閱讀的過程中，讀者隨著故事劇情的起伏，會產生各種不同的情緒狀態。能夠理解情緒在生活中是件重要的能力，可以幫助我們了解對方的感受，在閱讀的過程中亦是如此。隨著故事的發展，讀者會根據不同的敘述方式而產生不一樣情境模型。好比說人稱上的改變，如第一人稱的我，或是第三人稱的他，都會影響讀者閱讀過程中的情境模型建立，進而對於故事有不同的理解及體驗。本研究之目的在於探討透過第一人稱或第三人稱敘述，對於讀者閱讀過程中對讀者情緒、情緒理解、閱讀動機、閱讀理解以及閱讀體驗之影響。為了能夠得知讀者在閱讀過程中的情緒變化，實驗使用emWave情緒壓力檢測裝置了解讀者的正負向情緒起伏，並於實驗過程中根據所閱讀到的故事推測角色當下的情緒狀態，作為情緒理解的紀錄。此外，在閱讀活動後讀者需要根據閱讀到的內容及感受，填寫閱讀動機、閱讀理解以及體驗的問卷。研究以56位大學及碩士生作為研究對象，研究結果發現，透過第一人稱的敘述方式閱讀故事，讀者會對於角色情緒有較好的理解能力，能夠站在角色的觀點體驗角色的感受，並且在故事內容上也有較好的理解。然而在閱讀動機以及閱讀體驗上則沒有顯著的差異。顯示第一人稱的敘述方式以及第三人稱的敘述方式，雖然在整體故事體驗上不會有影響，但是透過第一人稱的敘述，對於故事的理解以及角色的情緒理解有較好的表現。在未來研究上，可以更深入地探討兩者間的情緒變化，或是與研究結果搭配將不同人稱敘述融入角色扮演，得以更加了解不同敘述方式對於閱讀的影響。

Emotions are aroused while reading. During the reading process, readers feel all kinds of emotions, which make them happy or sad as the plot progresses. Perspective-taking is an important ability for understanding the emotions of each character, especially those of the protagonist. Along with the development of the story, readers adopt different perspectives due to the narrative point of views. Different structures of situational models in pronoun (I, you, he, and she) will lead to different perspective-taking, which will influence the readers’ text/story comprehension or their engagement in reading. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the differences between the readers’ emotional changes and reading experience through the perspective taking of first-person and third-person narration. To investigate the emotion in different perspective-taking readings, the researchers evaluated the readers’ emotions using a emWave system and during the reading activity reader’s marked up protagonist's emotions according to the story plot, as a record of readers’ emotion understanding skills. Also, the participants need to fill out the story comprehension assessment and the reading experience questionnaire after reading the story. Fifty-five undergraduate students were recruited in the study. The result shows that the first-person perspective readers have stronger emotions expression, which were detected while reading. Along with a better understanding of protagonist’s emotions. Furthermore, first-person narration readers have a better experience of flow while reading. However, no difference in the reading motivation between the two groups was found. Although the results shows that when reading stories from different perspective, first-person perspective readers have better performance on reading and emotion understanding, but as in the reading experience shows no difference between each other. Future research could focus on more detail emotions not just positive and negative emotions, also researchers can add role-playing situation into understand whether this will influence how the readers adapt the story and the emotions in the character.

尹航（民100）。小说第二人称叙述的主体间性哲学内涵。山東行政學院山東省經濟管理幹部學院學報，3，137-141。
周苹（民94）。第三人称叙述者及其在文本中的介入。黑龙江社会科学，2，104-106。
孫劍秋與林孟軍（民101）。談PISA閱讀素養評量對十二年國教閱讀教學的意涵。北市大語文學報，9，85-98。
曹彦（民93）论第一人称与第三人称叙述角度上的差异。鞍山师范学院学报，6，14-16。
黃國珍（民106）。為什麼閱讀成為素養？國文快遞，85，2-5。
陳木金與許瑋山（民101）。從PISA閱讀評量的國際比較探討閱讀素養教育的方向。教師天地，181，4-15。
楊雅淇（民101） Rasch 模式檢核閱讀動機量表之心理計量特性（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東市。
Aslan, S., Alyuz, N., Okur, E., Mete, S. E., Oktay, E., & Esme, A. A. (2018). Effect of emotion-aware interventions on students’ behavioral and emotional states. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(6), 1399-1413.
Bagri, G., & Jones, G. V. (2018). The role of first person perspective and vivid imagery in memory for written narratives. Educational Psychology in Practice, 34(3), 229-244.
Barrett, H., & Popovi, N. (2015). A meta-synthesis on the effects of combining heart rate variability biofeedback and positive emotion on workplace performance. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 3(5), 61.
Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Giles, G. E., Holmes, A., & Taylor, H. A. (2016). Mentally simulating narrative perspective is not universal or necessary for language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(10), 1592.
Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S., & Taylor, H. A. (2009). When you and I share perspectives: Pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension. Psychological Science, 20(1), 27-32.
Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., & Taylor, H. A. (2011). Better you than I: Perspectives and emotion simulation during narrative comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(5), 659-666.
Chang, W. H., Huang, T. H., & Liu, Y. C. (2019). Influence of an Interactive e-Book on the Reading Comprehension of Different Ethnic Groups Using Indigenous Culture as Content. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4-5), 323-332.
Chen, C. M., & Wang, H. P. (2011). Using emotion recognition technology to assess the effects of different multimedia materials on learning emotion and performance. Library & Information Science Research, 33(3), 244-255.
Child, S., Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A. (2018). You’re the emotional one: the role of perspective for emotion processing in reading comprehension. Language, cognition and neuroscience, 33(7), 878-889.
Chin, T., & Rickard, N. S. (2014). Emotion regulation strategy mediates both positive and negative relationships between music uses and well-being. Psychology of Music, 42(5), 692-713.
Choi, M. J., & Whang, M. C. (2017). A study on behavior response of child by emotion coaching of teacher based on emotional recognition technology. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(7), 323-330.
Dunn, J., & Brown, J. (1994). Affect expression in the family, children's understanding of emotions, and their interactions with others. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 40(1), 120-137.
Dunn, J., & Cutting, A. L. (1999). Understanding others, and individual differences in friendship interactions in young children. Social Development, 8(2), 201-219.
Dzedzickis, A., Kaklauskas, A., & Bucinskas, V. (2020). Human Emotion Recognition: Review of Sensors and Methods. Sensors, 20(3), 592.
Edwards, S. D. (2015). HeartMath: A positive psychology paradigm for promoting psychophysiological and global coherence. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 25(4), 367-374.
Floman, J. L., Hagelskamp, C., Brackett, M. A., & Rivers, S. E. (2017). Emotional bias in classroom observations: within-rater positive emotion predicts favorable assessments of classroom quality. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(3), 291-301.
Flood, J., & Lapp, D. (1981). Language/reading instruction for the young child. Michigan, America: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Grazzani, I., & Ornaghi, V. (2011). Emotional state talk and emotion understanding: A training study with preschool children. Journal of child language, 38(5), 1124-1139.
Habermas, T. (2018). Kinds of emotional effects of narratives. Emotion and Narrative: Perspectives in Autobiographical Storytelling (pp. 97-121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781139424615.006
Habermas, T., & Diel, V. (2010). The emotional impact of loss narratives: Event severity and narrative perspectives. Emotion, 10(3), 312.
Kao, G. Y. M., Tsai, C. C., Liu, C. Y., & Yang, C. H. (2016). The effects of high/low interactive electronic storybooks on elementary school students’ reading motivation, story comprehension and chromatics concepts. Computers & Education, 100, 56-70.
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377-380.
Kim, J. (2018). Emotional Labor in the Care Field and Empathy-enhancing Education by Reading Literature: A Brief Review. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 47(8), 1084-1089.
Klimmt, C., Roth, C., Vermeulen, I., & Vorderer, P. (2010). The Empirical Assessment of the User Experience in Interactive Storytelling: Construct Validation of Candidate Evaluation Measures. Integrating Research in Interactive Storytelling, Technical Report.
Komeda, H., Kawasaki, M., Tsunemi, K., & Kusumi, T. (2009). Differences between estimating protagonists’ emotions and evaluating readers’ emotions in narrative comprehension. Cognition and Emotion, 23(1), 135-151.
de Koning, B. B., & van der Schoot, M. (2019). Can “you” make a difference? Investigating whether perspective‐taking improves performance on inconsistent mathematical word problems. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(5), 911-917.
Laurent, J., Catanzaro, S. J., Joiner, T. E., Jr., Rudolph, K. D., Potter, K. I., Lambert, S., Osborne, L., & Gathright, T. (1999). A measure of positive and negative affect for children: Scale development and preliminary validation. Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 326-338.
Lawlor, C. M. M. (2000). Learning from stories: Narrative interviewing in cross-cultural research. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 7(1), 4-14.
de Lima, E. S., Feijó, B., Furtado, A. L., & Gottin, V. M. (2018, October). Personality and Preference Modeling for Adaptive Storytelling. In 2018 17th Brazilian Symposium on Computer Games and Digital Entertainment (SBGames) (pp. 187-09). IEEE.
Mano, Y., Harada, T., Sugiura, M., Saito, D. N., & Sadato, N. (2009). Perspective-taking as part of narrative comprehension: a functional MRI study. Neuropsychologia, 47(3), 813-824.
Miller, C. H. (2013). Digital storytelling: A creator's guide to interactive entertainment. Routledge. Characters, Dialogue, and Emotions (pp. 89-112). New York: Routledge
Mouw, J. M., Van Leijenhorst, L., Saab, N., Danel, M. S., & van den Broek, P. (2019). Contributions of emotion understanding to narrative comprehension in children and adults. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(1), 66-81.
Mulcahy, M., & Gouldthorp, B. (2016). Positioning the reader: the effect of narrative point-of-view and familiarity of experience on situation model construction. Language and Cognition, 8(1), 96-123.
Novosel, L. C. (2012). Emotion self-regulation: A mixed-methods intervention study of sociemotional and reading outcomes of high school students with reading difficulties (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas)
Rogaten, J., & Moneta, G. B. (2015). Use of creative cognition and positive affect in studying: Evidence of a reciprocal relationship. Creativity Research Journal, 27(2), 225-231.
Roth, C., & Vermeulen, I. (2012, September). Real story interaction: the role of global agency in interactive storytelling. In International Conference on Entertainment Computing (pp. 425-428). Berlin, Heidelberg.
Roth, C., Vermeulen, I., Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., Pizzi, D., Lugrin, J. L., & Cavazza, M. (2012). Playing in or out of character: user role differences in the experience of interactive storytelling. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(11), 630-633.
Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 227-242
Troyer, M., Kim, J. S., Hale, E., Wantchekon, K. A., & Armstrong, C. (2019). Relations among intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation, reading amount, and comprehension: A conceptual replication. Reading and Writing, 32(5), 1197-1218.
Ungerer, T. (1999). Otto. Autobiographie eines Teddybären, Zürich, Germany: Diogenes.
Van Ammel, K., Aesaert, K., & Van Keer, H. (2019). The relationship between 9th grade students' reading motivation, reading behavior and reading comprehension. In 18th EARLI Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction.
Von Wallpach, S., Hemetsberger, A., & Espersen, P. (2017). Performing identities: Processes of brand and stakeholder identity co-construction. Journal of Business Research, 70, 443-452.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063.
Weedon, A., Miller, D., Franco, C. P., Moorhead, D., & Pearce, S. (2014). Crossing media boundaries: Adaptations and new media forms of the book. Convergence, 20(1), 108-124.
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Motivation for reading: An overview. Motivation for Reading: Individual, Home, Textual, and Classroom Perspectives. A Special Issue of Educational Psychologist, 32(2), 57-58.
Yang, Y. T. C., & Wu, W. C. I. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers & education, 59(2), 339-352.