簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 盧又馨
You-Xin Lu
論文名稱: 不同口語表達能力者,在線上課輔中面臨的溝通互動困境與因應策略-以數位學伴為例
Exploring the Difficulty in Communication and the Strategy to Solve the Problem for Those with Different Oral Expressive Ability - A Case Study of E-tutors in Digital Learning Companion Program
指導教授: 翁楊絲茜
Sz-Chien Wengyang
口試委員: 朱如君
Ju-Chun Chu
黃博聖
Po-Sheng Huang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 數位學習與教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 89
中文關鍵詞: 口語表達能力數位學伴線上溝通困境溝通策略制握信念
外文關鍵詞: Oral expression ability, digital learning companion, online communication challenges, communication strategy, locus of control
相關次數: 點閱:571下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

本研究探討數位學伴線上課輔中,不同口語表達能力的大學生,在線上課輔中面臨溝通互動困境時,其態度、採取策略及策略後溝通互動轉變為何。受訪大學生共計6位,口語表達能力高、低成就者各半,均全程參加十週的數位學伴線上課輔計畫。本研究依據研究目的,設計半結構式訪談大綱進行訪談;所得資料依據現象學和紮根理論進行整理與分析,萃取主要成分後,形成理論啟示,研究結果為:(1)不同口語表達能力的大學伴,在線上課輔中皆面臨相似的困境,如:視訊設備延遲導致訊息傳達不完整;小學伴因為興趣、個人特質或同儕造成互動減少;大學伴的教學內容難度過高,小學伴無法理解所造成的溝通互動困境。(2)不同口語表達能力的大學伴中,有4位不同口語表達能力之大學伴面臨困境時的心態傾向「正面、能同理接納小學伴,且反思自身教學方式」,能針對困境採取相對應的策略,如:改變教學模式、多方關注小學伴的狀態;而另外2位大學伴的心態則傾向於「負面、消極、無法同理小學伴、認為是外界影響」,難以針對困境採取相對應的策略,皆以口頭警告為因應策略。(3)不同口語表達能力並不會影響大學生面對線上溝通互動困境的類型和因應策略的異同,然而,制握信念可能是影響大學生態度及因應策略的原因之一。最後,本研究據此針對(1)線上溝通互動困境、(2)數位學伴線上課輔計畫團隊及(3)未來相關研究者,提出相對應的建議。


This study explores how the attitudes and strategy use of college students with different oral expression skills when participated in an online tutoring service as digital learning companions facing communication and interaction difficulties. A total of six college students were interviewed, half of them with high oral expression skills and the other half with low. They all participated in the 10-week Digital Learning Companion Program. According to the research purpose, this study uses semi-structured interviews to collect qualitative data which is then sorted and analyzed based on the Phenomenology and Grounded Theory. The main components and themes were extracted to form theoretical enlightenment. The research results are as follows:(1) College companions with different oral expression skills face similar challenges in online tutoring sessions, such as ”problems caused by equipment and internet connection”, “less participation for the elementary school learning partners due to their interest levels, personal characteristics, and peers”, “the content of prepared teaching materials are too difficult, and young learning partners are having trouble to comprehend.” (2) Among all six participated college learning companions with different oral expression skills, four tended to be "positive, able to empathize with the elementary school learning partners, and would reflect on their own teaching methods" when facing difficulties. They tend to adopt corresponding strategies in response to the difficulties, such as: changing the teaching methods and paying more attention to the status of their learning companions in many ways. The other two college learning companions tend to be "negative, unable to empathize with the elementary school learning companions, and blame on external influences". It is difficult for them to adopt corresponding strategies for the problems, and they tend to use verbal warnings as a response strategy. (3). Different oral expression skills do not affect the types of online communication and interaction difficulties faced by these participated college students and the different coping strategies they use. However, students’ “locus of control” may be one of the reasons that affect their’ attitudes and coping strategies when they are facing with communication challenges during this service learning opportunity. Finally, this research proposes corresponding suggestions for (1) online communication and interaction dilemmas, (2) administration team for the Digital Learning Companion Program, and (3) future researchers for the related topics.

第壹章 緒論 第一節 研究背景與動機 第二節 研究目的 第三節 研究問題 第四節 研究範圍與限制 第五節 研究之重要性 第貳章 文獻探討 第一節 口語表達能力的定義與重要性 第二節 口語表達能力的研究現況 第三節 數位學伴線上課輔計畫介紹 第參章 研究方法 第一節 研究取向選擇 第二節 研究參與者 第三節 研究工具 第四節 研究實施 第五節 資料蒐集的方法 第六節 資料分析 第七節 研究的信效度 第八節 研究倫理 第肆章 研究結果 第一節 不同口語表達能力在溝通互動模式中的異同 第二節 A、B類大學伴與其小學伴的背景 第三節 A、B類大學伴在線上課輔中面臨的溝通互動困境 第四節 A、B類大學伴面對溝通互動困難時的心態與策略 第五節 A、B類大學伴與其小學伴互動轉變的異同 第六節 A、B類大學伴線上課輔溝通互動模式之綜合探討 第伍章 結論與建議 第一節 結論 第二節 建議 參考文獻 附錄 一、口語表達能力評分表 二、大學生於數位學伴線上課輔的溝通互動經驗訪綱 三、大學伴與小學伴十週溝通互動曲線圖

王淑俐(1997)。教師 [口語表達能力] 之內容分析 (二) 用字遣詞及教學內容的呈現。師友月刊,(363),25-29。
王淑俐(1996)。老師應該是演講高手嗎? [教學表達能力檢核表] 之編製與運用 (下)。師友月刊,(344),42-46。
王玫珍(2007)。大學“口語表達訓練”通識課程之教學探究-以演說,朗讀之表達技巧為例。嘉義大學通識學報,(5),213-241。
吳心楷、宋曜廷、簡馨瑩(2010)。錄影分析在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊。
李月碧、何榮桂(2011)。透過網際網路縮減數位落差-以數位學伴為例。台灣教育,(670),2-11。
李秀芬(2010)。[問題導向學習] 與 [華語文溝通動機] 初探。台灣華語文教學,(8),19-38。
杜瑞澤、邱淑萍、莊立文、朱維政(2013)。遠距教學之線上學習成效影響因子之研究。文化創意產業研究學報,3(4),157-166。
林宝贵(2002)。語言障礙與矯治。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
林彥廷、陳思羽、籃玉如(2019)。翻轉教學應用於國小兒童華語口語溝通課程成效評估。華語文教學研究,16(1),113-155。
林宛蓉, 賴香菊, & 邱國展. (2007). 表情符號對線上採購談判和諧關係建立之影響—結合質化與量化分析.
林麗英(1998)。家有學語兒。臺北:信誼。
林麗娟、林宏彥、呂慈涵(2014)。線上學伴服務大學生社會參與指標之建構。教育傳播與科技研究,(108),17-29。
洪有義(1975)。大學生之內外制握與其適應問題的關係。國立臺灣師範大
學教育心理學系教育心理學報,8,81-94。
范幸玲、卓紋君(2004)。一位受暴婦女的內在信念與生命轉換歷程:詮釋學的觀點。中華輔導學報,(15),61-96。
陈弘昌(1999)。國小語文科教學研究。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
陳立楀(2015)。跨國線上課輔教師教學信念與教學行為之探究-以 [韓國僑鄉線上課輔服務計畫] 為例。暨南大學比較教育學系學位論文,1-241。
黃秋芳、闕月清(2004)。國小體育專家教師與生手教師回饋行為之比較研究。大專體育學術專刊,47-57。
黃振豊(2017)。透過磨課師優化偏鄉教育。教育研究學報,51(2),71-94。
黃瑞琴(1997)。質的教育研究方法(Vol。24)。心理出版社。
楊深坑(1988)。理論,詮釋與實踐。臺北市:師大書苑。
顏亦敏, & 李峻德. (2018). 對話情境, 貼圖類型與社會臨場感研究: 以 LINE
貼圖為例. 教育傳播與科技研究, (119), 1-13.
葉德明(2006)。九十五年華語文教師認證考試華語口語表達考後回顧。台灣華語文教學,(1),87-88。
劉貴傑(2005)。詮釋學及其教育意涵。區域人文社會學報,(8),1-27。
鄭雲卿(2014)。表達性藝術媒材在團體活動中的運用-以高中口語表達與寫作團體方案設計為例。諮商與輔導,(345),45-50。
羅秋昭(2015)。國小語文科教材教法。台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
羅鈞令(1997)。口語溝通(Verbal Communication)。當代醫學,(284),518-
522。
蘇美麗(2003)。詮釋學在教學上之應用。國民教育研究集刊,(11),121-
130。

Applebee, M. S., Johanson, A. P., Lawler-Sagarin, K. A., Losey, E. N., & Munro-Leighton, C. (2018). The Three-Minute Slide as an Effective Tool for Developing Oral Communication Skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(8), 1419-1422.
Barker, P. (2002). On being an online tutor. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(1), 3-13.
Bodnar, C. A., & Clark, R. M. (2017). Can game-based learning enhance engineering communication skills?. IEEE transactions on professional communication, 60(1), 24-41.
Bohannon, L. S., Herbert, A. M., Pelz, J. B., & Rantanen, E. M. (2013). Eye contact and video-mediated communication: A review. Displays, 34(2), 177-185.
Breen, A. M., & Giacalone, C. G. (2019). Unplugging to Reconnect: Using Oral Proficiencies to Strengthen Interpersonal Communication Skills. Hispania, 102(2), 165-168.
Cekaite, A., & Björk-Willén, P. (2018). Enchantment in storytelling: co-operation and participation in children's aesthetic experience. Linguistics and Education, 48, 52-60.
Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. L. (2007). Grounded theory. The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology.
Crosling, G., & Ward, I. (2002). Oral communication: The workplace needs and uses of business graduate employees. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 41-57.
García-López, L. J., Díez-Bedmar, M. B., & Almansa-Moreno, J. M. (2013). From being a trainee to being a trainer: helping peers improve their public speaking skills. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 18(2), 331-342.
Hrastinski, S., Cleveland‐Innes, M., & Stenbom, S. (2018). Tutoring online tutors: Using digital badges to encourage the development of online tutoring skills. British journal of educational technology, 49(1), 127-136.
Jana, S., Pande, A., Chan, A., & Mohapatra, P. (2013). Mobile video chat: issues and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(6), 144-151.
Karlsson, G. (1993). Psychological qualitative research from a phenomenological perspective. Almqvist & Wiksell International.
Kerry-Moran, K. J. (2016). Improving preservice teachers’ expression in read-alouds. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44(6), 661-670.
Liu, C. C., Chen, H. S., Shih, J. L., Huang, G. T., & Liu, B. J. (2011). An enhanced concept map approach to improving children’s storytelling ability. Computers & Education, 56(3), 873-884.
Luiz Adrian, J. A., Zeszotarski, P., & Ma, C. (2015). Developing pharmacy student communication skills through role-playing and active learning. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 79(3), 44.
Martin, S., & Valdivia, I. M. A. (2017). Students’ feedback beliefs and anxiety in online foreign language oral tasks. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 18.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and Expanded from" Case Study Research in Education.". Jossey-Bass Publishers, 350 Sansome St, San Francisco, CA 94104.
Peterson, M. S. (1997). Personnel interviewers' perceptions of the importance and adequacy of applicants' communication skills.
Rassaei, E. (2017). Video chat vs. face-to-face recasts, learners’ interpretations and L2 development: a case of Persian EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), 133-148.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psycho-logical Monographs, 80(1), 609.
Staiano, A. E., Beyl, R., Hendrick, C., Hsia, D., & Newton Jr, R. (2018, April). Engaging Parents And Overweight/Obese Children In Physical Activity Using Video Chat And Gaming Technology. In ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE (Vol. 52, pp. S186-S186). JOURNALS DEPT, 2001 EVANS RD, CARY, NC 27513 USA: OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC.
Stickler, U., & Shi, L. (2013). Supporting Chinese speaking skills online. System, 41(1), 50-69.
Stevens, B. (2005). What communication skills do employers want? Silicon Valley recruiters respond. Journal of Employment Counseling, 42(1), 2-9.
Tecedor, M., & Campos-Dintrans, G. (2019). Developing oral communication in Spanish lower-level courses: The case of voice recording and videoconferencing activities. ReCALL, 31(2), 116-134.
Yilmaz, R. M., & Goktas, Y. (2017). Using augmented reality technology in storytelling activities: examining elementary students’ narrative skill and creativity. Virtual Reality, 21(2), 75-89.

無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2025/08/07 (校內網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
QR CODE