在中等教育中，傳統教科書是其中一個學習工具，特別是在生物科。在現今數位時代，印刷書籍的性質其實不斷在變。若是課本的輔助不足時，學生們往往會失去學習興趣。老師、作者及研究人員們應該盡量適用新科技來開拓教材。為了幫助增加學習態度及學習生物課教材的成效，本研究使用擴增實境的方式發展和整合現今生物課印刷書籍中內容。透過擴增實境運用在傳統教科書中，會給予學生、老師及研究人員們很大的助力。 在此準實驗研究中，預測和後測被用來比較與測量科技運用於傳統教科書中，是否對於學生在生物課的學習態度和學習成效有影響。 本研究抽樣由68名印尼國中三年級學生作為研究樣本。研究問卷以食品生物科技知識問題和對於生物課態度問題，並在實驗前後進行數據收集和分析。 本研究量化統計分析中包含：描述統計、成對樣本t檢定、共變數分析ANCOVA、皮爾森積差相關分析，另外更是以質性三角驗證分析來支持研究結果與討論。 統計分析結果顯示，使用擴增實境作為補充印刷書籍的學習，可以改善學生們的學習態度和成效，特別是在分析層次的學習成效。 此外，本研究也討論學習成效和態度的相關分析結果。最後，提出對未來實踐和研究的建議。

In the secondary education, the traditional textbook is still one of the many tools used for learning especially for Biology learning. In this digital age, the nature of printed book is changing. Students tend to lose interest in reading when the books are lacking any learning supports. The teachers, authors and researchers should try to adapt a new technology while developing teaching materials. The form of augmented reality was integrated to the printed book on the development of the Biology book used in current study where the purpose was to help increase students’ attitude and learning outcome of Biology material. It’s believed applying augmented reality to the traditional science book will give benefits to students, teachers and researcher. A quasi-experimental research with pretest and posttest, was used to compare and measure whether or not a technology in book affects the learning outcome and learning attitude towards Biology. The sample for this study consisted of 68 ninth grade students. Food Biotechnology Knowledge questions and Attitude Towards Biology questionnaires were given before and after experiment and were used for data collection. The analysis of this study was conducted using Descriptive Statistics, Paired Sample T-Test, ANCOVA, Pearson Correlation and Triangular Analysis on qualitative data. Statistical analysis revealed that using augmented reality as a learning supplement of the printed book could improve students’ learning attitude towards Biology and learning outcome, especially in analyzing level. In addition, an analysis of correlation between the learning outcome and attitude result in both group are provided and discussed. Finally, recommendations for future practices and research are also discussed.

Ackerman, R. & Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive Regulation of Text Learning: On Screen Versus on Paper. Journal of experimental psychology. Applied. 17. 18-32. 10.1037/a0022086.
Arvanitis, T.N., Petrou, A., Knight, J.F., Savas, S., Sotiriou, S., Gargalakos, M., et al. (2007) Human factors and qualitative pedagogical evaluation of a mobile augmented reality system for science education used by learners with physical disabilities Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 13 (3) (2007), pp. 243-250.
Arzubiaga, A., Rueda, R., & Monzó, L. (2002). Family matters related to the reading engagement of Latino children. Journal of Latinos and Education,1(4), 231-243.
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence, 6(4), 355-385.
Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S. and MacIntyre, B.(2001) Recent advances in augmented reality, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 34-47, Nov/Dec 2001.
Ball, S.J. (2008). The education debate. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
Becker, B. (2010). Understanding and applying the technology forecast of the 2010 Horizon Report. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 29 (2) (2010), pp. 162-165.
Bennett, J., Rollnick, M., Green, G., & White, M. (2001). The development and use of an instrument to assess students’ attitude to the study of chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 833 – 845.
Billinghurst, M. (2002). Augmented Reality in Education. Seattle WA: New Horizons for Learning - Technology in Education.
Breakwell, G. M., & Beardsell, S. (1992). Gender, parental and peer influences upon science attitudes and activities. Public Understanding of Science, 1(2), 183-197.
Bronack, S.C. (2011) The role of immersive media in online education. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 59 (2) (2011), pp. 113-117.
Brown, S. A. (1976). Attitude goals in secondary school science. University of Stirling. Department of Education.
Butchart, B. (2011). Augmented Reality for Smartphones. UKOLN, University of Bath.
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press.
Chang, Rong-Chi & Yu, Zeng-Shiang. (2018). Using Augmented Reality Technologies to Enhance Students' Engagement and Achievement in Science Laboratories. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies. 16. 54-72. 10.4018/IJDET.2018100104.
Chiappetta, E.L., & Fillman, D.A. (2007) Analysis of Five High School Biology Textbooks Used in the United States for Inclusion of the Nature of Science, International Journal of Science Education,29:15, 1847-1868.
Cimer, A. (2012). What makes Biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views?. Educational Research and Reviews, 7, 61-71.
Clark, A. T., Power, T. J., Blom-Hoffman, J., Dwyer, J. F., Kelleher, C. R., & Novak, M. (2003). Kindergarten reading engagement: An investigation of teacher ratings. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 20(1), 131-144.
Classroom Learning with AR (2010). Trends in EdTech wiki. Retrieved July 25, 2010 from http://augreality.pbworks.com/ClassroomLearning-with-AR.
Costley, K.C. (2014). The Positive Effects of Technology on Teaching and Student Learning. Unpublished: Arkansas Tech University.
Cox, J. (2004), “E-book: challenges and opportunities”, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 10 No. 10, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/october04/cox/10cox.html (accessed 15 May 2008)
Crawley, F. E., & Black, C. B. (1992). Causal modeling of secondary science students' intentions to enroll in physics. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 585- 599.
Dede, C., et al. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323, 66-68. DOI: 10.1126/science.1167311.
Delpech, R. (2002). Why are school students bored with science?. Journal of Biological Education 36:4, pages 156-157.
Elangnovan, T. and Ismail, Z. (2014). The effect of 3D computer simulation on Biology students’ achievement and memory retention. Asia-Pacific forum on Science Learning and Teaching.
Etobro, A.B. & Fabinu, O.E. (2017). Students’ perceptions of difficult concepts in Biology in senior secondary schools in Lagos state. Global Journal of Educational Research. 16. 139. 10.4314/gjedr.v16i2.8.
Flowerday, T., Schraw, G., & Stevens, J. (2004). The role of choice and interest in reader engagement. Journal of Experimental Education, 72, 93–114
Fusco, D. and Barton, A. C. (2001), Representing student achievements in science. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 38: 337-354
Gambrell, L. B., Palmer, B. M., Codling, R. M., & Mazzoni, S. A. (1996). Assessing motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 518-533.
Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to Science: A Review. Studies in Science Education, 2, 1-41.
Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of Mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (10th anniversary ed.) New York: Basic Books.
Germann, P. J. (1988). Development of the attitude toward science in school assessment and its use to investigate the relationship between science achievement and attitude toward science in school. Journal of research in science teaching, 25(8), 689-703.
Gilakjani, A. P. (2012). The significant role of multimedia in motivating EFL learners' interest in English language learning. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS), 4(4), 57.
Gopalan, Valarmathie & Zulkifli, Abdul Nasir & Abubakar, Juliana. (2016). A study of students’ motivation using the augmented reality science textbook. 1761. 020040. 10.1063/1.4960880.
Hamilton, K. & Olenewa, J. (May, 2010). Augmented reality in education [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from Lecture Notes Online Web site: http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/k3hamilton-478823-augmented-reality-in-education/.
Hanho, J. (2012) "A comparison of the influence of electronic books and paper books on reading comprehension, eye fatigue, and perception", The Electronic Library, Vol. 30 Issue: 3, pp.390-408.
Hannah, R. (2013). The Effect of Classroom Environment on Student Learning. Honors Theses. Paper 2375.
Hartzell, G.(2002). The principal’s perceptions of school libraries and teacher-librarians. School Libraries Worldwide.8(1), 92-110
Henno, I. & Reiska, P. (2018). Difficulty of texts in upper-secondary school Biology textbook – using concept maps for analyzing students’ new knowledge.
Hernon, P., Hopper, R., Leach, M.R., Saunders, L.L. and Zhang, J. (2006), “E-book use by students: undergraduates in economics, literature, and nursing”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 3-13.
Hounshell, P.B., & Hill, S.R. (1989, September). The microcomputer and achievement and attitudes in high school Biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(6), 543-49. EJ 401 364.
Huang, K. H., Hung, K. C., & Cheng, C. C. (2012). Enhancing interactivity in geography class: Fostering critical thinking skills through technology. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 50
Jayawardana, H.B.A.. (2017). Paradigma pembelajaran biologi di era digital. Jurnal bioedukatika. 5. 12. 10.26555/bioedukatika.v5i1.5628.
J. Rockinson- Szapkiw, A., Courduff, J., Carter, K., & Bennett, D. (2013). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students' learning. Computers & Education. 63. 259–266. 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.022.
Johnson, J. E. & Christie, J. F. (2009). Play and digital media. Computers in the Schools, 26(4), 284-289.
Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Seljeflot, S., & Woolard, A. (2006). “Making It Real”: Exploring the Potential of Augmented Reality for Teaching Primary School Science. Virtual Reality, 10, 163-174.
Knight, B. A., & Horsley, M.(2013). The ecology of change and continuity in the use of textbooks in higher education.
Klopfer, E., Yoon, S. & Rivas, L. (2004). Comparative Analysis of Palm and Wearable Computers for Participatory Simulations. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(5), 347-359.
Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008) Environmental detectives: the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56 (2) (2008), pp. 203-228
Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning, and development. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3-25). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Krogh, L. B. (2005). Studying students’ attitudes towards science from a cultural perspective but with a quantitative methodology: Border crossing into the physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 27: 281-302. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/09500690412331314469
Langston, M. (2003), “The California State University E-book Pilot Project: implications for cooperative collection development”, Library Collections, Acquisitions and Technical Services, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 19-32.
Lazarowitz, R., & Penso, S. (1992). High school students’ difficulties in learning Biology concepts. Journal of Biological Education, 26, 215-224. doi:10.1080/00219266.1992.9655276
Lichti, L. (2012). The Affect of E-Book on Reading. Honors theses. Florida State University Libraries.
Liu, D., Jenkins, S. A., Sanderson, P. M., Fabian, P., & Russell, W. J. (2010, April). Monitoring with head-mounted displays in general anesthesia: A clinical evaluation in the operating room. Society for Technology in Anesthesia, 110(4), 1032-1038.
Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of documentation, 61(6), 700-712.
Long, D. & Szabo, S. (2016). E-readers and the effects on students’ reading motivation, attitude and comprehension during guided reading. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1197818.
Ma, J.Z. (2008). Teaching Effects of 3D Animation Applied to Science Learning in the Fourth Graders: The Case of Moon-Phase Conception. Master thesis, National Taitung University, Taiwan, ROC.
Martı ́n-Gutie ́rrez J, Luı ́sSaorı ́n J, Contero M, Alcan ̃iz M, Pe ́rezLo ́pez DC, Ortega M (2010). Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Comput Graph, 34(1):77–91
Mantzicopoulos, P., & Patrick, H. (2010). ―The seesaw is a machine that goes up and down”: Young children's narrative responses to science-related informational text. Early Education and Development, 21(3), 412-444.
Mauludin, R., Sukamto, A., Muhardi, H. (2017). Penerapan Augmented Reality Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Sistem Pencernaan pada Manusia dalam Mata Pelajaran Biologi. Jurnal Edukasi dan Penelitian Informatika (JEPIN). 3. 42. 10.26418/jp.v3i2.22676.
Mavrikaki, E., Andressa, H., & Dermitzaki, I. (2015). Adaptation of the students' motivation towards science learning questionnaire to measure greek students' motivation towards Biology learning. International Journal of Biology Education. 4. 10.20876/ijobed.56334.
Mejiro, V.D., Gunawan, P.R., Wianto, E. (2018). Perancangan augmented reality sebagai alat bantu edukasi pelajaran sejarah di indonesia bagi siswa smp. Serat Rupa Journal of Design. 2. 176. 10.28932/srjd.v2i2.899.
Millar, M. & Schrier, T. (2015) Digital or Printed Textbooks: Which do Students Prefer and Why?, Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism.
Miligram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., Kishino, F. (1994). Augmented Reality: A Class of Displays on the Reality-Virtuality Continumm. In: Proceedings of SPIE 2351, Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, pp. 282-292.
Murphy, P. K., Long, J. F., Holleran, T. A., & Esterly, E. (2003). Persuasion online or on paper: A new take on an old issue. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 511-532.
Nasr, A.R., & Soltani, A. (2011). Attitude towards Biology and Its Effects on Student's Achievement. International Journal of Biology.
Neumann, M., Finger, G., & Neumann, D. (2016). A Conceptual Framework for Emergent Digital Literacy. Early Childhood Education Journal, 1–9.
Nielsen, Birgitte & Brandt, Harald & Swenses, Hakon. (2016). Augmented Reality in science education-affordances for student learning. Nordic Studies in Science Education.
Niess, Margaret. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education. 21. 509-523.
Nincarean, D. & Ali, M.B. & Halim, N.A & Rahman, M.H.A. (2013). Mobile Augmented Reality: The Potential for Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 103. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.385.
O'hara, K., & Sellen, A. (1997, March). A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 335-342). ACM.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitude towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education. 25. 1049-1079.
Otero, V. (2001). The role of computer simulators in students’ construction of explanatory models of Static Electricity. A Paper Presented at NARST Conference at St Louis, Missouri.
Özcan N (2003). A Group of Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions with Respect to Biology Education at High School Level. MA Dissertation. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Partridge, T. (2003), Biological and caregiver correlates of behavioral inhibition. Inf. Child Develop., 12: 71-87.
Pence, H. E. (2010). Smartphones, smart objects, and augmented reality. The Reference Librarian, 52(1-2), 136-145.
Piaget, J. (1967). Biology and knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pickering, R. (2010). Complete Biology for Cambridge IGCSE. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pitler,H., Hubbell, E.R., & Kuhn, M. (2012). Using technology with classroom instruction that works. Alexandria,Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Prokop, P., Tuncer, G., & Chuda, J. (2007). Slovakian Students’ Attitude toward Biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3, 287-295.
Puhek, M. and Debevc, M. (2011). Development of augmented reality laboratory experiments in Biology classes.
Raven, P. H. (2013). Biology.
Regina, G., Roy, M. & Alotebi, H. (2015). The Interplay of Technology and Critical Thinking Skills in the 21st Century Blended Classroom. International Journal of Advanced Research in Eduation Technology (IJARET). 2. 32-35.
Reitmayr, G. and Schmalstieg, R. (2001) "Mobile collaborative augmented reality," Proceedings IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Augmented Reality, New York, NY, 2001, pp. 114-123.
Reynolds, A. R., & Walberg, H. J. (1992). A process model of mathematics achievement and attitude. Journal of Research in Mathematics, 23, 306-328.
Reynold, R. (2011) Trends influencing the growth of digital textbooks in US higher education. Publishing Research Quarterly, 27 (2) (2011), pp. 178-187
Saenz, S. (2010, January 11). Augmented Reality to Help Military Mechanics Fix Vehicles (Video). Retrieved July 20, 2011 from http://singularityhub.com/2010/01/11/augmented-reality-to-help-military-mechanics-fix-vehicles-video/.
Safar, A. H., Al-Jafar, A. A., Al-Yousefi, Z. H. (2017). The Effectiveness of Using Augmented Reality Apps in Teaching the English Alphabet to Kindergarten Children: A Case Study in the State of Kuwait. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 417-440.
Sampaio, Daniel & Almeida, Pedro. (2018). Students’ motivation, concentration and learning skills using Augmented Reality. In 4th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’18), Universitat Politecnica de Val ` encia, Val ` encia, 2018 `, 2018.
Sarwar, M. (2019). Relationship of Study Attitude and Academic Performance of Students at Secondary level in Punjab.
Sawang, S.,O’Connor, P.J.,Ali, M. (2017). IEngage: Using technology to enhance students’ engagement in large classroom. Journal of Learning Design.10 (1) (2017), pp.11-19.
Schmalstieg, D. & Hollerer, T. (2001). Principles and practice Augmented Reality. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Schraw, G., Flowerday, T. & Lehman, S.(2001). Educational Psychology Review. 13: 211.
Shelton, B. E., & Hedley, N. R. (2002). Using augmented reality for teaching earth-sun relationships to undergraduate geography students. Proceedings of the First IEEE International Augmented Reality Toolkit Workshop, Darmstadt, Germany, 8-pp. doi:10.1109/ART.2002.1106948.
Sielhorst, T., Obst, T., Burgkart, R., Riener, R., & Navab, N. (2004). An augmented reality delivery simulator for medical training. In International Workshop on Augmented Environments for Medical Imaging - MICCAI Satellite Workshop (pp. 11-20). AMIARCS.
Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1990). A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74(1), 1-18.
Smith, S.D., & Caruso, J. B. (2010). Research study. ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, Boulder vol. 6, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.
Stosic, L. (2015). The importance of educational technology in teaching. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE). 3. 111-114.
Szapkiw, A.J.R., Courduff, J., Carter, K., & Bennett, D. (2013). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students' learning. Computers & Education. 63. 259–266.
Sungur, S. , Tekkaya, C. and Geban, Ö. (2001), The Contribution of Conceptual Change Texts Accompanied by Concept Mapping to Students' Understanding of the Human Circulatory System. School Science and Mathematics, 101: 91-101.
Talton, E. & Simpson, D. (1985). Relationships between peer and individual attitudes toward science among adolescent students. Science Education, 69, 19–24.
Tekkaya, C., Ozkan, O. and Sungur, S. (2001) Biology Concepts Perceived as Difficult by Turkish High School Students. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Education, 21, 145-150.
Uşak, M., Erdogan, M., Prokop, P., & Özel, M. (2009). High school and university students' knowledge and attitudes regarding biotechnology: A Turkish experience. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 37(2), 123-130.
Weinburgh, M. (1995), Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta‐analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 32: 387-398.
Whitty, G., & Wisby, E. (2007). Whose voice? An exploration of the current policy interest in pupil involvement in school decision-making. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 17(3), 303-319.
Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Perencevich, A. T., Klauda, S. L., Mcrae, A., & Barbosa, P. (2008). Role of reading engagement in mediating effects of reading comprehension instruction on reading outcomes. Psychology in the Schools 45(5), 432-445.
Woo, W. (2009). Multi-layer based authoring tool for diglog book. Entertainment Computing-ICEC 2009.
Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49.
Yuen, S., Yaoyuneyong, G., & Johnson, E. (2011). Augmented Reality: An Overview and Five Directions for AR in Education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 4, 119-140.
Zhu, E., Hadadgar, A., Masiello, I., & Zary, N. (2014). Augmented reality in healthcare education: An integrative review. PeerJ. 2. e469. 10.7717/peerj.469.