本研究的主要概念是來自於Nelson and Winter（1982）對於組織能耐的理論基礎發展而來，並利用Henderson and Cockburn（1994）所發展出的核心能耐的兩個主要構面，亦即組成能力及建構能力，來衡量產學合作的能耐所在。
透過迴歸分析來探討標準化流程、溝通、誘因、資訊優勢－權力分配、資訊優勢－績效考核、團隊績效、共同價值觀、創新文化、共同合作經驗及專利數等變數對於產學合作績效的影響。
結果發現標準化流程、團隊績效及創新文化等三項變數對於合作案的產品品質是有正向顯著的影響。標準化流程、資訊優勢－權力分配、資訊優勢－績效考核、團隊績效及創新文化等五項變數對於合作產品的獲利率有正向顯著的影響。最後在合作所帶來的知識創造表現則與誘因及共同價值觀等二項變數有正向顯著的關係存在。

The main concepts of this research come from Nelson and Winter’s (1982) theory of organization capabilities. Henderson and Cockburn’s (1994) framework is utilized to measure the capabilities of industry-university collaboration.
We use multiple regression models to see how the factors, which are the standardization of procedure, communication, incentive management, assignment of decision rights by information advantage, assignment of performance evaluation right by information advantage, team performance evaluation, common values and innovative culture, affect the results of industry-university collaborations.
This research finds that standardization of procedure, team performance evaluation and innovative culture have positive effect on the quality of collaborative products. Standardization of procedure, assignment of decision rights by information advantage, assignment of performance evaluation right by information advantage, team performance evaluation and innovative culture have positive effect on the profit of collaborative products. Inducement and common values have positive effect on knowledge creation.

一、中文部份
1.Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P.（2004），策略地圖（陳正平等譯），台北市：臉譜出版社（原著出版年：2004年）。
2.Nonaka, I and Takeuchi, H（1997），創新求勝─智價企業論（楊子江，王美音譯），台北市：遠流出版社（原著出版年：1995年）。
3.林維熊（2004），策略管理，未出版書籍。
二、英文部份
1.Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. (1993), “Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 33-46.
2.Anderson, J. and Narus, J. (1990), “A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 42-58.
3.Azaroff, L.V. (1982), “Industry-university collaboration: how to make it work?,” Research management, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 31-34.
4.Barber, A. A. (1985), “University-Industry Research Cooperation,” SRA Journal, Vol.17. No. 2, pp. 19-30.
5.Barnes, T., Pashby, L. and Gibbons, A. (2002), “Effective University –Industry Interaction: A Multi-case Evaluation of Collaborative R&D Projects,” European Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 272–285.
6.Besanko, D., Dranove D., Shanley, M. and Schaefer S. (2003), Economics of Strategy (3rd ed.), Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
7.Bloedon, R. V. and Stokes, D. R. (1994), “Making University/Industry Collaborative Research Succeed,” Research Technology Management, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 44-48.
8.Bourdieu, P. (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice, New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.Bourdieu, P. (1990), The Logic of Practice, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.Collis, D. J. (1994), “Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, Winter Special Issue, 　pp. 143-152.
11.Das, T. K. and Teng, B-S. (1998), “The Dynamics of Alliance Conditions in The Alliance Development Process,” Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 725-746.
12.Dyer, J. H. and Singh, H. (1998), “The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 660-679.
13.Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B.T. (2003), “Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change,” Administrative Science Quarterly,　Vol. 48, No. 1, pp.94-118.
14.Geisler, E. (2001), “Industry-University Technology Cooperation: A Theory of Inter-Organizational Relationships,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 217-229.
15.Gomes, J. F. S., Hurmelinna P., Amaral, V. and Blomqvist, K. (2005), “Managing relationships of the republic of science and the kingdom of industry,” Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 17, No. 1-2, pp. 88-98.
16.Henderson, R. and Clark, K. B. (1990), “Architectural Innovation: The reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 9-30.
17.Henderson, R. and Cockburn, I. (1994), “Measuring Competence? Exploring Firm Effects in Pharmaceutical Research,” Strategic Management Journal, 　Vol. 15, Summer Special Issue, pp. 63-84.
18.Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1995), “Specific and General Knowledge, and Organizational Structure,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 4-18.
19.Khanna, T., Gulati, R. and Nohria, N. (1998), “The Dynamics of Learning Alliances: Competition, Cooperation, and Relative Scope,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 193-210.
20.Leonard-Barton, D. (1992), “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, Summer Special Issue, pp. 111-126.
21.Mansfield, E. and Lee, J. Y. (1996), “The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support,” Research Policy, Vol. 25, No. 7, pp. 1047-1058.
22.Mead, N., Beckman, K., Lawrence, J., O’Mary, G., Parish, C., Unpingco, P. and Walker, H. (1999), “Industry/university collaborations: different perspectives heighten mutual opportunities,” The Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 49, No. 2-3, pp. 155-162.
23.Mohr, J. and Spekman, R. (1994), “Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 135-152.
24.Mora-Valentin, E. M., Montoro-Sanchez, A. and Guerras-Martin L. A., “Determining Factors in the Success of R&D cooperative Agreements Between Firms and Research Organizations,” Research Policy, Vol. 33, No.1 , pp.17-40.
25.Motohashi, K. (2005), “University–industry collaborations in Japan: The role of new technology-based firms in transforming the National Innovation System,” Research Policy, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 583-594.
26.Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G.(1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
27.Ouchi, W. G., and Bolton, M. K. (1988). “The Logic of Joint Research and Development,” California Management Review, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 9-33.
28.Peteraf, M. A. (1993), “The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 3,pp. 179-191.
29.Reams, B. (1986)., University-Industry Research Partnerships, Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
30.Ryle, G. (1949), The Concept of Mind, London: Hutchinson House.
31.Santoro, M. D. and Chakrabarti, A. K. (1999), “Building industry-university research centers: some strategic considerations,” International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 225-244.
32.Santoro, M. D. and Gopalakrishnan, S. (2000), “The institutionalization of knowledge transfer activities within industry–university collaborative ventures,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 17, No. 3-4.,pp. 299–319.
33.Santoro, M. D. and Betts, S. C. (2002), “Making University-Industry Partnerships work,” Research Technology Management, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 42-46.
34.Sivadas, E. and Dwyer, F. R. (2000), “An Examination of Organizational Factors Influencing New Product Success in Internal and Alliance-Based Processes,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64, No. , pp. 31-49.
35.Smith, K. (1995), “Interactions in knowledge systems: foundations, policy implications and empirical methods,” STI-Review, Vol. 16, pp. 69–102.
36.Van Dierdonck, R. and Debackere, K. (1988), “Academic entrepreneurship at Belgian universities,” R&D Management, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 341-53.
37.Venkatraman, N. and Ramanujam, V. (1986), “Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research：A Comparison of Approaches!,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 801-814.
38.Williamson, O. E. (1975), Market and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti-Trust　Implication, NY: The Free Press.
39.Zollo, M., Reuer, J. J. and Singh, H. (2002), “Interorganizational Routines and Performance in Strategic Alliances,” Organization Science, Vol.13, No.6, pp.701-713.