簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 龔萬庭
Wan-Ting Kung
論文名稱: 當我們同在Facebook─期望與價值對社群網路中分享行為之影響
The Influence of Expectancy and Task Values for Sharing Behaviors on Facebook
指導教授: 翁楊絲茜
Cathy Weng
口試委員: 朱如君
Regina Juchun Chu
朱子君
Anita Zi-Chun Chu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 數位學習與教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 85
中文關鍵詞: 資訊分享社群網站Facebook期望回饋分享任務價值
外文關鍵詞: Information sharing, Social network site, Facebook, Expected feedback, Sharing task value
相關次數: 點閱:321下載:9
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

本研究旨在瞭解社群網站─Facebook中使用者的資訊分享行為受到期望回饋、分享任務價值等動機因素之影響程度,以及不同背景之Facebook使用者在資訊分享行為、期望回饋和分享任務價值的差異情形。
本研究以Facebook的使用者為研究對象,主要透過網路問卷的方式進行資料收集,有效樣本共計906份。分析方法包括敘述統計、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關和多元迴歸。研究結果摘述如下:
1. 19歲以上之Facebook使用者其使用Facebook的時間集中於3小時以上,遠高於過去研究之結果。
2. 不同性別與年齡其轉貼分享行為存在差異。男性之轉貼分享行為顯著多於女性之轉貼分享行為;19歲以上族群之轉貼分享行為亦顯著多於18歲以下之轉貼分享行為。
3. Facebook使用者其一般分享行為會受到期望回饋、內隱價值、時間成本代價此三個變項的正向影響,受到情緒成本代價的負向影響;而成就價值、社交效用性及隱私成本代價則未獲得統計上顯著之支持。
4. Facebook使用者其轉貼分享行為會受到年齡、內隱價值、時間成本代價此三個變項的正向影響,期望回饋、成就價值、社交效用性、情緒成本代價及隱私成本代價則未獲得統計上顯著之支持。
最後,則根據本研究之發現提出未來在研究上以及實務應用上之建議。


The main purposes of this study were to investigate the effects of expected feedback and task values of Facebook users on information sharing behaviors, and to exam the differences of those variables among various demographic background participants. A total of 906 data were collected via on-line questionnaires. And within the study, descriptive statistic, One-Way ANOVA, Pearson’s product-moment correlation, and multiple regressions were administrated for analysis. The results were found as the following:
(1) Comparing to the studies in the past, the study found that users spent much more time on the site, especially for those who were older than 18 years old spent over 3 hours a day.
(2) There were significant differences found in forwarding behavior among different age and gender groups, but not the general sharing behavior. The frequency of forwarding behavior for male users was higher than female users; in addition, older users, aged over 18, tended to forward more information on Facebook than younger users (ranged from 12 to 18 years old).
(3) Users’ general sharing behavior on Facebook was influenced by his/her perceived expected feedback, intrinsic value, time cost, and emotional cost. Expected feedback, intrinsic value, and time cost affected the general sharing behavior positively, but emotional cost affected it negatively. Moreover, intrinsic value was the most important factor to determine whether the users behave general sharing behavior.
(4) Users’ forwarding behavior on Facebook was positively influenced by age, his/her perceived intrinsic value, and time cost, and where intrinsic value was also the most important determinant.
At last, this study provided with advices on future studies and practical applications based on the findings.

目錄 I 表目錄 III 圖目錄 IV 中文摘要 V ABSTRACT VI 致謝 VII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 5 第三節 研究貢獻 6 第四節 名詞釋義 7 第二章 文獻探討 8 第一節 社群網站 8 第二節 網路中的分享行為 10 第三節 分享動機 13 第三章 研究方法 18 第一節 研究實施流程 18 第二節 研究架構與研究變項 19 第三節 研究假設 22 第四節 研究對象與實施方式 24 第五節 研究工具發展 25 第六節 資料處理方式 29 第四章 研究結果 31 第一節 填答者個人背景及資訊分享對象之描述性統計 31 第二節 資訊分享行為、期望回饋與分享任務價值之情形 35 第三節 個人背景在資訊分享行為之差異 38 第四節 個人背景在期望回饋之差異 42 第五節 個人背景在分享任務價值之差異 44 第六節 背景變項、期望回饋與分享任務價值對資訊分享行為的影響 51 第七節 研究假設檢定總整理 55 第五章 結論與建議 57 第一節 研究發現與討論 57 第二節 研究限制與建議 63 參考文獻 66 附錄 73

中文部分
戈立秀(2007)。部落客之資訊蒐集與分享行為之研究。國立台灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,碩士論文。
王鉦勻(2007)。網路使用者的分享行為及社群忠誠度對於 Web 2.0 網站使用意願影響之研究—以無名小站為例。國立中央大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文。
行政院研究發展考核會(2010)。網路新興議題報告。行政院。
克雷•薛基(2011)。下班時間扭轉未來。(吳國卿譯)。台北市:行人文化實驗室。(原作2010年出版)
吳明隆。(2011)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計。新北市:易習。
吳肇銘 (2010) 。訊息涉入、社會網絡連結強度、主觀任務價值對網路訊息傳遞意願影響之研究—以電子郵件訊息為例。管理與資訊學報。15,183-112。
林東清、孫培真、徐景智(2000)。影響資訊系統使用者抗拒行為之原因:以計劃行為理論為基礎之整合研究。資訊管理研究,2(2),1-26。
林信成、羅君玉、陳和琴(2006)。虛擬社群的知識分享:比較中文維基百科與Yahoo!奇摩知識+。傳播管理學刊。7(3),127-147。
邱皓政 (2008)。量化研究與統計分析:spss中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北:五南。
李銘薰、卜小蝶(2009)。電腦與數位3C專業虛擬社群知識分享之影響因素研究,教育資料與圖書館學。46(3),377-401。
楊佩樺(2007)。網路影音分享平台之使用行為調查研究。國立台灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所,碩士論文。
黃國庭(2008)。大學生的社會網絡網站使用行為與社會資本之關連性研究-以無名小站為例。國立政治大學新聞研究所,碩士論文。
創世紀月刊報告書(2012)。ARO 觀察:網路流量及族群分析。創市紀月刊報告書,2012年3月。
蔡至欣、賴玲玲(2011)。虛擬社群的資訊分享行為。圖書資訊期刊。9(1),161-196。
謝宗諭(2005)。虛擬社群知識分享行為研究─期待與價值扮演的角色。國立中央大學資訊管理學系,碩士論文。
謝碧甄 (2004)。網路教學系列小工具:社群網站。台大教與學期刊電子報,29,http://edtech.ntu.edu.tw/epaper/931010/tips/tips_1.asp。
羅希哲、劉一慧、孟祥仁(2007)。國小教師知識分享現況及行爲模式比較之研究。人文社會科學研究。1(1),99-122。

西文部分
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107.
Armstrong, A. G., & Hagel III, J. (1996). The real value of on-line communities. Harvard Business Review, May/Jun 1996, 134.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy; the exercise of control. NY: Freeman press.
Bao, X., & Bouthillier, F. (2007). Information sharing as a type of information behavior. McGill University, Montreal, Information Sharing in a Fragmented World: 35th Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science, Retrieved Dec 10, 2011, from http://www.cais-acsi.ca/proceedings/2007/bao_2007.pdf
Bartol, K. and Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organisational rewards, Journal of Leadership and Organisation Studies, 9(1), 64-76.
Battle, A., & Wigfield, A. (2003). College women’s value orientations toward family, career, and graduate school. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(1), 56-75.
Bock, G.W., Zmud, R.W., & Kim, Y.G., (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organization climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.
Bock, G.W., & Kim, Y.G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal, 15( 2), 14-21.
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
Cheshire, C. & Antin, J., (2008). The Social Psychological Effects of Feedback in Production of Internet Information. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 705-727.
Chiu, C.M., Hsu, M.H., & Wang, E.T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872-1888.
Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2009). Information disclosure and control on Facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(3), 341-345.
Customer Insight Group. (2012). The Psychology of Sharing: Why Do People Share Online? The New York Times. Retrieved Jun 20, 2012, from http://nytmarketing.whsites.net/mediakit/pos/
Davenport, T.H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Eccles, J., Adl e r, T.F., Futterman, R., Goff, S.B., Kaczala, C.M., Meece, J., & Midgley, C., (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In: Spence, J. T. (ed.), Achievement and Achievement Motives, San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman, 75-146.
Eccles, J.S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational belief, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132.
Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Old Communication, New Literacies: Social Network Sites as Social Learning Resource. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 1130-1161.
Hendriks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge?The influence of ICT on motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91-100.
Igbaria, M., Pavri, F.N., & Huff, S.L. (1989). Microcomputer applications: an empirical look at usage. Information & Management, 16(4), 187-196.
Jeon, S., Kim, Y.G., & Koh, J. (2011). An integrative model for knowledge sharing in communities-of-practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2), 251-269.
Kaiser, S., Muller-Seitz, G., Lopes, M.P., & Cunha, M.P. (2007). Weblog-technology as a trigger to elicit passion for knowledge. Organization, 14(3), 385-406.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
Nowson, S., & Oberlander , J. (2006). The identity of bloggers: openness and gender in personal weblogs, American Association for Artificial Intelligence Spring Symposium on Computational Approaches for Analyzing Weblogs.
Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College student’s social networking experiences on Facebook, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227-238.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill press.
Rioux, K.S. (2005). Information acquiring-and-sharing theory. Theories of information behavior. in: K. E. Ficsher, S. Erdelez, & L. Mckechnie, (Eds.), NJ: Information Today Press, 169-172.
Rotter, J.B. (1982). The development and applications of social learning theory. NY: Praeger press.
Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with facebook use. Computer in Human Behavior, 25(2), 578-586.
Savicki, V. (1996). Gender language style and group composition in Internet discussion groups. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 2(3). Retrieved Jun 20, 2012, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol2/issue3/savicki.html
Schler, J., Koppel, M., Argamon, S., & Pennebaker, J. (2005). Effects of age and gender on blogging, American Association for Artificial Intelligence Spring Symposium on Computational Approaches for Analyzing Weblogs.
Spence, J. T. (1985). Gender identity and its implications for the concepts of masculinity and femininity. T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.) Nebraska symposium on motivation: Psychology and gender(pp.59-96). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlations, and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Sonnenwald, D.H. (2006). Challenges in sharing information effectively: examples. from command and control. Information Research, 11(3). Retrieved Dec 10, 2011, from http://informationr.net/ir/11-4/paper270.html
Talja, S. (2002). Information sharing in academic communities: Types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use. The New Review of Information Behavior Research, 3, 143-160.
Talja, S., & Hansen, P. (2006). Information sharing. In A. Spink, & C. Cole (Eds.), New directions in human information behavior (chap. 7, 113-134). Dordrect: Springer.
Tohidinia, Z., & Mosakhani, M. (2010), Knowledge sharing behavior and its predictors. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(4), 611-631.
Triandis, H.C. (1980). Values, attitudes, and Interpersonal behavior. In: H.E. Howe, M.M. Page (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1979, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, 195-260.
Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875-901.
Wasko, M.M, and Faraj, S., (2005). Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: a developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6(1), 49-78.
Williams, R.L. & Cothrel, J. (2000), Four Smart Ways To Run Online Communities, Sloan Management Review, 41(4), 81-91.
Zack, M. H. (1999). Managing codified knowledge. Sloan management review, 40(4), 45.

QR CODE