簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李紹羽
Shao-Yu Lee
論文名稱: 服務設計中關鍵驅動因素的梳理及改善:以 GoShare 共享機車之旅遊服務為例
Sorting out and Improving Key Driving Forces in Service Design: A Case Study of GoShare Shared Scooter Service in Tourism Scenario
指導教授: 唐玄輝
Hsien-Hui Tang
口試委員: 陳書儀
Shu-Yi Chen
董芳武
Fang-Wu Tung
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 設計學院 - 設計系
Department of Design
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 138
中文關鍵詞: 服務設計淨推薦值驅動因素共享機車旅遊體驗
外文關鍵詞: Service design, NPS, Driving force, Shared scooter, Tourism experience
相關次數: 點閱:275下載:22
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

因應共享機車市場規模的快速擴張,台灣共享機車業者紛紛推出旅遊服務,以提升使用人數及機車租用率,然而如何不斷保持服務的差異化和動態發展來提升顧客忠誠度及滿意度一直是業者所面臨的難題。本研究目的為透過梳理及改善服務設計中的關鍵驅動因素,幫助業者提升顧客忠誠度及滿意度,並為使用者創造優良的服務體驗。我們運用「透過設計進行研究」(Research through design)的方法,探索GoShare共享機車之旅遊服務個案,依循服務設計流程,以質化研究方法建立驅動因素,再採用量化研究方法找出影響淨推薦值和使用歷程滿意度的關鍵驅動因素,提出因素相關的服務概念,並進行測試及驗證。最終,確認影響顧客忠誠度及滿意度的關鍵驅動因素,有利於企業進行策略佈局及執行。
研究問題為:「如何透過梳理及改善服務設計中的關鍵驅動因素,提升顧客忠誠度及滿意度?」,研究目的為探討共享機車旅遊服務之關鍵驅動因素,並透過服務設計思維優化服務內容,以提升顧客忠誠度及滿意度。研究目標為:(1)透過量化研究進行共享機車旅遊服務之驅動因素的篩選與評估,彙整出影響服務滿意度的關鍵驅動因素。(2)基於關鍵驅動因素,建立共享機車之旅遊服務設計概念,並以量化研究方法進行概念測試,提出執行順序建議及未來改善方向。(3)基於本案例的實施,提出服務設計中運用關鍵驅動因素的建議與流程。
本研究的主要發現有:(1)以商業目標為核心進行服務設計,可以幫助設計師在早期就聚焦於真正影響公司發展的關鍵問題上,幫助公司將資源放在正確位置。(2)在服務設計案中以量化指標檢測服務成效,可以幫助設計師隨時調整策略佈局與執行方向,更有效地提升使用者的服務體驗感受。(3)在服務設計迭代過程中,結合使用者需求和公司建議,可以確保設計概念滿足使用者期望,又符合公司發展方向,且具備落地可行性,為多方關係人創造價值。


Taiwan's shared electric scooters suppliers expect a bigger market share by offering tourism services to boost the number of users and rental rate. Maintaining service differentiation and sustainable development are keys to enhance customer loyalty and satisfaction. This study aims to explore the possibility of excellent service focusing on key driving forces. We adopt “Research Through Design” as the methodology to explore the travel services of GoShare service. First, utilize the regression analysis method to determine the key driving forces affecting NPS. Second, use interviews to determine related service problem. Finally, propose and verify the concepts for shared scooters tourism service. This study provides a case study on developing new service experience by transportation companies based on the driving forces in service design. It helps companies find the key factors affecting customer loyalty and satisfaction through quantitative and qualitative methods from a service design viewpoint.
How to improve customer loyalty and satisfaction by sorting out and improving the key driving forces in service design is the problem of this research. The research is to explore the key driving forces and optimize the service content through service design thinking. The research objectives are: (1) Screening the driving factors of shared scooter travel services through quantitative research, and summarizing the key driving factors that affect customer loyalty and satisfaction, (2) Based on the key driving forces, generating several concepts of shared scooter travel services, and providing suggestions on the execution priority, (3) proposing the suggestions and the procedure of using key driving factors in service design.
According to the research and design of this process, this study draws the following three conclusions: (1) Service design based on business goals can help designers focus on key issues that really affect the company's development at an early stage, and help the company use resources correctly. (2) Verifying service effectiveness with quantitative indicators can help designers adjust strategies and execution directions correctly, and more effectively optimize users' service experience. (3) In the service design iteration, combines user needs and company goals, contributes to the company's development and creates value for multi-party stakeholders.

第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 3 1.3 研究範圍與限制 3 1.4 研究架構 3 第二章 文獻探討 6 2.1 共享經濟 6 2.2 共享機車 7 2.2.1 共享機車服務案例分析 8 2.3 服務設計 10 2.3.1 服務設計定義 10 2.3.2 服務設計流程 12 2.3.3 服務設計方法與工具 13 2.4 淨推薦值 15 2.4.1 淨推薦值之驅動因素分析 15 2.5 文獻探討總結 17 第三章 研究方法 18 3.1 GOSHARE個案描述 18 3.1.1 GOSHARE服務模式說明 19 3.2 研究個案之設計流程 20 3.3 研究方法 20 3.3.1 驅動因素的建立和篩選 21 3.3.2 驅動因素的優化 24 3.3.3 驅動因素的評估 25 第四章 研究結果 28 4.1共享機車旅遊服務的關鍵驅動因素 28 4.1.1 驅動因素的建立 28 4.1.2 驅動因素的篩選 33 4.1.3 問題總結及優化方向建議 38 4.2 共享機車旅遊服務的設計優化 39 4.2.1 設計概念的發展 40 4.2.2 設計概念的評估 41 4.2.3 驅動因素的內容優化 45 4.3 共享機車旅遊服務的設計驗證 47 4.3.1 服務設計優化成效 47 4.3.2 驅動因素的評估 48 4.4 設計概念執行建議 54 4.5 小結 57 第五章 討論與建議 58 5.1 共享機車服務的問題與建議 58 5.2 驅動因素分析用於服務設計之探討 59 5.3 服務設計案中顧客忠誠度與滿意度之間的關係 60 第六章 結論 62 參考文獻 64 中文文獻 64 英文文獻 64 網路文獻 67 附件 69 附件一 個案公司商業問題分析圖 69 附件二 共享機車之旅遊服務調查問卷 70 附件三 共享機車之旅遊服務設計測試問卷 90 附件四 腦力激盪產出之共享機車旅遊服務設計概念 117 附件五 驅動因素說明影片分鏡 119

安宅和人(2019)。議題思考:用單純的心面對複雜問題,交出有價值的成果,看穿表象、找到本質的知識生產術(イシューからはじめよ―知的生産の「シンプルな本質」)(郭菀琪譯)。台北市:經濟新潮社。(原作2010年出版)
阮綠茵(2007)。設計研究方法。台北市:全華。
林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(2005)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究季刊,3(2),122-136。
張紹勳(2007)。研究方法(第三版)。台中市:滄海。
黃峰、賴祖杰(2020)。體驗思維:讓品牌觸動人心。天津市:天津科學技術出版社。
遠藤直紀、武井由紀子(2016)。7大步驟打造企業關鍵留客力:從滿足需求到超越期待!(売上につながる「顧客ロイヤルティ戦略」入門)(王美娟譯)。台北市:台灣東販。(原作2015年出版)
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。台北市:心理出版社。
蔡凱任(2017)。電動機車共享經濟租賃服務消費意願之研究:聯合分析法。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學經濟學研究所,台北市。
Berger, A. A. (2004)。媒介與傳播研究方法:質化與量化途徑(Media and Communication Research Methods)(黃光玉、劉念夏、陳清文譯)。台北市:風雲論壇。(原作2000年出版)
Aguilera-García, Á., Gomez, J., & Sobrino, N. (2020). Exploring the adoption of moped scooter-sharing systems in Spanish urban areas. Cities, 96, 102424.
Artz, M. (2017). NPS—The one measure you really need to grow?. Controlling & Management Review, 61(1), 32-38.
Ashworth, G., & Page, S. J. (2011). Urban tourism research: Recent progress and current paradoxes. Tourism Management, 32(1), 1-15.
Auh, S., & Johnson, M. D. (1997). The complex relationship between customer satisfaction and loyalty for automobiles. In Customer retention in the automotive industry (pp. 141-166). Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.
Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems. San Francisco: Elsevier.
Bolton, R. N. (1998). A dynamic model of the duration of the customer's relationship with a continuous service provider: The role of satisfaction. Marketing Science, 17(1), 45-65.
Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours. The rise of collaborative consumption. New York: Harper Business.
Chang, E. C., & Fan, X. (2013). More promoters and less detractors: Using generalized ordinal logistic regression to identify drivers of customer loyalty. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 5(5), 12.
Dobreva, M., O'Dwyer, A., & Feliciati, P. ed. (2012). User studies for digital library development. London: Facet Publishing.
Felson, M., & Spaeth, J. L. (1978). Community structure and collaborative consumption: A routine activity approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 21(4), 614-624.
Følstad, A., & Kvale, K. (2018). Applying transactional NPS for customer journey insight: case experiences and lessons learned. Services Marketing Quarterly, 39(3), 208-224.
Følstad, A., & Kvale, K. (2018). Using the Net Promoter Score to support service design: Digging for gold in customer free-text reports. In Proceedings of the ServDes. 2018 Conference (pp. 512-522). Sweden: Linköping University Electronic Press.
Fornell, C., Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (1996). The valuation consequences of customer satisfaction. Unpublished working paper, National Quality Research Center, Michigan.
Hallowell, R. (1996). The relationships of customer satisfaction, customer loyalty, and profitability: an empirical study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 7(4), 27-42.
Jeske, D. R., Callanan, T. P., & Gui, L. (2011). Identification of key drivers of Net Promoter Score using a statistical classification model. In Efficient decision support systems: practice and challenges from current to future. Shanghai: InTech (pp. 145-62).
Lartey, F. M. (2015). Increasing promoters in the residential broadband service industry: Relationship between customer satisfaction and loyalty using ordinal logistic regression. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Capella University, Minnesota.
Lehmann, E. (2020). Moped sharing building sustainable cities: defining critical success factors that enable operators to develop efficient business strategies. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Twente, Nederlands.
Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Service-dominant logic: Premises, perspectives, possibilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mager, B., & Sung, T. J. D. (2011). Special issue editorial: Designing for services. International Journal of Design, 5(2).
Moritz, S. (2005). Service Design: Practical access to an evolving field (pp. 39-167). Koln International School of Design.
Ngobo, P. V. (1999). Decreasing returns in customer loyalty: Does it really matter to delight the customers?. Advances in Consumer Research, 26, 469-477.
Owen, R., & Brooks, L. L. (2008). Answering the ultimate question: how Net Promoter can transform your business. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Reichheld, F. F. (2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 46-55.
Reichheld, F. F., & Covey, S. R. (2006). The ultimate question: driving good profits and true growth (Vol. 211). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4(1), 5-18.
Shaheen, S., & Chan, N. (2016). Mobility and the sharing economy: Potential to facilitate the first-and last-mile public transit connections. Built Environment, 42(4), 573-588.
Shaheen, S., Cohen, A., Chan, N., & Bansal, A. (2020). Sharing strategies: carsharing, shared micromobility (bikesharing and scooter sharing), transportation network companies, microtransit, and other innovative mobility modes. In Transportation, Land Use, and Environmental Planning (pp. 237-262). Oxford: Elsevier.
Shostack, G. L. (1984). Designing services that deliver. Harvard Business Review, 62, 133-139.
Stickdorn, M., & Zehrer, A. (2009, November). Service design in tourism: Customer experience driven destination management. In First Nordic conference on service design and service innovation (pp. 7-23).
Stickdorn, M., Hormess, M. E., Lawrence, A., & Schneider, J. (2018). This is service design doing: applying service design thinking in the real world. Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media.
Stickdorn, M., Schneider, J., Andrews, K., & Lawrence, A. (2011). This is service design thinking: Basics, tools, cases. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
WeMo Scooter(2019年6⽉)。WeMo Scooter 公布共享電動機車使用情境十大排行五成有單向騎乘需求 男女大不同!男愛聚會小酌前使用 女重通勤實務性 共享滿足全方位生活 推虛實整合闖關遊戲 消費者化身特務 邊騎邊玩拿大獎 城市交通超Playful。上網日期:2020年4月26日。網址:https://www.wemoscooter.com/wemo-scooter-公布共享電動機車使用情境十大排行-五成有單向騎
交通部觀光局(2020年8⽉)。2019年台灣旅遊狀況調查。網址:https://admin.taiwan.net.tw/Handlers/FileHandler.ashx?fid=6fa12aea-d02e-4059-8483-9d0fff9400ba&type=4&no=2
唐⽞輝(2019年1⽉)。新服務設計的內涵。上網日期:2020年5月5日。網址:https://medium.com/ditl/%E6%96%B0%E6%9C%8D%E5%8B%99%E8%A8%AD%E8%A8%8 8%E7%9A%84%E5%85%A7%E6%B6%B5-31f2319588a4
陸學森(2017年3月)。陸學森:Gogoro,從一個夢想開始說起。上網日期:2020年4月27日。網址:https://blog.gogoro.com/tw/the-future-is-now
陸學森(2019年7月)。陸學森:GoShare將成為最有力的電動車共享使用服務。上網日期:2020年4月27日。網址:https://mashdigi.com/gogoro-ceo-horace-luke-said-goshare-would-be-most-powerful-ev-sharing-service/
Amaresan, S. (2019). What Is a Good Net Promoter Score?. Retrieved April 20, 2021, from https://blog.hubspot.com/service/what-is-a-good-net-promoter-score
Design Council. (2015). The Design Process: What is the Double Diamond. Retrieved May 25, 2020, Retrieved May 05, 2020, from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/design-process-what-double-diamond
Econduce. (2020). Econduce官方網站. Retrieved May 02, 2020, from https://econduce.mx/
Emmy. (2020). Emmy官方網站. Retrieved May 02, 2020, from https://muenchen.emmy-sharing.de/en/
Gibbons, S. (2017, July 9). Service Design 101. Retrieved April 20, 2021, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/service-design-101
Gitlin, J. (2021). What is a good Net Promoter Score? And how does it vary across industries?. Retrieved April 20, 2021, from https://www.surveymonkey.com/curiosity/what-is-a-good-net-promoter-score
GoShare (2020). GoShare官方網站. Retrieved May 02, 2020, from https://www.ridegoshare.com/
IDEO.org (2016, June). Human-centered design sits at the intersection of empathy and creativity. Retrieved April 20, 2021, from https://www.ideo.org/tools
Moritz, S. (2005). Service design. Practical access to an evolving field. (Master’s thesis, Köln International School of Design). Retrieved May 05, 2020, from https://issuu.com/st_moritz/docs/pa2servicedesign/4
Motit. (2020). Motit官方網站. Retrieved May 02, 2020, from http://www.motitworld.com/
Scoot Networks. (2020). Scoot Networks官方網站. Retrieved May 02, 2020, from https://scoot.co/#
Unu Motors. (2019). Global Scooter Sharing Market Report. Retrieved April 28, 2020, from https://share.unumotors.com/global-mobility-sharing-market-report

QR CODE