簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 莉亞
Lea Adilman
論文名稱: 融合多重感官教學法於ADHD兒童之英語閱讀課程: 個案研究
Integrating a multi-sensory approach in an EFL reading curriculum for ADHD children: A case study
指導教授: 李思穎
Sy-Ying Lee
口試委員: 黃怡萍
Yi-Ping Huang
駱藝瑄
Yi-Hsuan Gloria Lo
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 應用外語系
Department of Applied Foreign Languages
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 128
中文關鍵詞: ADHDTPR
外文關鍵詞: multisensory
相關次數: 點閱:300下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

This study aimed to adapt an EFL reading curriculum for the purpose of facilitating learners with ADHD in an inclusive classroom through using a multisensory approach. The purpose was to provide teachers with methods that would foster a learning environment conducive to all learners regardless of learning ability because of the increasing number of struggling learners attending private language schools in Taiwan. Ten fourth and fifth grade EFL children, five with and five without ADHD, attending such a school located in Taipei, were involved for a total of 60-hour instruction (lasting six weeks) to attest whether the multisensory approach helped improve reading comprehension and motivation, and whether they were satisfied with this curriculum and in what ways.
The curriculum developed in this study was inspired by the Orton-Gillingham approach (1937), which pioneered the use of the multisensory method to teaching L1 reading. In this EFL context, the supplemental extension activities required to complete this approach, i.e. TPR, storyboarding, and reader’s theater, have been confirmed to be effective for ADHD learners that have trouble with traditional methods (Hughes, 2014). Creswell’s (2007) mechanism was adopted for analysis by coding, developing themes, describing and interpreting the collected data. Multiple sources of data were collected to ensure trustworthiness and triangulation: teacher’s field notes, classroom observation, participant’s storyboards, audio-recorded interviews and attitude questionnaires. Member checking also took place to add credibility to the transcribed audio-recorded interviews.
The extracted themes in the findings illustrate emerging behavioral changes in the students with ADHD and a corresponding improvement in comprehension. The students with ADHD initially expressed a dislike of reading, performed poorly on comprehension worksheets, and had low motivation for reading aloud. Over the 60-hour instruction, the same students achieved an average of 8.6% greater accuracy on comprehension and exhibited increased eagerness to participate in reading aloud by raising their hands and asking to read. Students with and without ADHD began to collaborate during readers theater and encouraged one another in the storyboarding activities. In light of such a drastic change in student’s behavior and attitudes, further research with a larger sample is warranted.


This study aimed to adapt an EFL reading curriculum for the purpose of facilitating learners with ADHD in an inclusive classroom through using a multisensory approach. The purpose was to provide teachers with methods that would foster a learning environment conducive to all learners regardless of learning ability because of the increasing number of struggling learners attending private language schools in Taiwan. Ten fourth and fifth grade EFL children, five with and five without ADHD, attending such a school located in Taipei, were involved for a total of 60-hour instruction (lasting six weeks) to attest whether the multisensory approach helped improve reading comprehension and motivation, and whether they were satisfied with this curriculum and in what ways.
The curriculum developed in this study was inspired by the Orton-Gillingham approach (1937), which pioneered the use of the multisensory method to teaching L1 reading. In this EFL context, the supplemental extension activities required to complete this approach, i.e. TPR, storyboarding, and reader’s theater, have been confirmed to be effective for ADHD learners that have trouble with traditional methods (Hughes, 2014). Creswell’s (2007) mechanism was adopted for analysis by coding, developing themes, describing and interpreting the collected data. Multiple sources of data were collected to ensure trustworthiness and triangulation: teacher’s field notes, classroom observation, participant’s storyboards, audio-recorded interviews and attitude questionnaires. Member checking also took place to add credibility to the transcribed audio-recorded interviews.
The extracted themes in the findings illustrate emerging behavioral changes in the students with ADHD and a corresponding improvement in comprehension. The students with ADHD initially expressed a dislike of reading, performed poorly on comprehension worksheets, and had low motivation for reading aloud. Over the 60-hour instruction, the same students achieved an average of 8.6% greater accuracy on comprehension and exhibited increased eagerness to participate in reading aloud by raising their hands and asking to read. Students with and without ADHD began to collaborate during readers theater and encouraged one another in the storyboarding activities. In light of such a drastic change in student’s behavior and attitudes, further research with a larger sample is warranted.

Abstract iv Acknowledgment vi Table of Contents vii List of Tables ix List of Figures x CHAPTER 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and Motivation 1 1.2 Purpose of the study 2 1.3 Research Questions 4 1.4 Value of the study 5 1.5 Terminology and Abbreviations 6 1.6 Organization of study 7 CHAPTER 2 9 LITERATURE REVIEW 9 2.1 ADHD 10 2.2 Understanding learning styles 11 2.3 Multisensory Approach 14 2.4 Reading aloud/storytelling 16 2.5 TPR 17 2.6 Graphic organizers 18 2.7 Readers theater 20 2.8 Conceptual framework 24 CHAPTER 3 25 METHODOLOGY 25 3.1 Setting and Participants 25 3.2 Reading Program 31 3.2.1 Reading Material 32 3.2.2 Reading activity 34 3.2.3 Extension activities 36 3.3 Data collection 39 3.4 Data Analysis 43 3.5 Trustworthiness 43 CHAPTER 4 44 RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 44 4.1 Research Question 1 44 4.1.1 Chloe 45 4.1.2 Sara 49 4.1.3 Eli 52 4.1.4 Jim 56 4.1.5 Leo 59 4.1.6 Jennifer 62 4.1.7 Conclusion 65 4.2 Research Question 2 66 4.2.1 Chloe 67 4.2.2 Sara 70 4.2.3 Eli 73 4.2.4 Jim 75 4.2.5 Leo 77 4.2.6 Conclusion 79 4.3 Research Question 3 79 CHAPTER 5 89 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 89 5.1 Summary of the findings 89 5.1.1 Reading and comprehension 89 5.1.2 Reading motivation 90 5.1.3 Multisensory and inclusive classrooms 90 5.2 Pedagogical implications 91 5.3 Limitations 91 5.4 Further research 92 References 93 Appendix 1 98 Appendix 2 100 Appendix 3 104 Appendix 4 107 Appendix 5 108 Appendix 6 109 Appendix 7 111 Appendix 8 112 Appendix 9 114 Appendix 10 116 Appendix 11 117 Appendix 12 118

Antrop, I., Roeyers, H., Van Oost, P., & Buysse, A. (2000). Stimulation seeking and
hyperactivity in children with ADHD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41, 225-231.

Armstrong, T. (2005). ADD/ADHD alternatives in the classroom. Moorabbin, Vic.:
Hawker Brownlow Education.

Asher, J. J. (1966) The learning strategy of total physical response: a review. The Modern
Language Journal, 50 (2), 79-84.

Barry, T. D. S., Lyman, R. D., & Klinger, L. G. (2002). Academic underachievement and
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: The negative impact of symptom severity on school performance. Journal of School Psychology, 40(3), 259-283.

Bloom, F., & Traub, N. (2002). Recipe for reading. Educators Pub. Service.

Caluris, J. (2006). Using readers theater to show off good reading. Retrieved from
http://www.teachersnetwork.org/tnli/research/achieve/caluris.pdf

Campbell, M.L., Helf, S., & Cooke., N.L. (2008). Effects of adding multisensory
components to a supplemental reading program on the decoding skills of treatment resisters. Education and Treatment of Children, 31(3), 267-295.

Carbo, M. (1983). Research in reading and learning style: Implications for exceptional
children. Journal Teaching Exceptional Children, 49, 486-494.

Chen, H., & Fan, H. (2016). Education in Taiwan: The Vision and Goals of the 12-Year
Curriculum. Retrieved October 06, 2017, from
https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/education-in-taiwan-the-vision-and-goals-of-the-12-year-curriculum/

Clark, V., & Creswell, J. (2015). Understanding Research: A Consumer's Guide (2nd ed.).
Pearson.

Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E. and Ecclestone K. (2004) Learning styles and
pedagogy in post-16 learning. A systematic and critical review, London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.

Combley, M. (2000). The Hickey multisensory language course (3rd ed.). USA: Wiley.

Corcoran, C. & Davis, D. (2005). A study of the effects of readers' theater on second and
third grade special education students' fluency growth. Reading Improvement, 42(2), 105-111.

Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among
Five Traditions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cuaresma, J. (2008). Learning style preferences and academic performance of PHEM
Majors at the University of the Cordilleras. (Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis). University of the Cordilleras, Baguio City.

Dalessandro, J. L. (2016). Total Physical Response and the Natural Approach to teaching
foreign language to students with disabilities. Rowan University.

Dexter, D. D., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Graphic organizers and students with learning
disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(1), 51-72.

Doherty, J., & Coggeshall, K. (2005). Reader's Theater and Storyboarding: Strategies
That Include and Improve. Voices from the Middle, 12(4), 37-43.

Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1978). Teaching Students through their Individual Learning
Styles. A Practical Approach. Prentice Hall, Reston, VA.

Dunn, R., & Stevenson, J. M. (1997). Teaching diverse college students to study within a learning-styles prescription. College Student Journal, 31(3), 333.
Duran, E. (1993). Effective Communication Programming for Language Minority
Students with Severe Disabilities. Washington, D.C.: Distributed by ERIC
Clearinghouse.

Edwards, B. (2009). Motivating middle school readers: the graphic novel link.
School Library Media Activities Monthly, Vol. 25(8), 56-58.

Elliott, E., & Yountchi, L. (2009). Total physical response and Russian multi- and
unidirectional verbs of motion: A case study in acquisition. Slavic and East European Journal, 53(3), 428-450.

Ewy, C. (2003). Teaching with visual frameworks: focused learning and achievement
through instructional graphics co-created by students and teachers. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Fillippatou, D., & Kaldi, S. (2010). The Effectiveness of project-based learning on
pupils with learning difficulties regarding academic performance, group work and motivation. International Journal of Special Education, 25(01), 17-26.

Flemming, N. (2017). A guide to learning styles. Retrieved from http://vark-learn.com/introduction-to-vark/research-statistics/
Gau SS, Chiu CD, Shang CY, Cheng AT, Soong WT (2009). Executive functions in
adolescence among children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in Taiwan. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 30(6):525-534.

Gaus, M., & Simpson, C. (2009). Integrating physical activity into academic pursuits.
Kappa Delta Pi Record, 45(2), 88-91.
Gilakjani, A. (2012). A match or mismatch between learning styles of the learners and
teaching styles of the teachers. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 4(11), 51-60.

Greathead, P. (2011). Language Disorders and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
Retreived from http://www.addiss.co.uk/languagedisorders.htm,

Hall, T., Meyer, A. & Rose, D. (2012). An introduction to Universal Design for Learning:
Questions and answers. In T. E. Hall, A. Meyer, & D.H. Rose (Eds.). Universal Design for Learning in the classroom: Practical applications (pp. 1-8). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Harjander, K. S. S. (2014). Attitudes towards English Language Learning and Language Use
Among Secondary School Students (Doctoral dissertation, Jabatan Bahasa Inggeris, Fakulti Bahasa dan Linguistik, Universiti Malaya).

Higgs, T., & Krashen, S. (1983). Principles and Practice in Second Language
Acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 67(2), 168.

Hornsby, B., Pool, J., & Moss, N. (1997). Alpha to omega (3rd ed.). Oxford: Heinemann
Educational.

Huang, H. (2006). The effects of storytelling on EFL young learners’ reading
comprehension and word recall. English Teaching & Learning, 30(3), 51-74.

Hughes, S. (2014). The Orton-Gillingham Language Approach - A research
review (Scholarly project). Retrieved from Https://iknowmyabcs.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Orton-Gillingham_Report-Final-Version.pdf.

Jensen, E. (1998). Teaching with the brain in mind. Alexandria: VA: Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Kang, S. (2004). Using visual organizers to enhance EFL instruction. ELT Journal, 58(1), 58-
67.
Krashen, S. (2004). The power of reading insights from the research. Westport, CT:
Libraries Unlimited.

LD Online. (n.d.). Helping the Student with ADHD in the Classroom: Strategies for
Teachers. Retrieved May 29, 2016 from http://www.ldonline.org/article/5911/.

Lee, S. (2012). Storytelling supported by technology: an alternative for EFL children
with learning difficulties. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3), 297-307.

Loe, I. M., & Feldman, H. M. (2007). Academic and educational outcomes of children
with ADHD. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. Oxford Academic.

Maheshwari, V. (2016). Multi-sensory teaching-meaning and importance. Retrieved
September 07, 2017, from http://www.vkmaheshwari.com/WP/?p=2364

Mason, B. (2013). Self-Selected Pleasure Reading and Story Listening for Foreign
Language Classrooms. 四天王寺大学紀要, (57), 247-256.

McCormick, S. (1977). Should you read aloud to your children?. Language Arts, 54(2),
139-163.

Melekoğlu, M. A. & Wilkerson, K. L. (2013). Motivation to read: how does it change for
struggling readers with and without disabilities? International Journal of
Instruction, 6(1), 77–88.

Millin, S. K., & Rinehart, S. D. (1999). Some of the benefits of readers theater participation
for second‐grade title I students. Literacy Research and Instruction, 39(1), 71-88.

Ministry of Education Republic of China (Taiwan). (2011). Ministry of Education,
Republic of China (Taiwan). Retrieved from http://english.moe.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=14754&ctNode=11435&mp=11

Naar, J. M. M. (2013). Storyboards and Reading Comprehension of Literary Fiction in
English. HOW Journal, 20(1), 149-169.

Nation, I., Macalister, J. (2010). Language Curriculum Design: ESL & Applied
Linguistics Professional Series. New York, NY. Routledge.

Nunan, D. (2015). Task-based language teaching in the Asian context: where are we
now and where are we going? Asian EFL Journal, 8(3).

Obaid, M. (2012). The impact of using multi-sensory approach for teaching students
with learning disabilities. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), 9(1), 75.

Orton, J. (1966). The Orton Gillingham approach. USA: Orton Dyslexia Society.

Orton, S. (1937). Reading, writing and speech problems in children. USA, New York:
Norton.

Pishol, S., Kaur, S. (2015). Teacher and students’ perceptions of reading a graphic novel
using the multiliteracies approach in an ESL classroom. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 12, 21-47.

Polanczyk, G. (2007). The Worldwide Prevalence of ADHD: A Systematic Review and
Metaregression Analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(6), 942.

Richards, J., & Rodgers T. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching.
(2nd ed.), 72-79.

Skinner, M., & Smith, A. (2011) Creating success for students with learning disabilities
in post secondary foreign language courses. International Journal of Special Education, 26 (2), 42-57.

Smith, D. (2011). Readers theatre: Its effectiveness in improving reading fluency, student
motivation, and attitudes toward reading among second-grade students. The Pennsylvania State University.

Stephens, T. (2015). Encouraging positive student engagement and motivation: Tips
for teachers. Review360 Pearson.

Tsai, C., Chen, Y., Lin, H., & Gau, S. (2017). One-year trajectory analysis
for ADHD symptoms and its associated factors in community-based children and adolescents in Taiwan. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 11, 28.

Turketi, N. (2010). Teaching English To Children With ADHD. MA TESOL Collection.
Paper 483.

Wang, F-Y. & Lee, S-Y. (2007). Storytelling is the bridge. International Journal of
Foreign Language Teaching, 3(2), 30-35.

What’s your learning style. (2010). Retrieved June 4, 2016, from
http://www.schoolonwheels.org/pdfs/3121/Learning-Styles.pdf.
Wilmes, B., Harrington, L., Kohler-Evans, P., & Sumpter, D. (2008). Coming to our
senses: Incorporating brain research findings into classroom instruction.
Education Digest, 128(4), 659-666.
Wintergerst, A., Decapua, A., & Verna, M. (2002). An analysis of one learning styles
instrument for language students. TESL Canada Journal, 20(1), 16.

Wood, M. (2015). The effect of graphic novel supplements on reading comprehension
and motivation in secondary students. University of Central Arkansas.

Wu, C., & Yang, H. (2015). Applying reader’s theater to develop EFL children oral
reading fluency and to promote their learning motivation. 英語文教與學的對話: 2012 國立屏東教育大學英語學系學術研討會論文選集. 屏東市: 國立屏東教育大學, 2012.

QR CODE