簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蔡定宏
Ting-Hung Tsai
論文名稱: 房屋特徵變數與房價:以學區評比與人口特徵作為調節效果之研究
The Attributes of House and the House Price : The Moderating effects of the School Quality and Demographic Variables
指導教授: 林維熊
Wei-Shong Lin
口試委員: 吳宗祐
none
葉明義
none
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 39
中文關鍵詞: 房價學區評比調節效果美國大西雅圖地區
外文關鍵詞: Housing price, School district rating, Moderating effect, greater Seattle area
相關次數: 點閱:202下載:10
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究欲探討影響房價波動之因素,並進一步將學區評比、家長評比和人口特徵做為調節變數,分析是否有調節效果。實證結果顯示,空氣品質評比、內部面積、浴室數、國小與國中學區評比較高的地區,該區每平方英呎房價較貴;平均通勤時間、人口變動率、房間數、平均家庭人數、白人人口比例高的地區,該區每平方英呎房價較便宜。本研究亦發現,在考量調節變數後,房價模型解釋力提升3.6 %。學區、家長評比在內部面積與房間數對房價變動之影響力具有調節效果。白人人口比例與平均家庭人數在房間數與浴室數對房價變動之影響力具有調節效果。由此可見,評估房屋品質特徵變數時,應考量學區與人口特徵變數的差異。


    This research is to discuss the factors cause house price difference. Furthermore, school district rating, parent rating, demographic characteristics are included as moderators to analyze whether moderating effect exist. The test results show that areas with higher air quality reviews, larger internal area, more number of bathrooms, and higher elementary and junior high school district rating result in higher house price per square foot. Areas with longer average commuting time, higher population change rate, more number of rooms, higher average number per household, and white population result in lower house price per square foot. This study also found that the housing price model’s adjusted R2 are increased 3.6% while the moderators are put into consideration. School district and parent rating show a moderating effect on the influence of house size and number of rooms towards house price changes. Meanwhile, white population and average family member per household demonstrate a moderating effect on the influence of number of rooms and number of bathrooms towards house price changes. Therefore, the potential housing buyers and housing policy markers should considerate the difference of school district and demographic characteristics variables for efficiency decision making.

    摘要I AbstractII 目錄III 圖目錄V 表目錄VI 第一章 緒論1 第一節 研究背景與動機1 第二節 研究目的3 第三節 研究流程4 第二章 文獻探討5 第一節 影響房價波動之因素5 第二節 基要價值6 第三章 研究方法8 第一節 研究架構8 第二節 研究推導9 第三節 資料蒐集11 第四節 研究變項之定義與衡量方式12 第四章 研究結果16 第一節 各城市特徵敘述16 第二節 各城市複迴歸分析與目前城市概況敘述19 第三節 大西雅圖地區全區複迴歸分析24 第四節 調節效果實證總結與分析29 第五章 結論與建議35 第一節 研究結論35 第二節 研究限制與未來研究之建議37 參考文獻38

    1.Alonso, W. (1964), “Location and Land Use,” Cambridge, Mass Harvard University Press.
    2.Anas, A., and S. J. Eum (1984), “Hedonic Analysis of a Housing Market in Disequilibrium,” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 15, pp. 87-106.
    3.Black, A., P. Fraster, and M. Hoesli (2006), “House Prices, Fundamentals and Bubbles,” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 33, pp. 1535-1555.
    4.Bourassa, S. C., P. H. Hendershott, and J. Murphy (2001), “Further Evidence on the Existence of Housing Market Bubbles,” Journal of Property Research, Vol. 18, pp. 1-19.
    5.Brasington, D. M., and D. Hite (2005), “Demand for Environmental Quality: A Spatial Hedonic Analysis,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 35, pp. 57–82.
    6.Case, K. E., and R. J. Shiller (2003), “Is There a Bubble in the Housing Market?” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 2, pp. 299-362.
    7.Chan, H. L., S. K. Lee, and K. Y. Woo (2001), “Detecting Rational Bubbles in the Residential Housing Markets of Hong Kong,” Economic Modelling, Vol. 18, pp. 61-73.
    8.DeSilva, S., and Y. Elmelech (2012), “Housing Inequality in the United States: Explaining the White-Minority Disparities in Homeownership,” Housing Studies, Vol. 27, pp. 1-26.
    9.Fernandez-Kranz, D., and M. T. Hon (2006), “A Cross-Section Analysis of the Income Elasticity of Housing Demand in Spain: Is there a Real Estate Bubble?” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 32, pp. 449-470.
    10.Gatzlaff, D. H., and M. T. Smith (1993), “The Impact of the Miami Metrorail on the Value of Residences near Station,” Land Economics, Vol. 69, pp. 54-66.
    11.Goodman, A. C. (1977), “A Comparison of Block Group and Census Tract Data in a Hedonic Housing Price Model,” Land Economics, Vol. 53, pp. 483-487.
    12.Goodman, A. C. (1988), “An Econometric Model of Housing Price, Permanent Income, Tenure Choice, and Housing Demand,” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol.23, pp. 327-353.
    13.Hamilton, J. D. (1986), “On Testing for Self-Fulfilling Speculative Price Bubbles,” International Economic Review, Vol. 27, pp. 545-552.
    14.Haurin, D. R., and D. Brasington (1996), “School Quality and Real House Prices: Inter- and Intrametropolitan Effects,” Journal of Housing Economics, Vol. 5, pp. 351–368.
    15.Haurin, D. R., and H. L. Gill (1987), “Effects of Income Variability on the Demand for Owner-Occupied Housing,” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 22, pp. 136-150.
    16.Jaffee, D.M., and K. T. Rosen (1979), “Mortgage Credit Availability and Residential Construction,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 10, pp. 333-386.
    17.Jud, G. D., and D. T. Winkler (2002), “The Dynamics of Metropolitan Housing Prices,” Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 23, pp. 29-45.
    18.Kain, J. F., and J. M. Quigley (1970), “Measuring the Value of Housing Quality,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 65, pp. 532-548.
    19.Katzman, M. T. (1980), “The Contribution of Crime to Urban Decline,” Urban Studies, Vol. 17, pp. 277-286.
    20.Kim, C. W., T. T. Phipps, and L. Anselin (2003), “Measuring the Benefits of Air Quality Improvement: A Spatial Hedonic Approach,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 45, pp. 24-39.
    21.Krainer, J. R. (2003), “House Price Bubbles,” FRBSF Economic Letter,” Vol.6, pp.1-3.
    22.Krumm, R. (1987), “Intertemporal Tenure Choices,” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 22, pp. 263-275.
    23.Lancaster, K. J. (1966), “A New Approach to Consumer Theory,” The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 74, pp. 132-157.
    24.Reichert, A. K. (1990), “The Impact of Interest Rates, Income, and Employment upon Regional Housing Prices,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol.3, pp. 373-391.
    25.Ridker, R. G., and J. A. Henning (1967), “The Determinants of Residential Property Values with Special Reference to Air Pollution,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 49, pp. 246-257.
    26.Rizzo, M. J. (1979), “The Effect of Crime on Residential Rents and Property Values,” American Economist, Vol. 23, pp. 16-21.
    27.Rodriguez, C., and R. Bustillo (2010), “Modelling Foreign Real Estate Investment: The Spanish Case,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 41, pp. 354-367.
    28.Rosen, H. S. (1979), “Housing Decisions and the U.S. Income Tax: An Econometric Analysis,” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 11, pp. 1-23.
    29.Rosen, S. (1974), “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition,” The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 82, pp. 34-55.
    30.Tita, G. E., T. L. Petras, and R. T. Greenbaum (2006), “Crime and Residential Choice: A Neighborhood Level Analysis of the Impact of Crime on Housing Prices,” Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Vol. 22, pp. 299-317.
    31.Turner, M. A., and R. J. Struyk (1984), “Urban Housing in the 1980s: Markets and Policies,” Washington, D.C., Urban Institute Press.
    32.Weicher, J. C., and T. G. Thibodeau (1988), “Filtering and Housing Markets: An Empirical Analysis,” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 23, pp. 21-40.
    33.Xiao, Q., and G. K. R. Tan (2007), “Signal Extraction with Kalman Filter: A Study of the Hong Kong Property Price Bubbles,” Urban Studies, Vol. 44, pp. 865-888.

    QR CODE