簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林芸珊
Yun-shan Lin
論文名稱: 在網路學習環境中,序列/全面認知風格、動機信念對搜尋行為及學習表現之影響
The Effects of Sequential/Global Cognitive Style and Motivational Beliefs On Searching Behaviors and Performance in the Web-based Learning Environment
指導教授: 王淑玲
Shu-ling Wang
口試委員: 楊鎮華
none
林珊如
none
翁楊絲茜
none
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 數位學習與教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 92
中文關鍵詞: 網路學習環境認知風格自我效能控制信念搜尋行為後設認知策略
外文關鍵詞: Web-based learning, Global/Sequential cognitive style, Self-efficacy, Locus of control, on-line searching behaviors, metacognitive strategies
相關次數: 點閱:530下載:13
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要探討網路學習環境中,個體認知風格、動機信念(自我效能及控制信念)對搜尋行為(深入潛進、表面搜尋)、後設認知策略與搜尋表現(即學習表現)之影響。共有335位高中生參與,有效樣本為225人。本研究採用質與量的研究方法。在質化方面,採內容分析法,共分析1887個網頁,以瞭解學生表現;在量化方面,使用問卷調查法,瞭解學生之序列/全面認知風格、自我效能、控制信念、搜尋行為,以及後設認知策略,並探測各變項間之影響。
    本研究結果顯示,在網路學習環境中,(1)全面型認知風格者與網路環境相適配,對自我效能與內部控制信念有顯著預測力;而序列型者則對內部控制信念有顯著負向預測力。(2)全面認知風格者與網路環境相適配,對深入潛進、表面搜尋與後設認知策略有顯著預測力;而序列型者對深入潛進與後設認知策略有顯著預測力,對表面搜尋則呈現負向預測力。(3)自我效能及內部控制信念皆對深入潛進、表面搜尋與後設認知策略有顯著預測力,而外部控制信念則對表面搜尋具有預測力。(4)自我效能及內部控制信念皆對搜尋表現具有顯著預測力,但外部控制信念則對搜尋表現無預測力。(5)深入潛進與後設認知策略對搜尋表現具有顯著預測力;而表面搜尋對搜尋表現不具預測力。(6)深入潛進與後設認知策略亦具有顯著正相關。最後,本研究根據研究結果進行討論,並提出對教師教學輔導、系統設計者與後續研究之相關建議。


    The purpose of this study was to investigate the roles of cognitive style and motivational beliefs (i.e. self-efficacy and locus of control) in searching behaviors (i.e. deep diving/ fast surfing), metacognitive strategies and performance in the web-based learning environment. There were 335 senior high school students participated in this study. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were applied for data analysis. The content analysis was applied to analyze 1887 students’ searching web pages for the quality of their performance. Some quantitative methods were used to analyze the reliability of the questionnaires for students’ sequential/global cognitive style, self-efficacy, locus of control, searching behaviors, metacognitive strategies, and the relationship among these variables.
    The result showed that in web-based learning environment (1) students’ global cognitive style adapting to the web-based learning environment significantly predicted their self-efficacy and internal locus of control. On the other hand, students’ sequential cognitive style negatively significantly predicted their internal locus of control. (2) Students’ global cognitive style adapting to the web-based learning environment significantly predicted their deep diving, fast surfing and metacognitive strategies. On the other hand, students’ sequential cognitive style positively predicted their deep diving, metacognitive strategies and negatively predicted their fast surfing behavior. (3) Students’ self-efficacy and internal locus of control significantly predicted their deep diving, fast surfing and metacognitive strategies, while students’ external locus of control only predicted their fast surfing behaviors. (4) Students’ self-efficacy and internal locus of control significantly predicted their performance, but their external locus of control did not predict their performance. (5) Students’ deep diving and metacognitive strategies, significantly predicted their performance, but their fast surfing did not predict their performance. (6) Students’ deep diving was significantly related to their metacognitive strategies. Finally, implications and suggestions for teaching and future research were provided.

    摘要 I Abstract II 誌謝 III 目錄 IV 表目錄 VI 圖目錄 VII 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究問題 7 第三節 研究架構 8 第四節 研究重要性 10 第五節 名詞釋義 11 第貳章 文獻探討 13 第一節 自我調制學習理論 13 第二節 資訊問題解決相關研究 16 第三節 認知風格理論及相關研究 19 第四節 自我效能理論及相關研究 23 第五節 控制信念理論及相關研究 26 第六節 網路搜尋行為相關研究 29 第七節 後設認知策略相關研究 31 第參章 研究方法 33 第一節 研究架構 33 第二節 研究對象 35 第三節 研究工具 35 第四節 研究設計 45 第五節 搜尋任務 46 第六節 資料處理與分析 47 第肆章 研究結果 54 第一節 描述性統計 54 第二節 問卷信、效度分析 57 第三節 研究假設統計結果 59 第伍章 結論與建議 66 第一節 結論與討論 66 第二節 未來研究建議 70 參考文獻 73 附錄 82

    中文文獻部份:
    王文科(2001)。教育研究法(六版)。台北:五南。
    王石番(1999)。傳播內容分析法-理論與實證。臺北:幼獅。
    吳佩羿(2002)。學習動機對網路學習行為及學習成就之影響。國立台灣科技大學。技術與教育職業研究所,未出版,台北市。
    林瑞榮(2001)。內容分析法。載於中正大學教育學研究所主編,教育學研究方法(47-56)。高雄:麗文。
    徐逢禪(2004)。團體效能對網路合作學習行為及學習成就之影響。國立台灣科技大學。技術與教育職業研究所,未出版,台北市。
    歐用生(1995)。質的研究。台北:師大。
    英文文獻部份:
    Ajzen, I.(2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665-683.
    Alesandrini, K. L. (1981). Pictorial-verbal and analytic-holistic learning strategies in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(3), 358-368.
    Alesandrini, K. L., Langstaff, J. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1984). Visual-verbal and analytic holistic strategies, abilities and styles. Journal of Educational Research, 77(3), 151-157.
    Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2007). Personality, individual differences and Internet use. In A. Joinson, K. McKenna, T. Postmes & U. Reips, The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology(187-204). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    Argelagos, E., & Pifarre, M. (2012). Improving Information Problem Solving skills in Secondary Education through embedded instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 515–526.
    Babbie, E. (2001). The Practice of Social Research. Belremont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
    Bajraktarevic, N., Hall, W., & Fullick, P. (2003). Incorporating learning styles in hypermedia environment: Empirical evaluation. Proceedings of the Workshop on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems(41-52). Nottingham, UK.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
    Bandura, A., & Wood, R. (1989). Effect of Perceived Controllability and Performance Standards on Self-regulation of Complex Decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 805-814.
    Bannert, M. (2003). Effekte metakognitiver Lernhilfen auf den Wissenserwerb in vernetzten Lernumgebungen. Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie, 17(1), 13-25.
    Begoray, J. A. (1990). An introduction to hypermedia issues, systems and application areas. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 33, 121-147.
    Biggs, J. B. (1985). The role of metalearning in study processes. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 185-212.
    Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
    Boechler, P. M. (2001). How spatial is hyperspace? Interacting with hypertext documents: Cognitive processes and concepts. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(1), 23-46.
    Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Vermetten, Y. (2005). Information problem solving by experts and novices: analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 487-508.
    Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Walraven, A. (2009). A descriptive model of information problem solving while using internet. Computers & Education, 53, 1207-1217.
    Brand-Gruwel, S., & Stadtler, M. (2011). Solving information-based problems: Evaluating sources and information. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 175-179.
    Bures, E., Abrami, P. C., & Amundsen, C. (2000). Student motivation to learn via computerconferencing. Research in Higher Education, 41(5), 593-621.
    Cacciamani, S., Cesareni, D., Martini, F., Ferrini, T., & Fujita, N. (2012). Influence of participation, facilitator styles, and metacognitive reflection on knowledge building in online university courses. Computers & Education, 58(3), 874-884.
    Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2000). Learning style, academic belief systems, self-report student proficiency and academic achievement in higher education. Educational Psychology, 20(3), 307-322.
    Chak, K., & Leung, L. (2004). Shyness and locus of control as predictors of Internet addiction and Internet use. Cyberpsychology &Behavior, 7(5), 559-570.
    Chang, M. M., & Ho, C. M. (2009). Effects of locus of control and learner-control on web based language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(3), 189-206.
    Chen, L. H. (2010). Web-based learning programs: Use by learners with various cognitive styles. Computer & Education, 54, 1028-1035.
    Clark, D. (2002). Psychological myths in e-learning. Medical Teacher, 24(6), 598-604.
    Converse, P. D., & Steinhauser, E. (2010). Individual differences in reactions to goal-performance discrepancies over time. Personality and individual differences, 48(2), 138-143.
    Coutinho, S. (2008). Self-efficacy, metacognition, and performance. North American Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 165-172.
    Coutinho, S. A., & Neuman, G. (2008). A model of metacognition, achievement goal orientation, learning style and self-efficacy. Learning Environments Research, 11(2), 131-151.
    Cubukcu, F. (2009). Metacognition in the classroom. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 559-563.
    Curry, L. (1983). Learning Style in Continuing Education. An organisation of learning style theory and constructs. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Medical Association.
    Dane, F. C. (1990). Research method. CA: Brooks Cole.
    Davis, E. A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 91-142.
    Dembo, M. H. (2004). Motivation and Learning Strategies for College Success.(2nd.ed.). Mahwah: NJ: Erlbaum Assoc.
    Dembo, M. H., Junge, L.G., & Lynch, R. (2006). Becoming a self-regulated learner: implications for web-based education. In H. F. O’Neil, & R.S. Perez, Web-based learning: Theory, research, and practice(185-202). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    DeRouin, R., Fritzsche, B. A., & Salas, E. (2005). E-learning in organizations. Journal of Management, 31, 920-940.
    Dunning, D., Johnson K., Ehrlinger, J. & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12 (3), 83-87.
    Dunser, A., & Jirasko, M. (2005). Interaction of Hypertext Forms and Global versus Sequential Learning Styles. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(1), 79 -91.
    Dunslosky, J. & Thiede, K. W. (1998). What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self-paced study. Acta Psychologica, 98, 37-56.
    Dinet, J., Marquet, P., & Nissen, E. (2003). An exploratory study of adolescent’s perceptions of the Web. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 538-545.
    Entwistle, N.J. (1988). Styles of Learning and Teaching. London: David Fulton.
    Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Schuyten, G. (2008). Relationships between student cognitions and their effects on study strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(2), 271-278.
    Felder, R. M., & Henriques, E. R. (1995). Learning and Teaching Styles In Foreign and Second Language Education. Foreign Language Annals, 28(1), 21–31.
    Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engr. Education , 78(7), 674-681.
    Findley, M., & Cooper, H. M. (1983). The relation between locus of control and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 419-427.
    Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-development inquiry. American Psychology, 34(10), 906-911.
    Ford, N., & Ford, R. (1993). Toward a cognitive theory of information accessing: An
    empirical study. Information Processing and Management, 29(5), 569-585.
    Ford, N. (1999). IR and creativity: Towards support for the original thinker. Journal of Documentation, 55(5), 528–542.
    Ford, N., Miller, D., & Moss, N. (2001). The Role of Individual Differences in Internet Searching: An Empirical Study. Journal of the American Society for Science and Technology, 52 (12), 1049-1066.
    Ford, N., Miller, D., & Moss, N. (2005). Web Search Strategies and Human Individual Differences: Cognitive and Demographic Factors, Internet Attitudes, and Approaches. Journal of the American Society for Science and Technology, 56 (7), 741-756.
    Ford, N., Wilson, T. D., Foster, A., Ellis, D., & Spink, A. (2002). Information seeking and mediated searching study. Part 4: cognitive styles in information seeking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (9). 728-735.
    Gorrell, G., Eaglestone, B., Ford, N., Holdridge, P., & Madden, A. (2009). Towards “metacognitively aware” IR systems: an initial user study. Journal of Documentation, 65(3), 446-469.
    Graff, M. G. (2003). Learning from we-based instructional systems and cognitive style. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34 (4), 407-418.
    Graf, S., Liu, T. C., & Kinshuk. (2010). Analysis of learners’ navigational behaviour and their learning styles in an online course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(2), 116–131.
    Hall, C. W. (2001). A measure of executive processing skills in college students. College Student Journal, 35(3), 442-449.
    Halttunen, K., & Jarvelin, K. (2005). Assessing learning outcomes in two information retrieval learning environments, Information Processing & Management, 41 (4). 949-972.
    Hayes, J., & Allinson, C. W. (1996). The implications of learning styles for training and development: A discussion of the matching hypothesis. British Journal of Management, 7(1), 63-73.
    Heinstrom, J. (2005). Fast surfing, broad scanning and deep diving. Journal of Documentation, 61(2), 228-247.
    Heinstrom, J. (2006). Broad exploration or precise specificity: two basic information seeking patterns among students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(11), 1440-1450.
    Heinstrom, J. (2010). From fear to flow: Personality and information interaction. London: Chandos Publishing.
    Hill, J. R. (1999). A conceptual framework for understanding information seeking in open-ended information systems. Educational Technology Research & Development, 47(1), 5-27.
    Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Schlosser, A. E. (2003). Locus of Control, Web Use, and Consumer Attitudes Toward Internet Regulation. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 22(1), 41-57.
    Hsu, Y. S., Cheng, Y. J., & Chiou, G. F. (2003). Internet use in a senior high school: a case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(4), 356-368.
    Johnson, K. (2007). Expertise research in language teaching: Some examples and some issues. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(1), 51-71.
    Johnson, R. D., Gueutal, H. & Falbe, C. M. (2009). Technolgy, Trainees, Metacognitive Activity and E-Learning Effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(6), 545-566.
    Joo, Y., Bong, M., & Choi, H. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 5-17.
    Joo, Y. J., Joung, S., & Sim, W. J. (2011). Structural relationships among internal locus of control, institutional support, flow, and learner persistence in cyber universities. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 714-722.
    Kesici, S., Sahin, I., & Akturk, A. O. (2009). Analysis of cognitive learning strategies and computer attitudes, according to college students’ gender and locus of control. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 529-534.
    Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121-1134.
    Kossowska, M., & Necka, E. (1994). Do it your own way: cognitive strategies, intelligence, and personality. Pers. Individ. Dif, 16, 33-46.
    Landine, J., & Stewart, J. (1998). Relationship between Metacognition, Motivation, Locus of Control, Self-Efficacy, and Academic Achievement. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 32(3), 200-212.
    Lazonder, A. W., & Rouet, J. F. (2008). Information problem solving instruction: Some cognitive and metacognitive issues. Computers in human behavior, 24(3), 753-765.
    Leader, L. F. & Klein, J. D. (1996). The effects of search tool type and cognitive style on performance during the hypermedia database searches. Edu. Tech. Res. & Dev., 4(1), 24-51.
    Lee, M., & Baylor, A. L. (2006). Designing Metacognitive Maps for Web-Based Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 9 (1), 344-348.
    Lee, H. W., Lim, K. Y., & Grabowski, B. L. (2010). Improving self-regulation, learning strategy use, and achievement with metacognitive feedback. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(1), 1042-1629.
    Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B. K., & Wang, R. Y. (2002). AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment. Information & Management, 40(2), 133–146.
    Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 486-512.
    Liu, C. T., Du, T. C., & Tsai, H. H. (2009). A study of the service quality of general portals. Information & Management, 46(1), 52-56.
    Loomis, K. (2000). Learning style and asynchronous learning: Comparing the LASSI model to classroom performance. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4, 23-32.
    Mampadi, F., Chen, S. Y., Ghinea, G. & Chen, M. P. (2011). Design of adaptive hypermedia learning systems: A cognitive style approach. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1003-1011.
    Moore, P. (1995). Information problem solving : a wider view of library skills. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 1-31.
    Nahl, D., & Tenopir, C. (1996). Affective and cognitive searching behavior of novice end-users of a full-text database. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(4), 276-286.
    Narciss, S., Proske, A., & Koerndle, H.(2007). Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1126–1144.
    Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (1995). Developing effective hypermedia instructional materials. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 8-22.
    O’Neil, H. F., & Perez, R. S. (2006). Web-based learning: Theory, research, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Palmquist, R. A., & Kim, K. S. (2000). The Effect of Cognitive Style and Online Search Experience on Web Search Performance. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 51(6), 558-567.
    Papaeconomou, C., Zijlema, A. F., & Ingwersen, P. (2008). Searchers' relevance judgments and criteria in evaluating web pages in a learning style perspective. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Information Interaction in Context (pp. 123-132).
    Pask, G., & Scott, B. (1972). Learning strategies and individual competence, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 4, 217-253.
    Pask, G.(1988). Learning Strategies, Teaching Strategies and Conceptual or Learning Style. in Schmeck R (ed.), Perspectives on Individual Differences, Learning Strategies and Learning Styles(83-100), London: Plenum Press.
    Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting Visual and Verbal Learning Preferences in a Second Language Multimedia Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 25-36.
    Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. (1991).The motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI:NCEIPTAL, The University of Michigan.
    Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds), Handbook of self-regulation (13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Pintrich, P. R.(2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 123-141.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 358-407.
    Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H.(2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications.(2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Prajapati, B., Dunne, M., Bartlett, H., & Cubbidge, R.(2011). The influence of learning styles, enrolment status and gender on academic performance of optometry undergraduates. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 31(1), 69–78.
    Raes, A., Schellens, T., De Wever, B., & Vanderhoven, E. (2012). Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning. Computers & Education, 59(1), 82-94.
    Ransdell, S., Kent, B., Gaillard-Kenney, S., & Long, J. (2011). Digital immigrants fare better than digital natives due to social reliance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 931-938.
    Ren, W. H. (2000). Library instruction and college student self-efficacy in electronic information searching. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 26(5), 323-328.
    Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles -- an overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11, 193-215.
    Riding, R., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies: Understanding Style Differences in Learning and Behavior. London: David Fulton Publishers.
    Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1-28.
    Rouet, J. F., & Coutelet, B. (2008). The acquisition of document search strategies in grade school students. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 389-406.
    Sabry, K., & Baldwin, L.(2003). Web-based learning interaction and learning styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 443-454.
    Sadler-Smith, E. (2001a). The relationship between learning style and cognitive style. Personality and Individual Differences, 30 (4), 609-616.
    Sadler-Smith, E. (2001b). A Reply to Reynolds's Critique of Learning Style. management learning, 32(3), 291-304.
    Sanchez-Alonso, S., & Vovides, Y. (2007). Integration of metacognitive skills in the design of learning objects. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2585-2595.
    Schmidt, A. M., & Ford, J. K. (2003). Learning within a learner control training environment the interactive effects of goal orientation and meta-cognitive instruction on learning outcomes. Personnel psychology, 56, 405-429.
    Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and cognitive skill learning (13-44). In C. Ames & R. Ames(Eds.), Research on motivation in education. San Diego: Academic Press.
    Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7, 109-134.
    Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139.
    Scott, T. J., & O'Sullivan, M. K. (2005). Analyzing student search strategies: making a case for integrating information literacy skills into the curriculum. Teacher Librarian. 33(1), 67-82.
    Spink, A., Wilson, T. D., Ford, N., Foster, A., & Ellis, D. (2002a). Information Seeking and Mediated Searching. Part 1. Theoretical Framework and Research Design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(9), 695-703.
    Spink, A., Wilson, T. D., Ford, N., Foster, A., & Ellis, D. (2002b). Information seeking and mediated searching study. Part 3. Successive searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (9), 716-727.
    Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Allowing for thinking styles. Educational Leadership, 52(3), 36-37.
    Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles. Mahwah: Lawrence Erbaulm Associates
    Tabatabai, D., & Shore, B. M. (2005). How experts and novices search the Web. Library & Information Science Research, 27(2), 222-248.
    Tobias, S. (2006). The importance of motivation, metacognition, and help seeking in web-based learning. In H. O’Neil, & R. Perez (Eds.), Web-based learning: theory, research, and practice(203-220). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40, 43-50.
    Tu, Y. W., Shih, M., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Eighth graders’ web searching strategies and outcomes: The role of task types, web experiences and epistemological beliefs, Computers & Education, 51, 1142-1153.
    Ultanir, E., Ultanir, Y.G., & Temel, G.O. (2012). The Examination of University Students’ Learning Styles by Means of Felder-Silverman Index. Education and Science, 37(163), 29-42.
    Vermetten, Y. J., Lodewijks, H. G., & Vermunt, J. D. (2001). The Role of PersonalityTraits and GoalOrientations in Strategy Use. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(2), 149–170.
    Walraven, A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2008). Information problem solving: A review of problems students encounter and instructional solutions. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 623-648.
    Wang, A. Y., & Newlin, M. H. (2000). Characteristics of students who enroll and succeed in psychology web-based classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 137-143.
    Wang, D. (2005). Students’ Learning and Locus of Control in Web-Supplemental Instruction. Innovative Higher Education, 30(1), 67-82.
    Wang, S. L., & Lin, S. S. J. (2000). The cross-cultural validation of motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Paper presented at the 2000 Annual Conference of American Psychological Association, Washington DC.
    Wang, S. L., & Wu, P. Y. (2008). The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective. Computers & Education, 51, 1589-1598.
    Warren, J. R., Hecht, M. L., Jung, E., Kvasny, L., & Henderson, M. G. (2010). African American Ethnic and Class-Based Identities on the World Wide Web: Moderating the Effects of Self-Perceived Information Seeking/Finding and Web Self-Efficacy. Communication Research, 37(5), 674-702.
    Watkins, D. (1984). Student learning processes: an exploratory study in the Philippines. Human Learning, 3, 33-42.
    Weissbein, D. A., Huang, J. L., Ford, J. K., & Schmidt, A. M. (2011). Influencing Learning States to Enhance Trainee Motivation and Improve Training Transfer. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 423–435.
    Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R., (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins. New York: International Universities Press, Inc.
    Wilhite, S. C. (1990). Self-efficacy, locus of control, self-assessment of memory ability, and study activities as predictors of college course achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 696-700.
    Willems, J. (2011). Using learning styles data to inform e-learning design: A study comparing undergraduates, postgraduates and e-educators. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(6), 863-880.
    Wolfe, C. R. (2001). Learning and Teaching on the World Wide Web. London: Academic Press.
    Wopereis, I., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Vermetten, Y. (2008). The effect of embedded instruction on solving information problems. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 738-752.
    Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C.C. (2007). Developing an Information Commitment Survey for assessing students’ web information searching strategies and evaluative standards for web materials. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (2), 120-132.
    Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2007). Predictors for Student Success in an Online Course. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 71-83.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: shifting from process outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 29-36.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic achievement: An overview. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329-339.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-regulation (13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    QR CODE