企業競爭不僅在價格上的評比，更在於企業價值是否與時俱進地創新、能否取得轉型的先機，以便在時代變動的巨輪下得以存續。價值創新者重新定義客戶問題，也得以創造新的契機；企業在牢固核心競爭力面對挑戰時，必須同時以轉型因應多變的市場需求。價值創新非一蹴可及，需要洞察出市場真正的需要，正如同企業轉型亦須謹慎而為，經營者不僅要從心態上改變，也需要從管理的模式調整。
A公司從近40年前的草創期開始，一路跟隨台灣經濟成長的腳步至今，在商業空間的機電工程服務中，以精良的設計技巧、嚴密的人力與成本控管，和靈活的溝通能力贏得公司成長契機與客戶深度信賴。從參與機電系統全國標準化制訂，到接手六星級飯店、國際精品購物中心及世界級手機展售中心的工程，作者探討企業如何透過學習的方式歷經創新及轉型，如何運用專案管理制度與提升工程服務品質，搭配靈巧的組織與堅實的工程團隊作為持續創新價值之基石，並以此朝向永續經營的願景前進。

Enterprise competition is not only focusing on price comparison but on whether the company's value is innovative with times and catch up in the business transformation. Value innovators redefine customer desire and create new opportunities. When facing challenges with firm core competitiveness, companies must also respond to changing market demands with transformation. Value innovation is not easy to achieve, which requires insight into the real needs of the market. Just as companies need to be cautious in their transformation, entrepreneurs should not only change their mind about times but need to adjust from the management methods.
Company A has been following the footsteps of Taiwan's economy and has a successful growth since 40 years ago. In the electromechanical engineering industry, company A has won with excellent design techniques, strict workers' abilities evaluation, and cost control, flexible communication professions. Therefore, company A won customers' trust in this industry. From participating in the formulation of national standardization of electromechanical systems to taking over the construction projects of six-star hotels, international boutique shopping centers, world-class mobile phone exhibition, as well as the sales centers, company A has done great jobs in every project. This research discusses how companies have undergone innovation and transformation through learning in project management systems, and upgrading projects service quality with a finesse organization and a strong engineering team to continuous innovation value. At the same time, the goal of company A is towards the vision of sustainable management.

中文文獻
1. 王吉發（2006）。企業轉型動因及路徑研究，哈爾濱工業大學管理學博士學位論文。
2. 何雍慶、蔡青姿（2008）。運用藍海策略的價值創新於產品開發之研究：市場動盪與技術動盪為干擾效果。企業管理學報，第七十八期，頁25-56。
3. 林公孚（2006）。品質與價值創新之道。品質月刊，第四十二期，頁55-57。
4. 哈佛商業評論，2020年2月號，學習成長的任務不再只有培訓！催生轉型學習，Lundberg& Westerman. 王怡棻 譯。
5. 哈佛商業評論。2019年12月號，轉型的兩難，Frankenberger, Mayer, Reiter& Schmidt. 林俊宏譯 。
6. 翁望回（1997）。中小企業的策略性轉型-台灣案例，華夏文化與現代管理國際學術研討會論文集-華夏文化之營銷實務論文集，香港：城市大學，頁50-61。
7. 鄭天明、邱國盛、陳零、黃洛敏、陳彥佐（2010）。桃米生態村發展歷程之質性研究：兼論價值創新策略的應用。人文社會科學研究，第四卷，頁61-85。
8. 鄭金龍（2016）。台電月刊，640期。
9. 謝家祥、田效文、薛家和（2019）。應用DANP探討直銷商價值創新關鍵因素分析。直銷管理評論，第二卷，頁108-133。
10. 謝碧枝（2000）。企業轉行中的多角化策略選擇－以食品業為例，屏東科技大學企業管理研究所未發表碩士論文集。
英文文獻
1. Abel, M.H., and Leblanc, A. (2009), “Competences Management in Organizational Learning Context,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Management Emergent Digital EcoSystems, 353-360.
2. Dinc, M. S. (2017), “Organizational Commitment Components and Job Performance: Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction,” Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Sciences, 11, 773-789.
3. Isoraite, M. (2004), “Theoretical Aspects of Benchmarking Theory,” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Mykolo Romerio University, Lithuania.
4. Kim, W. C., and Mauborgne, R.(1999), “Strategy, Value Innovation, and the Knowledge Economy,” ABI/INFORM Collection, 41-54.
5. Kotter, J.P. ASPI Book Reviews (2007), “Leading Change,” Air & Space Power Journal, 112.
6. Lavy, A., and Merry, U. (1988), Organizational Transformation: Revitalizing Organization for a Competitive World, Jossey-Bass Inc.
7. McGinnis, F. (2007), “Enterprise modeling and enterprise transformation,” Information Knowledge Systems Management, 123-143.
8. Mittelstaedt, R. E. Jr. (1992), “Benchmarking: How to Learn from Best-In-Class Practices,” in National Productivity Review, ABI/INFORM Collection, 301-315.
9. Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., and Mowday, R. T. (1974), “Organizational Commitment, Job satisfaction, and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians,” journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603-609.
10. Radulescu, C. M. (2017), “New Strategic Orientations of Firms based on Value Innovation,” North Economic Review: vol. 1 : Iss.1, 303-311.
11. Rindova, V.P., and Kotha, S. (2001), Continuous “Morphing”: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1263-1280.
12. Rouse, B., and Baba, L. (2006), “Enterprise Transformation”, Communications of the ACM, 67-72.
13. Rutowski, K. D., Guiler,J. K., and Schimmel, K. E. (2009), “Benchmarking organizational commitment across nonprofit human services organizations in Pennsylvania,” Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 135-150.
14. Setyaningrum, R. P. (2017), “Relationship between Servant Leadership in Organizational Culture, Organizational Commitment, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour and Customer Satisfaction,” European Research Studies Journal, 3A, 554-569.
15. Smit, J. (2015), “The Innovation Chain Value and Adaptability of Organizations,” Journal of International Technology and Information Management: Vol. 24 : Iss. 3 , Article 4.
16. Sunassee, N. N. and Haumant, V. (2004), “Organizational Learning versus the Learning Organization,” Proceedings of Static, 264-268.
17. Underdown, R. and Aikman, R. (2002), “The Impact of Quality Systems Implementation on Enterprise Transformation”, Texas Manufacturing Assistance Center University of Texas, Arlington.
18. Wang, D. and Zhang, D. D. (2010, November), “Relationship among Organizational Support, Organizational Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior of University Faculty Members,” International conference on Management Science & Engineering, Australia.
19. Wu, Fang., and Cavusgil, S.T. (2005), “Organizational learning, commitment, and joint value creation in interfirm relationships,” Journal of Business Research, 59 (2006), 81-89.
20. Zhang, Y. and Lv, X (2015), “Research on Enterprise Business Model Innovation in The Perspective of Value Chain Optimization – Case of kalian Inc business model innovation”, Beijing Jiaotong University, China
21. Zhong, L., Collins, A. and Egmon, J. (2004), “Organizational Learning in the Globalization Process,” Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Learning sciences, 576-581.
 
網路資源
1. 台電供電系統簡介（108）。取自於：https://www.taipower.com.tw/tc/page.aspx?mid=211 。
2. 自來水（2020，April 5）。In Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 取自於：https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%87%AA%E6%9D%A5%E6%B0%B4 。
3. 行業標準分類（105年版）。台北市：行政院主計處。
4. 吳武泰（2014）。緊急應變指揮系統架構圖。取自於：http://www.nfa.gov.tw/Upload/pro/attachment/d0c1d5555747c76b8e8b89fb4e2a2a0a.pdf 。
5. 林炳炎（2007）。龜山水力發電所—台灣第一。取自於：https://pylin.kaishao.idv.tw/?p=121 。
6. 建築技術規則建築設備編（108年版）。全國法規資料庫。取自於：https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0070117 。
7. 消防設備師及消防設備士管理辦法（104年版）。全國法規資料庫。取自於：https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0120031 。
8. 專門職業及技術人員高等考試技師考試規則（108年版）。台北市：考選部。
9. 鄭金龍（2016）。台電月刊，640期。取自於：https://tpcjournal.taipower.com.tw/article/2378?p=1 。
10. 營建統計資訊（108年版）。台北市：內政部營建署。
11. 職類別薪資調查動態查詢（108年版）。台北市：勞動部。
12. 中小企業白皮書（全）（107年版）。台北市：經濟部中小企業處。
13. 中小企業白皮書（全）（108年版）。台北市：經濟部中小企業處。