簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 鄭涵尹
Han-Yin Cheng
論文名稱: 使用同步電腦溝通工具以輔助自我調整英語學習: 以JoinNet為例
A Study on Using SCMC Tools for Self-Regulated English Learning: A Case Study of JoinNet
指導教授: 洪紹挺
Shao-Ting Hung
口試委員: 王世平
Shih-Ping Wang
王美蓉
Mei-Jung Wang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 應用外語系
Department of Applied Foreign Languages
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 138
中文關鍵詞: 自我調整學習同步電腦輔助溝通電腦輔助合作學習
外文關鍵詞: self-regulated learning, synchronous computer-mediated communication, computer-supported collaborative learning
相關次數: 點閱:809下載:11
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 近年來,許多研究致力於探討使用電腦輔助溝通工具於合作學習環境之成效。研究亦提出電腦輔助溝通工具有助於學習者發展自我調整學習能力。然而,對於網路環境對自我調整學習策略及過程上發展並未獲得足夠的研究關注。因此,本研究旨在探討同步電腦輔助溝通工具(JoinNet)對提升外語學習者自我調整學習能力的發展。主要研究問題涵括: (1)外語學習者在網路合作學習環境下所經歷的自我調整學習過程為何? (2)外語學習者在網路合作學習環境下所使用的自我調整學習策略為何? (3)外語學習者對於網路合作學習環境使用同步電腦輔助溝通工具(JoinNet)的看法為何? 研究工具包括問卷及學生訪談。本研究主要發現如下: 一、外語學習者在網路環境下最常經歷的自我調整學習過程為目標設定。其他常經歷的過程依序為時間計劃與管理、尋求幫助、自我評估及自我監控。二、外語學習者在網路環境下最常使用的自我調整學習策略為同儕學習策略。此外,批判性思考及努力調適也是學習者常使用的自我調整學習策略。三、對於網路環境下使用同步電腦輔助溝通工具(JoinNet)對學習者的溝通意願及學習成效有顯著影響。最後,本研究對於如何提升外語學習者自我調整學習發展之建議提出說明。


    Research on the use of computer-mediated communication (CMC) tools in the collaborative learning environment has been rapidly booming in the last few decades. A number of studies have indicated that if applied properly, CMC tools can make a great contribution to learners’ self-regulated learning (SRL) development. However, there is very little literature about SRL strategy use in online environment and any processes for learners’ SRL development. Thus, the present study, employing JoinNet, a virtual conferencing system, as a scaffolding mediation tool, aimed to investigate how such SCMC tool enhances EFL learners’ SRL development. To address this issue, the three research questions were proposed: (1) What processes of SRL do EFL learners experience in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment? (2) What SRL strategies do EFL learners use when participating in CSCL environment? (3) What are EFL learners’ perceptions of using SCMC tool in CSCL environment? Data sources included a questionnaire and student interviews. The results showed that firstly, among the use of processes of SRL, goal setting was ranked as the most frequently experienced one, followed by time planning and management, help seeking, self-evaluation, and self-monitoring. Second, peer learning strategy was most frequently used by EFL learners when participating in CSCL environment. Other self-regulatory strategies such as critical thinking and effort regulation were often applied by EFL learners. Third, research findings revealed that EFL learners’ perception of blending SCMC tool into collaborative learning significantly influenced their willingness to communicate and learning outcomes. Finally, pedagogical implications on how instructors can facilitate EFL learners’ SRL development in CSCL environment were discussed.

    CHINESE ABSTRACT ENGLISH ABSTRACT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of the Study 1.2 Research Gaps 1.3 Purpose of the Study 1.4 Research Questions 1.5 Significance of the Study 1.6 Definition of Key Terms 1.7 Organization of the Thesis CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication 2.1.1 SCMC in the CALL literature 2.1.2 SCMC in the SLA research 2.1.3 Benefits of SCMC in L2 learning 2.2 General Overview of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2.2.1 Benefits of CSCL for Educational Learning 2.2.2 Assessment in CSCL Environments 2.3 General Overview of Self-Regulated Learning 2.3.1 Theoretical view of Self-Regulated Learning 2.3.2 Social Cognitive Theory on Self-Regulation 2.3.3 Social-Cognitive Models in Self-Regulated Learning 2.3.4 Self-Regulation strategies use in Web-Based Learning 2.4 Assessment of Self-Regulated Learning 2.5 Summary CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY 3.1 Participants and the Context 3.2 Selection Criteria for JoinNet 3.3 Meeting Scenario 3.4 Instruments 3.4.1 Questionnaire 3.4.2 Interview 3.5 Data Collection 3.6 Data Analysis 3.6.1 Procedures of Quantitative Analysis 3.6.2 Procedures of Qualitative Analysis CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS 4.1 EFL Learners’ SRL Processes Experience in CSCL Environment 4.1.1 Results of the Questionnaire 4.1.2 Results of Interviews 4.2 EFL Learners’ SRL Strategy Use in CSCL Environment 4.2.1 Results of the Questionnaire 4.2.2 Results of Interviews 4.3 EFL Learners’ Perceptions of Using SCMC tool in CSCL Environment 4.3.1 Results of the Questionnaire 4.3.2 Results of Interviews CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 5.1 Summary of Major Findings 5.2 Pedagogical Implications 5.3 Limitations of the Study 5.4 Recommendations for Future Research REFERENCES APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E

    AbuSeileek, A. F. (2007). Cooperative vs. individual learning of oral skills in a CALL environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(5), 493-514.
    Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: A empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 159–174.
    Arbaugh, J. B. (2004). Learning to learn online: a study of perceptual changes between multiple online course experiences. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 169–182.
    Ayala, G., & Yano, Y. (1998). A collaborative learning environment based on intelligent agents. Expert Systems with Applications, 14(1-2), 129-137.
    Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive
    theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25, 729-735.
    Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In
    W.M. Kurtines & J.L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (pp. 45–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Stanford: W.H. Freeman.
    Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1017-1028.
    Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1986). Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation. Organizational Behaviors and Human Decision Processes, 38, 92-113.
    Bandura, A., Grusec, J., & Menlove, F. (1967). Vicarious extinction of avoidance
    behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 16-23.
    Bandura, A., & Kupers, C. J. (1964). Transmission of patterns of self-reinforcement through modeling. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 1-9.
    Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586-598.
    Beauvois, M. H. (1992). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals,25(5), 455-464.
    Beauvois, M. H. (1994). E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Computer and the Humanities, 28(1), 177–190.
    Beauvois, M. H. (1995). E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Computers and the Humanities, 28, 177–190.
    Beauvois, M. H. (1997). Write to speak: The effects of electronic communication on the oral achievement of fourth semester French students. In J. Muyskens (Ed.), New ways of learning and teaching: Issues in language program direction (pp. 93–116). Boston: Heinle.
    Beauvois, M. H. (1998). Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 198–217.
    Belz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language sudy. Language Learning and Technology, 6(1), 60–81.
    Benbunan-Fich, R., Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (2003). A comparative content analysis of face-to-face vs. asynchronous group decision making. Decision Support Systems, 34(4), 457-469.
    Bernard, R. M., Rubalcava, B. R., & St-Pierre, D. (2000). Collaborative online distance learning: Issues for future practice and research. Distance Education, 21(2), 260-277.
    Biemiller, A., Shany, M., Inglis, A., & Meichenbaum, D. (1998). Factors influencing children’s acquisition and demonstration of self-regulation on academic tasks. In D. Schunk, & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning (pp. 203-224). London: The Guilford Press.
    Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish Interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120–136.
    Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego: Academic Press.
    Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self- regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, police makers, educators, teachers, and students. Journal of learning and instruction. 7(2), 161-186.
    Bolhuis, S. (2003). Towards process-oriented teaching for self-directed lifelong learning: a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 13, 327–347.
    Borkowski, J. G., Carr , M., Rellinger, E., & Pressley, M. (1990). Self-regulated cognition: Interdependence of metacognition, attributions, and self-esteem. In B.F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking: Review of research (pp.53-92). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    Cekaite, A. (2009). Collaborative corrections with spelling control: Digital resources and peer assistance. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative
    Learning, 4(3), 319-341.
    Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (1995). Development of young children’s reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relation with reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 154–167.
    Chen, N. S., Ko, H. C., & Lin, T. (2005). A model for synchronous learning using the Internet. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(2),181-194.
    Chen, N. S., (陳年興) & Yang, J. T. (楊錦潭) (2006). Digital Learning Theory and Practice. (數位學習理論與實務 (一) ). Taipei: Drmaster Press.
    Chun, D. M. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22, 17–31.
    Chyung, S. Y., Moll, A. J., & Berg, S. A. (2010). The role of intrinsic goal orientation, self-efficacy, and e-learning practice in engineering education. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 10(1), 22-37.
    Collor, M., & Bellmore, N. (1996). Electronic language: A new variety of English. In S. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and crosscultural perspectives (pp. 13–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Compton, L. K. L (2002). From chatting to confidence: A case study of the impact of online chatting on international teaching assistants’ willingness to communicate, confidence level and fluency in oral communication. Unpublished master thesis. Iowa State University, Ames.
    Corno, L. (1986). The metacognitive control components of self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 333-346.
    Corno, L. (1989). Self-regulated learning: A volitional analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 111-141). New York: Springer.
    Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (2004). What we have learned about student engagement in the past twenty years. In D. M. McInerney & S. V. Etten (Eds.),Big theories revisited: Vol. 4. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
    Dabbagh, N. (2002). Assessing complex problem-solving skills and knowledge assembly using Web-based hypermedia design. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11(4), 291–322.
    Dabbagh, N., & Kistsantas, A. (2003, April). Do web-based pedagogical support self-regulatory processes in distributed learning? Paper presented at the 2003 AERA annual meeting, Chicago, IL.
    Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2004). Supporting self-regulation in student-centered web-based learning environments. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 40–47.
    Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33(5–6), 513–540.
    Darhower, M. (2000). Synchronous CMC in the intermediate Spanish class: A case study. Presentation at the CALICO Conference, Tucson, AZ.
    Darhower, M. (2002). Instructional features of synchronous computer-mediated communication in the L2 class: A sociocultural case study. CALICO Journal, 19, 249–277.
    Dettori, G., Giannetti, T., & Persico, D. (2006). SRL in online cooperative learning: implications for pre-service teacher training. European Journal of Education, 41, 397-414.
    Dettori, G., & Persico, D. (2008). Using interaction analysis to reveal self-regulated learning in virtual communities, In P. Dillenbourg & M. Specht (Eds.), European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 1-14).
    Didonato, N. C. (2013). Effective self- and co-regulation in collaborative learning groups: an analysis of how students regulate problem solving of authentic interdisciplinary tasks. Instructional Science, 41, 25-47.
    Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2002). Designing virtual learning environments based on problem oriented project pedagogy. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld & B. Fibiger (Eds.), Learning in virtual environments (pp.31-54). Frederiksberg C: Samfundslitteratur Press.
    Dlaska, A. (2002). Sites of construction: Language learning, multimedia, and the international engineer. Computers & Education, 39(2), 129-143.
    Donaldson, R., & Kotter, M. (1999). Language learning in cyberspace: Teleporting the classroom into the target culture. CALICO Journal, 16(4), 530-557.
    Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on second language research (pp. 31-56). Norwood. NJ: Ablex.
    Dornyei, Z.( 2005). The psychology of the language learner: individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117−128.
    Fjermestad, J. (2004). An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research. Decision Support Systems, 37, 239–263.
    Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Pica, T. (1998). The role of input and interaction in second language acquisition: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 82,299–307.
    Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. (1989). Incorporated repairs in nonnative discourse. In M. R. Eisenstein (Ed.), The dynamic interlanguage: Empirical studies in second language variation (pp. 71–86). New York: Plenum Press.
    Ghatala, E. S. (1986). Strategy-monitoring training enables young learners to select effective strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21, 43-54.
    Gokhale, A. (1995). Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7, 89–93. Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2001). CoNoteS2: A software tool for promoting self regulation. Educational Research & Evaluation 7(2–3), 313–334. (An International Journal on Theory & Practice).
    Hampel, R., & Baber, E. (2003). Using internet-based audiographic and video conferencing for language teaching and learning. In Felix, U. (Ed.), Language learning online: Towards best practice (pp. 171–191). Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
    Hampel, R., & Hauck, M. (2004). Towards an effective of audio conferencing in distance language courses. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 66-82. Henderson, R. Vil. (1986). Self-regulated learning: Implications for the design of instructional modules. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 405-427.
    Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A.R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (pp. 117-136). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
    Hiltz, S. R., & Goldman, R. (2005). What are asynchronous learning networks? In Hiltz, S. R., & Goldman, R. (Eds.), Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks (pp. 3-18). New York: Routledge.
    Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235–266.
    Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Jordan, R.C., Liu, L., & Chernobilsky, C.E. (2011). Representational Tools for Understanding Complex Computer-supported Collaborative Learning Environments. In S. Puntambekar., G. Erkens, & C. E. Hmelo-Silver (Eds.), Analyzing interactions in CSCL: Methodology, approaches, and issues (pp. 83-106). NY: Springer. Hotcomm. (2003). Synchronous tools and the emerging online learning model. Retrived April 18, 2004, from http://www.hotcomm.com/tec/dlwp.pdf.
    HomeMeeting. (2007). Products. Retrieved March 14, 2007, from http://www.homemeeting.com/en_US/download.asp#joinnet.
    Ittzes-Abrams, Z. (2003). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 157-167.
    Ja‥rvela‥, S., & Ja‥rvenoja, H. (2007, August). Socially constructed self-regulated learning in collaborative learning groups. Paper presented at the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Budapest, Hungary.
    Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom (2nd ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
    Kanfer, F. H., & Gaelick, L. (1986). Self-management methods. In F. H. Kanfer & A. P. Goldstein (Eds.), Helping people change: A textbook of methods (pp. 283-345). New York: Pergamon. Kanselaar, G., Erkens, G., Jaspers, J., & Tabachneck-schijf, H. (2001). Essay review: computer supported collaborative learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 123–129.
    Kao, H. H. (2010). Investigating the effects of implementing online tutoring in an English afterschool program. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2755-2760.
    Kauffman, D. F. (2002). Self-regulated learning in Web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
    Keefer, J. A., & Karabenick, S. A. (1998). Help seeking in the information age. In S.A Karabenick (Ed.), Strategic Help Seeking: Implications for Learning and Teaching (pp. 219–250). Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.
    Kelm, O. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 441–454.
    Kelm, O. (1996). Application of computer networking in foreign language education: Focusing on principles of second language acquisition. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: Proceedings of the Hawai’i symposium (pp. 19–28). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
    Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476.
    Kim, J. (1998). Economic analysis of foreign education and students abroad.
    Journal of Development Economics, 56(2), 337-365.
    Kitsantas, A. (2002). Test preparation and test performance: A self-regulatory
    analysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 41, 231–240.
    Kitsantas, A., & Chow, A. (2002). Examining college students’ self-efficacy beliefs and perceived threat to seek help in traditional and distance learning settings. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
    Kitsantas, A., & Chow, A. (2007). College students’ perceived threat and preference for seeking help in traditional, distributed, and distance learning environments. Computers and Education, 48, 383-395.
    Kitsantas, A., & Dabbagh, N. (2004). Promoting self-regulation in distributed learning environments with web-based pedagogical tools: An exploratory study. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 15(1–2), 119–142 (special issue).
    Kitsantas, A., & Dabbagh, N. (2010). Learning to learn with integrative learning
    technologies (ILT): A practical guide for academic success. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
    Koschmann, T. (Ed.). (1996). CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Koschmann, T. (2002). Dewey’s contribution to the foundations of CSCL research. In Stahl, G. (Ed.), Computer support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community (pp. 17-22). Boulder, CO: Proceedings of CSCL 2002, January.
    Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
    Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353.
    Lamy, M.-N., & Hampel, R. (2007). Online communication in language learning and teaching. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Lee, L. (1998). Going beyond classroom learning: Acquiring cultural knowledge via on-line newspapers and intercultural exchanges via on-line chatrooms. CALICO Journal, 16, 101-120.
    Lee, L. (2004). Learners' perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 83-100.
    Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In A.E. Kelly & R.A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education (pp. 591–645). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Lin, T. T., Hsiao, K. L., Chiang, H. S., & Huang, C. T. (2013). Continuous usage intention of videoconferencing software: A case study of one-to-some online courses. Proceedings of the Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), 2013 27th International Conference, 990-995.
    Lin, H. C., Tang, K. W., & Lai, H. C. (2010). User Intention and Learning Effect on an Internet-Based Instruction System: A Case Study of JoinNet. International Conference on Education Technology and Computer: Vol. 2. (pp. 107-111).
    Lin, W.-S., & Wang, C. H. (2012). Antecedences to continued intentions of adopting e-learning system in blended learning instruction: a contingency framework based on models of information system success and task-technology fit. Computers & Education, 58(1), 88–99.
    Lipponen, L., Hakkarainen, K., & Paavola, S. (2004). Practices and orientations of CSCL. In J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, & R. L. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL (pp. 31–50). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Liu, J., & Sadler, R. W. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(3), 193-227.
    Locke, E.A., & Lantham, G.P. (1985). The application of goal setting to sports. Journal of Sport Psychology 7(3), 205–222.
    Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Lockyer, L., Patterson, J., & Harper, B. (2001). ICT in higher education: Evaluating outcomes for health education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 275–283.
    Long, M. (1981). Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 259–279.
    Long, M. (1989). Task, group, and task–group interactions. University of Hawai’I Working Papers in ESL, 8(2), 1–26.
    Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form (pp. 15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Mark, M. (2006). A Study of Synchronous Versus Asynchronous Collaboration in an Online Business Writing Class. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 93-107.
    McCaslin, M., & Hickey, D. T. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygotskian view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement :Theoretical perspectives (pp. 227–252). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    McDonough, S. K. (2001). Promoting self- regulation in foreign language learners. The clearing house, Washington, 74(6), 323-326.
    McLoughlin, C., & Hollingworth, R. (2001). The weakest link: Is web-based learning capable of supporting problem-solving and metacognition? Proceedings of the ASCILITE 2001, 117–120. Retrieved June 4, 2003, from http://www.medfac.unimelb.edu.au/Ascilite2001/pdf/papers/mcloughlinc1.pdf.
    McMahon, M. (2002, July). Designing an on-line environment to scaffold cognitive self regulation. Paper presented at the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA), Perth, Western Australia.
    Meskill, C. (1999). 20 minutes into the future. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (pp. 459-469). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
    Meunier, L. E. (1998). Personality and motivational factors in computer-mediated foreign language communication (CMFLC). In J. Muyskens (Ed.), New ways of learning and teaching: Focus on technology and foreign language education (pp. 145–197). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
    Mischel, W. (1981). Metacognition and the rules of delay. In J. H. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds. ), Social cognitive development: Frontiers and possible futures (pp.240-271). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Mischel, W., & Bandura, A. (1965). The influence of models in modifying delay of gratification patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 698-705.
    Mischel, W., & Liebert, R. M. (1966). Effects of discrepancies between observed and imposed reward criteria on their acquisition and transmission. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 45-53.
    Nada, D., & Anastasia, K. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science. 33, 513-540.
    Nguyen, L. V. (2011). Learners' reflections on and perceptions of computer-mediated communication in a language classroom: a Vietnamese perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 27, 1413-1436.
    Niemi, H., Nergi, A., & Virtanen, P. (2003). Towards self-regulation in web-based learning. Journal of Educational Media, 28(4), 43–58.
    Ocker, R., & Yaverbaum, G. T. (2001). Collaborative learning environments: exploring student attitudes and satisfaction in face-to-face and asynchronous computer conferencing settings. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12(4), 427–448.
    Oxford, R. L. (1997). Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 443-456.
    Oxford, R. L., Rubin, J., Chamot, A, U., Schramm, K., Lavine, R., Gunning, P., & Nel, C. (2014). The learning strategy prism: Perspectives of learning strategy experts. System, 43, 30-49.
    Pea, R. D. (1994). Seeing what we build together: Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 283-298.
    Pellettieri, J. (1999). Why-Talk?: Investigating the role of task-based interaction through synchronous network-based communication among classroom learners of Spanish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Davis.
    Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Peterson, M. (2009). Learner interaction in synchronous CMC: a sociocultural perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(4), 303-321.
    Pintrich, P. R. (1988a). A process-oriented view of student motivation and cognition. In J.S. Stark & L. Mets (Eds), Improving teaching and learning through research: Vol. 57. New directions for institutional research (pp. 55-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Pintrich, P. R. (1988b). Student learning and college teaching. In R. E. Young & K. E. Eble (Eds), College teaching and learning: Preparing for new commitments: Vol. 33. New Directions for teaching and learning (pp. 71-86). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames & M. Maehr (Eds), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation enhancing environments: Vol. 6. (pp. 117-160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: the role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R, & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385-407.
    Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning component of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
    Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes (pp. 371-402). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
    Pintrich, P. R., Roeser, R., & De Groot, E. (1994). Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents’ motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 139–161.
    Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Madison, WI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
    Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.
    Pokay, P., & Blurnenfeld, P. C. (1990). Predicting achievement early and late in the semester: The role of motivation and use of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 41-50.
    Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1987). Cognitive strategies: Good strategy users coordinate metacognition and knowledge. In R. Vasta & G. Whitehurst (Eds.), Annals of child development:Vol. 5 (pp. 89-129). New York: JAI Press. Resta, P., & Laferriere, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning.
    Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65–83.
    Romiszowski, A. J., & Mason, R. (1996). Computer-mediated communication. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 438-456). NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
    Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2006). The face to face and the online learners: A comparative study of tutorial support for open and distance language learning and the learner experience with audio-graphic SCMC. The Reading Matrix, 6(3), 248–268.
    Sauro, S. (2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning and Technology, 13(1), 96–120.
    Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113–125.
    Schunk, D. H. (1984). The self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 19, 199-218.
    Schunk, D. H. (1985). Participation in goal-setting: Effects on self-efficacy and skills of learning disabled children. Journal of Special Education, 19, 347-369.
    Schunk, D. H. (1986). Verbalization and children's self-regulated learning.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 347-369.
    Schunk, D. H. (1989). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 83-110). New York: Springer-Verlag.
    Schunk, D. H. (1996). Learning theories: An educational perspective (2nd ed.). , Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
    Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40, 85-94.
    Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1984). Strategy self-verbalization during remedial listening comprehension instruction. Journal of Experimental Education, 53, 49-54.
    Schunk, D. H., & Swartz, C. W. (1993). Goals and progress feedback: Effects on self efficacy and writing achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 337-354.
    Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York: Guilford Press.
    Sha, G. (2009). AI-based chatterbots and spoken English teaching: a critical analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(3), 269-281.
    Shin, K. P., Chen, H. C., Chang, C. Y., & Kao, T. C. (2010). The development and implementation of scaffolding-based self-regulated learning system for e/m-learning. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 80-93.
    Smith, B. (2005). The relationship between negotiated interaction, learner uptake, and lexical acquisition in task-based computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly, 39(1), 33-58.
    Smith, R. (2002). Awareness in video-mediated communication. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation(pp. 425-432). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Sotillo, S. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 82-119. Souvignier, E., & Mokhlesgerami, J. (2006). Using self- regulation as a framework for implementing strategy instruction to foster reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 16, 57- 71.
    Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1998). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering and technology. Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education.
    Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409-426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Stewart, I. A. D., & File, P. (2007). Let’s Chat: a conversational dialogue system for second language practice. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(2), 97-116.
    Strijbos, J. W., Kirschner, P., & Martens, R. (Eds.). (2004). What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Sullivan, N., & Pratt, E. (1996). A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 29, 491-501.
    Suthers, D. (2006). A qualitative analysis of collaborative knowledge construction through shared representations. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(2), 1–28.
    Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp.125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Sweeney, S. (2004). Communicating in Business (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    VanderStoep, S., Pintrich, P. R., & Fagerlin, A. (1996). Disciplinary differences in self-regulated learning in college students. Contemporary Education Psychology, 21, 345–362.
    Vauras, M., Iiskala, T., Kajamies, A., Kinnunen, R., & Lehtinen, E. (2003). Shared-regulation and motivation of collaborating peers: A case analysis. An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 46, 19–37.
    Wang, Y. (2004). Distance language learning: Interactivity and fourth-generation internet-based videoconferencing. CALICO Journal, 21(2), 373–395.
    Wang, M. C., & Peverley, S. T. (1986). The self-instructive process in classroom learning contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 370-404.
    Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 7-26.
    Wegerif, R. (2006). A dialogical understanding of the relationship between CSCL and teaching thinking skills. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 1(1), 143-157. Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan.
    Werry, C. (1996). Linguistic and interactional features of Internet relay chat. In S. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and crosscultural perspectives (pp. 47–63). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Whipp, J.L., & Chiarelli, S. (2005). Self-regulation in a Web-based course: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 5–22.
    White, C. (2004). Independent language learning in distance education: Current issues. Proceedings of the independent learning conference, 2003, 1-9.
    Williams, P. E., & Hellman, C. M. (2004). Differences in self-regulation for online learning between first- and second-generation college students, Research in Higher Education, 45, 71–82.
    Winne, P., & Hadwin, A. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In Hacker, D., Dunlosky, J, & Graesser, A. (Eds.), Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice (pp. 279-306). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Winne, P., & Perry, N. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In Boekaerts, M.,Pintrich, P. R, & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation
    (pp. 531-566). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Winne, P., Jamieson-Noel, D., & Muis, K. (2001). Methodological issues and advances in researching tactics, strategies, and self-regulated learning. In Pintrich, P. R, & Maehr, M. L. (Eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement: Vol. 12. New Directions in Measures and Methods (pp. 121-155). Amsterdam: JAI Press Elsevier Science.
    Wolters, C., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Science, 26, 27–47.
    Wong, L.C., & Nunan, D. (2011). The learning styles and strategies of effective language learners. System, 39, 144-163.
    Wood, R. G., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 407-415.
    Wood, E., V. E. Woloshyn., & T. Willoughby. (Eds.). (1995). Cognitive Strategy Instruction for Middle and High Schools. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
    Yates, S. J. (1996). Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing: A corpus-based study. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication:Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 29–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Yamada, M. (2009). The role of social presence in learner-centered communicative
    language learning using synchronous computer-mediated communication: Experimental study. Computers & Education, 52(4), 820-833.
    Yamada, M., & Akahori, K. (2007). Social Presence in Synchronous CMC-based Language Learning: How does it affect the productive performance and consciousness of learning objectives? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(1), 37-65. Zeng, G., & Takatsuka, S. (2009). Text-based peer–peer collaborative dialogue in a computer-mediated learning environment in the EFL context. System, 37(3), 434-446.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (1985). The development of “intrinsic” motivation: A social learning analysis. Annals of Child Development, 2, 117-160.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Development of self-regulated learning: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 307-313.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self- regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329- 339.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3-17.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: an analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated Learning. From Teaching to Self-reflective Practice (pp. 1-19). New York: The Guilford Press.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R, & Zeidner, M (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation: Theory, Research, and Applications (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B.J. Zimmerman & D.H. Schunk
    (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 1-37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulating academic learning and achievement: The
    emergence of a social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 173-201.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Bonner, S. (1996). A social cognitive view of strategic learning. In C. E. Weinstein & B. L. McComb (Eds.), Strategic learning: Skill will and self-regulation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1996). Self-regulated learning of a motoric skill: The role of goal setting and self-monitoring. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 8, 69–84.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 29-36.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1999). Acquiring writing revision skill: Shifting from process to outcome self-regulatory goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1–10.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). The hidden dimension of personal competence: Self-regulated learning and practice. In A.J. Elliot, C.S. Dweck, & S.Carol (Eds.), Handbook of Competence and Motivation (pp. 509-526). New York: Guilford Publications.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284 – 290.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated
    learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Paulsen, A. S. (1995). Self-monitoring during collegiate studying: An invaluable tool for academic self-regulation. In P. Pintrich (Ed.), New directions in college teaching and learning: Understanding self-regulated learning (pp. 13–27). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Ringle, J. (1981). Effects of model persistence and statements of confidence on children's efficacy and problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 485-493.
    Zimmerman, B.J., & Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.
    Zimmerman, B.J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.) (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 153–189). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    QR CODE