簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉人儀
Jen-Yi Liu
論文名稱: 以學習投入、倦怠與身心健康探討中學生數學學習情緒與成就
Relationships among middle school students' school engagement, burnout, well-being, and mathematics achievement and emotions
指導教授: 陳素芬
Sufen Chen
口試委員: 陳素芬
梁至中
劉佩艷
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 數位學習與教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 105
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 54
中文關鍵詞: 學習投入學習倦怠學習成就情緒數學學習成就
外文關鍵詞: Latent Profile Analysis, Mathematics Learning, School Burnout, School Engagement
相關次數: 點閱:360下載:9
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

本研究以學生在學校的感受 (學習投入、學習倦怠)與生活中的身心狀況 (憂鬱程度、生活滿意度),歸類出中學生的數種類型,並進一步比較各類型學生的數學成就與數學的學習情緒(享受、驕傲、憤怒、羞愧、無聊)之間的關係。本研究以問卷方式調查了新北市七所中學裡共696位12-14歲的青少年在學校的感受、生活中的身心狀況以及在學習數學時的情緒,發現過半數的學生對於學校的學習是投入的,但有將近三分之二的學生對於學習感到倦怠。以身心狀況看來,大多數的學生對整體的生活是滿意的。對於數學的學習而言,多數的學生在學習數學時能感覺到享受或驕傲,但過半數的學生對於負向的憤怒、羞愧以及無聊情緒的感受度也不小。
以Latent Class Analysis分析後發現有四個類型的學生,分別是參與型、價值認同型、倦怠型和憂鬱型。這四類型的學校學習投入、生活滿意度逐漸下降,而倦怠和憂鬱情況則是有上升的情形。在積極參與的這組表現中,數學成就與學習情緒方面有顯著差異,包含對學習數學的享受中表現高於其他三組,其他三組則是沒有顯著差異。驕傲的情緒中這一組也高於其他三組,但中間兩組沒有顯著差異。憤怒的情緒四組有逐漸上升,而羞愧、無聊等方面,積極參與的學生表現都低於其他三組,中間兩組則無顯著差異。
對於四組之路徑分析結果顯示,對於多數的(77%)的學生而言,整體學習的投入與倦怠對於學習數學時所產生的情緒有重要的預測能力,而數學學習情緒當中的正負情緒則是對於數學成就有預測之能力。從四種類型的學生也可以看出學生在投入程度以及倦怠程度對於學習情緒的影響最為重要,教師在教學時應注意在認知和情意上以適當的教學方式來激勵學生學習的參與度,並藉由降低學習倦怠來促進正向情緒及抑制負向情緒,藉此提升學生的學習成效。


The present study explored the patterns of middle students’ school well-being (school engagement and school burnout) and overall well-being (depression and life satisfaction). The questionnaires were conducted to survey the school engagement, burnout, well-being, mathematics achievement emotions, and mathematics achievement of 696 secondary school students ranging from 12 to 14 years old. This study found that half of the students were involved in school learning, but nearly two-thirds of the students experienced learning burnout. However, in terms of physical and mental situation, most students were satisfied with their overall lives. Moreover, with respect to studying mathematics, most of the students expressed a certain degree of enjoyment or pride of learning. Nevertheless, more than half of the students felt anger, shame, and boredom.
Based on the Latent Class Analysis, the participants in the study were divided into four types; that is, the Engaged, the Stressed, the Burnout, and the Depressed. Their school engagement and life satisfaction were gradually decreasing in all of these four types while their school burnout and depression were on the rise. The Engaged had significantly higher achievement and positive learning emotions than the other three groups. The Burnout and the Stressed felt similarly in pride, same, and boredom.
The results showed that for most students their school engagement and burnout could significantly predict their mathematics learning emotions. Some of the positive and negative emotions in mathematics learning could predict the achievements of mathematics learning. From this study, the students with high degree of investment and low burnout had a great impact on their learning mood. Therefore, teachers are supposed to apply appropriate teaching methods to enhance students’ engagement. In addition, teachers may improve students’ achievement by reducing learning burnout to promote positive learning emotions and eliminating negative emotions to enhance students’ learning efficiency.

中文摘要 I ABSTRACT II 目錄 I 圖目錄 II 表目錄 III 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 3 第三節 研究範圍與限制 6 第貳章 文獻探討 7 第一節 學習成就情緒(ACHIEVEMENT EMOTIONS) 7 第二節 學習投入(ENGAGEMENT) 14 第三節 學習倦怠(BURNOUT) 16 第四節 憂鬱(DEPRESSIVE) 與生活滿意度(LIFE SATISFACTION) 18 第叁章 研究方法 20 第一節 研究樣本 20 第二節 研究工具 21 第三節 研究流程 24 第肆章 研究結果 28 第一節 整體學生之各項表現說明 28 第二節 分組及各組樣本之說明 32 第三節 學習投入、學習倦怠、憂鬱程度、生活滿意度與學習成就情緒及數學學習成就之統計分析 35 第四節 各組學生在學習投入、學習倦怠、憂鬱程度、生活滿意度對於預測學習成就情緒、數學學習成就之分析與建議 39 第伍章 結論與建議 45 第一節 研究結論 45 第二節 研究限制 48 第三節 未來研究議題 48 參考書目 49 

江民瑜(2013)。學業情緒為中介的自我調整學習模式之檢驗:以數學領域為例。當代教育研究季刊,21(3),113-150。doi: 10.6151/CERQ.2013.2103.04

余民寧、韓珮華(2009)。教學方式對數學學習興趣與數學成就之影響:以TIMSS 2003 台灣資料為例。測驗學刊,56(1),19-48。

林宴瑛、程炳林(2012)。環境目標結構與控制-價值信念對學業情緒之效果。教育心理學報,44(1),49-72。doi: 10.6251/BEP.20110711

林淑惠、黃韞臻(民101)。中部大學生學習投入與學習倦怠之分析。輔導與諮商學報,34(1),51-67。

林淑惠、黃韞臻(民97)。高中職學生學校生活與主觀幸福感關係之研究。輔導與諮商學報,30(2),83-106。

邱素玲、洪福源(民103)。大學生班級情緒氣氛、學習自我效能、學習倦怠與學習投入關係研究。彰化師大教育學報,25,85-112。

施淑慎(民101)。你累了嗎?國中生學習倦怠相關因素之縱貫性研究(第2年)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫期末報告(編號:NSC 99-2410-H-004-022-MY2),未出版。

陳信憲、許銘珊(2011)。大專校院教師情緒勞務與工作倦怠之相關研究。高雄師大學報: 教育與社會科學類,30,1-15。

黃寶園(2009)。工作壓力對工作滿足、職業倦怠影響之研究:統合分析取向。教育心理學報,40(3),439-461。doi:10.6251/BEP.20080618

黃韞臻、林淑惠(民101)。「大學生學習倦怠量表」之編製。教育與心理研究,34(4),73-95。

黃韞臻、林淑惠(2012)。樂觀/悲觀對大學生學習倦怠的差異分析。台灣心理諮商季刊,4(4),14-36。

楊孟麗(2005)。教育成就的價值與青少年的心理健康。中華心理衛生學刊,18(2),75-99。

蔡欣樺(2017)。父母投入對國中生學習涉入之影響:期望-價值動機之中介效果分析。教育科學期刊,15(2),65-92。

簡嘉菱、程炳林(2013)。環境目標結構、自我決定動機與學業情緒之關係。教育心理學報,44(3),713 -734。doi: 10.6251/BEP.20120614

藍雅慧、張景媛(民93)。知情意整合的國中生數學學習歷程模式之建構。教育心理學報,35(3),201-220。

魏琦芳、黃毅志(2011)。學業成就與心理健康因果順序的貫時性分析:以TEPS資料做分析。中華心理衛生學刊,24(1),97-130。

魏麗敏、黃德祥(民90)。國中與高中學生家庭、學習投入狀況與自我調節學習及成就之研究。中華輔導學報,10,63-118。

財團法人董氏基金會(2011)。2011年-台灣五都國、高中職學生運動狀況、壓力源與憂鬱情緒之相關性調查。2011/11/1 ,取自https://www.jtf.org.tw/psyche/melancholia/survey.asp?This=79&Page=1

財團法人董氏基金會(2006)。2006年-大學生日常生活、網路使用行為與憂鬱傾向之相關性調查。2006/10,取自https://www.jtf.org.tw/psyche/melancholia/survey.asp?This=67&Page=3

財團法人董氏基金會(2002)。2002年-大台北地區青少年主觀生活壓力與憂鬱傾向之相關性調查。2004/8/30 ,取自https://www.jtf.org.tw/psyche/melancholia/survey.asp?This=63&Page=2

財團法人董氏基金會(1999)。1999年-大台北地區在學青少年對憂鬱與憂鬱症認知與現況調查。1999/9,取自https://www.jtf.org.tw/psyche/melancholia/survey.asp?This=58&Page=2

Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 4-12.

Artino, A. R., & Jones, K. D. (2012). Exploring the complex relations between achievement emotions and self-regulated learning behaviors in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 170-175.

Artino, A. R., La Rochelle, J. S., & Durning, S. J. (2010). Second‐year medical students’ motivational beliefs, emotions, and achievement. Medical education, 44(12), 1203-1212. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03712.x

Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75.

Dettmers, S., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Students’ emotions during homework in mathematics: Testing a theoretical model of antecedents and achievement outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 25-35.

Hall, N. C., Sampasivam, L., Muis, K. R., & Ranellucci, J. (2016). Achievement goals and emotions: The mediational roles of perceived progress, control, and value. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 313-330. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12108

Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 59(1), 12-19.

Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Students’ emotions and academic engagement: Introduction to the special issue. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 1-3.

Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Rogat, T. K., & Koskey, K. L. (2011). Affect and engagement during small group instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 13-24.

MacCann, C., Fogarty, G. J., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2011). Coping mediates the relationship between emotional intelligence (EI) and academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 60-70.

Nett, U. E., Goetz, T., & Hall, N. C. (2011). Coping with boredom in school: An experience sampling perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 49-59.

Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational psychology review, 18(4), 315-341. doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9

Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., & Perry, R. P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 531.

Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary educational psychology, 36(1), 36-48.

Salmela-Aro, K., Muotka, J., Alho, K., Hakkarainen, K., & Lonka, K. (2016). School burnout and engagement profiles among digital natives in Finland: A person-oriented approach. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(6), 704-718.

Salokangas, R. K. R., Poutanen, O., & Stengård, E. (1995). Screening for depression in primary care Development and validation of the Depression Scale, a screening instrument for depression. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 92(1), 10-16.

Salmela-Aro K., Upadyaya K. (2012). The Schoolwork Engagement Inventory: Energy, dedication and absorption (EDA). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28, 60–67. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000091

Salmela‐Aro, K., & Upadyaya, K. (2014). School burnout and engagement in the context of demands–resources model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 137-151.

Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23.

Wang, M. T., & Peck, S. C. (2013). Adolescent educational success and mental health vary across school engagement profiles. Developmental psychology, 49(7), 1266.

QR CODE