簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: Tadele Hunde Wondumu
Tadele Hunde Wondumu
論文名稱: 非貴金屬奈米結構材料應用於水電解產氫
Electrochemical Production of Hydrogen from Water Using Precious Metal Free Nano Structures Materials
指導教授: 王丞浩
Chen-Hao Wang
口試委員: 張仍奎
Jeng-Kuei Chang
郭俞麟
Yu-Lin Kuo
王冠文
Kuan-Wen Wang
陳燦耀
Tsan-Yao Chen
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 工程學院 - 材料科學與工程系
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 153
中文關鍵詞: 析氫反應氧化鎢還原氧化石墨烯鐵摻雜含氧空位氧化鎢氮摻雜還原
外文關鍵詞: Oxygen vacancies-rich, Bi-functional catalyst, Over potential
相關次數: 點閱:456下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 電解產氫觸媒中觸媒活性以及穩定性十分重要,故傳統水電解裝置通常使用鉑、鈀或銥等貴金屬作為觸媒,但會對成本支出上造成很大的壓力。有別於傳統水電解觸媒,考慮到成本、觸媒活性與穩定性,本研究使用一種具有獨特功能的多種成分組成的混合結構非貴金屬材料,用以取代貴金屬的使用。
    首先,磷化氫還原鐵摻雜氧化鎢納米片/還原氧化石墨烯奈米複合物(Fe-WOxP/rGO)作為析氫反應的優良電催化劑。使用水熱法合成該電催化劑,然後用次磷酸鈉產生的膦(PH3)還原。研究觸媒反應起始電位 (onset potential)、塔弗斜率(Tafel slope)和穩定性。因此,Fe-WOxP/rGO表現出令人印象深刻的高電催化活性,在10 mAcm-2電流密度下具有54.60 mV的低過電位(overpotential),塔弗斜率為41.99 mVdec-1和2000次線性掃描伏安曲線幾乎相同,在過電位(54.60 mV)下在0.5 M H2SO4中電解24小時依然保持穩定。 Fe-WOxP/rGO的催化活性和導電率均高於WOxP、Fe-WOxP以及WOxP/rGO。 Fe-WOxP/rGO納米複合材料的這種優異性能歸因於Fe-WOxP的奈米板狀結構中氧化鎢上的高氧空位形成與rGO納米片之間的耦合協同效應,使其成為利於析氫反應(hydrogen evolution reaction, HER)的優異觸媒。
    其次,我們研究了富含氧空位之氧化鎢奈米線的催化劑,其由氮摻雜的還原氧化石墨烯(WOxNWs/N-rGO),其對酸溶液中的析氫反應(HER)具有優異的催化活性。納米線與三聚氰胺(melamine)/氧化石墨烯使用水熱法與化學氣象沉積法來合成WOxNWs/N-rGO。WOxNWs/N-rGO在10 mA cm-2的電流密度下,僅只有40 mV的過電位,其僅比Pt/C高7.01 mV,但比WOxNWs/rGO和WOxNWs低4.90和9.90 mV。WOxNWs/N-rGO的耐久性測試顯示在100 mA cm-2的大電流密度下5,000次循環後僅14 mV的過電位衰退。在55 mV的恆定過電位下,WOxNWs/N-rGO活性在12小時後也表現出約5.4%的輕微衰退。 WOxNWs/N-rGO對HER的突出表現歸因於富含氧空位的WOxNW與N-rGO之間的協同作用。
    第三,我們展示了合成用於HER和OER的鈷磷硒化物納米帶(CoSe(2-X)PX NB)的三個步驟,首先使用水熱法合成CoSe2,再將95%氬氣與5%的氫氣進行退火30分鐘,最後使用化學氣相沉積法(CVD)與次磷酸鈉作為磷來源反應2小時。發現CoSe(2-X)PX NB在大範圍pH值(0-14)皆為析氫反應的優異材料。另一方面,其催化活性可以應用於氧析出反應(OER, oxygen evolution reaction),並且電流密度為10 mA cm-2的過電位為391 mV,並且電流密度為10至40 mAcm-2 12小時長時間穩定性測試,其效能皆保持穩定。高性能,高電極穩定性和易於合成顯示CoSe(2-X)PX NB作為水電解的有效且經濟的電催化劑。
    關鍵字:析氫反應、氧化鎢、還原氧化石墨烯、鐵摻雜、含氧空位氧化鎢、氮摻雜還原氧化石墨烯、電流密度、雙功能催化劑、水分解、過電位。


    The production of hydrogen by electrochemical water splitting is a potential way to store energy from intermittent renewable energy sources such as solar, geothermal and wind. Synthesis and characterization of electrocatalysts for hydrogen production and oxygen evolution reaction is a great need for active, durable and cost effective materials to replace the precious metals such as platinum, iridium and ruthenium. However, the synthesis of these electrocatalysts are challenging approach to nano-materials development.
    In First part of this study, we report phosphine reduced an iron-doped tungsten oxide nanoplate/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite (Fe-WOxP/rGO) as an excellent electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. This electrocatalyst was synthesized using a hydrothermal method, followed by reduction with phosphine (PH3), which was generated from sodium hypophosphite. The catalyst onset potential, Tafel slope, and stability were investigated. Accordingly, Fe-WOxP/rGO exhibited impressively high electrocatalytic activity with a low overpotential of 54.60 mV, which is required to achieve a current density of 10 mAcm−2.The Tafel slope of 41.99 mVdec−1 and the linear sweep voltammetry curve is almost the same as 2,000 cycles and electrolysis under static overpotential (54.60 mV) is remain for more than 24 h in 0.5 M H2SO4. The catalytic activity and conductivity of Fe-WOxP/rGO were higher than WOXP, Fe-WOxP and WOxP/rGO. Such an outstanding performance of the Fe-WOxP/rGO nanocomposite is attributed to the coupled synergic effect between high oxygen vacancies formation on tungsten oxide in the nanoplate-like structure of Fe-WOxP and rGO nanosheet, making it as an excellent electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction.
    In Second part of our work, we use the oxygen vacancy concept and further increases the amount of oxygen vacancies in WOxNWs (tungsten oxide nanowires) using heat treatment in nitrogen-rich compound such as melamine. The catalyst is composed of oxygen-vacancy-rich tungsten oxide nanowires supported by nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide (WOxNWs/N-rGO), which has excellent catalytic activity for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) in acid solution. WOxNWs/N-rGO was synthesized by solvothermally coupling tungsten oxide nanowires with melamine/graphene oxide then annealing. The WOxNWs/N-rGO exhibit only 40 mV of overpotential to afford a current density of 10 mA cm−2, which is only 7.01 mV greater than that of Pt/C but 4.90 and 9.90 mV less than those of WOxNWs/rGO and WOxNWs, respectively. A durability test of WOxNWs/N-rGO reveals only 14 mV overpotential shift after 5,000 cycles at large current density of 100 mA cm-2. At a constant overpotential of 55 mV, the WOxNWs/N-rGO activity also exhibits a slight degradation of approximately 5.4% after 12 h. The outstanding performance of the WOxNWs/N-rGO for the HER is attributed to synergetic effect between the oxygen-vacancy-rich of the WOxNWs and N-rGO.

    In the third part of this study, we demonstrates a two-step, facile approach strategy for the synthesis of cobalt phosphoselenide nanobelt (CoSe(2-X)PX NB) for both HER and OER these are hydrothermal synthesis of CoSe2 followed annealing with 95%/5% of Ar/H2 for 30 minutes then reacting with sodium hypophosphite as source of phosphorus using chemical vapor deposition (CVD) methods for 2 h. The CoSe(2-X)PX NB was found to be an excellent material for the hydrogen evolution reaction over a wide pH range (0-14). On the other hand, its catalytic activity can be switched to the OER in basic media and overpotential for the OER to generate a current density of 10 mA cm-2 is 391 mV and it’s stability remain for more than 12 h at 10 to 40 mAcm-2. The high performance, prolonged electrode stability, and facile synthesis suggest that CoSe(2-X)PX NB as efficient and economic electrocatalyst for water splitting.
    Key words: Hydrogen evolution reaction; tungsten oxide; reduced graphene oxide; Iron-doped, Oxygen vacancies-rich, Nitrogen-doped, Reduced graphene oxide, Current density, Bi-functional catalyst, Water splitting, and Over potential.

    Table of Contents 中文摘要 iv Abstract vi Acknowledgements ix List of Schemes xvii List of Tables xvii Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1. Global energy demand 1 Chapter 2: Literature review 4 2.1. Renewable and nonrenewable energy 4 2.2. Advantage of hydrogen production from water 5 (c) hydrogen fuel car[18] (d) Hydrogen for space shuttle [19] 7 2.1. Hydrogen production from renewable energy 7 2.2. Electrochemical hydrogen production from water 8 2.3. Graphene materials for Catalyst support 10 2.3.1. Synthesis of reduced graphene oxide/nanostructured materials 10 2.4. Precious metal-free Electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction 12 2.5. Criteria for HER electrodes 14 2.5.1. Mechanism of HER reaction 15 2.6. Electrochemistry of the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) 17 2.7. Electrochemistry of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). 18 2.8. Parameters to evaluate the electrochemical activity of HER catalysts. 19 2.8.1. Overpotential (ƞ) 19 2.8.2. Tafel Slope and Exchange Current Density (j0). 19 2.8.3. Stability 21 2.8.4. Faradaic Efficiency. 22 2.9. Factors affecting HER activity 22 2.10. The availability of the active site 23 2.10.1. Tungsten-based materials for hydrogen evolution reaction 23 2.10.2. Cobalt selenide based materials for overall water splitting 33 Chapter 3: Motivation 36 3.1. Motivation of the work 36 Chapter 4: Experimental instruments 40 4.1. Materials characterization 41 4.2. Electrochemical characterization 42 Chapter 5: Highly efficient and durable phosphine reduced iron-doped tungsten oxide/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for the hydrogen evolution reaction 44 5.1. Introduction 44 5.2. Experimental Section 46 5.2.1. Synthesis of Fe-WOxP/rGO nanocomposite 46 5.3. Results and Discussion 47 5.3.1. The structure and morphology characterization of the Fe-WOxP/rGO nanocomposite 47 5.3.2. Electrochemical performance measurements 54 Chapter 6: High Catalytic Activity of Oxygen-vacancy-rich Tungsten Oxide Nanowires Supported by Nitrogen-doped Reduced Graphene Oxides for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction 61 6.1. Introduction 61 6.2. Experimental Section 62 6.2.1. Synthesis of WOxNWs/N-rGO 62 6.3. Results and Discussion 64 6.3.1. The morphology and structural characterization of WOxNWs/N-rGO 64 6.3.2. Electrochemical Performance Measurements 72 Chapter 7: Selenium Vacancies and Phosphorus Doping-induced Phase Transition Engineering in Cobalt Diselenide as Bifuctional Catalytic Properties for Overall Water Splitting 78 7.1. Introduction 78 7.2. Experimental Section 80 7.2.1. Synthesis of CoSe(2-X)PX NB 80 7.3. Result and discussions 81 7.4. Electrochemical measurements 88 Chapter 8: Conclusions 95 8.1. Highly efficient and durable phosphine reduced iron-doped tungsten oxide/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for the hydrogen evolution reaction (first work) 95 8.2. High Catalytic Activity of Oxygen-vacancy-rich Tungsten Oxide Nanowires Supported by Nitrogen-doped Reduced Graphene Oxides for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction (Second work) 95 8.3. Selenium Vacancies and Phosphorus Doping-induced Phase Transition Engineering in Cobalt Diselenide as Bifunctional Catalytic Properties for Overall Water Splitting (third work) 96 Chapter 9: Summary and out look 97 9.1. Overall conclusion of the dissertation 97 9.2. Outlook 98 Appendix A 101 Supporting Data for Chapter 5 101 Appendix B 107 Supporting Data for Chapter 6 107 Appendix C 117 Supporting Data for Chapter 7 117 References 120 List of Figures Figure 1 1 World energy sources [4] 1 Figure 2 1 (a) Hydrogen fuel cell [17] (b) Pure hydrogen production from water splitting [9] 7 Figure 2 2 Sustainable pathways for hydrogen production from renewable energy, such as solar energy [9] 8 Figure 2 3 (a) Water gas shift reaction (methane reforming process) [30] (b) Production of hydrogen by electrolysis of water [31] 9 Figure 2 4 Schematic illustration of the binding mechanisms of nanoparticles (NPs) onto rGO sheets and post immobilization (ex-situ hybridization) and in-situ binding (in situ crystallization) [35] 12 Figure 2 5 Abundance of metals in the earth’s crust that are used for constructing HER electrocatalysts [9]. 13 Figure 2 6 Volcano plot of exchange current density (j0) as a function of DFT-calculated Gibbs free energy (ΔGH*) of adsorbed atomic hydrogen on pure metals [44] 15 Figure 2 7 Reaction mechanism of HER [49] 16 Figure 2 8 (i) Exfoliation of WS2 to enhance HER (ii) graphene and Nickel foam supported WS2 nanoparticles. 25 Figure 2 9 (i) Molybdenum modified tungsten phosphide, (ii) phosphorus modified tungsten nitride reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite and (iii) nitrogen doped carbon tungsten oxynitride nanowire for HER. 26 Figure 2 10 (i) molybdenum doped W18O49 and its corresponding electrochemical activity for HER, (ii) mesoporous metallic WO2 nanowire and its electrochemical activity for HER (iii) Local atomic structure modulation of tungsten trioxide and its electrochemical activities for HER. 29 Figure 4 1 Instruments for materials characterization (a) Raman spectroscopy (b) Transmision electron Microscopy (TEM) (c) X-ray diffraction (XRD) (d) X-ray photon spectroscopy (XPS) (e) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) 42 Figure 4 2 (a) Electrochemical machine setup for HER (b) Solatron electrochemical workstation machine 43 Figure 5 1 (a) XRD pattern of WOxP, Fe-WOxP, WOxP/rGO, and Fe-WOxP/rGO and (b) narrow XRD scan of WOxP,Fe-WOxP,WOxP/rGO and Fe-WoxP/rGO (c) Raman spectroscopy of WOxP, Fe-WOxP, WOxP/rGO, and Fe-WOxP/rGO (d) D and g band of WOxP/rGO and Fe-WOxP/rGO. 49 Figure 5 2 SEM images of (a) WOxP, (b) Fe-WOxP, (c) WOxP/rGO, (d, e) Fe-WOxP /rGO, at different magnification, and (c, f) WOxP/rGO at different magnification. 50 Figure 5 3 (a) TEM images of Fe-WOxP/rGO, (b) HRTEM of Fe-WOxP/rGO, (c) The HAADF-STEM image for Fe-WOxP/rGO, and the corresponding EDX elemental mapping results for (d) oxygen, (e) carbon, (f) phosphorus, (g) iron and (h) tungsten. 51 Figure 5 4 (a) Full range XPS spectrum of W, O, Fe, P, and C, (b) narrow-scan O 1s, (c) narrow- Scan C 1s, (d) narrow-scan P 2p, (e) narrow-scan W 4f, and (f) narrow-scan Fe 2p. 52 Figure 5 5 XPS narrow-scan W 4f in WOxP, Fe-WOXP, WOxP/rGO, and Fe-WOxP/rGO. 54 Figure 5 6 (a) Polarization curves of WOxP, Fe-WOxP, WOx/PrGO, Fe-WOxP/rGO, and Pt/C; (b) corresponding polarization curve at 10 mAcm−2,and (c) corresponding Tafel plot of WOxP, Fe-WOxP, WOxP/rGO, Fe-WOxP/rGO, and Pt/C. 55 Figure 5 7 EIS of WOxP, Fe-WOxP, WOxP/rGO, and Fe-WOxP/rGO of the indicated electrodes at η = -54.60 mV in 0.5 M H2SO4 57 Figure 5 8 (a) Polarization curves of Fe-WOxP/rGOcatalyst before and after 2,000 potential cycles and inset digital photo of the H2 bubbles formed on a Fe-WOxP/rGO and (b) Chronoamperometric response (i−t) under a static overpotential of -54.60 mV vs RHE. 59 Figure 6 1 SEM images of (a) WOxNWs, (b) WOxNWs/rGO, and (c) WOxNWs/N-rGO after the annealing at 800 °C. 65 Figure 6 2 TEM images of (a) WOxNWs/N-rGO and (b) clear crystalline fringe of WOxNWs; HAADF-STEM images of (c) WOxNWs/N-rGO and its elemental mapping of (d) carbon, (e) oxygen (f) nitrogen, and (g) tungsten. 66 Figure 6 3 XRD patterns of WOxNWs, WOxNWs/rGO, and OxNWs/N-rGO 67 Figure 6 4 (a) Wide scan Raman spectra of WOxNWs, WOxNWs/rGO, and WOxNWs/N-rGO (b) Narrow scan Raman Spectra of WOxNWs, WOxNWs/rGO, and WOxNWs/N-rGO (c) Narrow scan Raman spectra of WOxNWs/rGO, and WOxNWs/N-rGO. 69 Figure 6 5 (a) Wide range XPS spectrum of WOxNWs/N-rGO and narrow-scan XPS of (b) W 4f, (c) N 1s, and (d) C 1s. 70 Figure 6 6 XPS narrow-scan W 4f in WOxNWs, WOxNWs/rGO, and WOxNWs/N-rGO 71 Figure 6 7 (a) Polarization curves and (b) corresponding Tafel plot of WOxNWs, WOxNWs/rGO, WOxNWs/N-rGO, and Pt/C, and (c) EIS spectra of WOxNWs, WOxNWs/rGO, and WOxNWs/N-rGO at ƞ = - 40 mV vs RHE. 75 Figure 6 8 (a) Linear sweep voltammogram (LCV) curves of WOxNWs/N-rGO after 2,000, and 5,000 potential cycles and (b) Potentiostatic response (current density versus time) under a constant potential of 55 mV. 76 Figure 7 1 SEM image of (a) as-prepared CoSe2 (b) H-CoSe2 NB (c) CoSe(2-X)PX NB. 82 Figure 7 2 TEM image of (a) CoSe(2-X)PX NB (b) HRTEM of CoSe(2-X)PX NB (c) HAADF-STEM image for CoSe(2-X)PX NB, and the corresponding EDX elemental mapping results for (d) cobalt, (e) selenium, and (f) phosphorus. 83 Figure 7 3 XRD pattern of as-prepared CoSe2, H-CoSe2 NB, and CoSe(2-X)PX NB 84 Figure 7 4 Raman spectroscopy of (a) as-prepared CoSe2, H-CoSe2 NB and CoSe(2-X)PX NB (b) XPS narrow scan modes Co-Se of as-prepared CoSe2, H-CoSe2 NB and CoSe(2-X)PX NB (c) XPS narrow scan modes Co-Se of as-prepared CoSe2, H-CoSe2 NB and CoSe(2-X)PX NB. 85 Figure 7 5 (a) XPS wide scan range of CoSe2 as prepared, H-CoSe2 NB and H-CoSe(2-X)PX NB ( b) XPS narrow scan of Co in CoSe2, H-CoSe2 NB and H-CoSe(2-X)PX NB (c) P narrow scan in CoSe(2-X)PX NB (d) Se XPS narrow scan in CoSe2 as prepared, H-CoSe2 NB and CoSe(2-X)PX NB. 87 Figure 7 6 (a-c) HER electrocatalytic performance of Pt/C, CoSe(2-X)PX NB, H-CoSe2 NB and CoSe2 as prepared in 0.5 M H2SO4 (d-e) Tafel slope of Pt/C, CoSe(2-X)PX NB, H-CoSe2 NB and CoSe2 as prepared in 1 M KOH. 89 Figure 7 7 (a) OER electrocatalytic performance of Pt/C, CoSe(2-X)PX NB, H-CoSe2 NB and CoSe2 as prepared (b) EIS spectra of CoSe2, H-CoSe2 NB, and CoSe(2-X)PX at ƞ = -112 mV Vs RHE in 0.5 M H2SO4 (c) Tafel slope of CoSe2, H-CoSe2 NB, Pt/C and CoSe(2-X)PX NB 91 Figure 7 8 (a) Electrochemical active surface area (EASA) of CoSe(2-X)PX NB, H-CoSe2 NB and CoSe2 CV scan of CoSe(2-X)PX NB, H-CoSe2 NB and CoSe2 at different scan rate in 0.5 M H2SO4. 92 Figure 7 9 (a) HER Stability test of CoSe(2-X)PX NB in 1 M KOH (b) HER Stability test of CoSe(2-X) PX NB in 1 M KOH (c) stability test for both anode and cathode in full water splitting in 1 M KOH at different current density (10 to 40 mAcm-2) each for 12 h. 93 Figure A 1 XRD Pattern of (a)WOxP,Fe-WOxP,WOxP/rGO and Fe-WoxP/rGO (b) narrow XRD scan of WOxP,Fe-WOxP,WOxP/rGO and Fe-WoxP/rGO. 102 Figure A 2 (b) XRD patterns of all samples together (i.e oxide and oxide phosphate after reduction with phosphine) (b) Raman shift of WO3, Fe-WO3, WO3/rGO, and Fe-WO3/rGO. 102 Figure A 3 (a, c) Fe-WO3/rGO at different magnification (b, d) WO3/rGO at different magnification (e) WO3 (f) Fe-WO3 103 Figure A 4 (a) TEM images of WOxP/rGO, (b) HRTEM of WOxP/rGO, (c) The HAADF-STEM image for WOxP/rGO, and the corresponding EDX elemental mapping results for (d) oxygen, (e) carbon, (f) phosphorus, and (g) tungsten 104 Figure A 5 (a) UV-Vis spectroscopy of WO3, WOxP, Fe-WOxP, WOxP/rGO, and Fe-WOxP/rGO (b) Polarization curve of Fe-WOxP/rGO in Pt counter and graphite rode counter after 20 cycles of activation. 104 Figure A 6 SEM images of different amount of graphene oxide with 1 g of Na2WO4.2H2O precursor with (a) 10 mg GO, (b) 20 mg GO, (c) 40 mg GO (d) 80 mg GO (e) 100 mg GO. 105 Figure A 7 (a) Polarization curves of different amount of graphene oxide with 1 g of Na2WO4.2H2O (b) Polarization curves of WOxP/rGO catalyst before and after 2,000 potential cycles. 106 Figure B 1 Cyclic Voltammetry calibration curve of SCE to RHE 107 Figure B 2 (a) SEM images of (a) untreated WOxNWs/N-rGO, (b) different heat treatment temperatures at (b) 700 oC , (c) 800 oC, and (d) 900 oC for WOxNWs/N-rGO. 108 Figure B 3 SEM images of the catalyst synthesized with glycerol for (a) WOxNWs (c) WOxNWs/rGO , and (e) WOxNWs/N-rGO, and without addition of glycerol for (b) WOxNWs, (d) WOxNWs/rGO, and (f) WOxNWs/N-rGO. 109 Figure B 4 XRD patterns of WOxNWs/N-rGO at different annealing temperatures. 110 Figure B 5 (a) Polarization curves and (b) EIS spectra of WOxNWs/N-rGO at different annealing temperatures. 110 Figure B 6 (a) The effect of melamine amount or % N for HER activity of WOxNWs/N-rGO (b) UV-Vis spectroscopy of WOxNWs,WOxNWs/rGO, WOxNWs/N-rGO, rGO and N-rGO 111 Figure B 7 CV curves of (a) WOxNWs/N-rGO, (b) WOxNWs/rGO, and (c) WOxNWs at different scan rates; (d) current density vs. scan rates of different catalysts. 112 Figure B 8 EIS spectra of (a)WOxNWs/N-rGO, (b) WOxNWs/rGO, and (c) WOxNWs at different overpotentials. 113 Figure B 9 SEM image of WOxNWS/N-rGO (a) before and (b) after 12 h of stability test 114 Figure B 10 XRD pattern of WOxNWS/NrGO before stability test and after stability test 115 Figure B 11 (a) XPS wide-scan sprectrum of WOxNWS/NrGO after stability test (b) XPS narrow-scan spectra of tungsten in WOxNWs/N-rGO before and after stability test. 116 Figure C 1 SEM images of CoSe2 after it annealed at 400 oC for 30 minutes with 95% Ar/5% H2 followed by heat treatment at different temperature (without heat treatment, 300 oC, 400 oC and 500 oC) with Na2HPO2.2H2O for 2 h. 117 Figure C 2 XRD pattern of CoSe2 at different heat treatment with 95% Ar/5% H2 followed by heat treatment at different temperature with Na2HPO2.2H2O 118 Figure C 3 Electrochemical impendence spectroscopy (EIS) of CoSe2 as prepared, H-CoSe2 NB and CoSe(2-X)PX (a) in 0.5 M H2SO4 (b) in 1 M KOH and 1M PBS. 118 Figure C 4 (a) HER activity of different molar ratio of cobalt to Se as the treatment with 95% Ar and 5% H2 at 400 oC for 30 minutes followed by heat treatment at 400 oC with Na2HPO2.2H2O for 2 h (b) HER activities of CoSe(2-X)PX at different heat treatment with phosphine (c) HER activity of CoSe2 at different time interval heat treatment with 95% Ar /5% H2 119 List of Schemes Scheme 6 1 Schematic illustration of synthesis of WOxNWs/N-rGO 63 Scheme 7 1 Synthesis of CoSe(2-X)PX NB 80 Scheme A 1 (a) Schematic synthesis of Fe-WO(3-X)P/rGO nanocomposite (b) photo of different composite of tungsten compound after and before reduction with phosphine. 101 List of Tables Table 2 1 Tungsten based materials for Hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) 30 Table 4 1 List of Chemicals 40 Table 5 1 Overpotential, exchange current density, and Tafel slope data obtained from Figure 5-6 (a-c) for each catalyst. 56 Table 5 2 Electrochemical impedance fitting data from Figure 5-7 for different catalysts. 58 Table 5 3 Summary of tungsten- based materials for HER catalysts in 0.5 M H2SO4. 60 Table 6 1 The percentage of tungsten ion species obtained from XPS peak area integration. 72 Table 6 2 Summary of Tafel slope, exchange current density, and overpotential of different catalysts. 74 Table A 1 Particles size of WOxP,Fe-WOxP,WOxP/rGO and Fe-WOxP/rGO obtained from Scherer equation. 101 Table B 1 Electrochemical impedance fitting data from Figure 7c for different catalysts. 112 Table C 1 Fitting Parameters resulting from the Nyquist plots obtained from EIS results of Fig. 7b 119

    1. Rotty, R.M., Growth in global energy demand and contribution of alternative supply systems. Energy, 1979. 4(5): p. 881-890.
    2. Höök, M., et al., Growth Rates of Global Energy Systems and Future Outlooks. Vol. 22. 2012. 23-41.
    3. <World-Energy-Resources-Full-report-2016.10.03.pdf>.
    4. https://www.e-education.psu.edu/earth104
    5. Gorjian, S., An Introduction to the Renewable Energy Resources. 2017.
    6. Yu, F., et al., High-performance bifunctional porous non-noble metal phosphide catalyst for overall water splitting. Nat Commun, 2018. 9(1): p. 2551.
    7. Reier, T., et al., Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Acidic Environments - Reaction Mechanisms and Catalysts. Advanced Energy Materials, 2017. 7(1): p. 1601275.
    8. Guan, C., et al., Hollow Mo-doped CoP nanoarrays for efficient overall water splitting. Nano Energy, 2018. 48: p. 73-80.
    9. Zou, X. and Y. Zhang, ChemInform Abstract: Noble Metal-Free Hydrogen Evolution Catalysts for Water Splitting. Vol. 46. 2015.
    10. Hou, Y., et al., Ternary Porous Cobalt Phosphoselenide Nanosheets: An Efficient Electrocatalyst for Electrocatalytic and Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Advanced Materials, 2017. 29(35): p. 1701589.
    11. Wang, J., et al., Graphene-supported iron-based nanoparticles encapsulated in nitrogen-doped carbon as a synergistic catalyst for hydrogen evolution and oxygen reduction reactions. Faraday Discussions, 2014. 176(0): p. 135-151.
    12. Alrikabi, N.K.M.A., Renewable Energy Types. Journal of Clean Energy Technologies, 2014: p. 61-64.
    13. Md. Abdul Wadud, M.T.Z., Fazlay Rabbee, Md. Rajibur Rahman, Abu, Renewable Energy, an Ideal Solution Of Energy Crisis and Economical Development in Bangladesh. Global Journal of Research In Engineering, 2013.
    14. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/print.php?page=nonrenewable home.
    15. Züttel, A., Hydrogen storage methods. Naturwissenschaften, 2004. 91(4): p. 157-172.
    16. <Hydrogen-Energy-The-Perfect-Energy-Source-for-the-Future.pdf>.
    17. https://www.indiamart.com/proddetail/hydrogen-fuel-cells-4168053273.html.
    18. https://www.slashgear.com/toyota-just-doubled-down-on-a-hydrogen-fuel-cell-ev-future-25531965/.
    19. https://kidsastronomy.com/space-exploration/space-shuttle-program/.
    20. Moradi, S.E., Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution by Iron Platinum Loaded Reduced Graphene Oxide. Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Quarterly Journal, 2016. 30(1): p. 1-7.
    21. Li, Y., et al., Identification of Cobalt Oxides with Raman Scattering and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2016. 120(8): p. 4511-4516.
    22. McEnaney, J.M., et al., Electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution using amorphous tungsten phosphide nanoparticles. Chem Commun (Camb), 2014. 50(75): p. 11026-8.
    23. Steinberg, M., Hydrogen Production form Fossil Fuels. 1989.
    24. Ogden, J.M., PROSPECTS FOR BUILDING A HYDROGEN ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 1999. 24(1): p. 227-279.
    25. Pu, Z., et al., Efficient Electrochemical Water Splitting Catalyzed by Electrodeposited Nickel Diselenide Nanoparticles Based Film. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016. 8(7): p. 4718-23.
    26. Read, C.G., et al., General Strategy for the Synthesis of Transition Metal Phosphide Films for Electrocatalytic Hydrogen and Oxygen Evolution. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016. 8(20): p. 12798-803.
    27. Sun, M., et al., Earth-Rich Transition Metal Phosphide for Energy Conversion and Storage. Advanced Energy Materials, 2016. 6(13): p. 1600087.
    28. Kibsgaard, J., et al., Designing an improved transition metal phosphide catalyst for hydrogen evolution using experimental and theoretical trends. Energy Environ. Sci., 2015. 8(10): p. 3022-3029.
    29. Li, X., et al., Nanostructured catalysts for electrochemical water splitting: current state and prospects. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2016. 4(31): p. 11973-12000.
    30. Karst, F., et al., Reduction of Microkinetic Reaction Models for Reactor Optimization exemplified for Hydrogen Production from Methane. Vol. 281. 2015. 981-994.
    31. Merrill, M., Water Electrolysis at the Thermodynamic Limit. 2007.
    32. Tang, S., et al., Review of New Carbon Materials as Catalyst Supports in Direct Alcohol Fuel Cells. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2010. 31(1): p. 12-17.
    33. Liang, Y., et al., Strongly Coupled Inorganic/Nanocarbon Hybrid Materials for Advanced Electrocatalysis. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013. 135(6): p. 2013-2036.
    34. Wang, H. and H. Dai, Strongly coupled inorganic–nano-carbon hybrid materials for energy storage. Chemical Society Reviews, 2013. 42(7): p. 3088-3113.
    35. Khan, M., et al., Graphene based metal and metal oxide nanocomposites: synthesis, properties and their applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015. 3(37): p. 18753-18808.
    36. Zou, X. and Y. Zhang, Noble metal-free hydrogen evolution catalysts for water splitting. Chem Soc Rev, 2015. 44(15): p. 5148-80.
    37. Liang, Y., et al., Co(3)O(4) nanocrystals on graphene as a synergistic catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Nat Mater, 2011. 10(10): p. 780-6.
    38. Hu, X., et al., Large-scale synthesis of WOx–EDA nanobelts and their application as photoswitches. CrystEngComm, 2011. 13(7): p. 2237.
    39. Wang, X., et al., Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 Using Titanium-Substituted and Fluorine-Doped Titanium-Substituted Hydroxyapatite as Photocatalysts. Catalysis Letters, 2017. 147(11): p. 2706-2713.
    40. Zhao, Y., et al., Ultrafine NiO Nanosheets Stabilized by TiO2 from Monolayer NiTi-LDH Precursors: An Active Water Oxidation Electrocatalyst. J Am Chem Soc, 2016. 138(20): p. 6517-24.
    41. Quaino, P., et al., Volcano plots in hydrogen electrocatalysis - uses and abuses. Beilstein J Nanotechnol, 2014. 5: p. 846-54.
    42. Jaksic, M., Volcano plots along the periodic table, their causes and consequences on electrocatalysis for hydrogen electrode reactions. Vol. 3. 2000.
    43. Bhattacharjee, S., U.V. Waghmare, and S.-C. Lee, An improved d-band model of the catalytic activity of magnetic transition metal surfaces. Scientific Reports, 2016. 6: p. 35916.
    44. Zeng, M. and Y. Li, Recent advances in heterogeneous electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015. 3(29): p. 14942-14962.
    45. Shinagawa, T., A.T. Garcia-Esparza, and K. Takanabe, Insight on Tafel slopes from a microkinetic analysis of aqueous electrocatalysis for energy conversion. Scientific Reports, 2015. 5: p. 13801.
    46. Fang, Y.-H. and Z.-P. Liu, Tafel Kinetics of Electrocatalytic Reactions: From Experiment to First-Principles. ACS Catalysis, 2014. 4(12): p. 4364-4376.
    47. Wang, Y., et al., Strategies for developing transition metal phosphides as heterogeneous electrocatalysts for water splitting. Nano Today, 2017. 15: p. 26-55.
    48. Fletcher, S., Tafel slopes from first principles. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, 2008. 13(4): p. 537-549.
    49. Morales-Guio, C.G., L.A. Stern, and X. Hu, Nanostructured hydrotreating catalysts for electrochemical hydrogen evolution. Chem Soc Rev, 2014. 43(18): p. 6555-69.
    50. Cook, T.R., et al., Solar Energy Supply and Storage for the Legacy and Nonlegacy Worlds. Chemical Reviews, 2010. 110(11): p. 6474-6502.
    51. Wang, J., H. Zhang, and X. Wang, Recent Methods for the Synthesis of Noble-Metal-Free Hydrogen-Evolution Electrocatalysts: From Nanoscale to Sub-nanoscale. Small Methods, 2017. 1(6): p. 1700118.
    52. Benson, J., et al., Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction on Edges of a Few Layer Molybdenum Disulfide Nanodots. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2015. 7(25): p. 14113-22.
    53. Herranz, J., et al., Interfacial effects on the catalysis of the hydrogen evolution, oxygen evolution and CO 2 -reduction reactions for (co-)electrolyzer development. Nano Energy, 2016. 29: p. 4-28.
    54. Strmcnik, D., et al., Design principles for hydrogen evolution reaction catalyst materials. Nano Energy, 2016. 29: p. 29-36.
    55. Lemuel G. Untalasco, J., A. Rahman Mariscal, and M. C. Marquez, Morphology Induced Effect on the Electrochemical Activity of Cobaltous Oxide Nanostructures in Potassium Hydroxide and Phosphoric Acid Media. Vol. 916. 2018. 96-100.
    56. Moon, J.-S., et al., The nature of active sites of Ni2P electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. Journal of Catalysis, 2015. 326: p. 92-99.
    57. Liu, D., et al., Unsaturated-sulfur-rich MoS2 nanosheets decorated on free-standing SWNT film: Synthesis, characterization and electrocatalytic application. Nano Research, 2016. 9(7): p. 2079-2087.
    58. Wu, R., et al., Metallic WO2–carbon mesoporous nanowires as highly efficient electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2015. 137(22): p. 6983-6986.
    59. Wang, X.-D., et al., Novel porous molybdenum tungsten phosphide hybrid nanosheets on carbon cloth for efficient hydrogen evolution. Energy & Environmental Science, 2016. 9(4): p. 1468-1475.
    60. Li, Q., et al., N-Doped Carbon-Coated Tungsten Oxynitride Nanowire Arrays for Highly Efficient Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution. ChemSusChem, 2015. 8(15): p. 2487-2491.
    61. Pu, Z., et al., Tungsten phosphide nanorod arrays directly grown on carbon cloth: a highly efficient and stable hydrogen evolution cathode at all pH values. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014. 6(24): p. 21874-9.
    62. Li, Y.H., et al., Local atomic structure modulations activate metal oxide as electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution in acidic water. Nat Commun, 2015. 6: p. 8064.
    63. Zhao, Y., et al., Self-supported tungsten/tungsten dioxide nanowires array as an efficient electrocatalyst in the hydrogen evolution reaction. RSC Adv., 2016. 6(92): p. 89815-89820.
    64. Chen, J., et al., WO3-x Nanoplates Grown on Carbon Nanofibers for an Efficient Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016. 8(28): p. 18132-9.
    65. Wu, R., et al., Metallic WO2-Carbon Mesoporous Nanowires as Highly Efficient Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. J Am Chem Soc, 2015. 137(22): p. 6983-6.
    66. Jing, S., et al., Carbon-Encapsulated WOx Hybrids as Efficient Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution. Adv Mater, 2018. 30(28): p. e1705979.
    67. Liu, W., et al., The effects of exfoliation, organic solvents and anodic activation on the catalytic hydrogen evolution reaction of tungsten disulfide. Nanoscale, 2017. 9(36): p. 13515-13526.
    68. Yan, H., et al., Phosphorus-modified tungsten nitride/reduced graphene oxide as a high-performance, non-noble-metal electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2015. 54(21): p. 6325-9.
    69. Imran, M., et al., Tungsten-molybdenum oxide nanowires/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite with enhanced and durable performance for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017. 42(12): p. 8130-8138.
    70. Duan, J., et al., 3D WS2 Nanolayers@Heteroatom-Doped Graphene Films as Hydrogen Evolution Catalyst Electrodes. Adv Mater, 2015. 27(28): p. 4234-41.
    71. Zhong, X., et al., Mo Doping Induced More Active Sites in Urchin-Like W18O49 Nanostructure with Remarkably Enhanced Performance for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Advanced Functional Materials, 2016. 26(32): p. 5778-5786.
    72. Ren, B., et al., Novel porous tungsten carbide hybrid nanowires on carbon cloth for high-performance hydrogen evolution. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017. 5(25): p. 13196-13203.
    73. Zhao, X., et al., Enhanced Catalytic Activities of Surfactant-Assisted Exfoliated WS(2) Nanodots for Hydrogen Evolution. ACS Nano, 2016. 10(2): p. 2159-66.
    74. Zhou, H., et al., Highly active and durable self-standing WS2/graphene hybrid catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2016. 4(24): p. 9472-9476.
    75. Wang, X., et al., Graphene-like WSe 2 nanosheets for efficient and stable hydrogen evolution. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2017. 691: p. 698-704.
    76. Voiry, D., et al., Enhanced catalytic activity in strained chemically exfoliated WS(2) nanosheets for hydrogen evolution. Nat Mater, 2013. 12(9): p. 850-5.
    77. Pu, Z., et al., Tungsten Phosphide Nanorod Arrays Directly Grown on Carbon Cloth: A Highly Efficient and Stable Hydrogen Evolution Cathode at All pH Values. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2014. 6(24): p. 21874-21879.
    78. Zhu, Y., et al., Rationally Designed Hierarchically Structured Tungsten Nitride and Nitrogen-Rich Graphene-Like Carbon Nanocomposite as Efficient Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalyst. Advanced Science, 2018. 5(2): p. 1700603.
    79. Chen, Z., et al., Tungsten carbide/carbon composite synthesized by combustion-carbothermal reduction method as electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016. 41(30): p. 13005-13013.
    80. Yang, J., et al., Two-Dimensional Hybrid Nanosheets of Tungsten Disulfide and Reduced Graphene Oxide as Catalysts for Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2013. 52(51): p. 13751-13754.
    81. Shi, J., et al., Tungsten nitride nanorods array grown on carbon cloth as an efficient hydrogen evolution cathode at all pH values. Electrochimica Acta, 2015. 154: p. 345-351.
    82. Ko, Y.-J., et al., Tungsten carbide nanowalls as electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction: New approach to durability issue. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2017. 203: p. 684-691.
    83. Jin, H., et al., Transition Metal Induced the Contraction of Tungsten Carbide Lattice as Superior Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Catalyst. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018. 10(26): p. 22094-22101.
    84. Fominski, V.Y., et al., The formation of a hybrid structure from tungsten selenide and oxide plates for a hydrogen-evolution electrocatalyst. Technical Physics Letters, 2016. 42(6): p. 555-558.
    85. Lin, J.-F., et al., Synthesis of tungsten carbide and tungsten disulfide on vertically aligned multi-walled carbon nanotube forests and their application as non-Pt electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015. 3(28): p. 14609-14616.
    86. Chen, W., et al., Single Tungsten Atoms Supported on MOF-Derived N-Doped Carbon for Robust Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution. Adv Mater, 2018. 30(30): p. e1800396.
    87. Xing, Z., et al., Self-standing Ni-WN heterostructure nanowires array: A highly efficient catalytic cathode for hydrogen evolution reaction in alkaline solution. Electrochimica Acta, 2016. 210: p. 729-733.
    88. Zheng, T., et al., Conductive Tungsten Oxide Nanosheets for Highly Efficient Hydrogen Evolution. Nano Lett, 2017. 17(12): p. 7968-7973.
    89. Han, N., et al., Nitrogen-doped tungsten carbide nanoarray as an efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for water splitting in acid. Nature Communications, 2018. 9(1): p. 924.
    90. Liu, C., et al., Noble-metal-free tungsten oxide/carbon (WOx/C) hybrid manowires for highly efficient hydrogen evolution. Nanotechnology, 2017. 28(44): p. 445403.
    91. Hu, Y., et al., Hydrogen Evolution Reaction of γ-Mo0.5W0.5 C Achieved by High Pressure High Temperature Synthesis. Catalysts, 2016. 6(12): p. 208.
    92. Nayak, A.K., et al., Highly Active Tungsten Oxide Nanoplate Electrocatalysts for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction in Acidic and Near Neutral Electrolytes. ACS Omega, 2017. 2(10): p. 7039-7047.
    93. Lukowski, M.A., et al., Highly active hydrogen evolution catalysis from metallic WS2 nanosheets. Energy Environ. Sci., 2014. 7(8): p. 2608-2613.
    94. Zhuang, M., et al., Engineering sub-100 nm Mo(1−x)WxSe2 crystals for efficient hydrogen evolution catalysis. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018. 6(7): p. 2900-2907.
    95. Pu, Z., et al., Ultrasmall tungsten phosphide nanoparticles embedded in nitrogen-doped carbon as a highly active and stable hydrogen-evolution electrocatalyst. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2016. 4(40): p. 15327-15332.
    96. McCrory, C.C., et al., Benchmarking hydrogen evolving reaction and oxygen evolving reaction electrocatalysts for solar water splitting devices. J Am Chem Soc, 2015. 137(13): p. 4347-57.
    97. Turner, J.A., Sustainable hydrogen production. Science, 2004. 305(5686): p. 972-974.
    98. Chen, M., et al., Nitrogen-doped Graphene-Supported Transition-metals Carbide Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Sci Rep, 2015. 5: p. 10389.
    99. Li, J.S., et al., Coupled molybdenum carbide and reduced graphene oxide electrocatalysts for efficient hydrogen evolution. Nat Commun, 2016. 7: p. 11204.
    100. Offer, G., et al., Comparative analysis of battery electric, hydrogen fuel cell and hybrid vehicles in a future sustainable road transport system. Energy policy, 2010. 38(1): p. 24-29.
    101. Hu, J., et al., Hydrogen evolution electrocatalysis with binary-nonmetal transition metal compounds. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017. 5(13): p. 5995-6012.
    102. Pi, M., et al., Facile preparation of semimetallic WP2as a novel photocatalyst with high photoactivity. RSC Adv., 2016. 6(19): p. 15724-15730.
    103. Voiry, D., et al., Enhanced catalytic activity in strained chemically exfoliated WS2 nanosheets for hydrogen evolution. Nat Mater, 2013. 12(9): p. 850-855.
    104. Dai, Z., et al., Hexagonal-Phase Cobalt Monophosphosulfide for Highly Efficient Overall Water Splitting. ACS Nano, 2017. 11(11): p. 11031-11040.
    105. Zhang, Z., et al., Nitrogen and Phosphorus Codoped Mesoporous Carbon Derived from Polypyrrole as Superior Metal-Free Electrocatalyst toward the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017. 9(19): p. 16236-16242.
    106. Harnisch, F., G. Sievers, and U. Schröder, Tungsten carbide as electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction in pH neutral electrolyte solutions. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2009. 89(3-4): p. 455-458.
    107. Li, Q., et al., N-doped carbon-coated tungsten oxynitride nanowire arrays for highly efficient electrochemical hydrogen evolution. ChemSusChem, 2015. 8(15): p. 2487-91.
    108. Wang, X.-D., et al., Novel porous molybdenum tungsten phosphide hybrid nanosheets on carbon cloth for efficient hydrogen evolution. Energy Environ. Sci., 2016. 9(4): p. 1468-1475.
    109. Jin, Z., et al., Three-dimensional amorphous tungsten-doped nickel phosphide microsphere as an efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014. 2(43): p. 18593-18599.
    110. Ma, L., et al., Hydrothermal preparation and supercapacitive performance of flower-like WO 3· H 2 O/reduced graphene oxide composite. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2015. 481: p. 609-615.
    111. Kabtamu, D.M., et al., Electrocatalytic activity of Nb-doped hexagonal WO3 nanowire-modified graphite felt as a positive electrode for vanadium redox flow batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016. 4(29): p. 11472-11480.
    112. Duan, J., et al., Porous C3N4 nanolayers@ N-graphene films as catalyst electrodes for highly efficient hydrogen evolution. ACS nano, 2015. 9(1): p. 931-940.
    113. Chekin, F., S. Bagheri, and S. Bee Abd Hamid, Synthesis of Tungsten Oxide Nanorods by the Controlling Precipitation Reaction: Application for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction on a WO3 Nanorods/Carbon Nanotubes Composite Film Modified Electrode. Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society, 2013. 60(4): p. 447-451.
    114. Ramireddy, T., et al., Phosphorus–carbon nanocomposite anodes for lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015. 3(10): p. 5572-5584.
    115. Ghosh, S., et al., Selective Oxidation of Propylene to Propylene Oxide over Silver-Supported Tungsten Oxide Nanostructure with Molecular Oxygen. ACS Catalysis, 2014. 4(7): p. 2169-2174.
    116. Singh, T., et al., Tailoring surface states in WO3 photoanodes for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Applied Surface Science, 2015. 347: p. 448-453.
    117. Wang, D., et al., Hydrogen evolution catalyzed by cobalt-promoted molybdenum phosphide nanoparticles. Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016. 6(6): p. 1952-1956.
    118. Tang, C., et al., Fe-Doped CoP Nanoarray: A Monolithic Multifunctional Catalyst for Highly Efficient Hydrogen Generation. Advanced Materials, 2017. 29(2): p. 1602441-n/a.
    119. Liu, Y., et al., Coupling Mo2C with Nitrogen-Rich Nanocarbon Leads to Efficient Hydrogen-Evolution Electrocatalytic Sites. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2015. 54(37): p. 10752-7.
    120. Khan, M., et al., Green Approach for the Effective Reduction of Graphene Oxide Using Salvadora persica L. Root (Miswak) Extract. Nanoscale Res Lett, 2015. 10(1): p. 987.
    121. Kabtamu, D.M., et al., Water-activated graphite felt as a high-performance electrode for vanadium redox flow batteries. Journal of Power Sources, 2017. 341: p. 270-279.
    122. Xing, Z., et al., High-Efficiency Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution Catalyzed by Tungsten Phosphide Submicroparticles. ACS Catalysis, 2015. 5(1): p. 145-149.
    123. Lin, Y., Y. Pan, and J. Zhang, In Situ Construction of Nickel Phosphosulfide (Ni5P4|S) Active Species on 3D Ni Foam through Chemical Vapor Deposition for Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution. ChemElectroChem, 2017. 4(5): p. 1108-1116.
    124. Phillips, D.C., et al., Synthesis, characterization, and hydrodesulfurization properties of silica-supported molybdenum phosphide catalysts. Journal of Catalysis, 2002. 207(2): p. 266-273.
    125. Saleem, M., et al., Influence of hydrogen annealing on the optoelectronic properties of WO3 thin films. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015. 40(36): p. 12343-12351.
    126. Chala, T., et al., Highly Efficient Near Infrared Photothermal Conversion Properties of Reduced Tungsten Oxide/Polyurethane Nanocomposites. Nanomaterials, 2017. 7(7): p. 191.
    127. Qiao, X., et al., Nitrogen, phosphorus and iron doped carbon nanospheres with high surface area and hierarchical porous structure for oxygen reduction. Journal of Power Sources, 2015. 288: p. 253-260.
    128. Tian, L., X. Yan, and X. Chen, Electrochemical Activity of Iron Phosphide Nanoparticles in Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Catalysis, 2016. 6(8): p. 5441-5448.
    129. Li, Y., et al., MoS2 nanoparticles grown on graphene: an advanced catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J Am Chem Soc, 2011. 133(19): p. 7296-9.
    130. Shi, Y. and B. Zhang, Recent advances in transition metal phosphide nanomaterials: synthesis and applications in hydrogen evolution reaction. Chem Soc Rev, 2016. 45(6): p. 1529-41.
    131. Jin, Y. and P.K. Shen, Nanoflower-like metallic conductive MoO2 as a high-performance non-precious metal electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015. 3(40): p. 20080-20085.
    132. Khan, M., et al., Graphene based metal and metal oxide nanocomposites: synthesis, properties and their applications. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015. 3(37): p. 18753-18808.
    133. Yan, H., et al., Phosphorus-Modified Tungsten Nitride/Reduced Graphene Oxide as a High-Performance, Non-Noble-Metal Electrocatalyst for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Angewandte Chemie, 2015. 127(21): p. 6423-6427.
    134. Zhang, H., et al., Active Sites Implanted Carbon Cages in Core-Shell Architecture: Highly Active and Durable Electrocatalyst for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Nano, 2016. 10(1): p. 684-94.
    135. Li, D., et al., Efficient Water Oxidation Using CoMnP Nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc, 2016. 138(12): p. 4006-9.
    136. Aslan, E., I. Hatay Patir, and M. Ersoz, Catalytic Hydrogen Evolution by Tungsten Disulfide at Liquid–Liquid Interfaces. ChemCatChem, 2014. 6(10): p. 2832-2835.
    137. Shao, Y., et al., Nanostructured Electrocatalysts for PEM Fuel Cells and Redox Flow Batteries: A Selected Review. ACS Catalysis, 2015. 5(12): p. 7288-7298.
    138. Li, Q., et al., N‐Doped Carbon‐Coated Tungsten Oxynitride Nanowire Arrays for Highly Efficient Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution. ChemSusChem, 2015. 8(15): p. 2487-2491.
    139. Wondimu, T.H., et al., Highly efficient and durable phosphine reduced iron-doped tungsten oxide/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for the hydrogen evolution reaction. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018. 43(13): p. 6481-6490.
    140. Chen, J., et al., WO3–x Nanoplates Grown on Carbon Nanofibers for an Efficient Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016. 8(28): p. 18132-18139.
    141. Xing, Z., et al., Mo Doping Induced More Active Sites in Urchin‐Like W18O49 Nanostructure with Remarkably Enhanced Performance for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Advanced Functional Materials, 2016. 26(32): p. 5778-5786.
    142. Bayeh, A.W., et al., Ta2O5-Nanoparticle-Modified Graphite Felt As a High-Performance Electrode for a Vanadium Redox Flow Battery. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2018. 6(3): p. 3019-3028.
    143. Kabtamu, D.M., et al., Three-dimensional annealed WO3 nanowire/graphene foam as an electrocatalytic material for all vanadium redox flow batteries. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 2017.
    144. Gu, Y., et al., Electronic Structure Tuning in Ni3FeN/r-GO Aerogel toward Bifunctional Electrocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting. ACS Nano, 2018. 12(1): p. 245-253.
    145. Weng, B., et al., Observing the Role of Graphene in Boosting the Two-Electron Reduction of Oxygen in Graphene–WO3Nanorod Photocatalysts. Langmuir, 2014. 30(19): p. 5574-5584.
    146. Chala, T.F., et al., Highly Efficient Near Infrared Photothermal Conversion Properties of Reduced Tungsten Oxide/Polyurethane Nanocomposites. Nanomaterials (Basel), 2017. 7(7).
    147. Dong, H., et al., Three-dimensional Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Supported Molybdenum Disulfide Nanoparticles as an Advanced Catalyst for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Sci Rep, 2015. 5: p. 17542.
    148. Du, D., P. Li, and J. Ouyang, Nitrogen-Doped Reduced Graphene Oxide Prepared by Simultaneous Thermal Reduction and Nitrogen Doping of Graphene Oxide in Air and Its Application as an Electrocatalyst. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2015. 7(48): p. 26952-8.
    149. Weber, A.Z., et al., Erratum: Redox flow batteries: A review (Journal of Applied Electrochemistry DOI: 10.1007/s10800-011-0348-2). Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 2011. 41(10): p. 1165-1166.
    150. Xu, C., et al., Ultrathin S-doped MoSe2nanosheets for efficient hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014. 2(16): p. 5597-5601.
    151. Shibayama, N., et al., Modelling of an equivalent circuit for Cu2ZnSnS4- and Cu2ZnSnSe4-based thin film solar cells. RSC Advances, 2017. 7(41): p. 25347-25352.
    152. Tang, T., et al., Electronic and Morphological Dual Modulation of Cobalt Carbonate Hydroxides by Mn Doping toward Highly Efficient and Stable Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Overall Water Splitting. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2017. 139(24): p. 8320-8328.
    153. Zhang, F., et al., The survey of key technologies in hydrogen energy storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016. 41(33): p. 14535-14552.
    154. Jia, H., et al., Aerosol-spray metal phosphide microspheres with bifunctional electrocatalytic properties for water splitting. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018. 6(11): p. 4783-4792.
    155. Ma, X., et al., A Janus MoSSe monolayer: a potential wide solar-spectrum water-splitting photocatalyst with a low carrier recombination rate. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018. 6(5): p. 2295-2301.
    156. Libin, Y., et al., An efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for water splitting based on cobalt phosphide. Nanotechnology, 2016. 27(23): p. 23LT01.
    157. Zhuang, H., et al., CoFex-CoFe2O4/N-doped carbon nanocomposite derived from in situ pyrolysis of a single source precursor as a superior bifunctional electrocatalyst for water splitting. Electrochimica Acta, 2018. 262: p. 18-26.
    158. Yang, J., et al., In-situ cobalt and nitrogen doped mesoporous graphitic carbon electrocatalyst via directly pyrolyzing hyperbranched cobalt phthalocyanine for hydrogen evolution reaction. Electrochimica Acta, 2018. 262: p. 48-56.
    159. Pellow, M.A., et al., Hydrogen or batteries for grid storage A net energy analysis. Energy & Environmental Science, 2015. 8(7): p. 1938-1952.
    160. Ali, Z., et al., Cobalt selenide decorated carbon spheres for excellent cycling performance of sodium ion batteries. Energy Storage Materials, 2018. 13: p. 19-28.
    161. CoSe2 and NiSe2 nanocrystals as superior bifunctional catalysts for electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016. 8: p. 5327.
    162. Masud, J., et al., Cobalt Selenide Nanostructures: An Efficient Bifunctional Catalyst with High Current Density at Low Coverage. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016. 8(27): p. 17292-17302.
    163. Gao, M.-R., et al., An efficient molybdenum disulfide/cobalt diselenide hybrid catalyst for electrochemical hydrogen generation. Nature Communications, 2015. 6: p. 5982.
    164. Zhang, H., et al., Polymorphic CoSe2 with Mixed Orthorhombic and Cubic Phases for Highly Efficient Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015. 7(3): p. 1772-1779.
    165. Jiaojiao, G., et al., Engineering phase transformation of cobalt selenide in carbon cages and the phases’ bifunctional electrocatalytic activity for water splitting. Nanotechnology, 2017. 28(31): p. 315401.
    166. Ko, Y.N., S.H. Choi, and Y.C. Kang, Hollow Cobalt Selenide Microspheres: Synthesis and Application as Anode Materials for Na-Ion Batteries. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016. 8(10): p. 6449-6456.
    167. Jia, J., et al., Influence of deposition voltage of cobalt diselenide preparation on the film quality and the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Solar Energy, 2017. 151: p. 61-67.
    168. Duan, Y., et al., Bifacial dye-sensitized solar cells with transparent cobalt selenide alloy counter electrodes. Journal of Power Sources, 2015. 284: p. 349-354.
    169. Sobhani, A. and M. Salavati-Niasari, Cobalt selenide nanostructures: Hydrothermal synthesis, considering the magnetic property and effect of the different synthesis conditions. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2016. 219: p. 1089-1094.
    170. Liu, K., et al., CoS2xSe2(1-x) nanowire array: an efficient ternary electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Nanoscale, 2016. 8(8): p. 4699-4704.
    171. Cabán-Acevedo, M., et al., Efficient hydrogen evolution catalysis using ternary pyrite-type cobalt phosphosulphide. Nature Materials, 2015. 14: p. 1245.
    172. Liu, W., et al., A highly active and stable hydrogen evolution catalyst based on pyrite-structured cobalt phosphosulfide. Nature Communications, 2016. 7: p. 10771.
    173. Chen, P., et al., Phase-Transformation Engineering in Cobalt Diselenide Realizing Enhanced Catalytic Activity for Hydrogen Evolution in an Alkaline Medium. Advanced Materials, 2016. 28(34): p. 7527-7532.
    174. Ullah, K., et al., Microwave synthesis of a CoSe2/graphene-TiO2 heterostructure for improved hydrogen evolution from aqueous solutions in the presence of sacrificial agents. RSC Advances, 2015. 5(24): p. 18841-18849.
    175. Kovanda, V., M. Vlček, and H. Jain, Structure of As–Se and As–P–Se glasses studied by Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 2003. 326-327: p. 88-92.
    176. G. Georgiev, D., et al., Molecular structure, glass transition temperature variation, agglomeration theory, and network connectivity of binary P-Se glasses. Vol. 64. 2001.
    177. Popović, L., D. de Waal, and J. Boeyens, Correlations Between Raman Wavenumbers and P-O Bond Lengths in Crystalline Inorganic Phosphates. Vol. 36. 2005. 2-11.
    178. Ullah, K., et al., Microwave synthesis of a CoSe2/graphene–TiO2 heterostructure for improved hydrogen evolution from aqueous solutions in the presence of sacrificial agents. RSC Advances, 2015. 5(24): p. 18841-18849.
    179. Wondimu, T.H., et al., Highly efficient and durable phosphine reduced iron-doped tungsten oxide/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for the hydrogen evolution reaction. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018.
    180. Kosacki, I., et al., Raman scattering and lattice defects in nanocrystalline CeO2 thin films. Solid State Ionics, 2002. 149(1): p. 99-105.
    181. Mohamed, S., S. Y. Attia, and H. Hassan, Spinel-structured FeCo2O4 mesoporous nanosheets as efficient electrode for supercapacitor applications. Vol. 251. 2017.
    182. Hua, B., et al., A Coupling for Success: Controlled Growth of Co/CoOx Nanoshoots on Perovskite Mesoporous Nanofibres as High-Performance Trifunctional Electrocatalysts in Alkaline Condition. Vol. 32. 2017.
    183. Panissod, P., M. Larhichi, and M.F. Lapierre-Ravet, Anomalous properties of cobalt diselenide. Solid State Communications, 1979. 31(5): p. 273-276.
    184. Wang, J., et al., Recent advances in cobalt phosphide based materials for energy-related applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017. 5(44): p. 22913-22932.
    185. Zheng, Y.-R., et al., Cobalt diselenide nanobelts grafted on carbon fiber felt: an efficient and robust 3D cathode for hydrogen production. Chemical Science, 2015. 6(8): p. 4594-4598.
    186. Seitz, L.C., et al., Tuning Composition and Activity of Cobalt Titanium Oxide Catalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Electrochimica Acta, 2016. 193: p. 240-245.
    187. Ouyang, C., X. Wang, and S. Wang, Phosphorus-doped CoS2 nanosheet arrays as ultra-efficient electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Chemical Communications, 2015. 51(75): p. 14160-14163.
    188. Kabtamu, D.M., et al., Three-dimensional annealed WO3 nanowire/graphene foam as an electrocatalytic material for all vanadium redox flow batteries. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 2017. 1(10): p. 2091-2100.
    189. Córdoba-Torres, P., T.J. Mesquita, and R.P. Nogueira, Relationship between the Origin of Constant-Phase Element Behavior in Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy and Electrode Surface Structure. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015. 119(8): p. 4136-4147.
    190. García-Osorio, D.A., et al., The Kinetic Parameters of the Oxygen Evolution Reaction (OER) Calculated on Inactive Anodes via EIS Transfer Functions: •OH Formation. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2017. 164(11): p. E3321-E3328.
    191. Dupont, M., A.F. Hollenkamp, and S.W. Donne, Electrochemically active surface area effects on the performance of manganese dioxide for electrochemical capacitor applications. Electrochimica Acta, 2013. 104: p. 140-147.
    192. Reid, O.R., F.S. Saleh, and E.B. Easton, Determining electrochemically active surface area in PEM fuel cell electrodes with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and its application to catalyst durability. Electrochimica Acta, 2013. 114: p. 278-284.
    193. Fischer, A., et al., Structural purity of magnetite nanoparticles in magnetotactic bacteria. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 2011.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2024/01/07 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 2029/01/07 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 2029/01/07 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE