隨著智慧型手機快速發展及行動網路的普及，人們開始依賴並透過即時通訊APP及網路社群媒體來聯繫親友及互動的主要工具之一。而LINE提供多樣化的貼圖並獲得廣大使用者的青睞及市占率並藉此獲益後，即時通訊APP及社群媒體的各家廠商也看準貼圖的商機，開始提供各種多樣化的貼圖來吸引消費者，其中，社群媒體『Facebook』在台灣每月有達1,500萬人連上，使用率達88%，能有這麼高的使用率，其原因莫過於可以喜歡時時刻刻黏在臉書上分享生活的點點滴滴與朋友互動。而臉書上也可以用『圖像(人物照、影片、圖片)+文字』的訊息方式回覆貼文，讓溝通變得更生動有趣味。因此，本研究欲探討，為何使用者願意使用貼圖訊息，有哪些因素會影響使用者的使用態度。
本研究應用科技接受模式(Technology Acceptance Model-TAM)，理性行為理論(Theory of Reasoned Action)及使用者反應(User Reaction)等理論。研究結果發現：(1)認知趣味性、認知易用性、認知社交有用性、使用反應皆顯著影響使用態度。(2) 認知趣味性和使用反應對使用圖像訊息的態度也有直接影響性。(3) 認知社交有用性及趣味性相較於其他構面的影響性是最為顯著。

As smart phone usage and mobile network are more popular, people are getting relied on instant message applications and social networking to communicate with friends and relatives. Since LINE offers a variety of stickers to increase usage, its market share and income are also increased；The Instant Message Applications and Social Networks started to pay attention to the business model of sticker, and also started to offer diversified stickers for users. Which social media of "Facebook" has reached 15 million users every month in Taiwan, the usage rate accounted for 88%. People aggressively share on Facebook anytime and anywhere, this is the main reason to cause high usage rate. The Images (portraits, videos, pictures) can also be used on the Facebook to reply text messages, this made the communication become more fun. Therefore, this study would like to explore why the users are willing to use image messages, what factors will affect the users’ attitude.
This study adopted the theory of Technology Acceptance Model-TAM、Theory of Reasoned Action and the theory of User Reaction.(1) perceived enjoyment significantly affect users’ perceived ease of use (2) perceived ease of use reaction significantly affect perceived useful and users’ attitudes (3) perceived useful and affective reaction significantly affect users’ attitudes.

1. 吳明隆(2011)，SPSS統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計(第三版)：問卷分析與應用統計，台北易習圖書。
2. 呂孟蘋（2009），臺灣網路社群系統行動化發展之市場研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立交通大學企業管理碩士學程學位，新竹臺灣，http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0030-0309201012111292
3. 涂金堂(2008)，教育測驗與評量(初版)，台北三民出版社。
4. 創市際(2013)，「創市際ARO公佈台灣首份智慧型手機使用行為測量報告」，http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_03_23_13.html，取用日期：2015年3月。
5. 創市際(2015)，「創市際ARO公佈台灣網路使用狀況報告」，http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_03_27_15.html，取用日期：2015年3月。
6. 黃少華、陳文江（2002），重塑自我的遊戲：網路空間的人際交往，嘉義：南華大學社會研究所。
7. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J.(1999), “Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new technologies?”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 30(2), 361-391.
8. Anandarajan, M., Zaman, M., Dai, Q., & Arinze, B. (2010).“Generation Y adoption of instant messaging: An examination of the impact of social usefulness and media richness on use richness.” Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on, 53(2), 132-143.
9. Bagozzi, R. P. (1993). “On the neglect of volition in consumer research: A critique and proposal.”Psychology & Marketing, 10(3), 215-237.
10. Brown K.G. & Gerhardt M.W.(2002), “Formative evaluation: an integrated practice model and case study”, Personnel Psychology, Vol.55, pp. 951-983.
11. Dabholkar, P. A. (1996),“Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: an investigation of alternative models of service quality.”International Journal of research in Marketing, 13(1), 29-51.
12. Davis, F. D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly Vol.13(3), pp. 319-340.
13. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). “User acceptance of computer technology: a comparisonof two theoretical models.” Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
14. Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., & Grumbkow, J. v. (2007).“Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: the importance of social context.” Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 842-849.
15. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). “The repertoire of nonverbal behaviour: Categories, origins, usage and codings.” Semiotica, 1(1), 49-97.
16. Fishbein, Martin, Isek Ajzen, (1975), Belief, Attitude , Intention , and Behavior：An Introduction to Theory and Research, MA：Addison -Wesley.
17. Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). “Self-presentation in online personals the role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating.” Communication Research, 33(2), 152-177.
18. Grinter, R. E., & Palen,L. (2002),“Instant messaging in teen life.”,Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work.
19. Ha, I., Yoon, Y., Choi, M.(2007), “Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment”, Information & Management , Vol.44 (3), pp. 276-286.
20. Harrison, R. P. (1973),“Nonverbal communication. In King, S. S. (Ed.), Human communication as a field of study: Selected contemporary views.”Albany: State University of New York Press.
21. Holbrook, M. B. (1984). “Play as a consumption experience: The roles of emotions, performance, and personality in the enjoyment of games.”Journal of Consumer Research, 11(2), 728-739.
22. Huberman, B. A., Romero, D. M., & Wu, F. (2008). Social Networks that Matter:Twitter Under the Microscope. SSRN eLibrary.
23. Kenneth G. Brow(2005),“An Examination of the Structure and Nomological Network of Trainee Reactions: A Closer Look at “Smile Sheets”,”Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 90, No. 5, 991–1001.
24. Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A. (2002),“ Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction.” Australia: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
25. Krohn, F. B. (2004),“A Generational Approach to Using Emoticons as Nonverbal Communication.” Technical Writing and Communication, 34(4), 321-328.
26. Langeard, E., Bateson, J., Lovelock, C., & Eiglier, P. (1981),“ Marketing of services: New insights from consumers and managers. ”Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA,81-104
27. Li, D., Chua, P. Y., & Lu, H. (2005),“Understanding Individual Adoption of Instant Messaging: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(4).
28. Lu, Y., Zhou, T., & Wang, B. (2009),“Exploring Chinese users’ acceptance of instant messaging using the theory of planned behavior, the technology acceptance model, and the flow theory.”Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 29-39.
29. Msn Messenger (2015)。表情符號。民104年4月20日，取自：https://www.google.com.tw/search?q=MSN%E7%AC%A6%E8%99%9F&espv=2&biw=1280&bih=699&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=UyU2Ve6gF4W0mAXKw4HgCA&ved=0CBsQsAQ#imgrc=_
30. Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., & Bradner, E. (2000). Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action.Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work.
31. Rezabek, L. L., & Cochenour, J. J. (1998). Visual cues in computer-mediated communication: Supplementing text with emoticons. Journal of Visual Literacy, 18(2), 201-215.
32. Thompson, P. A., & Foulger, D. A. (1996). Effects of pictographs and quoting on flaming in electronic mail. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(2), 225-243.
33. Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time.Human Communication Research, 28(3),317-348.
34. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research,19(1), 52-90.
35. Wang, W., Hsieh, J. P.-A., & Song, B. (2012). Understanding User Satisfaction With Instant Messaging: An Empirical Survey Study. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(3), 153-162.
36. Yahoo Messenger (無日期)。表情圖示。民104年4月20日，取自：https://hk.messenger.yahoo.com/features/emoticons/
37. Ya-Yueh Shih; Kwoting Fang, “The use of a decomposed theory of planned behavior to studyOLEL”, Internet Research; 2004; 14, 3; ABI/INFORM Global, pg. 213-223