簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳卓為
Juo-Wei Chen
論文名稱: 虛實整合電子商務使用者經驗評估模式與方法研究
User Experience Evaluation Pattern and Method Research for Online to Offline E-commercial
指導教授: 林久翔
Chiuhsiang Joe Lin
口試委員: 林承哲
Cheng-Jhe Lin
林瑞豐
Jui-Feng Lin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業管理系
Department of Industrial Management
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 64
中文關鍵詞: 使用者經驗O2O電子商務快速評估法
外文關鍵詞: User Experience, Online to Offline, Rapid Evaluation Method
相關次數: 點閱:453下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 時自今日,電子商務的趨勢,從傳統的線上消費線下享受服務的模式,逐漸擴大為以整體服務系統為範圍考量,O2O(Online to Offline,網路到實體)虛實整合電子商務模式孕育而生,使用者為中心考量的趨勢也讓使用者經驗(User Experience,UX)的評估越來越重要。另外,電子商務市場日新月異,O2O電子商務系統的生命週期更為縮短,然而,傳統的使用者評估方法需針對個別服務,經過設計UX評估法、找尋受測者進行UI testing、實行訪談/問卷、結果分析等冗長步驟,不足以因應快速評估並修正服務內容的需求。因此本研究發展的重點,即是開發可縮短O2O電子商務評估程序的使用者經驗快速評估法。。
    本研究先以文獻探討建立O2O電子商務的UX構面與其構面下的各因子,並經由問卷調查一般使用者心中對各因子的重要程度排序,選出重要的因子做為開發快速評估法的依據。快速評估法分為質化檢核表與量化標竿測試兩項,分別對其進行驗證實驗。質化檢核表經由使用者經驗問卷的相關性調查,發現若干題項頗具相關性,並分別與以討論。量化標竿測試在進行逐步回歸分析後發現,使用步驟與設置步驟對使用者經驗的影響最大,設置時間亦對其中對應的構面有相關性。


    Recently, the trend of E-commercial pattern has broaden from the traditional paying online and acquire products offline into more the overall commercial system. O2O (Online to Offline) e-commercial successfully derive marketing applications to more multivariate aspect. In the mean while, the user-centre design receiving increasing attention , the evaluation of User Experience (UX) become more and more importance. However, the traditional process of user evaluation method is usually focused on individual systems. General user evaluation method need to process through the UX evaluation method design, looking for subjects to apply user interface (UI) testing, conduct interviews or questionnaires, all the way to result analysis to attain the conclusions. Lengthy process had inadequate to response the needs of quick fixing system. Therefore, the major object of this study is to develop a rapid evaluation method that may reduce the time and resource spending on the O2O evaluation. Through literature review, the UX construct of O2O systems has established. By questionnaire investigation, this study tries to understand which UX elements are more important in user’s opinion, and then chose it as the foundation of rapid evaluation method development. Rapid evaluation method includes two different method, qualitative checklist and quantitative benchmark test. The verification experiment had conducted on both. Checklist result was conducted correlation analysis with post-test questionnaire score, some elements show strong correlation with the corresponding post-test questionnaire elements. Discussion had made on each of elements. Benchmark test result was conducted by stepwise regression analysis, the analysis discover that operate procedure and setting procedure have the most significant effect to the UX.

    摘要 2 ABSTRACT 3 CONTENT 4 LIST OF FIGURES 6 LIST OF TABLE 7 Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background and motivation 1 1.2 Study Objective 4 1.3 Study Framework 5 Chapter 2 Literature review 6 2.1 User Experience (UX) 6 2.2 UX method orientation 8 2.3 UX constructs 11 Chapter 3 Methodology 13 3.1 UX of O2O E-commercial 13 3.2 UX Questionnaire Development 17 3.3 Rapid Evaluation Method Development 18 3.4 Rapid Evaluation Method Verification 19 Chapter 4 Result 24 4.1 UX Questionnaire analysis 24 4.2 Quantitative Checklist Verification Analysis 26 4.3 Qualitative Benchmark test Verification Analysis 28 Chapter 5 Discussion and Conclusion 33 5.1 Analysis result discussion 33 5.2 Implications 38 5.3 Research limitation 39 5.4 Future research 39 Reference 40 Appendix 42 Appendix I 42 Appendix II 47

    2013 New Design Method. (n.d.). : 使用者經驗設計 / 戴妤平. Retrieved July 24, 2014, from http://newdesignmethod.blogspot.tw/2013/03/blog-post_5896.html
    Albert, W., & Tullis, T. (2013). Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. Newnes.
    Bargas-Avila, J. A., & Hornbæk, K. (2011, May). Old wine in new bottles or novel challenges: a critical analysis of empirical studies of user experience. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2689-2698). ACM.
    Bevan, N. (2009, August). What is the difference between the purpose of usability and user experience evaluation methods. In Proceedings of the Workshop UXEM (Vol. 9).
    Buchenau, M., & Suri, J. F. (2000, August). Experience prototyping. In Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 424-433). ACM.
    Dancey, C. P., & Reidy, J. (2007).Statistics without maths for psychology. Pearson Education.
    Ergonomics of human-system interaction: part 210: human-centred design for interactive systems.. (2010). Geneva: ISO.
    Guo, F. Y., & Principal, U. X. Not Just Usability–The Four Elements of User Experience.
    Hair, J. (1998). Multivariate data analysis(5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
    Hartmann, J., De Angeli, A., & Sutcliffe, A. (2008, April). Framing the user experience: information biases on website quality judgement. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 855-864). ACM.
    Hartson, R., & Pyla, P. S. (2012).The UX Book: Process and guidelines for ensuring a quality user experience. Elsevier.
    Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience-a research agenda.Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 91-97.
    HomePlus: Subway Virtual Store. (n.d.). Retrieved July 16, 2014.
    Ji, Y. G., Park, J. H., Lee, C., & Yun, M. H. (2006). A usability checklist for the usability evaluation of mobile phone user interface. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 20(3), 207-231.
    Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ: British medical journal, 311(7000), 299.
    McDonald’s: Interactive ‘Pick N’ Play’ Billboard | Digital Buzz Blog.(n.d.).McDonald’s: Interactive ‘Pick N’ Play’ Billboard | Digital Buzz Blog. Retrieved July 23, 2014, from http://www.digitalbuzzblog.com/mcdonalds-interactive-pick-n-play-billboard/
    Mental models. (n.d.).The Interaction Design Foundation. Retrieved July 24, 2014, from http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/mental_models_glos
    Norman, D. A. (1986). Cognitive engineering. User centered system design, 31-61.
    Orgad, S. (2005). From online to offline and back: Moving from online to offline relationships with research informants (pp. 51-66). Berg.
    Suri, J. F., & Marsh, M. (2000). Scenario building as an ergonomics method in consumer product design. Applied ergonomics, 31(2), 151-157.
    Tolia, N., Andersen, D. G., & Satyanarayanan, M. (2006). Quantifying interactive user experience on thin clients. Computer, 39(3), 46-52.
    Tsai, T. W., Chang, T. C., Chuang, M. C., & Wang, D. M. (2008). Exploration in emotion and visual information uncertainty of websites in culture relations.International Journal of Design, 2(2), 55-66.
    O2O分享1:我理解的O2O. (n.d.). 香港矽谷. Retrieved July 23, 2014, from http://www.hksilicon.com/kb/articles/67601/O2O1O2O?mobi=true#.U8sQevmSzH9
    邱皓政. (2006). 量化研究與統計分析. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
    陳寬裕、王正華(2010)。論文統計分析與實務,SPSS 與AMOS 的運用,五南出版社。

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2021/05/09 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE