以往的產品著重視覺感官的刺激，美感指的是視覺的第一印象。研究者認為，美的體驗可由動作帶入，喚起以往的身體記憶，開啟與產品較高的互動層級，觸發了環境脈絡下使用者的經驗與想像。動覺美學的文化性、體現度在使用者心理價值中，占有一席之地。
因此，以動作開展產品設計為本研究主要探究的目標，首先透過文獻探討使用者如何因為動作的帶入加深直覺性的操作，以及動作如何影響使用者心理的情感定位。接著分析現有互動燈具的動作表情，並透過「燈具脈絡探尋」了解大眾對於現有燈具的認知，「動作探索工作坊」廣泛地蒐集現有的動作，成為動作開啟的設計資源。並以設計實例 “Twins”與 “Zenta”詮釋動作帶入燈具設計的特性，在參與式設計中，在重要環節加入參與者的體驗與回饋，使研究者重新定義與聚焦設計過程，深化與確立設計目標。
不同體驗的操作方式影響著使用者對於形體的詮釋，透過設計物的模糊性與留白，在參與者的心中留下不同的體驗、操作方式與價值定位。在開燈的當下提供使用者另一種經驗，心理感受影響著開啟燈具的過程，除了功能性、愉悅性外，燈具因為動作的開啟在參與者心中有更高層級的價值與意義。

Abstract
Over the last few years, there are more and more interaction designs that have been widely discussed in HCI community. However, most research focuses on the functionality or usability, but fewer on the construction of meaning in interaction. To probe the behavior of using lamp, we performed a series of activities, including culture probe (Gaver et al. 1999), exploration of movement (Ross et al. 2010), participatory design, and interview (Light 2006). The findings were iteratively used to frame and reframe the design space of our concept and to inform our prototyping of interactive lamps. We present an appropriate design, ‘Twins’, which not only enriches lived experience through a lamp with composite functions in four different shape placement (Figure 1.) but also explore a new possibility of lamp design to change perspective of HCI in an ambiguous way (Zimmerman et al. 2007).
Another intention is to unfold an alternative form of social computing in terms of everyday practice, a pair of lamps, which provide interesting aspects ranging from embodiment to personal meaning and social meaning. While turning the pair lamps to the same shape placement, a user and his/her friends could see indicatory LED’s lighting up, and feel connected coincidentally in different spaces. After participants lived with Twins for a whole day, we conducted in-depth interviews to describe the phenomenon with a dialogical approach to meaning-making in detail through deploying our design artifacts in the life world (Figure 2.). We argue that our design itself is not a physical form used to light up only, but rather a perceptual medium to warm up the communication of users and their friends. In particular, our research emphasizes on how this everyday practice provides us a new kind of user experience. We would expect that our design could be an exemplary of embodied interaction. Further, this research should contribute understanding of embodied interaction to the HCI community.
Reference
1. Gaver, B., T. Dunne, et al. (1999). "Design: Cultural probes." interactions 6(1): 21-29.
2. Light, A. (2006). "Adding method to meaning: a technique for exploring peoples' experience with technology." Behaviour & Information Technology 25(2): 175-187.
3. Ross, P. R. and S. Wensveen (2010). Designing Behavior in Interaction: Using Aesthetic Experience as a Mechanism for Design.
4. Zimmerman, J., J. Forlizzi, et al. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. San Jose, California, USA, ACM: 493-502.

英文文獻
1. Binder, T., Redstrom, J. (2006). Exemplary design research. In Design Research Society Wonderground International Conference. 1-4 October, Lisbon.
2. Fishkin, K. P. (2004). A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces.Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(5), 347-358. Springer-Verlag.
3. Gaver, B., T. Dunne, et al. (1999). "Design: Cultural probes." interactions 6(1): 21-29.
4. Gaver, W., Blythe, M., Boucher,A., Jarvis, N., Bowers, J., Wright, P.,(2010). The Prayer Companion Openness and Specificity, Materiality and Spirituality. CHI '10. ACM Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
5. Hummels, C., Overbeeke, K. C., & Klooster, S. (2007). Move to get moved: a search for methods, tools and knowledge to design for expressive and rich movement-based interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(8), 677-690.
6. Jordan, P.W. (2000). Designing Pleasurable Products – An introduction to the new human factors.

7. Kuniavsky, M. (2010). Chapter 16 Nabaztag, an Ambiguous Avatar. In Smart Things: Ubiquitous Computing User Experience Design (p250). London: Morgan Kaufmann.
8. Light, A. (2006). Adding method to meaning: a technique for exploring peoples' experience with technology. Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 25, No. 2. (March 2006), pp. 175-187
9. Moen, J. (2007). From Hand-Held to Body-Worn : Embodied Experiences of the Design and Use of a Wearable Movement-Based Interaction Concept.Elements, 15-17. ACM.
10. Petersen, M. G., Iversen, O. S., & Krogh, P. G. (2004). Aesthetic Interaction — A Pragmatist ’ s Aesthetics of Interactive Systems. Media, pp, 269-276. ACM New York, NY, USA.
11. Ross, P. R., & Wensveen, S. A. G. (2010). Designing Behavior in Interaction : Using Aesthetic Experience as a Mechanism for Design. International Journal,4(2), 3-13.
12. Saffer, D. (2008). Designing Gestural Interfaces. Annals of Physics (Vol. 1, p. 270). OʼReilly Media.
13. Verplank, B. (2003). Interaction Design Sketchbook. Design, 9(December), 1-23. February.
14. Wensveen, S. A. G., Djajadiningrat, J. P., & Overbeeke, C. J. (2004). Interaction frogger: a design framework to couple action and function through feedback and feedforward. Designing Interactive Systems, 177-184. ACM Press.
15. Zimmerman, J., J. Forlizzi, et al. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. San Jose, California, USA, ACM: 493-502.

中文文獻
1. 徐江敏、李姚軍(譯)(1992)。日常生活中的自我表演。台北市：桂冠。(The presentation of self in everyday life, Goffman, E.,1992)
2. 周世箴(譯)(2006)。我們賴以生存的譬喻。台北市：聯經。(Metaphors we live by, Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.,1980)
3. 翁鵲嵐、鄭玉屏、張志傑(譯)(2005)。情感設計:我們為何喜歡(討厭)日常用品。台北市：田園。(Emotional design:why we love(or hate)every thungs, Norman, D. A.,2005)
4. 卓耀宗(譯)(2011)。好設計不簡單:和設計師聯手馴服複雜科技，享受豐富生活。台北市：遠流。(Living with Complexity, Norman, D. A.,2010)
5. 陳力豪(2003)。物件物理特質所提供之Affordance感知差異研究。碩士論文，國立雲林科技大學工業設計系，雲林縣。
6. 梁桂嘉(2010)。家用燈飾之綠色設計策略與應用。碩士論文，國立台灣師範大學設計研究所，台北市。
7. 蕭舒駿(2010)。感官經驗統合之設計創作。碩士論文，國立台灣科技大學設計研究所，台北市。
8 謝杰樺、王雲幼。數位化解析情緒，優質人類生活，淺談動作分析中情緒應用。快樂學習。美育第168期。
9. 成寒(譯)(2007)。靜謐與光明。台北市：聯經。(Between Silence and Light : Spirit in the Architecture of Louis I. Kahn, Kahn,L.I.,1979)
10. 蔣勳(2006)。美的覺醒。台北市：遠流。