簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: Uyanga Sumiya
Uyanga Sumiya
論文名稱: Culture influence in Electronic Word-of-mouth in Social Networking Sites: Cross-cultural study of Mongolia and Taiwan
Culture influence in Electronic Word-of-mouth in Social Networking Sites: Cross-cultural study of Mongolia and Taiwan
指導教授: 林孟彥
Meng-Yen Lin
口試委員: 葉穎蓉
Ying-Jung Yvonne Yeh
林孟彥
Meng-Yen Lin
蔡瑤昇
Cai-Yao Sheng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 管理學院MBA
School of Management International (MBA)
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 105
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 51
中文關鍵詞: electronic word-of-mouthsocial networking sitessocial capitalMongoliaTaiwanculturecross-culturallife satisfaction
外文關鍵詞: electronic word-of-mouth, social networking sites, social capital, Mongolia, Taiwan, culture, cross-cultural, life satisfaction
相關次數: 點閱:413下載:19
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

eWOM behavior in Social Networking Sites (SNSs) has been shown to differ across cultures. This research presents cross-cultural study of Electronic Word-of-mouth (eWOM) behavior between Mongolia and Taiwan’s SNS users. Prior to investigate cultural and social influence on eWOM behavior, culture orientation of Mongolia and Taiwan was defined. Results showed horizontal individualism context shift for both cultures. It was shown that previously, Mongolia was vertical collectivism dominant and now it’s in transition to horizontal individualism. Taiwan was vertical collectivism and horizontal collectivism dominant, but now horizontal individualism orientation outscored horizontal collectivism.
Taiwan’s SNS users more actively engaged in eWOM than Mongolian counterparts. Both cultures’ SNS users were more opinion seeking than opinion leading and pass-along and formed more bridging social capital than bonding social capital. Culture, bonding and bridging social capitals were the main predictors of opinion leading and seeking eWOM behavior. In addition to culture and social capital, life satisfaction was significant predictor of pass-along eWOM behavior. Moreover, strong correlation between opinion leading and pass-along behavior was observed. Medium correlation of opinion seeking – opinion leading, and opinion seeking – pass along confirmed interchangeable role of eWOM behaviors depending on purpose of information diffusion. Personal attributes gender and age were not significant predictors of eWOM behavior.


eWOM behavior in Social Networking Sites (SNSs) has been shown to differ across cultures. This research presents cross-cultural study of Electronic Word-of-mouth (eWOM) behavior between Mongolia and Taiwan’s SNS users. Prior to investigate cultural and social influence on eWOM behavior, culture orientation of Mongolia and Taiwan was defined. Results showed horizontal individualism context shift for both cultures. It was shown that previously, Mongolia was vertical collectivism dominant and now it’s in transition to horizontal individualism. Taiwan was vertical collectivism and horizontal collectivism dominant, but now horizontal individualism orientation outscored horizontal collectivism.
Taiwan’s SNS users more actively engaged in eWOM than Mongolian counterparts. Both cultures’ SNS users were more opinion seeking than opinion leading and pass-along and formed more bridging social capital than bonding social capital. Culture, bonding and bridging social capitals were the main predictors of opinion leading and seeking eWOM behavior. In addition to culture and social capital, life satisfaction was significant predictor of pass-along eWOM behavior. Moreover, strong correlation between opinion leading and pass-along behavior was observed. Medium correlation of opinion seeking – opinion leading, and opinion seeking – pass along confirmed interchangeable role of eWOM behaviors depending on purpose of information diffusion. Personal attributes gender and age were not significant predictors of eWOM behavior.

Abstract Acknowledgement Table of contents List of Tables List of Figures Chapter 1. Introduction 1.1. Research background and motives 1.2. Research objectives 1.3. Research procedure Chapter 2. Literature review and research hypothesis 2.1. Electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in SNS 2.2. Cultural orientation 2.3. Social capital in SNS 2.4. Personal well-being (Life satisfaction) 2.5. Gender 2.6. Research framework and hypothesis Chapter 3. Research method 3.1. Research design 3.2. Sampling 3.3. Questionnaire design 3.4. Measures 3.5. Data analysis design Descriptive analysis Independent sample T-test One-way ANOVA and one sample T-test Linear Regression Analysis Chapter 4. Findings and results 4.1. Descriptive analysis 4.2. Statistical analysis and hypothesis testing result Cultural orientation eWOM behavior hypothesis (H1) Social capital hypothesis (H2) Life satisfaction hypothesis (H3) Influence of cultural, social and personal attributes on eWOM behaviors 4.3. Discussion Chapter 5. Conclusion and suggestion 5.1. Conclusion 5.2. Suggestions Managerial implications Future research direction and insights Reference APPENDIX A1. Correlation matrix A2. Brief information about the countries A3. Survey questionnaire

Arndt, J. (1967). Role of product-related conversations in diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing Research, 4(3), 291–295.
Brown, J. J., & Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 350–362.
Buttle, F. A. (1998). Word of mouth: understanding and managing referral marketing. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 6, 241-254.
Chu, S. C., & Choi, S. M. (2011). Electronic Word-of-mouth in Social Networking Sites: A Cross-Cultural Study of the United States and China. Journal of Global Marketing, 24(3), 263-281.
Flynn, L. R., Goldsmith, R. E., & Eastman, J. K. (1996). Opinion leaders and opinion seekers: Two new measurement scales. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(2), 137–147.
Mak, V. (2008). The Emergence of Opinion Leaders in Social Networks. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1157285
Sun, T., Youn, S., Wu, G., Kuntaraporn, M. (2006). Online Word-of-mouth (or Mouse): An Exploration of its Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 11(4), 1104-1127.
Rogers, E. M., & Hart, W. B. (2002). New communication technology and the changing nature of conversation. In E. William & N. Paul (Eds.), The Changing Conversation in America (pp. 91–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Summers, J. O. (1970). The Identity of Women’s Clothing Fashion Opinion Leaders. Journal of Marketing Research, 7(2), 178-185.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1).
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (Rev. 3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 118–128.
Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P.S., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural research. 29(3), 240-275.
Rarick, C., Winter, G., Barczyk, C., Pruett, M., Nickerson, I., & Angriawan, A. (2014). Mongolia: A Cultural Portrait using the Hofstede 5-D Model. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: Administration and Management, 14(9).
Chiou, J. S. (2001). Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism Among College Students in the United States, Taiwan, and Argentina. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(5), 667-678.
Ali, A. J., Lee, M., Hsieh, Y. C, & Krishnan, K. (2005). Individualism and collectivism in Taiwan. Cross Cultural Management an International Journal, 12(4).
Keeley, B. (2007). Human Capital: How what you know shapes your life, OECD Publishing, Paris. dio: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264029095-en
Nahapiet, J. &, Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
Babaei, H., Ahmad, N., & Gill, S. S., (2012). Bonding, bridging and linking social capital and empowerment among squatter settlements in Tehran, Iran. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17(1), 119-126.
Hawkins, R. L., & Maurer, K. (2010). Bonding, Bridging and Linking: How social capital operated in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1777-1793.
Wang, T., Yeh, R. K., Chen, C., & Tsydypov, Z. (2016). What drives electronic word-of-mouth on social networking sites? Perspectives of social capital and self-determination. Telematics and Informatics, 33, 1034-1047.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
Oh, H. J., Ozkaya, E., & LaRose, R. (2014). How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationship among online supportive interaction, affect perceived social support, sense of community, and life satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 69-78.
Mehl, M. R., Vazire, S., Holleran, S. E., & Clark, C. S. (2010). Eavesdropping on Happiness: Well-being is related to having less small talk and more substantive conversations. Psychological Science, 21(4), 539-541.
Srivastava, A. (2015). The effect of Facebook Use on Life Satisfaction and Subjective Happiness of College Students. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 2(4).
Tromholt, M. (2016). The Facebook Experiment: Quitting Facebook leads to higher levels of well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 19(11), 661-666. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0259
Lam, D., & So, A. (2013). Do happy tourists spread more word-of-mouth? The mediating role of life satisfaction. Annals of Tourism Research, 43, 646-650.
Neculaesei, A. N. (2015). Culture and gender role differences. Cross-cultural Management Journal. 17(1), 31-35.
Costa Jr, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender Differences in Personality Traits Across Cultures: Robust and Surprising Findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 322-331.
Kashima, Y., Kim, U., Gelfand, M. J., Yamaguchi, S., Choi, S. C., & Yuki, M. (1995). Culture, Gender, and Self: A Perspective from Individualism-Collectivism Research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 925-937.
Zhang, Y., Feick, L., & Mittal, V. (2014). How Males and Females Differ in Their Likelihood of Transmitting Negative Word of mouth. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1097-1108.
Sanduijav. T. (2008). Cross Cultural Aspects of Advertising-Cultural Analysis of Mongolian and Chinese Web Sites (Doctoral Thesis).
Retrieved from http://theses.cz/id/ay3p68/?furl=%2Fid%2Fay3p68%2F;lang=en
Abubakar, A. M., Ilkan, M., & Sahin, P. (2016). eWOM, eReferral and gender in the virtual community. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 34(5), 692-710.
Wu, M. Y. (2006). Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions 30 Years Later: A Study of Taiwan and the United States. Intercultural Communication Studies. 15(1).
Zhong, Y. (2016). Explaining national identity shift in Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(99).
Australian bureau of statistics. (2002). Social capital and social well-being. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/d3110122.nsf/6ead87599a9a3b0bca256eaf00836eb9/150bcb152250ddcfca256c220080ba47/$FILE/Social%20Capital%20and%20Social%20Wellbeing_Discussion%20Paper.pdf
Fu, Q. (2004). Trust, Social capital and Organizational effectiveness (Master’s Thesis). Retrieved from Virginia Tech Thesis Database. (No 17496)
Pierce, J., Lovrich, N., Johnson, B., Reames, T., & Budd, W. (2014). Social Capital and Longitudinal Change in Sustainability Plans and Policies: U.S. Cities from 2000 to 2010. Sustainability, 6, 136-157. doi: 10.3390/su6010136
Shavitt, S., Torelli, C. J., & Riemer, H. (2010). Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism: Implications for Understanding Psychological Processes. In Gelfand, M. J., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y., Advances in Culture and Psychology: Volume 1. Oxford Scholarship online. (dio: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380392.003.0007)
Taiwan’s GDP information. (2017, April 19) Retrieved from http://www.tradingeconomics.com/taiwan/gdp
Mongolia’s GDP information. (2017, April 19) Retrieved from http://www.tradingeconomics.com/mongolia/gdp
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills: CA: Sage Publications.
Shavitt, S., Lalwani, A. K., Zhang, J., & Torelli, C. J. (2006). The Horizontal/Vertical Distinction in Cross-Cultural Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 325-356.
Lewis, R., Mobilio, L., Phelps, J. E., & Raman, N. (2005). Understanding Pass-Along Emails: Motivations and Behaviors of Viral Consumers. In Haugtvedt. C. P., Machleit. K. A., & Yalch. R., Online consumer psychology: Understanding and influencing Consumer behavior in the Virtual World (pp. 59-94). Psychology Press.
Gittell, R., & Vidal, A. (1998). Community Organizing: Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage Publications.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Dodge, R., Daly, A. P., Huyton, J., & Sanders, L. D. (2012). The challenge of defining wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(3), 222-235. doi: 10.5502/ijw.v2i3.4
Taiwan’s masculinity score. (2017, February 2) Retrieved from https://geert-hofstede.com/taiwan.html.
United Nations Development Programme in Mongolia. (2016). Mongolia Human Development Report 2016. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/mongolia_human_devlopment_report_2016_english_full_report_2016_06_28.pdf
Williams, D. (2006). On and off the “net”: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 593–628.

QR CODE