隨著科技發展，資訊和資本在快速流通，組織經營環境相較於過去也變得更加不確定性。在這種情形之下，如何讓員工主動獻言獻策，提出有建設性的意見，以幫助企業發現和處理問題，使得企業得到永續經營，就顯得尤為重要。在企業運營的過程中可以發現，部屬信任主管確可降低人際關係間的不確定性，因為部屬信任主管的善意，提高部屬承擔風險的意願，同時促進部屬與主管間的合作。團隊成員之間相互信任，形成良好的人際互動，可使員工同仁間的工作協調度高，並提升工作滿足感及組織承諾。良好人際互動，會正向提高員工對自身價值的確認，產生組織成員間相互幫助、分享、信任與回饋，也能夠讓員工安心表達想法，且員工對於組織的忠誠度也會提高，認為組織對於自身的期待越多，較容易回報組織，因此更可能表達出自己的心聲。當團隊成員間的互動關係良好，團隊成員的工作績效更容易達成。團隊-成員交換關係呼應了華人文化中的「有關係(guanxi)就沒關係，沒關係就有關係」的概念。本文建議未來研究可運用量化研究方法，來實證分析本文的研究命題。

With the development of science and technology, information and capital are rapidly flow, and the organizational environment has become more uncertain than before. In this situation, it is very important that how to let employees to actively offer positive suggestions to support organization to find and deal with problems, in order to achieve sustainable operation. In the process of enterprise operation, it can be found that trusted supervisors of subordinates can indeed reduce the uncertainty of interpersonal relationship, because the goodwill of trusted supervisors of subordinates improves the willingness of subordinates to take risks and promotes the cooperation between subordinates and supervisors. Team members trust each other and form a good interpersonal interaction, which can improve the work coordination between employees and colleagues, and improve the job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Good interpersonal interaction, can positively improve staff's own value, help each other, sharing between members, trust and feedback, to communicate ideas can also be to reassure employees, and employees to the organization's loyalty will improve, think organizations for their expectations, the more easily return organization, therefore more likely to express their own feelings. When team members interact well, team performance is more likely to be achieved. The quality of team-member exchange echo the Chinese culture: “guanxi is everything". This thesis suggests that future research can use quantitative methods to empirically analyze the research propositions of this thesis.

樊景立、鄭伯壎(民86)，華人自評式績效考核中的自謙偏差：題意、謙虛價值及自尊之影響，中華心理學刊，39(2)，103-118。
李寶元（民91），人力資源管理案例教程，人民郵電出版社。
李長貴（民87） ，組織行為，臺北：華泰文化。
李美玲、 周萍芬(民92)，員工認知對工作態度與工作績效之探討，遠東學報二
十卷四期869。
林守紀，周麗芳，任金剛，曾春榮(民106)，員工建言行為：回顧與未來，人力資源管理學報，第17卷，第1期，頁1-33。
戚樹誠、林行宜(民83)，企業高階主管親信關係之研究，管理科學學報，11 卷2
期，頁281-312。
秦峰;许芳（民102），马基雅维利主义者的工作绩效和职业成功-基于工作场所的元分析，心理學進展。
邱紀鳳，鄭仁偉(民99)，團隊成員交換關係與員工建言之關連性研究--角色定義
之中介效果，臺灣科技大學企管未出版碩士論文。
王麗婕(民102)，員工工作滿意度,工作投入與工作績效關係的實證研究，北京林
業大學未出版碩士論文。
王沛、孫連榮（民93），工作績效評估研究綜述［J］.人類工效學，頁6:28-29。
謝冰瑩、李鍌、劉正浩及邱燮友(民70)編譯，「新譯四書讀本」，台北：三民
書局。
楊傑、方俐洛、淩文銓(民90)，關於績效評價若干基本問題的思考，自然辯證法
通訊，23期，頁40-51。
於桂義(民88)，民間諺語，心理矛盾與能本管理，第三屆兩岸中華文化與企業管理論文集(二)，華東理工大學，成功大學主辦，頁446-450。
於明鑫(民108)，中國跨國公司差異化激勵對核心員工績效影響研究，亞洲貿易
與商業雜誌，第六卷，第二期，頁55-66。
鄭伯壎 (民84)，差序格局與華人組織行為，本土心理學研究，3 卷，頁142-219。
鄭仁偉(民108)，部屬信任主管，建言行為與工作績效的關係:主管-主管交換與團
隊-成員交換的調節角色，科技部研究計畫。
鄭仁偉、郭智輝、 袁梅玲、許惠珊、陳春希，2014， 就業與勞動關係
鄭仁偉、廖文志、石佩珊，2002，「台灣會計事務所與客戶間之組織信任模型研
究」，空大商學學報，第十期，頁189-212。
鄭仁偉、林秀霞、郭智輝、劉麟書(民95)，人際信任的理論性構念詮釋，國立台中技術學院學報，第七卷，第二期，頁3-25。
仲理峰、時勘(民91)，績效管理的幾個基本問題，南開管理評論，第三期，頁15-19。
周浩、龍立榮（民94），心理科學進展, 績效考核中寬大效應的成因及控制方法，
心理學進展，第13卷，第六期，頁806-813。
周莉（民104），新生代員工薪酬公平感對工作績效的影響機制研究—組織內信
任的仲介作用，中國礦業大學未出版碩士論文。
周麗芳(民91)，華人組織中的關係與社會網絡，本土心理學研究，第18期，頁175-228。
周允潔(民102)，不當督導對，情感性承諾與工作績效影響之研究: 工作不安全
感之中介效用，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
Afsar, B. & Shahjehan, A. (2018). Linking ethical leadership and moral voice: The effects of moral efficacy, trust in leader, and leader-follower value congruence. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 39, No.6, pp.775-793.
Atuahene-Gima, K. & Li, H. (2002). When does trust matter? Antecedents and contingent effects of supervisee trust on performance in selling new products in China and the United States. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66, 61-81.
Banksi, G. C., Batchelor, J. H., Seers, A., O’boyle Jr. E. H., Pollack, J. M. & Gower, K. (2014). What does team–member exchange bring to the party? A meta-analytic review of team and leader social exchange. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, pp. 273–295.
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, 2(2), 349-444.
Carnevale, J. B., Huang, L., Crede, M., Harms, P., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2017). Leading to stimulate employees ideas: A quantitative review of leader–member exchange, employee voice, creativity, and innovative behavior. Applied Psychology: an international review, Vol. 66, No. 4, pp.517–552.
Cashman, J., Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. 1976. Organizational understructure and leadership: A longitudinal investigation of the managerial role-making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15: 278-296.
Cheng, J. W., Chang, S. C., Kuo, J. H. & Cheung, Y. H.（2014). Ethical leadership, work engagement and voice behavior. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 114, No. 5, 817-831.
Cheng, J. W., Lu, K. M., Chang, Y. Y., & Johnstone, S. (2013). Voice behavior and work engagement: The moderating role of supervisor-attributed motives. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 51, 81–102.
Cheng, J. W., Lu, K. M., Cheung, Y. H., & Kuo, J. H. (2013). Psychological safety serves as mediator between person-group fit and voice behavior. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, Vol.12, Nos.4/5/6, 297-309.
Cheng, J. W., Seih, Y. T., Hung, C. Z. & Su, T. W. (2016). Voice behavior and career success: The moderating role of supervisor attribution motives, Universal Journal of Psychology, 4(4): 209-214.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94 Supplement, 95-120.
Cropanzano, Dasborough, & Weiss (2017). Affective events and the development of leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 42, No. 2, PP .233 – 258.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.
Detert, J.R., & Burris, E.R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628.
Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of management, 38(6), 1715-1759.
Dundon, T., Wilkinson, A., Marchington, M., & Ackers, P. (2004). The meanings and purpose of employee voice. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(6), 1149-1170.
Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1419-1452.
Eisenberger, R., Karagonlar, G., Stinglhamber, F., Neves, P., Becker, T. E., Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., & Steiger-Mueller, M. (2010). Leader–member exchange and affective organizational commitment: The contribution of supervisor's organizational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1085-1103.
Farh, C. I., Lanaj, K., & Ilies, R. (2017). Resource-based contingencies of when team-member exchange helps member performance in teams. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp.1117–1137.
Farmer, S. M., Van Dyne, L., & Kamdar, D. (2015). The contextualized self: How team–member exchange leads to coworker identification and helping OCB. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 100, No.2, pp.583-595.
Farrell, A. (1983). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect as responses to job dissatisfaction: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 596-607.
Frese, M., Teng, E., & Wijnen, C. J. (1999). Helping to improve suggestion systems: Predictors of making suggestions in companies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(7), 1139-1155.
Fukuyama, F., Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press, 1995.
Fuller, J. B., Marler, L. E., & Hester, K. (2006). Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(8), 1089-1120.
Gao, L., Janssen, O., & Shi, K. (2011). Leader trust and employee voice: The moderating role of empowering leader behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 22, pp.787–798.
George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (1997). Organizational spontaneity in context. Human Performance, 10(2), 153-170.
Graen, G. B., Cashman, J. F., Ginsburg, S., & Schiemann, W. (1977). Effects of linking-pin quality on the quality of working life of lower participants. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 491-504.
Gu, J., Wang, G., Liu, H., Song, D., & He, C. (2018). Linking authoritarian leadership to employee creativity: The influences of leader–member exchange, team identification and power distance. Chinese Management Studies, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 384-406.
Guinot, J., Chiva, R., & Roca-Puig, V. (2014). Interpersonal trust, stress and satisfaction at work: an empirical study. Personnel Review, Vol. 43, Iss1, pp. 96 – 115.
Guptai, N., Ho, V., Pollack, J. M., & Lai, L. (2016). Multilevel perspective of interpersonal trust: Individual, dyadic, and cross-level predictors of Performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.37, pp. 1271–1292.
Harvey, B. M., Reiche, S., & Moeller, M. (2011). Developing effective global relationships through staffing with inpatriate managers: The role of interpersonal trust. Journal of International Management Vol.17, pp.150–161.
He, W., Fehr, R., Yam, K. C., Long, L. R., & Hao, P. (2017). Interactional justice, leader–member exchange, and employee performance: Examining the moderating role of justice differentiation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(4), 537-557.
Herdman, Yang, & Arthur (2017). How does leader-member exchange disparity affect teamwork behavior and effectiveness in work groups? The moderating role of leader-leader exchange. Journal of Management, Vol. 43, No. 5, PP .1498 – 1523.
Hirschman, A.O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
Hodson, R. (2008). The ethnographic contribution to understanding co-worker relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(1), 169-192.
Holland, P. & Cooper, B., & Sheehan, C. (2017). Employee voice, supervisor support, and engagement: The mediating role of trust. Human Resource Management, Vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 915–929.
Jacobs, J. (1965). The death and life of great American cities. London: Penguin Books.
John, K. A., & Shah, P. P. (1997). Interpersonal relationships and task performance: an examination of mediating processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 775-790.
Kakkar, H., Tangirala, S., Srivastava, N. K., & Kamdar, D. (2016). The dispositional antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(9), 1342-1351.
Kamdar, D., & VanDyne, L. (2007). The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1286-1298.
LePine, J.A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853–868.
Liao, S. H. & Chen, C. C. (2018). Leader-member exchange and employee creativity: Knowledge sharing: the moderated mediating role of psychological contract. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp.419-435.
Liao, S. H., Chen, C. C., & Hu, D.C. (2018). The role of knowledge sharing and LMX to enhance employee creativity in theme park work team: A case study of Taiwan. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 30, No.5, pp. 2343-2359.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 407-416.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader–member exchanges. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 662–674.
Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge, University Press, 2001.
Lin, S. H. J., & Johnson, R. E. (2015). A suggestion to improve a day keeps your depletion away: Examining promotive and prohibitive voice behaviors within a regulatory focus and ego depletion framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1381-1397.
Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 189-202.
Lorinkova, N. M., & Perry, S. J. (2017). When is empowerment effective? The role of leader-leader exchange in empowering leadership, cynicism, and time theft. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1631-1654.
Love, M. S., & Forret, M. (2008). Exchange Relationships at Work: An examination of the relationship between team-member exchange and supervisor reports of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14(4), 342.
Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. (2016). Leader–member exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta‐analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 67-121.
Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. B. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 1-13.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 3, 709-734.
McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 1, 24-59.
Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1453-1476.
Molm, L. D., Takahashi, N. & Peterson, G. (2000). Risk and trust in social exchange: An experimental test of a classical proposition. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 105, No. 5, 1396-1427.
Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management annals, 5(1), 373-412.
Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management review, 25(4), 706-725.
Ng, T. W. H. & Feldman, D. C. (2013). Changes in perceived supervisor embeddedness: Effects on employees’ embeddedness, organizational trust, and voice behavior. Personnel Psychology, Vol.66, pp. 645–685.
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2012). Employee voice behavior: A meta‐analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 216-234.
Pathak, S. & Muralidharan, E. (2016). Informal institutions and their comparative influences on social and commercial entrepreneurship: The role of in-group collectivism and interpersonal trust. Journal of Small Business Management, Vol.54, No.1, pp. 168–188.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G. & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 49, No. 1, 95-112.
Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception, but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 15, 245–259.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404.
Schmitt & Borman ,(1993),Personnel Selection in organizations.
Seers, A. (1989). Team-Member Exchange Quality: A new construct for role-making research. Organizational behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 118-135.
Seers, A., Petty, M. M., & Cashman J. F. (1995). Team-member exchange under team and traditional management. Group & Organization Management, 20(1), 18-38.
Serageldin, I. & Grootaert, C. (2000). Defining social capital: An integrating view, in P. Dasgupta and I. Serageldin (Eds) Social capital: A multifaceted perspective, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Shih, H, A. & Nikodemus Hans Setiadi Wijaya (2017). Team-member exchange, voice behavior, and creative work involvement. International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 38 Issue: 3, pp.417-431.
Stamper, C. L., & Dyne, L. V. (2001). Work status and organizational citizenship behavior: A field study of restaurant employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(5), 517-536.
Susan, M. M., Sandy, J. W., Robert, C. L., & Berrin E. (2003). Understanding social loafing: The role of justice perceptions and exchange relationships. Human Relations, 56(1), 61-84.
Tangirala, S., Green, S. G., & Ramanujam, R. (2007). In the shadow of the boss's boss: Effects of supervisors' upward exchange relationships on employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 309-320.
Tepper, B. J., & Taylor, E. C. (2003). Relationships among supervisors’ and subordinates’ procedural justice perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviors. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 97–105.
Tse, H. H. M., Dasborough, M. T., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2008). A multi-level analysis of team climate and interpersonal exchange relationships at work. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 195-211.
Tse, H. H. M., Lam, C. K., Gu, J., & Lin, X. S. (2018). Examining the interpersonal process and consequence of leader–member exchange comparison:The role of procedural justice climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior,Vol. 39, No. 8, pp.922-940.
Uhl-Bien, M., & Maslyn, J. M. (2003). Reciprocity in manager-subordinate relationships: Components, configurations, and outcomes. Journal of Management, 29(4), 511-532.
Van Dyne, L., Kamdar, D., & Joireman, J. (2008). In-role perceptions buffer the negative impact of low LMX on helping and enhance the positive impact of high LMX on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1195–1207.
Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. X. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers' performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of management Journal, 48(3), 420-432.
Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, 513-530.
Wicks, A. C., Berman, S. L., & Jones, T. M. (1999). The structure of optimal trust: Moral and strategic Implications. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 1, 99-116.
Yu, A., Matta, F. K., & Cornfield, B. (2018). Is LMX differentiation beneficial or detrimental for group effectiveness? A meta-analytic investigation and theoretical integration. Academy of Management Journal,Vol. 61, No. 3.
Zhou, L., Wang, M., Chen, G., & Shi, J. (2012). Supervisors' upward exchange relationships and subordinate outcomes: Testing the multilevel mediation role of empowerment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 668-680.