在此波物聯網的浪潮中，物件將逐漸被賦予複雜的運算功能，至此「物－人」關係也將被重新定義，傳統著重於使用為者中心之設計框架將可能受到限制，互動設計派典中開始出現了新的推測轉向，即物件將不僅止於服膺於人的需求，更可能成為人類社交生活中的行動者。因此如何建構物主體之設計將成為一新興議題，在過往的研究中已有不少學者提出體現能動性方法，諸如運用泛靈論或角色的隱喻等，在此本研究試圖探究在能動性頻譜中具有較低能動性的設計可能：植物性，通過現象學研究方法，邀請參與者進行互動設計物與植物學理論的詮釋接合，以六件實際互動設計作品以及植物學名詞的註記與詮釋工作，還原出具有潛力的植物性的意向及中介知識，再經由透過設計做研究，製作能夠部署至居家空間中的設計物：植物性印表機，來汲取體驗中的實徵資料，最後透過設計師對資料的意義解讀，用以理解植物性更深入的潛在意涵。

In the trend of Internet of things, objects are gradually given complex processing features. The relationship between objects and human beings will be redefined and divided from the user-centered approach. Therefore, speculative turn starts to appear among the design paradigms. Things will no longer belong to serve the mankind, but also become the actants in human’s social life. How to construct a thing-centered design will become the next key issue. In the past, a certain number of researchers have put forward the method of agency, such as applying the animism or characteristics of metaphor, etc. In this study, phenomenological approach on exploring the “plantness” is used to accompanied with lower agency in the spectrum of artifact agency. Through an intermediary knowledge workshop including guided annotation of six artifacts and their situated probes, the senses of plantness of an artifact steady emerged. Drawing on these understandings, Botanical Printer was built and deployed with the method of research through design. After gaining the empirical data, a deeper significance of plantness can be comprehend.

中文文獻
1.林逸筑（2011）。從抽象中提取概念-詩意互動設計初探。國立臺灣科技大學工商業設計學系。碩士論文。
2.林岑縈（2014）。溫度符碼應用於互動設計。國立臺灣科技大學工商業設計學系。碩士論文。
3.陳伯璋（2000）。質性研究方法的理論基礎。載於中正大學教育研究所（主編），質的研究方法，25-49。高雄:麗文文化。
4.陳濟民（2015）。植物的魔法。國立臺灣博物館，台北市。
5.理查．包威爾/著（2007）。朱影/譯。無為而活。人本自然文化事業，台北縣。
6.張汝倫（1997）。現象學方法的多重含義。哲學雜誌20期，pp.90-115。
7.董素芬、黃惠汝、何偲安（2013）。現象學研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究法專題研究，臺北市。
8.德勒茲(Gilles Deleuze)/著(2000)。楊凱麟/譯。德勒茲論傅柯。麥田出版，臺北市。
9.Tim Cresswell/著（2006）。徐苔玲、王志弘/譯。地方：記憶、想像與認同。群學出版，臺北市。
10.Tim Dant/著（2009）。龔永慧/譯。物質文化。書林出版，臺北市。

外文文獻
1.Bertran, I. (2014). Slow Games. Retrieved Jan 7, 2018 from http://www.ishback.com/slowgames/index.htm
2.Claffey, B. (2016). Indoor Green: Living with Plants. Australia: Thames & Hudson Ltd.
3.Cila, N., Smit, I., Giaccardi, E., and Kröse, B. (2017). Products as Agents: Metaphors for Designing the Products of the IoT Age. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 448-459.
4.Dalsgaard, P., & Dindler, C. (2014). Between theory and practice: bridging concepts in HCI research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1635-1644. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557342
5.Deckers, E., Wensveen, S., Levy, P. & Ahn, R. (2013). Designing for perceptual crossing: designing and comparing three behaviors. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1901-1910.
6.Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: The Athlone Press.
7.Dunne, A. (2006). Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience,
and Critical Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.Dunne, A., and Raby, F. (2013). Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. The MIT Press.
9.Gaver, W., Bowers, J., Boehner, B., Boucher, A., Cameron, D., Hauenstein, M., Jarvis, N. & Pennington, S. (2013). Indoor weather stations: investigating a ludic approach to environmental HCI through batch prototyping. In Proc. CHI '13. ACM Press, 3451-3460.
10.Harman, G. (2009). Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. re.press.
11.Hallnäs, L., & Redström, J. (2001). Slow technology–designing for reflection. Personal and ubiquitous computing, 5(3), 201-212.
12.Hallnäs, L. & Redström, J. (2002). From use to presence: on the expressions and aesthetics of everyday computational things. Trans. CHI, 9(2):106-124.
13.Husserl, E. (1962). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology, trans. Boyce Gibson. Collier.
14.Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redstrom, J., & Wensveen, S. (2011). Design research through practice: From the lab, field, and showroom. Boston: Elsevier.
15.Latour, B. (201)1. Networks, societies, spheres: Reflections of an actor-network theorist. Int J of Communication 5, 15:786-810.
16.Merleau-Ponty, M. (1958). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans). London, UK: Routledge, & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1945).
17.Odom, W., Sellen, A., Banks, R., Kirk, D., Regan, T., Selby, M., Forlizzi, J.L., & Zimmerman, J. (2014). Designing for slowness, anticipation and re-visitation: A long term field study of the Photobox. In Proc. CHI ’14. ACM Press, 1961-1970.
18.Pierce, J. (2009). Material Awareness: Promoting Reflection on Everyday Materiality. In Ext. Abs. of CHI '09. ACM Press, 4459-4464.
19.Pollan, M., (2002). The Botany of Desire: A Plant's-Eye View of the World, Random House Trade Paperbacks.
20.Rebaudengo, S. (2012). Addicted products: the story of brad and the toaster. Retrieved on Nov. 29, 2015. http://www.simonerebaudengo.com
21.Rebaudengo, S. (2015). Secrete life of objects. Retrieved on Nov. 29, 2015. http://ciid.dk/education/portfolio/idp15/courses/secret-life-of-objects/projects/
22.Tsai, W.-C. Wang, P.-H., Lee, H.-C., Liang, R.-H., and Hsu, J. (2014). The reflexive printer: toward making sense of perceived drawbacks in technology-mediated reminiscence. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS 14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 995-1004.
23.van Allen, P., McVeigh-Schultz, J., Brown, B., Kim, H.M., and Lara, D. (2013). AniThings: animism and heterogeneous multiplicity. InCHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2247-2256.
24.Vallgårda, A. (2014). Giving form to computational things: developing a practice of interaction design. Personal and ubiquitous computing, 18(3), 577-592.
25.Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3), 94-104.
26.Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Evenson, S. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proc. CHI '07. ACM Press, 493-502.