簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王永明
Hector Landes
論文名稱: 用迭代求解多目標的設施佈置和廣義指派問 題:真實世界中的應用
Solving FLP and GAP iteratively with multiobjectives: A real world application
指導教授: 周碩彥
Shuo-Yan Chou
口試委員: 喻奉天
Vincent F. Yu
郭伯勳
Po-Hsun Kuo
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業管理系
Department of Industrial Management
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 63
中文關鍵詞: 布局GA分配設施行業
外文關鍵詞: Layout, GA, Assignment, Facility, Industry
相關次數: 點閱:273下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

IC製造商使用高度自動化的生產來滿足不可預測的需求模式。為了確保遵守調度計畫的日常約束,工作層管理人員需要集中精力減少操作員的總工作時間,同時確保平衡的工作量。到目前為止,大多數研究都只專注於分別尋找佈局設計或操作員分配的新演算法。
這項研究為實際應用提供了一種新的反覆運算方法,該方法要求通過同時動態地優化設施佈局和操作員分配問題來滿足日後需求的整體解決方案。
根據實際應用程式的獨特特性,設計了時間成本來衡量不同佈局設計和操作員分配下的操作員生產率。與輸送量指標相比,可以使用歷史資料或預期的調度計畫輕鬆得出時間成本,從而為現場調整和定期更新提供了極大的靈活性。時間成本度量標準考慮了操作員活動的不同組成部分(例如裝載和卸載,修復測試錯誤和行走)以及由於基於非排隊的機器干擾而導致的生產力損失。引入了工作負載平衡的懲罰項,以找到系統範圍的生產率與操作員之間工作負載相等之間的權衡。優化分為獨立的佈局和分配階段。在佈局階段,使用CRAFT演算法找到改進的解決方案,而在分配階段,使用遺傳演算法。然後,這兩個階段將反覆運算運行,以為佈局設計和操作員分配提供最終解決方案。
這項研究的方法和框架可以輕鬆地適應其他類型設施中的類似問題以及不同的調度計畫。


IC manufacturers use highly autonomous production to satisfy an unpredictable demand pattern. In order to ensure respect for the due-day constraints of the scheduling plan, work-floor managers need to focus on reducing total operator work time while ensuring a balanced workload. Most of the research so far has solely focused on finding new algorithms for layout design or operator assignment separately.
This study presents a new iterative approach to a real-world application that calls for a holistic solution to satisfies due-day demand by optimizing both the facility layout and the operator assignment problem simultaneously and dynamically.
Based on the unique characteristics of the real-world application, a time cost is devised to measure operator productivity under different layout design and operator assignment. Compared to throughput metrics, the time cost can be easily derived using both historical data or prospective scheduling plans, affording great flexibility for on-site adjustment and periodic updates. The time cost metric considers different components of operator activities (such as loading and unloading, fixing testing errors and walking) as well as productivity lost due to non-queuing-based machine interference. A penalty term of workload balance is introduced to find the trade-off between system-wide productivity and equality of workload among operators. The optimization is divided into separate layout and assignment stages. For the layout stage, CRAFT algorithm is used to find an improved solution while for the assignment stage, a genetic algorithm is adopted. The two stages are then run iteratively to arrive at a final solution for both the layout design and the operator assignment
The methodology and framework of this study can be easily adapted for similar problems in other types of facilities and for different scheduling plans.

ABSTRACT .......................... I ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .......................... II TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................... III LIST OF TABLES .......................... V LIST OF FIGURES .......................... VI LIST OF ACRONYMS .......................... VII CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .......................... 1 1. MOTIVATION .......................... 1 1.1 Flexibly and Robustness .......................... 1 1.2 Potential Benefits .......................... 2 2. SCOPE AND LIMITATION .......................... 2 3. THESIS OUTLINE .......................... 3 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW .......................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION .......................... 4 2. FACILITY LAYOUT PROBLEM .......................... 4 3. OPERATOR ASSIGNMENT PROBLEM .......................... 6 4. PROBLEMATIZATION .......................... 8 CHAPTER 3: MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION .......................... 9 1. INTRODUCTION .......................... 9 1.1 Company Overview .......................... 9 1.2 Testing Process .......................... 10 1.3 Disruption-handling Process .......................... 11 2. GENERAL FRAMEWORK .......................... 12 3. CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE REAL-WORLD APPLICATION .......................... 16 4. SIMPLIFIED MODEL FORMULATION - CHEL .......................... 17 4.1 Objectives .......................... 18 4.2 Calculating Various Time Components .......................... 20 5. OPTIMIZATION METHODS .......................... 24 5.1 Sequential Iterative Optimization .......................... 24 5.2 Assumptions .......................... 25 5.3 Constraints .......................... 25 5.4 Solution Search – CRAFT Algorithms .......................... 25 5.5 Solution Search – GA Algorithms .......................... 27 5.6 Iterations .......................... 30 CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .......................... 31 1. DATA .......................... 32 2. RESULTS .......................... 38 2.1 Crossover Rate and Mutation Rate Tuning .......................... 38 2.2 Weight Tuning .......................... 40 2.3 Choice of the Definition of Workload Balance .......................... 43 2.4 Conclusion .......................... 44 3. LIMITS .......................... 45 4. FUTURE RESEARCH .......................... 45 5. CONCLUSION .......................... 46 5.1 Insight .......................... 46 5.2 Advices .......................... 46 APPENDIX .......................... 47 REFERENCES .......................... 51

[1] S. H. Amar and A. Abouabdellah, "Facility layout planning problem: Effectiveness and
reliability evaluation system layout designs," in 2016 International Conference on System
Reliability and Science (ICSRS), 2016, pp. 110-114: IEEE.
[2] H. Hosseini-Nasab, S. Fereidouni, S. Ghomi, and M. Fakhrzad, "Classification of facility
layout problems: a review study," vol. 94, no. 1-4, pp. 957-977, 2018.
[3] S. Benajaafar, "Design of flexible layouts for manufacturing systems," in Proceedings for
Operating Research and the Management Sciences, 1995, pp. 421-427: IEEE.
[4] A. Drira, H. Pierreval, and S. Hajri-Gabouj, "Facility layout problems: A survey," vol. 31,
no. 2, pp. 255-267, 2007.
[5] T. Urban, W.-C. Chiang, and R. Russell, "The integrated machine allocation and layout
problem," vol. 38, no. 13, pp. 2911-2930, 2000.
[6] M. El-Baz, "A genetic algorithm for facility layout problems of different manufacturing
environments," vol. 47, no. 2-3, pp. 233-246, 2004.
[7] SK. Das, "A facility layout method for flexible manufacturing systems," vol. 31, no. 2, pp.
279-297, 1993.
[8] T. Lacksonen, "Static and dynamic layout problems with varying areas," vol. 45, no. 1, pp.
59-69, 1994.
[9] J. D. Knowles and D. J. H. Corne, "Towards Landscape Analyses to Inform the Design of
Hybrid Local Search for the Multiobjective Quadratic Assignment Problem," vol. 87, pp.
271-279, 2002.
[10] S. Benjaafar, "Modeling and analysis of congestion in the design of facility layouts," vol.
48, no. 5, pp. 679-704, 2002.
[11] TA. Lacksonen and E. Enscore Jr, "Quadratic assignment algorithms for the dynamic
layout problem," vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 503-517, 1993.
[12] J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, "Particle swarm optimization," in Proceedings of ICNN'95-
International Conference on Neural Networks, 1995, vol. 4, pp. 1942-1948: IEEE.
[13] J.-Y. Kim and Y.-D. Kim, "Graph theoretic heuristics for unequal-sized facility layout
problems," vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 391-401, 1995.
[14] J.-M. Proth, Conception et gestion des systèmes de production. Presses universitaires de
France, 1992.
[15] D. G. Conway, and M. A. Venkataramanan, "Genetic search and the dynamic facility
layout problem," vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 955-960, 1994.
[16] G. Aiello, M. Enea, and G. Galante, "A multi-objective approach to facility layout problem
by genetic search algorithm and Electre method," vol. 22, no. 5-6, pp. 447-455, 2006.
[17] B. Kaku and J. Mazzola, "A tabu-search heuristic for the dynamic plant layout problem,"
vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 374-384, 1997.
[18] K. Tsuchiya, S. Bharitkar, and Y. Takefuji, "A neural network approach to facility layout
problems," vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 556-563, 1996.
[19] K.-C. Ying and C.-J. Liao, "An ant colony system for permutation flow-shop sequencing,"
vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 791-801, 2004.
[20] S. Samanta and D. O. Philip, "Facility layout optimization of an indian SME using artificial
bee colony algorithm," in Proc. of Int'l Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Energy and
Manufacturing Engineering (ICAEME'2014), 2014, pp. 16-22.
[21] S. P. Singh and R. Sharma, "A review of different approaches to the facility layout
problems," vol. 30, no. 5-6, pp. 425-433, 2006.
[22] T. Motzkin, "The assignment problem," in Proc. Symposia in Applied Mathematics, 1956,
vol. 6, pp. 109-125.
[23] T. Ö ncan, "A survey of the generalized assignment problem and its applications," vol. 45,
no. 3, pp. 123-141, 2007.
[24] K. Bhaskar and G. Srinivasan, "Static and dynamic operator allocation problems in cellular
manufacturing systems," vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 3467-3482, 1997.
[25] T. Yang, M.-C. Chen, and C.-C. Hung, "Multiple attribute decision-making methods for
the dynamic operator allocation problem," vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 285-299, 2007.
[26] L. Haque and M. Armstrong, "A survey of the machine interference problem," vol. 179,
no. 2, pp. 469-482, 2007.
[27] E. Gottlieb and M. Rao, "The generalized assignment problem: Valid inequalities and
facets," vol. 46, no. 1-3, pp. 31-52, 1990.
[28] G. Srinivasan, "Introduction to Operations Research - Hungarian Algorithm," Introduction
to Operations Research,
[29] M. Fisher, "The Lagrangian relaxation method for solving integer programming problems,"
vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1-18, 1981.
[30] P. Barcia and K. Jörnsten, "Improved Lagrangean decomposition: An application to the
generalized assignment problem," vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 84-92, 1990.
[31] M. Yagiura, T. Yamaguchi, and T. Ibaraki, "A variable depth search algorithm for the
generalized assignment problem," in Meta-heuristics: Springer, 1999, pp. 459-471.
[32] M. Abdel-Basset, G. Manogaran, H. Rashad, and A. Zaied, "A comprehensive review of
quadratic assignment problem: variants, hybrids and applications," pp. 1-24, 2018.
[33] S. Faudzi, S. Abdul-Rahman, and R. Abd Rahman, "An assignment problem and its
application in education domain: A review and potential path," vol. 2018, 2018.
[34] Keytack. H. Oh, "The computerized operator-machine system (OMS) for the least cost
combination of operators and machines," vol. 31, no. 1-2, pp. 159-162, 1996.
[35] V. Deshpande and I. Chopade, "Facility Layout Design by CRAFT Technique," vol. 16, p.
17, 2005.
[36] N. Hari, G. Rayjyalaksmhi, A. Reddy, "A typical manufacturing plant layout design using
CRAFT algorithm," vol. 97, pp. 1808-1814, 2014.
[37] E. Buffa, "Allocating facilities with CRAFT," vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 136-159, 1964.
[38] J. Balakrishnan and C. Cheng, "Dynamic layout algorithms: a state-of-the-art survey," vol.
26, no. 4, pp. 507-521, 1998.
[39] E. Perez, "Lecture 3: Layout Planning Models and Design Algorithms Part 2," in Facilities
Planning, ed. Ingram School of Engineering: Texas State University, 2015.
[40] M. Wall, "A genetic algorithm for resource-constrained scheduling," Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, 1996.
[41] L. LeBlanc, A. Shtub, and G. Anandalingam, "Formulating and solving production
planning problems," vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 54-80, 1999.
[42] E. Anderson and M. Ferris, "Genetic algorithms for combinatorial optimization: the
assemble line balancing problem," vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 161-173, 1994.
[43] K. Kostikas and C. Fragakis, "Genetic programming applied to mixed integer
programming," in European Conference on Genetic Programming, 2004, pp. 113-124:
Springer.
[44] J. Balakrishnan, C.-H. Cheng, and K.-F.nWong, "FACOPT: A user friendly FACility
layout OPTimization system," vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1625-1641, 2003.
[45] J. Carl Warren Mathews, "An experimental application of industrial engineering
techniques to department store operations," Master of Science in Industrial Engineering,
Industrial Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia Institute of Technology,
1951.
[46] 总 局 政 府 网 站 . (2015). 2014 年 国 民 体 质 监 测 公 报 . Available:
http://www.sport.gov.cn/n16/n1077/n1422/7331093.html

無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2025/07/07 (校內網路)
全文公開日期 2025/07/07 (校外網路)
全文公開日期 2025/07/07 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
QR CODE