創業是近年蓬勃發展的議題。然而，對於資源不充裕的物聯網創新產品設計團隊而言，應該依循何種設計流程與架構以及後續的開發與生產均為極大的挑戰，有鑑於此，本研究以典型的「通用產品設計流程」以及電子與高科技製造工業常見的「新產品導入流程（NPI process）」架構為依據，訪談一家新創團隊以及二家製造服務廠商，加上一位資深個人設計顧問，以探討實務上適合於物聯網創新產品設計開發的流程。結果發現，物聯網創新產品開發應該優先考量.電子與高科技製造工業所遵循的NPI流程、充分瞭解外在製造資源與限制以及與門當戶對的製造協力商合作，而具有機構設計及再學習能力的設計師是成員選擇時的關鍵，且產品開發募資在第一輪通常是以投資客為主，第二輪才是以群眾募資為目標。新創團隊應考量前述事項以降低風險與成本並促成創新。

Startup is a vigorous topic in recent years. However, for the IoT innovation product design team with insufficient resources, it is hard to decide which design process and architecture should follow, and the subsequent development and production provide great challenges. In view of this, this study uses a typical “general product design process”and “New Product Introduction process (NPI)” architecture common to the electronics and high-technology manufacturing industry, by interviewing a startup company and two design manufacturing service providers, with a senior personal design consultant to explore practical adaptations to the development process of Internet of Things innovation products. The study found that the development of IoT innovation products should give priority to the NPI process followed by the electronics and high-technology manufacturing industry, fully understand the external manufacturing resources and restrictions, and cooperate with the manufacturing partners of the door-to-door business. The designers with mechanical design and re-learning ability are The key to member selection, and product development fundraising is usually based on investment customers in the first round, and the second round is aimed at crowdfunding. The startup team should consider the aforementioned issues to reduce risk and cost and promote innovation.

1. Amorós, J. E., Bosma, N., & Levie, J. (2013). Ten years of global entrepreneurship monitor: Accomplishments and prospects. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 5(2), 120-152.
2. Bass, L., Mann, S., Siewiorek, D., & Thompson, C. (1997). Issues in wearable computing: a CHI 97 workshop. SIGCHI BULLETIN, 29, 34-39.
3. Blank, S. (2013). Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard business review, 91(5), 63-72.
4. Bosma, N., Schøtt, T., Terjesen, S. A., & Kew, P. (2016). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2015 to 2016: special topic report on social entrepreneurship. Available at SSRN 2786949.
5. Bruyat, C., & Julien, P. A. (2001). Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of business venturing, 16(2), 165-180.
6. De Bruin, A., Brush, C. G., & Welter, F. (2006). Introduction to the special issue: Towards building cumulative knowledge on women's entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and practice, 30(5), 585-593.
7. Eng, T. Y., & Ozdemir, S. (2014). International R&D partnerships and intrafirm R&D–marketing–production integration of manufacturing firms in emerging economies. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(1), 32-44.
8. Eppinger, S. D., & Ulrich, K. T. (1995). Product design and development.
9. Frenkler, F. (2018). Need-based Innovation. Faszination Forschung. Retrieved from
https://portal.mytum.de/pressestelle/faszination-forschung/2018nr22/09_Faszination_Forschung_22_18_Need-based_Innovation.pdf/download
10. Gephart Jr, R. P. (2004). Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal.
11. Isa, S. S., & Liem, A. (2014). Classifying physical models and prototypes in the design process: a study on the economical and usability impact of adopting models and prototypes in the design process. In DS 77: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2014 13th International Design Conference.
12. Jankowski, S., Covello, J., Bellini, H., Ritchie, J., & Costa, D. (2014). The Internet of Things: Making sense of the next mega-trend. Goldman Sachs.
13. Lambert, D. M., Cooper, M. C., & Pagh, J. D. (1998). Supply chain management: implementation issues and research opportunities. The international journal of logistics management, 9(2), 1-20.
14. Li, Y., & Hu, J. L. (2002). Technical efficiency and location choice of small and medium-sized enterprises. Small Business Economics, 19(1), 1-12.
15. Mann, S. (1998, May). Wearable computing as means for personal empowerment. In Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Wearable Computing (ICWC) (pp. 51-59).
16. Mollick, E. R. (2016). Containing multitudes: the many impacts of Kickstarter funding. Available at SSRN 2808000.
17. Porter, M. E. (1989). How competitive forces shape strategy. In Readings in strategic management (pp. 133-143). Palgrave, London.
18. Rogers, E. M., & Larsen, J. K. (1984). Silicon Valley fever: Growth of high-technology culture. Basic Books (AZ).
19. Salamzadeh, A., & Kawamorita Kesim, H. (2015). Startup companies: life cycle and challenges. In 4th International conference on employment, education and entrepreneurship (EEE), Belgrade, Serbia.
20. Takeuchi, H., & Nonaka, I. (1986). The new new product development game. Harvard business review, 64(1), 137-146.
21. Wang, J., Lin, W., & Huang, Y. H. (2010). A performance-oriented risk management framework for innovative R&D projects. Technovation, 30(11-12), 601-611.

中文文獻
1.吳冠樺, 洪偉肯, & 陳玲鈴. (2019). 臺灣設計與製造服務在新創產品開發過程所扮演的角色. International Association of Societies of Design Research Conference 2019.稿件審查中.
2.周重憲、薛義誠（2004）。台灣汽車業全球供應鏈管理之國內外供應商評選要素研究。國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士班碩士論文,桃園市.
3.周碩彥. (2015). 「物聯網發展趨勢展示內容」研究報告. 國立科學工藝博物館委託研究計畫報告, 台北市.
4.周海濤, 李永賢, & 張蘅. (2009). 個案研究設計與方法 (Case Study Research Design and Methods 3 Edition by Robert K. Yin), 台北, 五南圖書.
5.侯采雯. (2013). 群眾集資 (Crowdfunding) 中小企業融資新選擇. 證交資料, (617), 36-42.
6.董芳武. (2016). 台灣設計創業價值鏈分析. 設計學報 (Journal of Design), 21(2).
7.劉皓仁. (2013). 新世代科技冒險家─ 歸國創業家的網路競爭力. 政治科學季評, (38), 21-24.
8.鄭政秉, 李揚, & 黃晉偉. (2006). 多角化海外投資對台灣製造業經營效率的影響. 管理與系統, 13(3), 315-331.
9.劉常勇. (2002). 創業管理的 12 堂課, 台北: 天下遠見.
10.蔡明宏. (2012). 創業家創造力對經營模式運作影響之文獻研究: 文本基礎認知圖分析技術之應用. 創業管理研究, 7(2), 105-138.
11.嚴巍. (2013). 新創事業策略創業之個案研究：以台灣色彩與影像股份有限公司為例. 國立臺灣科技大學科技管理所碩士班碩士論文, 未出版, 台北市.
12.劉宜萍. (1995). 形成策略聯盟之目標, 選擇盟友準則與型態間相關性之研究-以台灣積體電路產業為例 (Doctoral dissertation).
13.楼高翔, & 万宁. (2010). 基于供应链的技术创新协同动因研究. 科技管理研究, 30(11), 153-154.