簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳全福
Chuan-Fu Chen
論文名稱: 台灣海運貨物承攬業企業併購與顧客忠誠度關聯性之實證研究
An Empirical Study on the Association of Merger&Acquisition with Customers Retention in Taiwan’s Ocean Cargo Forwarding Industry
指導教授: 吳克振
Cou-Chen Wu
口試委員: 楊文鐸
none
楊維寧
none
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 115
中文關鍵詞: 顧客滿意度平衡計分卡企業併購
外文關鍵詞: customer satisfactory, balance score card, acquistion
相關次數: 點閱:215下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 處在競爭日益激烈的環境中,企業併購也成了海運承攬業擴張市場經營手法之ㄧ。例如:近來許多全球性的物流整合業者以併購的方式擴大期事業版圖,如Engle合併了Circle,Excel併購了MSAS,UPS合併Fritz,Deutsche Post連續併購Danzas/AEI、DHL及Airborne。他們利用同業間的併購或結合物流產業內上、中、下游的方式來加強其服務的廣度和深度,成為世界級的整合型物流服務提供者。然而,企業併購可產生1+1=2或是大於2的效應,顧客的滿意與否,就是一項很重要的關鍵因素。由於產業特性,顧客即使在簽約的情況下,顧客的忠誠度,仍會隨著市場趨勢,服務需求及態度而有所改變。
    本研究將進行下列問題探討:
    1.企業併購的類型大致有哪些?特色為何?
    2.對於海運承攬業者提供的服務,顧客重視哪些項目?
    3.當海運承攬業者進行企業併購之後,顧客會產生什麼看法與反應?顧客滿意度是否有顯著差異?
    希望藉此了解顧客期望,並加以改善,是可以增加長期合作的根本基礎。由於集團海運的不斷擴張與發展,併購將會是將來發展的手段之一,希望從此方面了解顧客的反應。
    本研究係以顧客滿意度為基礎架構。探討海運承攬業其企業併購對顧客滿意度之影響,進而分析、了解並掌握顧客所關心及會繼續購買之關鍵因素。
    研究結果顯示,企業併購對於顧客忠誠度及訂單延續並無顯著之影響,亦即滿足顧客的需求,才是企業根本應關注的課題,尤其是服務業。
    對於顧客滿意度,應在平衡計分卡的四個構面基礎上,對企業做一全面的評估與加強,尤其是往全球化為發展目標之本土企業,更應奉為參考與重要績效指標依據。
    關鍵字:企業併購、顧客滿意度。


    In face of an environment of increasingly keen competition, the merger & acquisition of enterprises has become one of the administrative techniques for ocean freight cargo-forwarding industry to expand their market subsequently. For example: Recently, there are a large number of service providers of logistic integration worldwide have employed the approach of merger & acquisition to broaden their business territory; such as, Engale merged Circle, Excel incorporated MSAS, UPS amalgamated Fritz, Deutsche Post continuously consolidated Danzas/AEI, DHL and Airborne. They strive to straighten their scope and depth of service and make them the world-class service provider of integrated logistics through the merger & acquisition among the Horizons and integration of logistics amongst the upstream, midstream and downstream of logistics industry. Nevertheless, whether the consolidation of enterprises can produce a double effect or an effect greater than twofold or not, that is, an effect of 1+1=2 or >2, the satisfaction of customer plays a vital role in this regard. In virtue of the industrial characteristics, even under a situation that the customers have singed the agreement, still the customers loyalty with service demand and attitude taken into consideration will keep in line with the trend of market and vary accordingly.

    The following issues have been explored by this study in a bid to understand the expectation from customers so that the service provider can make improvement correspondingly and reinforce their rooted foundation to access a long-term cooperation with customers:

    1.How many types of merger & acquisition are there for enterprises? And what are their features?
    2.What will be the valued items of service offered from the ocean freight cargo forwarders to the customers?
    3.What kind of points of view and reactions do customers have after the ocean freight cargo forwarders carry out their merger & acquisition of enterprise? Are there any significant differences before and after the merger & acquisition?

    Since the groups of ocean freight have been unceasingly expanding and developing, hopefully the reactions from customers can be realized through this study when enterprises enforce an approach of merger and acquisition for their development in the future.

    Customer satisfaction was taken as the infrastructure in this study. The influences given from the customer satisfaction to the ocean freight forwarding industry pertaining to the merger & acquisition of enterprises were probed, further analyzed, comprehended to control the concerns of customer and key factors essential to their ongoing purchase.

    As concluded from the study, the merger & acquisition of enterprises gives no prominent influences against the customer loyalty and ongoing purchase orders; instead, to satisfy the demand of customer is the topic that enterprises, especially the service industry, should pay close attention.

    With respect to the customer satisfaction, an overall evaluation and enhancement for enterprises based on the basis of four-structured facets on Balance Score Card shall be put into practice, particularly those local enterprises that take the globalization as their objective of development should take customer satisfaction as their reference and leading index of performance.
    Key words:M&A, customer satisfication.

    致謝一 中文摘要二 英文摘要三 表次七 圖次九 第一章 緒論1 第一節 研究動機1 第二節 研究目的2 第二節 研究對象與範圍2 第四節 研究流程3 第二章 市場分析5 第一節 航運市場分析5 第二節 貨櫃市場分析13 第三節 亞洲/北美洲航線及亞洲/歐洲航線18 第四節 海運貨運承攬業之特性20 第三章 文獻探討22 第一節 企業併購22 第二節 平衡計分卡29 第三節 顧客滿意度32 第四章 研究方法37 第一節 研究架構37 第二節 變數之操作型定義38 第三節 研究假設41 第四節 問卷設計42 第五節 資料分析方法50 第五章 實證結果51 第一節 樣本特性51 第二節 敘述統計54 第三節 獨立樣本T檢定74 第四節 假設檢定82 第五節 假設驗證結果95 第六章 結論與建議97 第一節 研究結論97 第二節 理論貢獻103 第三節 管理建議103 第四節 後續研究方向106 參考文獻107 一、中文部分107 二、英文部分108 附錄 問卷110

    一、中文部分
    1.王泰允(1993),企業購併實用,初版四刷,台北:遠流出版公司。
    2.王裕生(2004),「西式速食連鎖店行銷組合與服務品質滿意度對顧客滿意度之影響」,國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    3.伍忠賢(2002),企業購併理論與實務。
    4.林文雄(1998)。經營績效平衡表。管理會計,第45期,3-7頁。
    5.周建文(2004),「台灣航空貨運承攬業顧客滿意與訂單延續關聯性之實證研究」,國立台灣科技大學管理研究所碩士論文。
    6.洪明君(2002),「我國海運業近況與展望」台灣工業銀行。
    7.郭炳宏(2002),「金融控股公司合併後顧客滿意度之研究—以日盛國際商業銀行為例」,義守大學管理研究所碩士論文。
    8.游中凱(2003),「企業購併後經營績效及其影響因素之研究-以平衡計分卡觀點探討」,東吳大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    9.孫克難(1989),企業合併獎勵措施的成效調與分析,企銀季刊,第十二卷第四期,頁28-62。
    10.羅明敏(1998),「台灣企業海內外購併宣告對主併公司股東財富影響之實證研究」,朝陽科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    11.謝見佑(2004),「從顧客關係管理活動探討如何提升顧客滿意度-以郵局國內快捷為例」,長榮大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。

    二、英文部分
    1.Beatty, C.A, (1994), “Wanted: the Perfect Tiny Acquisition,” Business Quarterly, summer, pp.51~59.
    2.Brigham, and Gapenski (1987), Capital Structure, Cost of Capital and Revenue Requirements, A Public Unilities Fortnightly, 119(1), pp.35-50.
    3.Cardozo (1965), “An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expectation and Satisfaction”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.2, pp.244-249.
    4.Churchill, G.A. and C. Surprenant (1982), “An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.19, pp.491-504.
    5.Copeland, Thomas E., and J. Fred Weston (1988), Financial Theory and Corporate Policy, 2nd, New York: Addison- Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
    6.Fornell, C. (1992), “A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer. The Swedish Experience”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.55, Jan, pp.1-22.
    7.Fowler L.K, and R.D. Schmidt (1988), “Tender Offers, Acquisition, and Subsequent Performance in Manufacturing Firm,” Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), pp.41~57.
    8.Friedrich Trautwein (1990), “Merger motives and merger prescriptions,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.11, pp. 283-295.
    9.James M. Carman (1990), “Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality: An Assessment of the SERVQUAL Dimensions,” Journal of Retail, Vol.66, Spring, pp.33~55.
    10.Kaplan, Robert S and David P Norton (1992), “The Balanced Scorecard Measures That Drive Performance.” Harvard Business Review, January-February.
    11.Kaplan, Robert S and David P Norton (1996), “The Balanced Scorecard –Translating Strategy into Action.” Harvard Business School Press, September -October.
    12.Kitching, J. (1967), “Why Merger Miscarry?” Harvard Business Review, 45, pp.84~101.
    13.Kotler (2003), Marketing Management, 11th ed., Prentice Hall.
    14.Lewellen, W.G. (1971), “A Pure Financial Rationale for the Conglomerate Merger” Journal of Finance, 26(2), pp.521~542.
    15.Oliver, R.L. (1981), “Measurement and Evaluation of Satisfaction Processes in Retailing Setting”, Journal of Retailing, Vol.57, Fall, pp.25-48.
    16.Palepu, Bernard and Healy (1997), Introduction to Business Analysis and Valuation, South-Western Publishing Co.
    17.Patrick A. Gaughan (2001), Mergers, Acquisitions and Corporate Restructurings. Publisher: John Wiley and Sons; 3rd edition.
    18.Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. and Berry, L.L. (1985), "SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perception of Service Quality", Journal of Marketing, 64(Spring), pp.13-40.
    19.Parasuraman, A.,Zeithaml, V. A. and Berry, L.L. (1988), "A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research", Journal of Marketing, 49, pp.41-50. Perspectives on Consumer Satisfaction", AMA Conference Proceedings, pp.119-123.
    20.Parker Cathy, Mathews Brian P. (2001), Marketing Intelligence and Planning. Bradford. Vol. 19, Iss. 1; p. 38
    21.Ranaweera Chatura, Prabhu Jaideep (2003), “Measurement and Analysis for Marketing,” Journal of Targeting, London: Vol. 12, Iss. 1, p82.
    22.Singh, Habir and Cynththia A. Montgomery (1987), “Corporate Acquisition Strategies and Economic Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), pp.337~386.
    23.Seth, A. (1990), “Value Creation in Acquisitions: Reexamination of Performance Issue” Strategic Management Journal, pp.523~534.
    24.Williamson, Dliver E (1977), “The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes,” Journal of Economics, 14, pp.1537~1568.
    25.Weston and Chung (1983), “Do Mergers Make Money? A Research Summary.” Mergers and Acquisitions.
    26.WESTON, J. Fred, Juan A. Siu & Brian A. Johnson (2001), Takeovers, Restructuring, and Corporate Governance, 3rd ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE