由於科技之進步讓通訊設備得以縮小攜帶便利以及網絡資訊傳輸迅速數位化，使得智慧型行動裝置因此快速的興起，當中以智慧型手機為現今需求中最為主要的成長趨勢；而這樣的發展使行動APP遊戲需求大增，同時開發門檻較低、讓許多小型獨立遊戲開發團隊也能夠跟原有的大型遊戲開發商競爭，於是每年有超過上千種的APP遊戲被開發出來。因此如何讓眾多使用者能夠在使用APP遊戲時可獲得良好的介面操作體驗便成為各遊戲開發商最為重視的議題、更在互動型式設計上卯足全力進行研究。
遊戲應用程式介面選單位置及互動型式之設計研究、希望以現有理論文獻架構應用於使用者經驗來探討遊戲開發之可行性，預期帶給台灣遊戲產業研發人員開發上之成效。本研究欲達成目的如下：(1)由文獻及現有產品進行實驗測試，作為實驗原型介面依據，結果以提供台灣介面設計者參考，(2)藉由實驗任務操作進行深入的研究分析，以比較出三組產品間操作對於使用性上的差別與使用者體驗感受，(3)探討直立式介面設計與横示介面介面設計對於使用者操作的使用性對於使用者體驗滿意度的影響。
本研究共分為兩部份實驗：(1)前導性實驗針對三款市面上受歡迎的APP遊戲軟體進行介面操作評估，透過計測操作任務來了解三組樣本之間的差異性與問題；(2)驗證實驗由前導性實驗分析結果及文獻研究論述，進行模擬實驗；驗證模擬實驗採3 (選單配置位置) x 2 (直橫式手機介面操作) 雙因子組間實驗；選單配置計有三組：(1)上層選單、(2)下層選單、(3)上下式選單；介面操作2組：(1)直立式介面、(2)橫式介面。
研究成果如下：(1)每天使用APP遊戲軟體的時間以1-2小時為主、(2)目前使用的手機螢幕尺寸以5吋螢幕以上人最多、(3)使用直式遊戲介面者習慣以單手握持一手操作為主、(4)使用橫式遊戲介面者多習慣以雙手握持操作為主、(4)在主觀感受上，橫式介面比起直式介面更受到青睞、(5)使用評估上，橫式介面操作於操作易用性與操作學習性更讓人容易上手、(6)以系統使用性來說，下層選單設計於操作使用體驗是較好的系統介面設計。

Thanks to the improvement of technology to reduce the size of communication devices making them easy to carry, and the Internet information transport mission has been rapidly digitized, which has led to the rapid rise of smart mobile devices. Among them, smart phones are the most important growth trend in present. With such development increasing the demand of mobile App, many independent game developing teams can be competed with giant development company as the lower developing barrier. As the result, there are over thousands of App that have been developed in every year. Therefore, how to make the users experience the friendly operating interface has been became one of the most value issues. They have been doing every possible on the design of interaction.
The select unit on the game App interface and interactive design research are based on the current theoretcial structures to apply the users experience to help explore the possibility of game development. With the anticipation, it is hoped to bring certain influence in those RD persons of Taiwan game development industry. This research study is intended to reach the following objects: (1) To conduct the usability test on the current App available in the market based on the relative document for verifying interface of experiment prototype, and to provide it as reference to Taiwan interface designers. (2) Conduct the thoughtful research based on the procedure of experiment tasks to compare the usage difference and user experience from the 3 App prototypes. (3) To study the influence of user experience satisfaction by researching between the vertical and horizontal interface designs.
There are two parts of the research: (1) The initial research focuses on the 3 popular Apps on the market, through counting-testing operation to recognize the difference and questions from the 3 App samples. (2) To verify the analysis outcomes from the initial experiment data and the document research. The experiment of verifying simulation adopts 3 (the spot arrangement of the select menu) X 2 (vertical and horizontal smartphone interface operation) two-factor experiment. There are 3 levels of the select menu: (1) upper menu, (2) bottom menu, and (3) upper-bottom menu. Interface operation uses 2 levels: (1) vertical interface operation, and (2) horizontal interface operation.
 
The research outcomes are as follows: (1) To use game App with 1-2 hours every day. (2) The most users use the 5-inches smart phone at present. (3) Those users who use the vertical game interface get used to operate by one hand. (4) Those users who use the horizontal game interface get used to operate by two hands. (5) Based on the usability evaluation, the horizontal interface is easy to operate on the simplicity of operation and guidance of operation. (6) As far as the system usability, the bottom menu is the better system interface design on operation using experience.

英文文獻
1. Anthony N. Cabot & Louis V. Csoka (2003-2004). The Games People Play: Is It Time for a New Legal Approach to Prize Gaming? Nevada Law Journal, Vol. 4:197.
2. Caillois, R. (1961). Man, play and games. New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe.
3. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
4. Glass, A. L. & Holyoak, K. J. (1986). Cognition (2nd Ed). New York, NY: Random House.
5. Hoober, S. (2013). “How Do Users Really Hold Mobile Devices”. UXmatters. November 1, 2012. Retrieved January 18, 2013.
6. Horton, W. (1994). The Icon Book, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, lnc.
7. Huizinga, J. (1938). Homo Ludens: Proeve Ener Bepaling Van Het Spelelement Der Cultuur. Wolters-Noordhoff cop. 1985. (荷文版)
8. Johnston, W. A. & Heinz, S. P. (1978). Flexibility and capacity demands of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology.
9. Kahneman, D. & Ben-Ishai, R. & Lotan, M. (1973). Relation of a test of attention to road accidents. Journal of Applied Psychology.
10. Kathleen M. Eisenhard. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review.
11. Marcus, A. (2001). Babyface Design for Mobile Devices and the Web. In Smith, Michael J., and Salvendy, Gavriel, (Eds.), Conference Proceedings, Human-Computer Interface Internet. (HCII), Vol. 2, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Orleans, LA, pp. 514-518.
12. Nielsen, J. (2004). Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Publishing.
13. Norman, D. A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In: D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens, (Eds), Mental Models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Rollings, A. & Adams, E. (2003). Andrew Rollings and Ernest Adams on Game Design. Macmillan Computer Pub.

中文文獻
1. 王長斌 (2016)。博彩的分類與種類：英美澳門博彩法律的比較研究。澳門期刊第114期，第29卷第4期，111-127。
2. 方裕民 (2003)。人與物的對話-互動式介面的理論與實務。台北市：田園城市出版社。
3. 胡昭民，吳燦銘 (2014)。遊戲設計概論。新北市：博碩。
4. 柯華葳 (1998)。發展心理學第九章。台北市：心理。
5. 施宏霖 (2009)。簡化開發遊戲使用者介面之研究與實作。世新大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
6. 陳建雄 (1999)。由使用者導向互動設計之觀點探討介面可用性。銘傳大學跨世紀學術研討會論文。台北。
7. 陳郁汝 (2010)。圖形化使用者介面之頁面配置研究-以電子睡眠日誌為例。國立台灣科技大學碩士論文。台北。
8. 張紹勳 (2007)。研究方法-精華本二版。台中市：滄海書局。
9. 董玟伶，蘇芳慶 (2009)。萬能雙手的奧秘。科學發展月刊第444期，58-65。
10. 管倖生 (2010)。設計研究方法-三版。全華圖書。
11. 顏孟賢，謝伯欣，林亭汝 (2013)。台灣數位內容產業之關鍵發展因素研究：以數位遊戲為例。科技管理學刊，18-4。
12. 經濟部工業局，財團法人資訊工業策進會(2014)。2013台灣數位內容產業年鑑。經濟部工業局。
13. Burdek,B.E. (1996)。工業設計-產品造形的歷史、理論及實務。(胡佑宗譯)。亞太圖書出版社。(1998)
14. Jennifer,P.& Helen,S. & Yvonne,R. (2002)。互動設計。(陳建雄譯，2010)。新北市：全華。
15. John,B.B. (1998)。認知心理學。(黃秀瑄編譯，2012)。台北市：心理。
16. Martin & Pear (2002)。行為改變技術理論與運用。(黃裕惠譯，2012)。台北市：學富文化。
17. Norman,D.A. (1988)。設計的心理學：人性化的產品設計如何改變世界。(陳宜秀譯，2014)。台北市：遠流。
18. Stanton, N. (2003)。消費產品之人因工程。(張文德譯，2003)。台北市：六合。
19. Huizinga,J. (1938)。遊戲人：對文化中遊戲因素的研究。(成窮編譯，2013)。新北市：康德。
20. Shneiderman,B. & Plaisant,C. (2010)。人機介面設計：有效的人機互動策略。(賴錦慧編譯)。新北市：東華。