研究生: |
潘志瑋 Chih-Wei Pan |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
研發組織能力-台灣高科技產業實證研究 The Capabilities of R&D Organization-An Empirical Study of Taiwan High Technology Industry |
指導教授: |
林維熊
Wei-Shong Lin |
口試委員: |
胡昌亞
Chang-Ya Hu 孔祥科 Xiang-Ke Kong 梅國忠 Guo-Zhong Mei |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理系 Department of Business Administration |
論文出版年: | 2005 |
畢業學年度: | 93 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 49 |
中文關鍵詞: | 高科技產業 、組織能力 、研發管理 |
外文關鍵詞: | R&D management, capabilities, high-technology |
相關次數: | 點閱:298 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
於高科技產業中,過去研究及實務界都認為研發活動的績效和投入資金、人才及技術取得有莫大的關係。但是除了研發資金、人才及技術,如何從廠商內部建立組織能力充分利用現有資源才是最重要的課題。
研究發現研發成本控制方面,研發組織跨部門溝通順暢是有正向幫助。但是研發流程重新規劃成反向影響。知識技術提升方面,研發組織採用標準化研發流程及產品模組化有正向幫助,以及個人績效評估制度方面,納入“團隊績效”及“鼓勵申請專利”都有正向幫助。但是研發流程重新規劃成反向影響。在研發進度方面,研發組織標準化流程及研發人員了解職責有正向幫助。但是研發流程重新規劃成反向影響。
組織授權當中,專案內各功能性部門協調權力授權給專案主管,對於研發成本、知識技術提升及研發進度有正向幫助。而專案計畫內進度排程權力授權給功能性部門主管對於知識提升有正向幫助。
In high technology industry, the past research and firms all consider that investment, human resources and technology have tremendous influence on R&D performance. Besides investment, human resources and technology, how to create capabilities to efficiently use resources the firm owns is the key to gain competitive advantage.
This research finds that cross-functional communication has positive affect on R&D cost reduction. Standardizing R&D procedure, product module, team performance evaluation, and rewarding research patent have positive affect on it knowledge creation. Standardizing R&D procedure and understanding duties have positive affect on speeding the R&D.
Regarding organization empowerment, the coordination right delegated to project managers would be good for R&D cost reduction, knowledge creation and speed of R&D. The schedule control right delegated to functional deparment managers would be good for knowledge creation.
中文
1.丁錫鏞主編(1992),現代科技管理學:如何做好科技研發管理,嵐德。
2.王廣仁(1988),「矩陣式組織設計管理之研究」,國立政治大學碩士論文。
3.吳思華(2000),策略九說,臉譜出版。
4.林維熊(2004),策略管理,台灣科技大學課程教材,
5.袁建中、張建清、邱泰平(2004),科技管理:觀念與案例,聯經。
6.財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策實驗與研究中心,“產業策略評析:鴻海善用『專利策略』布局微笑曲線左半端!”,網址:http://cdnet.stpi.org.tw/techroom/analysis/pat002.htm
7.張紹勳(1994),SPSS For Windows 多變量統計分析,松崗。
8.張紹勳、林秀娟(1994),SPSS For Windows 統計分析-上下冊,松崗。
9.黃昆明(2001),「功能式矩陣組織研發管理關鍵成功因素之探討」,國立中山大學碩士論文。
10.楊和炳(2003),科技管理,五南。
11.劉常勇(2003),「第四代研發管理」,能力雜誌,1月份,頁82-89。
英文
1.Cooper R.G. & Kleinschmidt E. J.(1996), ”Winning Business in Product Develop: The Critical Success Factors”, Research.Technology Management, Vol.39, No.4:p19-29.
2.Davis S.M. & Lawrence P.R.(1977), Matrix, Reading, Massachusettes: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company,
3.Galbraith J. R.(1971), “Matrix Organization Design: How to combine functional and project forms”, Business Horizons, February, p29-40.
4.Henderson R. & Cockburn I.(1994), “Measuring Competence? Exploring Firm Effect In Pharmaceutical Reseach”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.15, p63-84.
5.Hodgetts R. M.(1968), “Leadership Techniques in the Project Organization”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.11, p211-219,
6.Hultink E. J. & Robben H. S. J.(1995), “Measuring New Product Success: The Difference that Time Perspective Makes”, Journal of Product Innovation Management; Vol.12 Issue 5, p392.
7.James A. B., Clifford W. S. & Jerold L. Z.(2001), Managerial Economics and Organizational Architecture, 2nd ed, McGraw-Hill.
8.Johne F. A. & Patricia A. S.(1988), “Success Factors in Product Innovation: A Seclective Review of Literature”, Journal of Product innovation Management, Vol.5, No2: 114-128.
9.Kuzunoki K., Nonaka I., & Nagata A.(1998), ”Organizational capabilities in product development of Japanese firms: a conceptual framework and empirical findings”. Organization science, Vol.9, No.6, November-December.
10.Larson E.W. & Gobeli D. H.(1988), ”Organization For Product Development Project”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, May, p180-190.
11.Larson E. W.& Gobeli D. H.(1985), ”Project Management Structure: Is There A Common Language?”, Project Management Journal, June, p40-44.
12.Leonard-Barton D. (1992), “Core Capabilities And Core Rigidities: A Paradox In Managing New Product Development”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.13, p111-125
13.Morbey G. K. (1988), ”R&D: Its Relationship to Company Performance”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.5, No3, p191-200.
14.Nelson R. R. & Winter, S. G.. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
15.Schoemaker P. J. H. (1992), “How to link strategic vision to core capabilities”, Sloan management review/ fall.
16.Roussel P. A, Saad K. N. & Erickson T. J. (1991), Third Generation R&D: Management the risk to Corporate Strategy, Harvard Business School Press.
17.PMI Standard Committee(2000), A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Newton Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
18.Prahalad C. K. & Hamel G.. (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation”, Harvord Business Review, May-June, p79-91.
19.Rinholm B. L. & Boag B. A. (1987), “Controlling New Product Development in the Small Technology-Based Firm”, American Journal of Small Business, p37-50.
20.Grant R. M. (1991), “The Resource-based theory of Competitive Advantage: Implication for Strategy”, California Management Review, vol.33
21.Stuckenbruck L.C. (1984), ”Interface Management, or Making the Matrix Work” in D.I. Cleland, Eds., Matrix Management Systems Handbook.
22.Teece D. J., Pisano G.. & Shuen A. (1997), ”Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.18, p509-533.
23.Souder W. E. (1987.5-6), “Stimulating and Management Idea”, Research-Technology Management, Vol.30, No3, p13-17.
24.Youker R. (1977), ” Organization Alternatives for Project Managers”, Management Review, Nov., p46-53.