歷經全球金融海嘯，各國政府、組織及個人都深刻感受到金融產業的重要性及影響力；然而國內金融產業面對國際金融自由化及兩岸經貿ECFA的衝擊，營運的競爭壓力日益升高；如何能在穩健的經營中還能保持獲利的成長，是銀行業必須共同面臨的困難挑戰。
分行通路化是一項重大的改變，通路適合以團隊的模式運作，但是分行的組織有內稽內控設計，反應遲慢不利於市場競爭。本研究試圖探討在「高績效工作系統」的組織架構下，運用「高績效團隊」的管理及領導模式，是否能建立符合「高績效組織」特徵的銀行分行單位。
　　本研究採用質化訪談研究，深度訪談個案銀行分行經理人及分行員工，試圖歸納分行運用高績效團隊模式經營管理，對分行成為具備高績效組織特徵的影響過程，及分行運用高績效團隊模式經營管理對分行執行高績效工作系統的影響程度。研究結論歸納如下：
　　一、影響分行績效成果的關鍵因素是主管對員工的組織能力、領導統御及策略規劃能力。
　　二、分行員工對員工參與、資訊分享、教育訓練、績效–獎酬連結、團隊合作、內部晉升等人力資源措施都有相當的需求。
　　三、1+1＞2的高績效團隊是一連串的變革管理過程，最重要的是主管有思維有擔當的領導力表現。
　　四、 高績效工作系統是組織策略發展及人力資源管理的“硬”實力，而高績效團隊的組織與運作是關鍵成功因素的“軟”實力，兩者配適發展造就持續的競爭優勢即高績效組織。
關鍵字：高績效組織、高績效工作系統、高績效團隊

　　Undergoing world economic tsunami, governments, organizations and individuals all deeply felt the importance and influence of financial industry. However, domestic financial industry is facing increasingly tough competitors, due to international financial liberalization as well as the signing of ECFA between Taiwan and China. How to survive this crisis while creating profit becomes a very difficult challenge for all financial industries in Taiwan.
　　Bank branch distribution is an important change. Supply-Chain Management usually operates as a team, but branch organizations operates under close internal audit and control. The process is inefficient and not competitive. This report tracks the performance of a High Performance Organization bank branch that operates under a High Performance Work System, with High Performing Teams’ Management and leadership.
　　This study is conducted through a series of interviews. By interviewing the management team and branch employees, this study organizes the process of a branch becoming a High Performance Organization through High Performing Teams management, as well as the performance of High Performance Work System, HPWS in the branch. The result of the study as follow:
1.The key factor that influences the performance is management’s ability; including organization skill, leadership skill and strategic planning.

2. Branch employees’ needs from Human Resources includes; employee participation, information-sharing, extensive training & development, performance-based pay, team work, and promotion from within.

3. The High Performing Teams operates under the philosophy of “1+1＞2” will go through a series of transformation in management. Most importantly, management needs to step up, take charge and show leadership qualities.

4. High Performance Work System, HPWS creates the “tangible” company asset in strategic planning and human resource, and High Performing Teams’ organization and operation are the key factors, also called the “abstract “company asset, to company’s success. Only by developing both assets by parallel, the company can continue to have the competitive edge as a High Performance Organization.

Key words：High Performance Organization, High Performing Teams,　High Performance Work System（HPWS）

參考文獻
一、中文部份
李婷立(2005),“高績效工作系統與組織公民行為之關係–以信任、組織承諾、責任感為中介變數”，國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
高薰芳、林盈助、王向葵譯(2001)，質化研究設計：一種互動取向的方法(Joseph A. Maxwell, 1996)，初版，台北：心理出版社。

黃欣瑜(2009),“高績效工作系統與組織績效關聯性之探討”，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
黃石發(2003),“人格特質、高績效工作系統與工作滿意度及工作適應性間關係之研究–以研發人員為例”，國立成功大學管理學院高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
馮逸藍(2008),“人力資源系統對服務人員組織承諾與角色績效之影響–以金融業為例”，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。
張文隆(2006)，當責，台北：中國生產力中心。

楊惠如(2005),“高績效工作系統與員工績效、單位績效間關係之研究”，國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
蔡卓芬、李靜瑶、吳亞穎譯(2007)，願景領導：Leading at Higher Level(Ken Blanchard, Ken Blanchard Companies, 2006)，初版，台北：培生教育出版社。

羅耀宗譯(1992)，一分鐘最佳團隊：The One Minute Manager Builds High Performing Teams (Ken Blanchard, Donald K. Carew , Eunice Parisi- Carew)，初版，台北：聯經出版社。

羅耀宗譯(2007)，團隊力：高紀律打造高績效The Discipline of Teams (Jon R. Katzenbach, Douglas K. Smith)，HBR全球繁體中文版。

行政院金融監督管理委員會 http://www.banking.gov.tw

二、英文部份
Arthur, J. B. (1992), “The Link between Business Strategy and Industrial Relations Systems in American Steel Minimills”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol.45,
pp.488-506.

Arthur, J. B. (1994), “Effects of Human Resource Systems on Manufacturing Performance
and Turnover”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.37, pp.670-687.
Becker, B. E. & Huselid, M. A. (1998), “High-Performance Work System and Firm
Performance: A Synthesis of Research and Managerial Implications” in Research in
Personnel and Human Resource Management, Vol.16, pp.53-101, G.R. Ferris (Ed).
Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Becker, G. S. & Gerhart, B. (1996), “The Impact of Human Resource Management on
Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects”, Academy of Management Journal,
Vol.39(4), pp.779-801.
Delancy, J. T. & Huselid, M. A. (1996), “The Impact of Human Resource Management
Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance”, Academy of Management
Journal, Vol.40(1), pp.88-171.
Guest, D. E. (1997), “Human Resource Management and Performance:A Review and Research Agenda”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol.8, pp.263-276.

Guthrie, J. P. (2001), “High Involvement Work Practices, Turnover and Productivity:
Evidence from New Zealand”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.44(1), pp.180-190.
Guthrie, J. P., Snell, C. S, & Nyamori, R. O. (2002), “Correlates and Consequences of High Involvement Work Practices:The Role of Competitive Strategy”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol.13(1), pp.183-197.

Huselid, M. A. (1995), “The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity and Corporate Financial Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.38(3), pp.635-672.

Huselid, M. A., Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. J. (1997), “Technical and Strategic HRM
Effectiveness as Determinants of Firm Performance”, Academy of Management Journal,
Vol.40(1), pp.171-188.
Ichniowski, C., Shaw, K., & Prennushi, G. (1997), “The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity:A Study of Steel Finishing Lines”, The American Economics Review, Vol.87(3), pp.291-313.

Jon R. Katzenbach, Douglas K. Smith, The Wisdom of Teams, Harvard Business School Press,1993.

Jon R. Katzenbach, Douglas K. Smith, The Discipline of Teams, Wiley,2001.

Jessup, H. R. (1990), “New Roles in team Leadership”, Training & Development Journal,
Vol.44(11), pp.79-83.
MacDuffie, J. P. (1995), “Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance:
Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in The World Auto Industry”,
Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol.48, pp.197-221.
Meyer, J. P. & Smith, C. A. (2000), “HRM Practices and Organizational Commitment:Test of a Mediation Model”, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences,Vol.17(4),pp.319-331.

Organ, D.W.(1988), “Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome.”,
Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Osterman, J. (1994), “How Common Is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopt It?”,
Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 47(2), pp. 173-188.
Paul, A. K. & Anantharaman, R. N. (2003), “Impact of People Management Practices on Organizational Performance:Analysis of a Causal Model”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol.14(7), pp.1246-1266.

Pfeffer, J. (1996), “When It Comes to Best Practices–Why Do Smart Organizations Occasionally Do Dumb Things ? ”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol.25, pp.33-44.

Pil, F. K. & MacDuffie, J. P., “The Adoption of High–Involvement Work Practices ”, Industrial Relations, Vol.35(3), pp.423-455.

Richard, O. C. & Johnson, N. (2001), “Strategic Human Resource Management Effectiveness and Firm Performance”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol.12, pp.299-310.

Varma, A., Beatty, R. W., Schenier, C. E. & Ulrich, D. O. (1999), “ High–Performance Work System:Exciting Discovery or Passing Fad? ”, Human Resource Planning, pp.26-37.

Wright, P. M. & McMahan, G. C. (1992), “Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human
Resource Management”, Journal of Management, Vol.18(2), pp.295-320.
Youndt, M. A., Snell, S. A., Dean, J. W. Jr., & Lepak, D. P. (1996), “Human Resource
Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm Performance”, Academy of
Management Journal, Vol.39, pp.836-866.