising ESL students into the discourse of school science through academic writing. Language and Education, 18, 97–123.
    Huang, S. F., Eslami, Z., & Hu, R. J. (2010). The Relationship between teacher and
    peer support and English-Language learners’ anxiety. English Language Teaching, 3(1).
    Hyde, M. (1993). Pair work—a blessing or a curse?: An analysis of pair work from pedagogical, cultural, social and psychological perspectives. System, 21(3), 343-348.
    Hymes, D. H. (1971). Piginization and creolization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Hymes, D. H. (1972a). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Gumperz, J., & Hymes, D. (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35–71). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
    Hymes, D. H. (1972b). On communicative competence. In Pride, J.B., & Holmes, J.
    (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected Readings (pp. 269–293). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.
    Jacob, E. (1987). Qualitative research traditions: A review. Review of Educational Research, 57(1), 1-50.

    Jarvela , S. (1995). The cognitive apprenticeship model in a technologically rich learning environment: Interpreting the learning interaction. Learning and Instruction, 5, 237–259.
    Jarvis, P. (1985). The Sociology of Adult and Continuing Education. London: Croom Helm.
    Jarvis, P. (1987). Adult Learning in the Social Context. London: Croom Helm.
    Johnson, D. (2001). An annotated bibliography of second language acquisition in adult English language learners. Washington, DC: National center for Adult ESL Literacy Education (NCLE).
    Kanagy, R. (1999). Interactional routines as a mechanism for L2 acquisition and socialization in an immersion context. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1467-1492.
    Kasper, G. (2001). Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development. Applied
    Linguistics, 22, 502–530.
    Kasworm, C. E., Rose, A. D., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2010). Handbook of Adult and Continuing Education. SAGE Publications, Inc.
    Kim, Y. J., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the
    collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 211–234.
    Kinginger, C. (2006). Socialization: second language. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 466-472.
    Knowles, M. S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus pedagogy. New York: Association Press.
    Knowles, M. S. (1977). Adult learning processes: Pedagogy and andragogy. Religious Education, LXXII (2), 202-211.
    Knowles, M. S. (1979). Humanagogy anyone? Adult Education, 29, 261-264.
    Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy (Rev. and updated ed.). River Grove, Ill.: Follett.
    Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.
    Knox, A. B., & Fleming, J. E. (2010). Professionalization of the field of adult and continuing education. In Kasworm, C. E., Rose, A. D., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Adult and Continuing Education. SAGE Publications, Inc.
    Ko. J., Schallert, D. L., & Walters, K. (2003). Rethinking scaffolding: Examining
    negotiation of meaning in an ESL storytelling task. TESOL Quarterly, 37,
    303–324.
    Kucerova, S. (2007). Residential intensive language courses for adult learners (Master's thesis). Faculty of Education English Department, Masaryk University Brno, Czech Republic.
    Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    Lai, M., & Law, N. (2006). Peer scaffolding of knowledge building through collaborative groups with differential learning experiences. J. Educational Computer Research, 35(2), 123-144.
    Lajoie, S. P. (2005). Extending the scaffolding metaphor. Instructional Science, 33, 541-557.
    Lajoie, S.P., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. In Alexander, P., & Winne, P. (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (2nd ed.). Erlbaum: Mahwah NJ.
    Langer, J. A. (1984). Literacy instruction in American schools: Problems and perspectives. American Journal of Education, 93(1), 107-132.
    Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford:
    Oxford University Press.
    Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Sociocultural theory and L2: State of the art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (SSLA), 28, 67-109.
    Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (Eds). (1998). Vygotskyan approaches to second language
    research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Larrotta, C. (2010). English language learning for adults. In Kasworm, C. E., Rose, A. D., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Adult and Continuing Education (pp. 199-208). SAGE Publications, Inc.
    Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Le, H. (2003, November). What does a more knowledgeable peer mean? A socio-cultural analysis of group interaction in a Vietnamese classroom. Paper presented a the NZARE/AARE Joint Conference, Auckland.
    LeGrand, B. B., Farmer, J. A., & Buckmaster, A. (1993). Cognitive Apprenticeship Approach to Helping Adults Learn. In Flannery, D. D. (Ed.), Applying Cognitive Learning Theory to Adult Learning.. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 59. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Lepper, M.R., Drake, M., & O’Donnell-Johnson, T. M. (1997). Scaffolding techniques of expert human tutors. In Hogan, K. & Pressley, M. (Eds.), Scaffolding Student Learning: Instructional Approaches and Issues (Vol. 5, pp. 108–144). New York: Brookline Books.
    Litowitz, B. E. (1997). Just say no: Responsibility and resistance. In Cole, M., Engestrom, Y., & Vasquez, O. (Eds.), Mind, culture, and activity: Seminal papers from the laboratory of comparative human cognition (pp. 473–484). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Mathews-Aydinli, J. (2008). Overlooked and understudied? A survey of current trends in research on adult English language learners. Adult Education Quarterly, 58 (3), 198-213.
    Machado, A. (2000). A Vygotskian approach to evaluation in foreign language
    learning contexts, ELT Journal, 54, 335–345.
    Mackey, A., McDonough, K., Fuji, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2001). Investigating learners’ reports about the L2 classroom. IRAL, 39, 285–307.
    Mari, H. (1996). Peer interaction in an adult-second language class: An analysis of collaboration on a form-focused task.
    Marvasti, A. B. (2004). Qualitative Research in Sociology. SAGE Publications Ltd.
    Masters, J., & Yelland, N. (1996). Geometry in context: Implementing a discovery-based technology curriculum with young children. Canberra: ACEC96, ACCE.
    Masters, J., & Yelland, N. (1997). Investigations in geometry: Young children learning with technology. In From misconceptions to constructed understanding. Ithaca, NY: Fourth international seminar, Cornell University.
    Matoba, M. (2005). Exploring the nature of dyadic interaction between Japanese EFL
    learners: Does it play a role in language uptake? (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hyogo University of Teacher Education, Japan.
    Mayer, R.E. (1992). Cognition and instruction: their historic meeting within educational psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 405-12.
    McCarthy, M., & O’Keefe, A. (2004). Research in the teaching of speaking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 26-43.
    McDermott, R. P., Gospodinoff, K., & Aron, J. (1978). Criteria for an ethnographically adequate description of concerted activities and their contexts. Semiotica, 24, 245-275.
    McEwan-Fujita, E. (2010). Ideology, affect, and socialization in language shift and
    revitalization: The experiences of adults learning Gaelic in the Western Isles of Scotland. Language in Society, 39, 27 – 64.
    Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Multilingual Matters.
    Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
    Mercer, N., Littleton, K., & Wegerif, R. (2004). Methods for studying the processes of interaction and collaborative activity in computer-based educational activities. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(2), 195–212.
    Merrill, D.C., Reiser, B.J., Merrill, S.K. & Landes, S. (1995). Tutoring: Guided learning by doing. Cognition and Instruction, 13(3), 15–372.
    Merriam, S. B., & Caffarella, R. S. (1991). Learning in Adulthood. A comprehensive guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 89, 1-13.
    Merriam, S. B. (2004). The role of cognitive development in Mezirow's
    transformational learning theory. Adult education quarterly, 55(1), 60-68.
    Merriam, S. B. (2008). Adult learning theory for the twenty-first century. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 119, 93-98.
    Mezirow, J. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. In Cranton, P. (Ed.), Transformative learning in action: Insight from practice. New Direction for Adult and Continuing Education, 74. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Milligan, F. (1994). In defense of andragogy. Nurse Education Today, 15, 22-27.
    Mohan, B., & Marshall-Smith, S. (1992). Context and cooperation in academic tasks. In Nunan, D. (Ed.), Collaborative language learning and teaching (pp. 81-99). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Morita, N. (2000). Discourse socialization through oral classroom activities in a TESL graduate program. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 279–310.
    Moss, D., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2003). Second language acquisition in adults: From research to practice. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
    Nakonečný, M. (1998). Encyklopedie obecné psychologie. (2.vyd). Brno: Academia.
    National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan (NDLTD). (2011). National Central Library Taiwan Digital Meta-Library. Retrieved from http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=pemEOj/webmge?Geticket=1
    National Institute of Adult Continuing Education (NIACE). (2010).
    Retrieved from http://www.niace.org.uk/news/economic-fears-get-more-adults-learning
    Nguyen, H. T., & Kellogg, G.. (2010). I had a stereotype that American were fat: Becoming a speaker of culture in a second language, The Modern Language Journal, 94(i), 56-73.
    Nielson, B. B. (1992). Applying andragogy in nursing continuing education. Journal of Continuing Education, 23(4), 148-151.
    Niiyama, M. (1997). Language socialization of Japanese ESL students in an advanced public speaking and debating class. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
    Nottingham Andragogy Group (1983). Towards a developmental theory of andragogy. University of Nottingham, Department of Adult Education.
    Ochs, E. (1988). Culture and language development: Language acquisition and language socialization in a Samoan village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Ochs, E. (2002). Becoming a speaker of culture. In Kramsch, C. (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 99-120). New York: Continuum.
    Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1984). Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories and their implications. In Shweder, R. A., & LeVine, R .A. (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self and emotion (pp. 276-320). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Ohta, A. S. (1999). Interactional routines and the socialization of interactional style in adult learners of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1493–1512.
    Oxford, R. L. (1997). Cooperative Learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 81(iv), 443-456.
    Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
    Pata, K., Sarapuu, T., & Lehtinen, E. (2005). Tutor scaffolding styles of dilemma solving in network-based role-play. Learning and Instruction, 15, 571-587.
    Pata, K., Lehtinen, E., & Sarapuu, T. (2006). Inter-relations of tutor’s and peers’ scaffolding and decision-making discourse acts. Instructional Science, 34, 313-341.
    Pawan, F. (2008). Content-area teachers and scaffolded instruction for English language learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1450-1462.
    Piaget, J. (1928). Judgement and Reasoning in the Child. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & Co.
    Pifarre, M., & Cobos, R. (2010). Promoting metacognitive skills through peer scaffolding in a CSCL environment. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5, 237-253.
    Ping, L. C., & Swe, K. M. (2004). Engaging junior college students in computer-mediated lessons using scaffolding strategies. Journal of Educational Media, 29(2), 98-112.
    Pollard, A. (1997). Reflective Teaching in the Primary School. London, Cassell.
    Poole, D. (1992). Language socialization in the second language classroom. Language Learning, 42, 593–616.
    Pressley, M., Hogan, K., Wharton-McDonald, R., Mistretta, J., & Ettenberger, S. (1996). The challenges of instruction that supports student thinking. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11(3), 138-146.
    Roehler, L., & Cantlon, D. (1997). Scaffolding: A powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms. In Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 27-37). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
    Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Rogoff, B. (1993). Children’s guided participation and participatory appropriation in sociocultural activity. In Wozniak, R., & Fischer, K. (Eds.), Development in Context: Acting and Thinking in Specific Environments. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity in three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In Wertsch, J., Rio, P. del, & Alvarez, A. (Eds.), Sociocultural Studies of the Mind. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Rommetveit, R. (1974). On message structure: A framework for the study of language and connection. New York: John Wiley.
    Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2005). The influence of the tutee in learning by peer tutoring. In Forbus, K., Gentner, D., & Reiger, T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1179–1184). Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.
    Sapir, E. (1933). Language. In Mandelbaum, D. G. (Ed.), Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture, and Personality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Saslow, J., & Ascher, A. (2006). Top Notch Fundamentals. Pearson ESL.
    Saslow, J., & Ascher, A. (2006). Top Notch 1. Pearson ESL.
    Saville-Troike, M. (2003). The ethnography of communication (3rd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    Schieffelin, B. B., & Ochs, E. (1986a). Language socialization. Annual Review of Anthropology, 15, 163-191.
    Schieffelin, B. B., & Ochs, E. (1986b). Language socialization across cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse. Blackwell, London.
    Seliger, H. W., & Shohamy, E.(1989). Second Language Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
    Seung, H. S. (2007). A philosophical investigation of the role of teachers: A synthesis of Plato, Confucius, Buber, and Freire. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 515-535.
    Sharpe, T. (2008). How can teacher talk support learning? Linguistics and Education, 19, 132-148.
    Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
    Smith, M. K. (2002). Howard Gardner and Multiple Intelligences. The Encyclopedia of Informal Education. Retrieved from http://www.infed.org/thinkers/gardner.htm
    Snow, C. E. (1983). Literacy and language: Relationships during the preschool years. Harvard Educational Review, 53(2), 165-189.
    Stone, C.A. (1993). What is missing in the metaphor of scaffolding? In: Forman, E.A, Minick, N., & Stone, C. A. (Eds.), Contexts for learnings: sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 169-183). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Stuart, R., Y., & Holmes, L. (1982). Successful Trainer Styles. Training and Development Journal, 6(4), 17-23.
    Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119-158.
    Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153-173.
    Storch, N. (2008). Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17, 95-115.
    Storch, N. (2007). Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL
    classes. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 143–159.
    Swain, M. (2001) Examining dialogue: Another approach to content specification and to validating inferences drawn from test scores. Language Testing, 18,319-346.
    Tabak, I., & Baumgartner, E. (2004). The Teacher as Partner: Exploring participant structures, symmetry, and identity work in scaffolding. Cognition and Instruction, 22, (4), 393-429.
    Thornburg, D. G. (1993). Intergenerational literacy learning with bilingual families: A context for the analysis of social mediation of thought. Journal of reading Behavior, 25(3), 323-352.
    Tusting, K., & Barton. D. (2003). Models of adult learning: a literature review.
    Lancaster University.
    UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. (2009). Global Report on Adult Learning and Education (GRALE). Retrieved from http://uil.unesco.org/content/home/programme-areas/adult-education/news-target/global/
    U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education. (2006). Adult Education and Family Literacy Act: Program Year 2003-2004 (Report to Congress on State Performance). Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/ovae/2004aefla.pdf
    van Lier, L., (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. New York: Longman.
    Vickers, C. H. (2007). Second language socialization through team interaction
    among electrical and computer engineering students. The Modern Language Journal, 91(iv), 621–640.
    Vickers, C. H. (2010). Language competence and the construction of expert–novice
    in NS–NNS interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 116–138.
    von Glasersfled, E. (1998). Constructivism as a scientific method. Cognitive Process Research Group Newsletter, 3(2), 8-9.
    Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    Wang, C.L. (2010). Toward a second language socialization perspective: Issues in
    study abroad research. Foreign Language Annals, 43(1).
    Walsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 3–23.
    Warwick, P., & Maloch, B. (2003). Scaffolding speech and writing in the primary classroom: A consideration of work with literature and science pupil groups in the USA and UK. Reading, literacy and language, 54-63.
    Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of
    pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11, 121–142.
    Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2008). Perception of Learner Proficiency: its impact on the interaction between an ESL learner and her higher and lower proficiency partners. Language Awareness, 17( 2).
    Watanabe, Y. (2008). Peer–Peer interaction between L2 learners of different
    proficiency levels: Their interactions and reflections. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(4), 605–635.
    Watson-Gegeo, K. (1992). Thick explanation in the ethnographic study of child socialization: a longitudinal study of the problem of schooling for Kwara’ae (Solomon Islands) children. In Corsaro, W. A., & Miller P. J. (Eds.), Interpretive Approaches to Children’s Socialization [Special issue]. New Directions for Child Development, 58, 51-66.
    Watson-Gegeo, K. (2004). Mind, language, and epistemology: Toward a language socialization paradigm for SLA. Modern Language Journal, 88, 331–350.
    Watson-Gegeo, K. A., & Gegeo, D. W. (1986a). The social world of Kwara’ae children: Acquisition of language and values. In Cook-Gumperz, J., Corsaro, W., & Streeck, J. (Eds.), Children’s Worlds and Children’s Language (pp. 109-128). The Hague: Mouton.
    Watson-Gegeo, K. A., & Gegeo, D. W. (1986b). Calling-out and repeating routines in Kwara’ae children’s language socialization. In Schieffein, B. B., & Ochs, E. (Eds.), Language Socialization Across Cultures (pp. 17-50). London and New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Watson-Gegeo, K. A., & Nielsen, S. (2003). Language socialization in SLA. In Doughty, C., & Long, M. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 155-177). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    Webb, N. M. (1982). Student interaction in small groups. Review of Educational Research, 52, 421–445.
    Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-39.
    Wegerif, R. (2004). The role of educational software as a support for teaching and learning conversations. Computers and Education, 43(1/2), 179–191.
    Wentzel, K. R. (1994). Relations of social goal pursuit to social acceptance, classroom behavior, and perceived social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 173-182.
    Wertsch, J. V. (1979). From social interaction to higher psychological process: A clarification and application of Vygotsky’s theory. Human Development, 22, 1–22.
    Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Wertsch, J. V., & Hickmann, M. (1987). Problem solving in social interaction: A microgenetic analysis. In Hickmann, M. (Ed.), Social and functional approaches to language and thought (pp. 251–266). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
    Willett, J. (1995). Becoming first graders in an L2: An ethnographic study of L2 socialization. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 473-503.
    Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49, 583–625.
    Wong-Fillmore, L. (1976). The second time around. Cognitive and social strategies in second language acquisition. (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford University. Dissertation Abstracts International: 37-10, 6443A.
    Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G.. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
    Wood, D., & Wood, H. (1996). Vygotsky, tutoring and learning. Oxford Review of Education, 22(1), 5–16.
    Yang, Y. (2005). Teaching adult ESL learners. Internet TESL Journal, 11(3).
    Yelland, N. J. (1999). Reconceptualising schooling with technology for the 21st century: Images and reflections. In Shade, D. D. (Ed.), Information technology in childhood education annual (pp. 39–59). Virginia: AACE.
    Yelland, N. J., & Masters, J. E. (1994, December). Innovation in practice: Learning in a technological environment. Paper presented at AARE, Newcastle.
    Yelland, N., & Masters, J. (1995). Learning without limits: Empowerment for young children exploring with technology. Proceedings of Australian computers in education conference, Perth (pp. 79–93).
    Yelland, N., & Masters, J. (2007). Rethinking scaffolding in the information age. Computers & Education, 48, 362-382.
    Zappa-Hollman, S., C. (2001). Academic presentation: Exploring the second language socialization of international graduate student across disciplines. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Department of Language and Literacy Education (Teaching English as a Second Language) University of British Columbia.
    Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL
    writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 209-222.
    朱邦賢(二oo二)。<2050以前, 一半人口會說英語>。 聯合報,二oo二年一月十六日,第十一版。
    行政院主計處 (DGBAS) (Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. Taiwan) 。(二oo五)。國情統計通報,第十六號。
    吳明烈、吳明德(二oo九)。<台灣的大學校院回流教育政策與發展>。《成人及終身教育》,第二十五期,pp. 28-36。
    吳明烈、李藹慈、賴弘基(二oo九)。<2008 台閩地區成人教育調查報告>。台北市:教育部。
    沈添鉦(一九九七)。<鷹架在語言發展中的角色:母語學習及第二語教學之實況分析與比較>。《國民教育研究學報》,第三期,pp. 1-24。
    黃富順(一九九五)。<台灣地區近年成人教育發展省思>。《教改通訊》,第十期,pp. 11-13。
    黃富順(二oo二)。<台灣加入世貿組織 成人教育發展的因應>。 《成人教育》,第六十六期,pp. 2-10.
    黃富順(二oo五)。<終身學習社會對大學的挑戰與因應>。《成人及終身教育雙月刊》,第七期,pp. 21-30。
    黃景裕(二oo四)。<國小社會學習領域建構式教學之研究>。國立台灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系博士論文,台北市。
    張莞珍(一九九七)。<鷹架理論在成人教學實務之應用>。《成人教育》,第四十期,pp. 43-51。
    蔡文瑞(二oo九)。<相互教學法在增進成人學生英文閱讀理解表現上應用之研究>。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育學系博士論文,台北市。
    鄭瓊月(二oo四)。 <我國大學成人教育功能轉變與制度發展之社會學分析>。 國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所博士論文,高雄市。

    QR CODE