簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃婕妤
Chieh-Yu Huang
論文名稱: 團隊成員交換關係與員工建言行為之關聯性研究-情感型信任與認知型信任之中介效果
The Study of Relationship between Team-member Exchange and Employee Voice Behavior – The Mediating effect of Cognition-based trust and Affect-based trust
指導教授: 鄭仁偉
Jen-Wei Cheng
口試委員: 陳崇文
Chung-wen Chen
廖文志
Wen-Chih Liao,
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 84
中文關鍵詞: 團隊成員交換關係認知型信任情感型信任建言行為
外文關鍵詞: Team-Member Exchange, Voice Behavior, Cognition-Based Trust, Affect-Based Trust
相關次數: 點閱:387下載:13
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 勇於即時反應企業經營情勢,客戶意見與各項管理挑戰問題的員工建言行為表現,會影響企業競爭優勢的創造。本研究以業務員為研究對象,通常業務代表公司,其接觸顧客較為頻繁,較易知道顧客的真實需求與想法。但是,業務員通常為確保個人銷售利益的藏私心態、自我保護意識與銷售成就動機較不願無償釋出辛苦建立的人脈維繫,多數時候其對工作區域調動或是培育新人接棒的關心程度較低。然而,在工作內容日益繁雜的競爭環境中,企業紛紛採用建立業務團隊作為因應策略,藉此來促進業務員們相互交流並提出個人看法與建議。業務團隊組織結構改變後,業務團隊成員彼此之間的信任關係與互動也隨之改變,對建言行為也造成影響。對於此狀況,目前少有相關研究,但此現象卻普遍存在於企業中,故值得進行探討於研究。

    本研究以團隊成員交換關係來探討員工建言行為表現,並將認知型信任與情感型信任作為中介,探討建言行為發生的程度是否會在這兩種信任成因影響下而有所不同。透過此研究提供實務界人際互動與員工行為展現較可行的建議。


    Employees who are willing to respond on business operating situation, customers feedback and management challenges places the company in a more positive and advantageous status. This research aims at salesman, who represents the company in contacting customers first handedly and is prone to understand customer needs and perspectives. Salesman however is more indifferent to the mobility of his working environment and is less concerned with training new comers due to self- protection, which can be explained as follow. Because of the profit- oriented target in a salesman, he is more inclined to hide his people network and strategies from colleague in order to ensure personal success and achievements.
    Nevertheless, companies prefer team collaboration out of personal success, especially situated in a competitive economy and society nowadays. In order to combat the self- protective phenomenon among salesman, companies have established methods such as sales team, expecting salesmen to interact and exchange ideas and suggestions for the group interest. After gradual change in the structure of sales team, companies are witnessing positive results in sales team members, who have gained mutual trust and affinity among each other, unlike the one man job as before. Although there are only a few researches in this situation, this kind of improvement in salesman performance is a topic worth investigating.
    This research uses “team-member exchange” , ” cognition-based trust” , ” affect-based trust” , and “voice behavior” as variables to discuss whether team member exchange will lead to voice behavior though cognition-based trust and affect-based trust. I hope this research will be useful for the enterprises.

    中文摘要 ABSTRACT 誌謝 目錄 圖表索引 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究背景與動機 第二節 研究目的 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 團隊成員交換關係 第二節 信任 (TRUST) 第三節 建言行為(VOICE-BEHAVIOR) 第四節 團隊成員交換關係、信任與建言行為之間相互關係 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究架構 第二節 研究變數之操作型定義與測量工具 第三節 樣本與資料蒐集 第四節資料分析方法 第四章 實證結果 第一節 樣本敘述性統計 第二節 單因子變異數分析 第三節 量表信效度分析 第四節 研究變項平均數、標準差相關係數分析 第五節 研究假說驗證 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 研究結論 第二節 學術理論意涵 一、探討團隊成員交換關係與建言行為之關聯性 二、認知型信任在團隊成員交換關係與員工建言行為的中介效果 第三節 管理實務意涵 第四節 研究限制與未來研究建議 參考文獻 一、英文文獻 二、中文文獻 附件:問卷

    1. Bateman, T.S., & Crant, J.M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of organizational behavior, 14(2), 103-118.
    2. Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategy for taking charge. Richard Lynch (2000) Corporate Strategy, 444.
    3. Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life: Transaction Publishers.
    4. Botero, I.C., & Van Dyne, L. (2009). Employee voice behavior interactive effects of LMX and power distance in the United States and Colombia. Management Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 84-104.
    5. Butler, Jr, J.K. (1991). Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. Journal of management, 17(3), 643-663.
    6. Casper, W.J., & Harris, C.M. (2008). Work-life benefits and organizational attachment: Self-interest utility and signaling theory models. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(1), 95-109.
    7. Chebat, J.C., & Kollias, P. (2000). The impact of empowerment on customer contact employees’ roles in service organizations. Journal of Service research, 3(1), 66-81.
    8. Chowdhury, S. (2005). The role of affect-and cognition-based trust in complex knowledge sharing. Journal of Managerial issues, 310-326.
    9. Chua, YJ, Morris, W., & Ingram, P. (2010). Embeddedness and New Idea Discussion in Professional Networks: The Mediating Role of Affect‐Based Trust. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 44(2), 85-104.
    10. Chua, Y.J., Ingram, P., & Morris, M.W. (2008). From the head and the heart: Locating cognition-and affect-based trust in managers' professional networks. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 436-452.
    11. Crant, J.M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of management, 26(3), 435-462.
    12. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M.S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
    13. Dienesch, R.M., & Liden, R.C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of management review, 618-634.
    14. Dyne, L.V., Ang, S., & Botero, I.C. (2003). Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs*. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359-1392.
    15. Deutsch, M. (1960). The effect of motivational orientation upon trust and suspicion. Human Relations, 13(2), 123-139.
    16. Deutsch, M. (1962). Cooperation and Trust: Some theoretical notes. Industrial Relations, 8(1), 1-27
    17. Ellis, J.B., Van Dyne, L., Greenberg, J., & Edwards, M.S. (2009). Voice and silence as observer reactions to defensive voice: Predictions based on communication competence theory. Voice and silence in organizations, 37-61.
    18. Erdem, F., & Ozen, J. (2003). Cognitive and affective dimensions of trust in developing team performance. Team Performance Management, 9(5/6), 131-135.
    19. Farrell, D. (1983). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect as responses to job dissatisfaction: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of management journal, 26(4), 596-607.
    20. Graen, B,, & Scandura, T.A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in organizational behavior.
    21. Greenberg, J., & Edwards, M.S. (2008). Voice and silence in organizations: Emerald Group Publishing.
    22. Hagedoorn, M., Van Y., Nico W., Van E., & Buunk, B.P. (1999). Employees' reactions to problematic events: A circumplex structure of five categories of responses, and the role of job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(3), 309-321.
    23. Hansen, M.H., Morrow, Jr, J.L, & Batista, J.C. (2002). The impact of trust on cooperative membership retention, performance, and satisfaction: an exploratory study. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 5(1), 41-59.
    24. Holste, J.S., & Fields, D. (2010). Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 128-140.
    25. JF Hair, RE Anderson, RL Tatham, WC Black - NY: Prentice Hall International, (1998).Multivariate data analysis, 5th
    26. Jones, G. R., & George, J.M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of management review, 531-546.
    27. Kamdar, D., & Van Dyne, L. (2007). The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1286.
    28. Kenny, D.A. (2008). Reflections on mediation. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 353-358.
    29. Konovsky, M.A., & Pugh, S.D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 656-669.
    30. Lee, H.J. (2004). The role of competence-based trust and organizational identification in continuous improvement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(6), 623-639.
    31. LePine, J.A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853.
    32. LePine, J.A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 326.
    33. Lewis, J.D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social forces, 63(4), 967-985.
    34. Li, N., Liang, J., & Crant, J.M. (2010). The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: A relational perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 395.
    35. Liden, R.C., Wayne, S. J., Kraimer, M.L., & Sparrowe, R.T. (2003). The dual commitments of contingent workers: an examination of contingents' commitment to the agency and the organization. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 609-625.
    36. Lindenberg, S. (2000). It takes both trust and lack of mistrust: The workings of cooperation and relational signaling in contractual relationships. Journal of Management and Governance, 4(1), 11-33.
    37. Lindenberg, S. (2003). The cognitive side of governance. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 20, 47-76.
    38. Lindenberg, S. (2003). Governance seen from a framing point of view: the employment relationship and relational signalling. B. Nooteboom & FE Six (red.), The trust process in organizations, empirical studies of the determinants and the process of trust development, 37-57.
    39. Malhotra, D. (2004). Trust and reciprocity decisions: The differing perspectives of trustors and trusted parties. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94(2), 61-73.
    40. Mao, H.Y. (2006). The relationship between organizational level and workplace friendship. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(10), 1819-1833.
    41. Masterson, S.S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B.M, & Taylor, M. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management journal, 43(4), 738-748.
    42. McAllister, D.J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of management journal, 24-59.
    43. Murphy, S.M., Wayne, S.J., Liden, R.C., & Erdogan, B. (2003). Understanding social loafing: The role of justice perceptions and exchange relationships. Human Relations, 56(1), 61-84.
    44. Ng, K.Y., & Chua, Y.J.. (2006). Do I Contribute More When I Trust More? Differential Effects of Cognition‐and Affect‐Based Trust. Management and Organization Review, 2(1), 43-66.
    45. Nikolaou, I., Vakola, Maria, & Bourantas, D. (2008). Who speaks up at work? Dispositional influences on employees' voice behavior. Personnel Review, 37(6), 666-679.
    46. Nyhan, R.C., & Marlowe, H.A. (1997). Development and psychometric properties of the organizational trust inventory. Evaluation Review, 21(5), 614-635.
    47. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Paine, Julie B., & Bachrach, D.G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of management, 26(3), 513-563.
    48. Rusbult, C.E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G., & Mainous, A.G. (1988). Impact of exchange variableson exit,voice,loyalty,and neglect:an integrative model of responses to declining job status satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 599-627.
    49. Seers, A. (1989). Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 43(1), 118-135.
    50. Seers, A., Keller, T., & Wilkerson, J. (2003). Can Team Members Share Leadership? Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership, 77-102.
    51. Seers, A., Petty, M.M., & Cashman, J.F. (1995). Team-Member Exchange Under Team and Traditional Management A Naturally Occurring Quasi-Experiment. Group & Organization Management, 20(1), 18-38.
    52. Settoon, R.P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R.C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader–member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of applied psychology, 81(3), 219.
    53. Sherony, K.M., & Green, S.G. (2002). Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 542.
    54. Sias, P.M, & Cahill, D.J. (1998). From coworkers to friends: The development of peer friendships in the workplace. Western Journal of Communication (includes Communication Reports), 62(3), 273-299.
    55. Song, S.H., & Olshfski, D. (2008). Friends at Work A Comparative Study of Work Attitudes in Seoul City Government and New Jersey State Government. Administration & Society, 40(2), 147-169.
    56. Song, S.H. (2007). Workplace Friendship and EmployeesProductivity: LMX Theory and the case of the Seoul City Government. International Review of Public Administration, 11(1), 47-58.
    57. Thompson, J.A. (2005). Proactive personality and job performance: a social capital perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 1011.
    58. Tse, H.M, & Dasborough, M.T. (2008). A study of exchange and emotions in team member relationships. Group & Organization Management, 33(2), 194-215.
    59. Tse, H.M., Dasborough, M.T., & Ashkanasy, N.M. (2008). A multi-level analysis of team climate and interpersonal exchange relationships at work. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 195-211.
    60. Vakola, M., & Bouradas, D. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of organisational silence: an empirical investigation. Employee Relations, 27(5), 441-458.
    61. Van Dyne, L., Kamdar, D., & Joireman, J. (2008). In-role perceptions buffer the negative impact of low LMX on helping and enhance the positive impact of high LMX on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology; Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1195.
    62. Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J.A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
    63. Weber, L.R., & Carter, A. I. (2002). The social construction of trust: Springer.
    64. Zhou, J., & George, J.M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696.

    二、中文文獻

    1. 林佳怡, (2004),新進人員與直屬主管及資深同事價值觀契合度對新進人員組織承諾之影響-並檢驗 [與主管交換關係] 及 [與同事交換關係] 之干擾效果
    2. 林鉦棽, (2004),休閒旅館業從業人員的組織公正, 組織信任與組織公民行為關係: 社會交換理論的分析, 中華管理學報, 5(1), 91-112
    3. 林鉦棽, & 陳心怡, (2006), 組織公正對動機與信任及組織公民行為之影響. 亞太經濟管理評論, 9(2), 23-41
    4. 林鉦棽, 蕭淑月, & 何慧清, (2005),社會交換理論觀點下組織支持, 組織知識分享行為與組織公民行為相關因素之研究: 以信任與關係為分析切入點, 人力資源管理學報, 5(1), 77-110
    5. 許道然, (2001),公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究 公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究 公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究. 國立政治大學公共行政學系研究所博士論文
    6. 許道然, (2001), 組織信任之研究: 一個整合性觀點
    7. 許道然, (2002), 組織公民行為之研究
    8. 曾鈺雯, (2011), 政治技巧、人際信任與建言關係之研究
    9. 黃品全, (2003), 顧客接觸人員與上司、同事關係對付能及服務工作之影響-社會交換觀點
    10. 魏瑞芬, (2009), 心理契約違反與員工建言行為關係的研究-個人與工作適的調節效果
    11. 蔡昕諭, (2009), 企業社會責任價值觀知覺、同事間交換關係與組織公民行為之關聯性
    12. 黃麗穎, (2004), 團隊成員交換關係、信任與知識分享關係之研究
    13. 曾士芳, (2010), 員工工作投入與內在動機之研究:探討承諾基礎人力資源實務、制度式組織信任及裁員之影響
    14. 林傳洋, (2008), 關係認定取向與主管領導行為對建言行為影響
    15. 許 惠, (2011), 倫理領導與員工建言行為之關連性研究-感受當責與信任主管之中介效果
    16. 陳方裕, (2010), 組織政治知覺對組織信任之影響:組織犬儒主義的中介效果分析
    17. 劉鴻漢, (2003), 組織公平、團隊成員交換關係與社會賦閒之關聯性研究
    18. 黃麗穎, (2004), 團隊成員交換關係、信任與知識分享關係之研究
    19. 李瑞瓔, (2008), 職場友誼與知識分享之研究.
    20. 黃淑玲, (2008), 團隊成員交換關係與職場友誼之研究-團隊情感氣候之
    干擾效果
    21. 邱紀鳳, (2010),團隊成員交換關係與員工建言之關聯性研究-角色定義之中介效果
    22. 吳明隆, (2010), SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務 = SPSS operation and application : the practice of quantitative analysis of questionnaire data
    23. 蕭文龍, (2012), 多變量分析最佳入門實用書 : SPSS+LISREAL(SEM)
    徐聖訓, (2009), LISREL新手入門 : 在結構方程模式的應用
    24. Ronald D. Yockey著; 陳正昌,簡淸華譯, (2012), SPSS就是這麼簡單

    QR CODE