這項研究的目的是探討將人工智慧(AI)圖像生成器整合進設計流程的影響。透過實驗和訪談,研究聚焦於設計師如何與 AI 共同發想設計提案。研究方法包括透過設計進行研究(RTD)、半結構化訪談及放聲思考法。六位設計師被邀請與 AI 共創,過程包括收集案例、製作註記式作品集和使用圖像生成工具生成圖片。研究結果發現,人與AI 溝通、合作時,會經歷將內在資源外部化並且交換的過程,而細節可以透過「雙向溝通框架」來闡述。此外「提示詞策略」展示了不同設計師在使用圖像生成工具時的不同行為特徵與目的,而「設計師作為策展者」則強調可用的生成圖提供了至少三種不同元素(概念、情境與形式),而設計師的角色則由單純的創作者進化成具備策展能力的創作者,執行與策展相近的行為:從這些圖像中挑選可用元素並重組出最終結果。在討論中也提到 AI 介入創作流程後所產生的道德、教育及正義的影響,以及未來可持續努力的研究方向。

This study examines the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) image generators into design processes. Utilizing experiments and interviews, it explores how designers collaborate with AI in conceptualizing designs. The methodology includes Research Through Design (RTD), semi-structured interviews, and think-aloud methods. Six designers participated in creating with AI, involving case study collection, annotated portfolio creation, and image generation. The findings reveal a process of externalizing and exchanging internal resources between humans and AI, elaborated through a ”bidirectional communication framework.” Additionally, ”prompt strategies” show varying behaviors and intentions of designers using image generators, while ”designers as curators” emphasizes the selection
and reassembly of elements from generated images, evolving the designers’ role from mere creators to curators. The study also discusses the ethical, educational, and justice implications of AI’s role in creative processes and suggests future research directions.

Arkin, D. (2023). Hollywood screenwriters don’t want robots taking their jobs, either. NBC News. Retrieved from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/writers-strike-2023-hollywood-screenwriters-ai-concerns-rcna82543

Banathy, B. H. (1996). Designing Social Systems in a Changing World. Springer US. ISBN 978-0-306-45251-2.

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’21) (pp. 610–623). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Birhane, A., Isaac, W., Prabhakaran, V., Diaz, M., Elish, M. C., Gabriel, I., & Mohamed, S. (2022). Power to the People? Opportunities and Challenges for Participatory AI. In Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO ’22). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3551624.3555290

Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., et al. (2021). On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258. Retrieved from https://crfm.stanford.edu/assets/report.pdf

Chang, M., Druga, S., Fiannaca, A. J., Vergani, P., Kulkarni, C., Cai, C. J., & Terry, M. (2023). The Prompt Artists. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 75–87).

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Culén, A. L., Børsting, J., & Gaver, W. (2020). Strategies for Annotating Portfolios: Mapping Designs for New Domains. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’20) (pp. 1633–1645). https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395490

Design council. (2019). The CityRadio. Framework for Innovation: Design Council’s Evolved Double Diamond. Https://Www.Designcouncil.Org.Uk/Our-Work/Skills-Learning/Tools-Frameworks/Framework-for-Innovation-Design-Councils-Evolved-Double-Diamond/. https://designthinking.ideo.com/blog/what-does-design-thinking-feel-like

Elling, S., Lentz, L., & de Jong, M. (2011). Retrospective think-aloud method: Using eye movements as an extra cue for participants’ verbalizations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’11) (pp. 1161–1170). https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979116

Epstein, Z., Hertzmann, A., Investigators of Human Creativity, Akten, M., Farid, H., Fjeld, J., Frank, M. R., Groh, M., Herman, L., Leach, N., et al. (2023). Art and the science of generative AI. Science, 380(6650), 1110–1111.

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A qualitative research approach. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92.

Gaver, B., & Bowers, J. (2012). Annotated portfolios. Interactions, 19(4), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212877.2212889

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., & Singh, R. P. (2022). An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 2(4), 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100089

Ho, J., Chan, W., Saharia, C., Whang, J., Gao, R., Gritsenko, A., Kingma, D. P., PooleP., Poole, B., Norouzi, M., Fleet, D. J., et al. (2022). Imagen video: High definition video generation with diffusion models. arXiv:2210.02303 [cs.CV]

Höök, K., & Löwgren, J. (2012). Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 19(3), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1145/2362364.2362371

Inie, N., Falk, J., & Tanimoto, S. (2023). Designing Participatory AI: Creative Professionals’ Worries and Expectations about Generative AI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–8).

Kulkarni, C., Druga, S., Chang, M., Fiannaca, A. J., Cai, C. J., & Terry, M. (2023). A Word is Worth a Thousand Pictures: Prompts as AI Design Material. arXiv:2303.12647 [cs.HC]

Koch, J., Lucero, A., Hegemann, L., & Oulasvirta, A. (2019). May AI? Design Ideation with Cooperative Contextual Bandits. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19) (Paper 633). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300863

Lencioni, P. (2007). How successful leaders think. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 112-122.

Lexon. (1991). Éditeur d’objets Contemporains Depuis. https://lexon-design.com/

Light, A. (2006). Adding method to meaning: A technique for exploring peoples’ experience with digital products. Behaviour and Information Technology, 25(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500331172

Li, J., Cao, H., Lin, L., Hou, Y., Zhu, R., & Ali, A. (2023). User Experience Design Professionals’ Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence.

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

McCarthy, J., & Wright, P. (2004). Technology as experience. MIT Press.

Muller, M., Chilton, L. B., Kantosalo, A., Martin, C. P., & Walsh, G. (2022). GenAICHI: Generative AI and HCI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’22). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3503719

Ning, B., Liu, F., & Liu, Z. (2023). Creativity Support in AI Co-creative Tools: Current Research, Challenges and Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2023 26th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD). https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCWD57460.2023.10152832

Oh, C., Song, J., Choi, J., Kim, S., Lee, S., & Suh, B. (2018). I Lead, You Help but Only with Enough Details: Understanding User Experience of Co-Creation with Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174223

OpenAI. 2023. GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv:2303.08774 [cs.DL]

Palomar. (2020). The CityRadio. Https://Www.Palomarweb.Com/Products/the-City-Radio.

Pearson, A. (2023). The rise of CreAltives: Using AI to enable and speed up the creative process. Journal of AI, Robotics & Workplace Automation, 2(2), 101–114.

Pierce, J. (2014). On the presentation and production of design research artifacts in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS ’14). https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598525

Ramey, J., Boren, T., Cuddihy, E., Dumas, J., Guan, Z., van den Haak, M. J., & De Jong, M. D. T. (2006). Does think aloud work? How do we know? In CHI ’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’06). https://doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125556

Roose, K. (2022). The brilliance and weirdness of ChatGPT. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/05/technology/chatgpt-ai-twitter.html

Saharia, C., Chan, W., Saxena, S., Li, L., Whang, J., Denton, E. L., Ghasemipour, K., Lopes, R. G., Ayan, B. K., Salimans, T., et al. (2022). Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 36479–36494.

Sbai, O., Elhoseiny, M., Bordes, A., LeCun, Y., & Couprie, C. (2019). DesIGN: Design Inspiration from Generative Networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 37-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11015-4-5

Sf-so. (2019). Ball Internet Radio. https://sf-so.com/Ball-radio

Shneiderman, B. (2007). Creativity support tools: Accelerating discovery and innovation. Communications of the ACM, 50(12), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/1323688.1323689

Sousa, A., Almeida, P., Silva, D., & Coelho, H. (2018). Moodboard: A creative tool for product design education. Procedia Manufacturing, 20, 592-599.

Stapelfeldt, S. (2019). Radio. https://dribbble.com/shots/8976661-radio

Wang, Y., Shen, S., & Lim, B. Y. (2023). RePrompt: Automatic Prompt Editing to Refine AI-Generative Art Towards Precise Expressions. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581402

Weatherbed, J. (2022). ArtStation is hiding images protesting AI art on the platform. The Verge. Retrieved from https://www.theverge.com/2022/12/23/23523864/artstation-removing-anti-ai-protest-artwork-censorship

Weisz, J. D., Muller, M., He, J., & Houde, S. (2023). Toward general design principles for generative AI applications. In the 4th Workshop on Human-AI Co-Creation with Generative Models (HAI-GEN). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.05578

Winograd, T. (2006). Shifting viewpoints: Artificial intelligence and human–computer interaction. Artificial Intelligence, 170(18), 1256–1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2006.10.011

Wu, D., Yu, Z., Ma, N., Jiang, J., Wang, Y., Zhou, G., Deng, H., & Li, Y. (2023). StyleMe: Towards Intelligent Fashion Generation with Designer Style. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23). https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581377

Zarki. (2021). TELECUBES. https://www.zarki.net/lab

梁容輝. (2014). 從技術即經驗談起. http://Interactionpodium.Blogspot.Com/2014/12/Opa.Html.

(N.d.). https://Designthinking.Ideo.Com/Blog/What-Does-Design-Thinking-Feel-Like.

(N.d.). https://www.theverge.com/2022/8/2/23287173/Ai-Image-Generation-Art-Midjourney-Multiverse-Interview-David-Holz. https://designthinking.ideo.com/blog/what-does-design-thinking-feel-like