隨著全球經濟的不斷發展和人口的增長，氣候變化、環境污染、資源浪費等 問題日益嚴重。應對這些挑戰，聯合國於2015年制定了17項可持續發展目標 (SDGs)，旨在實現全球經濟、社會和環境的可持續發展。其中包括消除貧困、潔淨水和衛生設施、負責任的消費和生產、氣候行動等重要目標。
本個案研究探討新北市低碳社區，同時也是被喻為蘆洲最美的社區「淳詠」， 在H主委的領導之下物業公司，管理委員會成員及全體住戶，實施低碳活動的過程、H主委領導的角色以及社區努力對居民福祉的影響。
本研究以哈佛個案方式撰寫包含個案本文與教學指引二部份。面對社區經營，H主委提出「全功能數位低碳幸福宅」的概念，積極參與新北市政府低碳認證、綠化競賽、節能補助，經常舉辦教育課程及社區活動聯絡感情，成立瑜伽社團及開心農場社團常態性組織活動，資源回收扶助弱勢，防疫團購取代會館群聚，節能照明汰換;不同情境成員，運用不同領導風格創新思維和靈活性改善生活質量， 積極溝通達成共識，創造雙贏推動SDGs，影響整個社會的可持續發展。本個案可用於討論情境領導、資源拼湊、衝突管理、社會影響力等相關議題。通過本個案的探討，社區配合新北市政府推動低碳社區與SDGs之間存在著密切的相互作用，其在促進經濟、社會和環境的可持續發展方面具有重要意義。

With the continuous development of the global economy and population growth, issues such as climate change, environmental pollution, and resource waste have become increasingly serious. To address these challenges, the United Nations formulated 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2015, aimed at achieving sustainable development of the global economy, society, and environment. These include important goals such as eradicating poverty, providing clean water and sanitation, responsible consumption and production, and climate action.
This case study explores how the community, also known as the beautiful "Chunyong" community in Lujhou, under the leadership of Chairperson H, implemented low-carbon activities. It examines the role of Chairperson H's leadership in the property company, the management committee, and all residents, as well as the impact of the community's efforts on residents' well-being.
In the face of community management, Chairman H proposed the concept of a "full-functional digital low-carbon happy home", actively participated in the New Taipei City government's low-carbon certification, green competition, energy-saving subsidies, regularly held educational courses and community activities to foster relationships, established yoga clubs and happy farming clubs for regular organized activities, provided resource recycling assistance to vulnerable groups, replaced clubhouse gatherings with epidemic prevention group purchases, and upgraded to energy-saving lighting. With different situational members, innovative thinking and flexibility were applied through different leadership styles to improve the quality of life and achieve win-win outcomes to promote SDGs and influence the sustainable development of the entire society. This case can be used to discuss related issues such as situational leadership, Resources Bricolage, conflict management, and social impact. Through the discussion of this case, it is apparent that there is a close interaction between the community's cooperation with the New Taipei City government in promoting low-carbon communities and SDGs, which is of great significance in promoting the sustainable development of the economy, society, and the environment.

參考文獻

中文文獻
孫健忠 (1999)，社會影響理論在組織行為研究中的運用，管理評論, 18(2), 59- 80
陳介玄和高承恕 (1991). "組織間衝突:台灣高科技產業的個案研究." 《科
技管理學刊》, 8, 43-66 陳意文(2009)，「創新產品的資源拼湊與價值實現之研究:採新資源基礎觀點之
定性與定量分析」，博士論文，國立政治大學科技管理研究，臺北市 費孝通 (1991)，《中國社會關係史》，香港: 商務印書館
黃光國 (1988)，《台灣社會關係的文化分析》，台北: 左岸文化
黃囇莉(2006)，人際和諧與衝突一本土化的理論與研究
鄭伯壎和黃敏萍 (2000)，"家族事業的傳承與再造:以台灣的家族企業為 例，" 《臺灣社會學刊》, 24, 1-47
謝如梅等(2011)， 「資源拼湊、創業經驗與新事業機會之初探性研究:社 會網絡觀點」，2011 第14 屆科技整合管理研討會，441-453。

英文文獻
Ahwill, S., & Williamson, P. J. (2001). Social impact assessment: A contribution to the state-of-the-art series. International Association for Impact Assessment
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329-366. doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
Brett, J. M. (2000). Culture and Negotiation. International Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 97-104
Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford University Press
Emerson, R. M., Wachowics, T., & Chun, K. (2000). Social exchange theory and research on business-to-business relational exchange. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1119-1132
Epstein, M. J., & Yuthas, K. (2014). Measuring and Improving Social Impacts: A Guide for Nonprofits, Companies, and Impact Investors. Berrett-Koehler Publishers
Finsterbusch, K., & Freudenberg, N. (2002). Social impact assessment. Annual Review of Public Health, 23(1), 247-272
Grieco, M. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and social impact: A statistical approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(1), 33-45
Hersey, P. and Blanchard, K. H. (1977). Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources (3rd ed.) New Jersey/Prentice Hall, ISBN 978- 0132617697
Kim, H. S., Wang, Y., Kondo, M., & Kim, D. (2007). Emotional Acculturation: Cultural Adaptation of Emotions in Asian American College Students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(1), 112-134
Latane, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343-356
Leung, K. (1997). Negotiation and Reward Allocations Across Cultures. In P. B. Smith, M. H. Bond, & C. C. Wang (Eds.), Understanding Social Psychology Across Cultures (pp. 184-206). Sage Publications
Liu, J. H., & Chen, X. (2002). Messianic Belief, Altruistic Punishment, and Cooperation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(4), 547-567
Lulofs, R. S., & Cain, M. (2000). "Conflict and Collaboration in Natural Resource Management." 《Ecology and Society》, 4(2), 8. Available at: https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol4/iss2/art8/
Maas, K., & Liket, K. (2011). What is social impact and how can it be assessed? A review of literature. Society and Business Review, 6(3), 211-233
Reisman, J. M., & Gienapp, A. (2004). Conceptual, methodological, and ethical problems in social impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(7-8), 665-686
Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural Conflict Styles: A Face-Negotiation Theory. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in Intercultural Communication (pp. 213-235). Sage Publications
Vanclay, F. (2004). Social principles for agricultural extension to assist in the promotion of natural resource management. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 44(3), 213-222
Wainwright, S. P. (2002). Egoism versus altruism in social impact theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 786-795