近年臺北市政府規劃建置市區自行車友善騎乘環境，使通勤族可透過折疊自行車轉乘大眾運輸前往目的地的方式，日漸可行與完備。本研究目的在了解攜行方式、收折與包裝，是否會影響攜帶折疊自行車進行轉乘的意願，因此前測透過三款折疊自行車，分別為Brompton、Strida、Dahon，進行臺北大眾運輸系統場域任務，進而歸納出主要影響使用者經驗的因素為場域中的攜行經驗。再透過分析結果與建議，搭配人因尺寸，進一步設計一款新式折疊自行車原型，與另款相同系統的折疊自行車（Strida）進行後測，比較攜行經驗，提出更細節的建議與改善方針。
研究成果歸納如下：(1)折疊自行車需設計以推行為主，揹行、提行為輔。(2)車身最大長度尺寸應與輪徑相等，能有效讓使用者在揹行與提行時，減少碰撞與保持行走重心。(3)折疊自行車折疊尺寸應越小越好攜帶，但是在推行時須提供適合的握把高度。(4)折疊自行車在車袋包裝狀態下，需設置明顯的主、副抓握區，且須適當的符合手部人因工程或提供舒適的抓握材質。(5)車袋、揹帶的包裝與收納須簡單、快速，並在操作時能保持車身穩定不傾倒。(6)攜行時車體貼靠於使用者的肢體處，容易造成疲勞與受傷，因此車袋與揹帶需設計減壓、防撞材。

For the past few years, the Taipei city government has planned and built a municipal
bike-friendly riding environment for commuters to their destinations by folding bicycles and
mass transportation with practicality and convenience. This study tried to understand the
influence of carrying, folding and packaging on user intention of using folding bicycles for
transit access. Three folding bicycles of Brompton, Strida and Dahon were used in the pretest
for field tasks on the Taipei mass transportation. Carrying experience in the field was
concluded as the key factor of influencing user experience. A new prototype of folding
bicycle was subsequently designed after analytical results and suggestions with human factor
dimension. It was compared with another folding bicycle (Strida) with the same system in the posttest for carrying and folding experience to propose more detailed suggestions and improvements. The research results were summarized as follows. (1) A folding bicycle should be
designed mainly for pushing supplemented by carrying and lifting. (2) The maximum length of a folding bicycle should be the same as the wheel diameter to avoid colliding and to maintain effectively the center of mass while the user was carrying and lifting. (3) Smaller folding size was better for carrying a folding bicycle while a suitable handle height was necessary for pushing. (4) When a folding bicycle is in a packaging mode, there should be obvious primary and auxiliary grasping areas with suitable human factor for the hand or with comfortable handle material. (5) The packaging and storage of transport bag and strap should be easy and quick by keeping the bicycle stable without falling down during operation. (6) The bicycle would cling on to the user’s body while carrying and could cause fatigue and injury. Therefore the transport bag and strap should be designed with pressure-relieving andanti-collision material.

Ashby, M. F., & Johnson, K. (2014). Materials and design: The art and science of material
selection in product design (3rd ed.). Waltham, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Bevan, N. (1995). Measuring usability as quality of use. Journal of Software Quality,
4(2),115-130.
Clemitson, S. (2017). A history of cycling in 100 objects. London, UK: Bloomsbury Sport.
Glaskin, M. (2012). Cycling science: How rider and machine work together. Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
Hassenzahl, M. (2003). The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and
product. In M. Blythe, C. Overbeeke, A. F. Monk, & P. C. Wright (Eds.), Funology:
From usability to enjoyment (pp. 31-42). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Hassenzahl, M. (2008). User experience (UX): Towards an experiential perspective on
product quality. In É. Brangier, G. Michel, J. M. C. Bastien, & N. Carbonell (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 20th Conference on l’Interaction Homme-Machine (pp. 11-15). New
York, NY: ACM.
Herlihy, D. V. (2006). Bicycle: The history. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lichter, J, & Kline, J. (2015). Basic illustrated bike touring and bikepacking. Guilford, CT:
Falcon Guides.
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Reid, C. (2017). Bike boom: The unexpected resurgence of cycling (3rd ed.). Washington,
DC: Island Press.
Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Roto, V., & Hassenzahl, M. (2008). Now let’s do it in practice:
User experience evaluation methods in product development. In M. Czerwinski, A.
Lund, & D. Tan (E.), Proceedings of the CHI ’08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors
in Computing Systems (pp. 3961-3964). New York, NY: ACM.
王比利（2007）。小摺快跑：熱門小輪徑摺疊車指南。臺北市：臉譜。
交通部統計處（2017）。民眾日常使用運具狀況調查。臺北市：交通部統計處。
李世純（2010）。摺疊自行車於捷運環境之攜行方式（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺北科
技大學，臺北市。
李再長、黃雪玲、李永輝、王明揚（2005）。人因工程。臺北市：華泰。
侯東旭、鄭世宏（2010）。人因工程（三版）。臺中市：鼎茂。
凌偉益（2008）。腳踏車架折疊機構之構造分析與最佳化尺度合成（未出版碩士論文）。
國立臺灣科技大學，臺北市。
張學孔、張馨文、陳雅雯（2013）。綠色交通—慢活‧友善‧永續：以人為本的運輸
環境，讓城市更流暢、生活更精采。臺北市：新自然主義。
許懷恩（2015）。新式摺疊自行車機構設計與分析（未出版碩士論文）。崑山科技大學，
臺南市。
陳宏瑋（2009）。都市生活通勤型自行車道之研究－以臺北縣板橋市自行車道為例（未
出版碩士論文）。國立臺北科技大學，臺北市。
勞動部勞動及職業安全衛生所（2016）。人體計測資料庫。臺北市：勞動部勞動及職
業安全衛生所。
臺北捷運公司（2015）。臺北捷運公司開放旅客攜帶自行車搭乘捷運應行注意事項。
臺北市：臺北捷運公司。