近年來，企業組織日漸致力於投資在發展IT能力，包括經營管理及關鍵企業流程等，諸如此類的IT服務能力。有鑑於此，如何使用有效的方法來回應變化快速的環境，以及適當的配置內部的IT資源，是企業首要考量的重要因素。
本研究主要在探究IT的適當配置，由IT主導邏輯的觀點，觀察其為因應企業所組成的環境和策略所需，設計並發展出來的IT管理理念及原則（Sambamurthy & Zmud,2000）。除此之外，本研究旨在探索組織文化如何影響企業導入IT相關活動時，其潛在的組織主導邏輯。
本研究採用個案研究的方法，以及紮根理論作為主要研究策略，探討慈濟醫院進行的兩項IT專案（分別為2009年的ISO27001:2005資訊安全認證及2010年的電子病歷管理系統驗證），並藉由深入分析，觀察慈濟的組織文化對進行IT相關資源的配置及管理上的IT主導邏輯潛在的影響為何，使之能夠有效率地進行IT相關活動的資源配置及管理。同時，本研究亦提及研究貢獻、啟示及未來的研究方向。

Organizations have increasingly invested in deploying IT for administrative operations and critical business processes in their ability to deliver those IT services. Accordingly, how to use effective way to deploy and arrange the firm’s IT resource in responding the rapid environmental change is now of critical importance to the firm.
This study aims to explore the IT deploy arrangements, in terms of IT dominant logic, which refers to the managerial rationale for designing and evolving specific organizational IT arrangements in response to an enterprise’s environmental and strategic imperatives(Sambamurthy & Zmud,2000). In addition, the study seeks to explore how organizational culture influences on the organizing dominant logics for IT activities.
This study employs the case study method and grounded theory as main research strategies. This study describes two IT projects (including information security management system certification and electronic medical records system verification) undertaken by a case organization, Tzu Chi Hospital, and through the in-depth examination of underlying influences of Tzu Chi’s culture on IT dominant logic a better way to deploy and manage IT resource more effectively is corroborated. The implications of the study and future research directions are also discussed.

中文部分
1.湯明哲，2002，主導邏輯也要改變，遠見雜誌，第192卷，頁42。
2.鈕文英，2012，質性研究方法與論文寫作，台北市：雙葉書廊。
3.劉汗曦，2012，由病人資訊隱私權觀點論我國全民電子病歷政策，碩士，國立政治大學
4.郭建志，2003，組織文化研究之回顧與前瞻，應用心理研究，第20期，頁83-114。
5.胡幼慧、姚美華，1996，一些質性方法上的思考，載於胡幼慧主編，質性研究，頁153，臺北：巨流。
6.何日生，2008，慈濟實踐美學─行入證嚴上人的思想與實踐（上）：生命美學，新店市：立緒文化。
7.何日生，2008，慈濟實踐美學─行入證嚴上人的思想與實踐（下）：情境美學，新店市：立緒文化。
8.黃興進、佘明玲、劉忠峰，2006，醫療資訊管理，臺灣健康資訊管理學會。
9.經濟部標準檢驗局，2005，資訊技術-安全技術-資訊安全管理系統-要求事項，CNS 27001。
10.簡文山等，2005，制訂及推動電子病歷內容基本格式之研究，醫療資訊雜誌，第14期，第4卷，頁1-9。
11.辛靜如，2012，主導邏輯與組織慣性對企業回應科技創新之影響：以國際音樂公司為例，碩士，國立臺灣大學。
12.徐敏嘉，2013，集團IT資源模組化管理-以慈濟醫院為例，碩士，國立臺灣科技大學。
13.徐其力，2002，組織文化對知識分享之影響研究，碩士，國立彰化師範大學。
14.徐宗國譯，1997，質性研究概論，臺北：巨流。
15.陳文欽，2009，淺談電子病歷實務，中央研究院計算中心通訊電子報，第23卷。
16.鄭祥麟、黃北豪、蔡敦浩，2006，從產業生態觀點構形中小企業國際化之行為：類型學取向--以投資越南的四個製造業為例，中山管理評論，第14卷，第1期，頁109-159。
17.財團法人佛教慈濟慈善事業基金會，2011，四分之一世紀的愛與感恩─慈濟醫療志業25周年，花蓮縣：作者。
18.吳知賢，1994，組織文化剖析，研考雙月刊，第18卷，第2期，頁45-60。
19.吳盈潔，2002，企業購併對組織文化與組織承諾之影響─以元大京華證券為例，碩士，國立中央大學。
英文部分
1.Arthur, W.B., Ermoliev, Y.M. & Kaniovski, Y.M., (1984), “Strong laws for a class of path-dependent stochastic processes with applications,” Stochastic Optimization, Berlin: Springer-Heidelberg, pp. 142-162.
2.Barley, S., Meyer, G. & Gash, D., (1988), “Cultures of culture: Academics, practitioners, and the pragmatics of normative control,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.33, pp.24-60.
3.Creswell, J.W., (1998), “Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions,” London: Sage.
4.Daft, R.L. & Lewin, A.Y.,(1990), “Can Organizations Begin to Break Out of the Normal Science Straightjacket? An Editorial Essay,” Organizational Science, Vol. 1, pp.1-9.
5.Daft, R.L., (1998), “Organisation Theory and design (6th ed),” Mason, Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning.
6.Davis, S., (1985), “Culture is not just an internal affair,” Gaining control of the Corporate Culture, SF: Jossey-Bass.
7.Deal, T.E. & Kennedy, A.A., (1982), “Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life,” Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8.Denison, D.R., (1990), “Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness,” NY: John Wiley & Sons.
9.Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.), (2005), “The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (4th ed.),” London: Sage.
10.Dixon, P.J. & John, D.A., (1989), “Technology issues facing corporate management in the 1990s,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp.247–255.
11.Eisenhardt, K.M., (1989), “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of management review, Vol.14, No.4, pp.532-550.
12.Flick, U., (2006), “An Introduction to Qualitative Research (4th ed.),” London: Sage.
13.Glaser, B. & Strauss, A., (1967). “The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research,” Chicago: Aldine.
14.Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D.D. & Sanders, G., (1990), “Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35, pp.286-316.
15.ISO/IEC 17799 – Information technology – Code of Practice for Information Security Management, Second edition, ISO, 2005.
16.ISO/IEC 27001 – Information technology – Information security management systems – Requirements, First edition, ISO, 2000.
17.Kilmann, R.H., Saxton, M.J. & Serpa, R., (1985), “Five Key Issues In Understanding and Change Culture,” Gaining Control of Corporate Culture, SF: Jossey-Bass.
18.Kim, K.Y. & Surendran, K., (2002), “Information security management curriculum design: A joint industry and academic effort,” Journal of Information Systems Education, Vol. 13, No.3, pp.227-235.
19.Kotter, J.P. & Heskett, J.L., (1992), “Corporate culture and performance,” NY: Free Press.
20.Kvale, S., (1996), “InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing,” Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.Kvale, S. & Brinkmann, S., (2009), “InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing,” Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
22.Lincoln, Y.S & Guba, E.G., (1985), “Naturalistic Inquiry,” Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.Lorsch, J.W., (1985), “Strategic Myopia: Culture as an invisible Barrier to Change,” Gaining control of the corporate culture, SF: Jossey-Bass.
24.Maanen, J.V. & Barley S.R., (1985), “Cultural Organization: Fragments of a Theory,” Organizational Culture, Beverly Hills: Sage.
25.Martin, J., Sitkin, S.B. & Boehm, M., (1985), “Founders and the elusiveness of a cultural legacy,” In P.J. Frost, L.F. Moore, M. Louis, C. Lundberg & J. Martin (Eds.), Organizational culture, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.Minichiello ,V., Aroni,R., Timewell, E. & Alexander, L., (1995), “In-depth Interviewing(2nd ed),” South Melbourne: Longman.
27.Neuman, W.L., (1994), “Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches,” Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
28.Ott, J.S., (1989), “The organizational culture perspective,” Chicago: Dorsey Press.
29.Ouchi, W.G., (1981), “Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge,” Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
30.O'Reilly, C.A., (1989), “Corporations, culture, and commitment: Motivation and social control in organizations,” California Management Review, Vol.31, No.4, pp.9-25.
31.Peters, T. J., & Waterman, JR. R. H., (1982), “In search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies,” NY: Harper & Row.
32.Pettigrew, A.M., (1979), “On studying organizational cultures,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.24, pp.570-581.
33.Piore, M.J., (2006), “Qualitative research: does it fit in economics,” European Management Review, Vol.3, pp.17-23.
34.Pondy, L.R. & Mitroff, I.I., (1979), “Beyond open system models of organization,” Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.1, No.1, pp.3-39.
35.Prahalad, C.K. & Bettis, R.A., (1986), “The Dominant Logic: A new Linkage Between Diversity and Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.7, No.6, pp. 485-501.
36.Robbins, S.P., (2000), “Management today (2nd ed.),” Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
37. Robbins, S.P., (2001), “Organization Behavior (9th ed.),” New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
38.Rutherford, M., (1994), “Institution in Economics: The Old and the New Institutionalism,” UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.Sambamurthy, V. & Zmud, R.W., (2000), “Research Commentary: The organizing logic for an enterprise’s IT activities in the digital era—A prognosis of practice and a call for research,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp.105–114.
40.Schein, E.H., (1985), “Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View,” SF: Jossey-Bass.
41.Schwartz, H., & Davis, S.M., (1981), “Matching corporate culture and business strategy,” Organizational Dynamics, Vol.10, No.1, pp.30-48.
42.Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J. & Silverman, D.(Eds), (2004) “Qualitative Research Practice,” London: Sage.
43.Senge, P. M., (1990), “The Fifth Discipline-The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization,” NY: Doubleday.
44.Serpa, R.,(1985), “Creating a candid corporate culture,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.4, No.5, pp.425-430.
45.Shafritz, J.M & Ott, J.S.,(1987), “Classics of organization theory,” San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace College.
46.Simon, H., (1957), “Administrative Behavior,” NY: Macllillan.
47.Smircich, L., (1983a), “Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.28, pp.339-358.
48.Smirich, L., (1983b), “Organizations as shared meanings,” Organizational symbolism, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
49.Sorensen, J.B., (2002), “The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.47, No.1, pp.70-91.
50.Strauss, A. & Corbin, J., (1990), “Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques,” Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51.Strauss, A. & Corbin, J., (1998), “Basics of Qualitative Research：Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory,” Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
52.Tesch, R.C., (1990), “Qualitative Research：Analysis types & software tools,” NY: Falmer.
53.Waldrop, M.M.,(1992), “Complexity: The Emerging Science at The Edge of Order and Chaos,”, NY: Simon and Schuster.
54.Walsh, J.P. & Ungson, G.R., (1991), “Organization Memory,” Academy of Management Review, Vol.16, No. 1, pp.59-71.
55.Williams, M., (1997), “Social Surveys: Design to Analysis,” Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
56.Yin, R.K., (1994), “Case Study Research: Design and Methods,” Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.