簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 方維鴻
Wei-hung Fang
論文名稱: 圖像文字設計的情緒認知
A Study on Event-Related Potential and Emotion Dimensions Evoked by Pictorial Character Design
指導教授: 王韋堯
Regina W. Y. Wang
口試委員: 宋同正
Tung-Jung Sung
鄭仕坤
none
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 設計學院 - 設計系
Department of Design
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 112
中文關鍵詞: 圖像文字圖字意義聯結性結構完整性事件相關電位情緒維度創造力
外文關鍵詞: pictorial character, word-picture linkage, structural integrity, event-related potential (ERP), emotion dimension, creativity
相關次數: 點閱:285下載:12
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究以「圖像文字設計」為主題,進行「事件相關腦電位(ERP)」、「情緒維度」與「創造力」之關係研究。研究目的:(1)透過收集圖像文字設計樣本,了解其「圖字意義聯結性」與「結構完整性」兩設計特徵。(2)透過腦波實驗,研究設計特徵對觀者ERP振幅的影響。(3)透過問卷實驗,研究設計特徵對觀者「情緒維度」及「創造力」的影響。(4)綜合探討設計特徵影響之「情緒維度」與「創造力」的關係。(5)綜合探討觀者「ERP」與「情緒維度」的關係。
    研究發現:
    (1)經文獻探討與設計特徵分析,圖像文字設計之圖字意義聯結性可以分成「高度聯結、中度聯結、低度聯結」;結構完整性可分成「筆劃、輪廓、部件」。其中「高度聯結」與「筆劃」在特徵中數量為做多,兩者的搭配亦是如此;「中度聯結」搭配「輪廓」數量最少。

    (2)認知腦波實驗結果:「圖字意義聯結性」對於觀者在「情緒(P200與P300)與記憶(SW)」波段,圖字意義聯結性越高,引起之ERP振幅越大。「結構完整性」對於觀者在「注意(N100)」波段,筆劃(完整性低)與部件(完整性高)的結構完整性影響最大;在「情緒(P300)」波段時,完整性越高,引起之ERP振幅越大。觀者在「記憶(SW)」階段時,「圖字意義聯結性與結構完整性」在大腦位置「中央」電極產生的活化作用大於「左腦與右腦」電極,大腦處理視覺訊息沒有產生偏側效應。觀者在「情緒(P200、N200、P300)與記憶(SW)」階段時,隨著認知過程時間遞進,大腦活化的情形為由「額葉」電極轉移至「頂葉」電極。

    (3)認知問卷調查結果:兩設計特徵中,圖字意義聯結性中度與結構完整性中度,引起之情緒越正效價;圖字意義聯結性越高,引起之情緒越高喚起。而圖字意義聯結性中度(含)以下,感受之創造力越高;結構完整性中度(含)以上,感受之創造力越高。情緒維度(效價、喚起)與創造力的關係為「正相關」。

    (4)比較「ERP實驗」與「情緒維度實驗」結果發現:觀者ERP振幅與「情緒效價」關係為:在「圖字意義聯結性」的條件下,ERP振幅越大,則情緒越負效價;在「結構完整性」的條件下,ERP振幅越大,則情緒越負效價。觀者ERP振幅與「情緒喚起」關係為:在「圖字意義聯結性」的條件下,ERP振幅越大,則情緒越高喚起;在「結構完整性」的條件下,則無顯著差異。ERP振幅與「情緒效價」的關係為「負相關」;ERP振幅與「情緒喚起」關係部分成立,在圖字意義聯結性下為「正相關」。


    This study focuses on “pictorial character design” and explores its relationship with “event-related potential (ERP)”, “emotion dimensions” and “creativity”. The purposes of this study are: (1) to find out the design features of “word-picture linkage” and “structural integrity” by collecting samples of pictorial characters; (2) to investigate the influence of the two design features on the viewer’s ERP amplitude through brainwave experiment; (3) to explore the influence of the two design features on the viewer’s “emotion dimensions” and “creativity” by questionnaire survey; (4) to investigate into the relations between “emotion dimensions” and “creativity”; (5) to investigate into the relations between the viewer’s “ERP” and “emotion dimensions”.

    We have the following findings based on the research results:
    1.According to the contents in literature review and analysis of design features, word-picture linkage can be divided into “high, medium, and low linkage”, and structural integrity into “stroke, outline, and stroke-pattern”. Among them, “high linkage” and “stroke” are both in the majority, and so is their combination. In contrast, “medium linkage” with “outline” is in the minority.
    2.The result of brainwave experiment shows that for viewers in “emotion (P200, P300) and memory (SW)” component, the higher the word-picture linkage, the greater the evoked ERP amplitude will be. In terms of structural integrity, for viewers in “attention (N100)” component, stroke (low integrity) and stroke-pattern (high integrity) have greatest influence on structural integrity; in “emotion (P300)” component, the higher the integrity, the greater the evoked ERP amplitude will be. For viewers in “memory (SW)” component, word-picture linkage and structural integrity produce greater activation in central brain than in left and right brain — no lateralization effects occur when the brain is processing visual messages. For viewers in “emotion (P200, N200, P300) and memory (SW)” component, activation in the brain goes from frontal lobe to parietal lobe with the passage of time in cognition.
    3.The result of cognition survey shows that for the two design features, medium word-picture linkage and structural integrity evoked more positive valence; the higher the word-picture linkage, the higher arousal in emotion will be evoked. Perceived creativity will become higher once word-picture linkage is medium and below, and structural integrity is medium and above. Emotion dimensions (valence and arousal) are positively correlated to creativity.
    4.A comparison of “ERP experiment” and “emotion dimensions” shows that in terms of “word-picture linkage”, the greater the ERP amplitude, the more negative valence will occur in emotion dimension; in terms of “structural integrity”, the greater the ERP amplitude, the more negative valence will occur in emotion dimension. As for the relationship between viewers’ ERP amplitude and “emotion arousal”, in terms of “word-picture linkage”, the greater the ERP amplitude, the higher arousal will occur in emotion dimension; in terms of “structural integrity”, no significant difference will be made. “ERP amplitude” is negatively correlated to “emotional valence”; the relation of “ERP amplitude” with “emotion arousal” is partially valid, and they are “positively correlated” in terms of word-picture linkage.

    中文摘要i ABSTRACTii 致謝iv 目次v 圖目次vii 表目次ix 第1章 緒論1 1.1 研究背景與動機1 1.2 研究目的2 1.3 研究假設2 1.4 研究名詞定義3 1.5 研究限制與範圍5 1.6 研究流程6 第2章 文獻探討7 2.1 圖像文字7 2.1.1 圖像文字設計7 2.1.2 圖字意義聯結性8 2.1.3 結構完整性9 2.2 情緒11 2.2.1 情緒的定義11 2.2.2 事件相關電位(ERP)12 2.2.3 認知情緒維度15 2.2.4 情緒維度與ERP18 2.3 創造力22 第3章 研究方法25 3.1 樣本設計25 3.1.1 圖像文字設計特徵26 3.1.2 腦波實驗樣本設計29 3.2認知腦波實驗(ERP)31 3.2.1 腦波實驗架構31 3.2.2 腦波實驗樣本設計33 3.2.3 腦波實驗受測者33 3.2.4 腦波實驗環境、設備33 3.2.5 實驗步驟34 3.2.6 腦波資料處理與數據分析方法36 3.3 情緒維度問卷實驗38 3.3.1 問卷實驗架構38 3.3.2 問卷實驗樣本設計39 3.3.3 問卷設計39 3.3.4 問卷實驗對象、設備、環境40 3.3.5 問卷實驗步驟40 3.3.6 資料分析方法41 第4章 研究結果42 4.1 認知腦波實驗結果42 4.1.1 「圖字意義聯結性」對不同「大腦區域」電極之ERP振幅45 4.1.2 「結構完整性」對不同「大腦區域」電極之ERP振幅49 4.1.3 ERP實驗假設驗證53 4.2 認知問卷實驗結果55 4.2.1 圖像文字設計對「情緒維度」55 4.2.2 圖像文字設計對「創造力」59 4.2.3 圖像文字設計之「情緒維度」與「創造力」的關係62 4.2.4 情緒維度與創造力問卷假設驗證63 4.3 情緒ERP實驗與情緒維度結果比較66 4.4 驗證結果之綜合討論68 4.4.1 認知腦波實驗綜合討論69 4.4.2 情緒問卷實驗綜合討論70 4.4.3 情緒ERP實驗與情緒維度結果比較之綜合討論72 第5章 結論與建議73 5.1 結論73 5.2 後續研究建議74 參考文獻76 附錄A:收集之105個樣本81 附錄B:ERP實驗前測結果統整83 附錄C:ERP實驗84個樣本設計85 附錄D:情緒維度問卷格式92

    Ang, S. H., S. Y. M. Low (2000), "Exploring the dimensions of ad creativity," Psychology and marketing, Vol. 17, Issue 10, pp. 835-54.
    Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
    Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in contex: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Oxford: Westview Press.
    Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). Extension of the consensual assessment technique to nonparallel creative products. Creativity research journal, Vol.16, pp. 113–117.
    Carretié, L., Iglesias, J., & García, T. (1997). A study on the emotional processing of visual stimuli through event related potentials. Brain and Cognition, 34, 207-217.
    Carretie, L., & Iglesias, J.(1994). ERPs elicited by photographically mixed facial expressions [Abstract]. Psychophysiology, 8, 252–253.
    Carretie, L., Hinojosa, J. A., ,Albert, J., & Mercado, F.(2006). Neural response to sustained affective visual stimulation using an indirect task. Experimental Brain Research, 174, 630–637.
    Carretie, L., Hinojosa, J. A., Martin-Loeches, M., Mercado, F., & Tapia,M.(2004a). Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: neural correlates. Human Brain Mapping, 22, 290–299.
    Carretie, L., Martin-Loeches, M. Hinojosa, J. A., & Mercado, F.(2001). Emotion and attention interaction studied through event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 1109–1128.
    Chen, Y. P., Allport, D. A., & Marshall, J. C. (1996). What Are the Functional Orthographic Units in Chinese Word Recognition: The Stroke or the Stroke Pattern?
    Cavanagh, J., & Geisler, M. W. (2005). Mood effects on the ERP processing of emotional intensity in faces: A P3 investigation with depressed students. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60(2006), 27-33.
    Caves, R. E., Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce,Cambridge,Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2000, pp.2-8,178-200.
    Caroff, X. & Besançon, M.(2008), Learning and individual differences, Vol. 18, Issue 4, pp 367-371.
    Dolcos, F., & Cabeza, R. (2002). Event-related potentials of emotional memory: Encoding pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(3), 252-263.
    Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K., & James, T. A. (2004), Creativity and openness: further validation of two creative product measures, Creativity research journal, Vol. 16, pp. 35−47.
    Delplanque, S., Silvert, L., Hot, P., & Sequeira, H.(2006b). Attentional modulation of appraisal in emotion: the case of the P3b. Psychophysiology, 43, S7.
    Delplanque, S., Silvert, L., Hot, P., Rigoulot, S., &,Sequeira, H.(2006a). Arousal and valence effects on event-related P3a and P3b during emotional categorization. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 315–322.
    Eisenberg, J. & Thompson, W.F (2003), A matter of taste: evaluating improvised music, Creativity research journal, Volume 15, Issue 2-3, pp. 287-296.
    Fleur, J.M. Laros, Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp.(2005). Emotions in consumer behavior: a hierarchical approach. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1437–1445
    . Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 49(4), 1024-1043.
    Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W.(2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 191–197.
    Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1988). Story-tellig: A method for assessing children’s creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 22, 235-246.
    Kaufman, J.C., Baer, J. & Cole, J.C., (2009), Expertise, domains, and the consensual assessment technique, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp. 223-233.
    Kayser, J., Tenke, C., Nordby, H., Hammerborg, D., Hugdahl, K., & Erdmann, G. (1997). Event-related potential (ERP) asymmetries to emotional stimuli in a visual half-field paradigm. Psychophysiology, 34(1997), 414-426.
    Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation. Arkana, London.
    Kover, Arthur J. and Stephen M. Goldberg (1995), "The Games Advertising Copywriters Play: Conflict, Quasi-Control, A New Proposal," Journal of Advertising Research, 35(July/August), 52-62.
    Luk, G., & Bialystok, E. (2005). How iconic are Chinese characters? Bilingualism, 8(1), 79-83.
    Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual Technical Report A-6. Gainesville: University of Florida.
    Lee, S., Lee, J., & Youn, C. -Y. (2005). A variation of CAT for measuring creativity in business products. The Korean journal of thinking & problem solving, Vol. 15, pp. 143−153.
    Machleit, K. A., & Eroglu, S. A.(2000). Decribing and Measuring Emotional Response to Shopping Experience. Journal of Business Research, 49, 101–111.
    Machleit, K. A., & Mante, S. P.(2004). Emotional response and shopping satisfaction Moderating effects of shopper attributions. Jouranl of Business Research, 54, 97-106.
    Mardaga, S., & Hansenne, M. (2009). Personality modulation of P300 wave recorded within an emotional oddball protocol. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology, 2009(39), 41-48.
    Mardaga, S., & Hansenne, M. (2009). Personality modulation of P300 wave recorded within an emotional oddball protocol. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology, 2009(39), 41-48.
    Olofsson J. K., Nordin S., Sequeira H., & Polich J.(2008). Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings. Biological Psychology, 77, 247–265.
    Pick, D. F., J. Sweeney, J. A. Clay ( 1991 ), "Creative advertising and the von restorff effect, Psychological reports, Vol. 69, Issue 3, pp. 923-26.
    Pieters, R., L. Warlop, M. Wedel(2002), "Breaking through the clutter: benefits of advertisement originality and familiarity for brand attention and memory, Management science, pp. 765-81.
    Postrel, V. (2004). 風格美感經濟學 (閻蕙群 & 陳俐雯, Trans.). 台北: 商智文化.
    Radilova, J., Figar, S., & Radil, T.(1983). Sexual arousal and visual perception. Activitas Nervosa Superior, 25, 168–170.
    Rozenkrants, B., & Polich, J. (2008). Affective ERP processing in a visual oddball task: arousal, valence, and gender. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119, 2260-2265.
    Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-1178.
    Russell, J. A. (2003). Core Affect and the Psychological Construction of Emotion. psychological Review, 110(1), 145-172.
    Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (1999). Core Affect, Prototypical Emotional Episodes, and Other Things Called Emotion: Dissecting the Elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(76), 805-819.
    Russell, J. A., Weiss, A., & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1989). Affect Grid: A Single-Item Scale of Pleasure and Arousal Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 493-502.
    Schmitt, B. H. (1999). Experientail marketing, New York: The free press.
    Seva, R. R. (2006). The marketing implications of affective product design. Nanyang technological University, Singapore.
    Smith, R. E., S. B. MacKenzie, X. Yang, L. M. Buchholz, W. K. Darley (2007), “Modeling the determinants and effects of creativity in advertising, Marketing science, Vol. 26, Issue 6, pp. 19-33.
    Smith, R., & Yang, X. ( 2004 ). Towards a general theory of creativity: examining the role of divergence. Marketing theory, Vol. 4, issue (1/2), pp.31-58.
    Spreckelmeyer, K. N., Kutas, M., Urbach, T. P., Altenmuller, E., Munte, T. F.(2006). Combined perception of emotion in pictures and musical sounds.Brain Research, 1070, 160–170.
    Stermberg, R. J. (1998). The triarchic mind: A theory of human intelligence. New York: Viking.
    Stermberg, R. J. Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677-688.
    Strongman, K. T. (1993). 情緒心理學(游恆山譯)。台北市:五南圖書
    Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the hauman visaul system. Nature, 381, 520-522.
    Till, B. D. and D. W. Baack ( 2005 ), “Recall and persuasion: does creativity matter? journal of advertising, Vol. 34, issue 3, pp.47-57.
    Veen, V. v., & Carter, C. S. (2002). The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies. Physiology & Behavior 77, 477- 482.
    Wang, R. W. Y. (2007). The study on packaging illustration affect on buying emotion. Singapore: IASDR 2007.
    Widen, S. C., & Russell, H. A. (2001). Children's Scales of Pleasure and Arousal. Paper presented at the APS Conference.
    王光福 (1993)。中文美術字設計技法。台北:大孚書局.
    王韋堯, & 周穆謙 (2001)。商業包裝設計之中文商標文字識認性研究。2001年基礎造形展暨視覺傳達研討會,151-156。
    王迺琪(2004)。購物頻道之環境因素對消費者情緒與行為意圖的影響:以認知需求與產品涉入調節效果驗證。國立東華大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。
    丘永福 (2005)。字學。台北:藝風堂。
    江春枝 (1991)。創新美術字體。臺南:信宏出版社。
    江蘭(1996)。消費者心理認知對產品包裝視覺設計之影響─以台灣飲料為例。大葉工學院工業設計研究所碩士論文。
    行政院衛生署國民健康局。操作電腦終端機視力保健須知。檢自:http://hercom.bhp.doh.gov.tw/educzone/edu_detail.aspx?catid=10016
    余泰魁、林益民(2002)。情境擾動影響電子商店購物行為之研究。資訊管理展望,4(1)。
    吳月鳳(2002)。商店氣氛對消費者情緒與購買行為之影響研究─以高速公路服務區為例。國立高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理所碩士論文。
    吳月鳳(2003)。商店氣氛對消費者情緒與購買行為之影響研究─以高速公路服務區為例。國立高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理所碩士論文。
    吳佳穎 (2006)。包裝圖像文字之情緒維度與腦事件相關電位研究. 國立台灣科技大學,台北。
    吳懿雯 (2004)。服務業中顧客參與、情緒和滿意度間關係之研究-主題樂園為例。國立東華大學, 花蓮。
    邱百榆(2006)。以事件相關電位探討年輕成人情緒覺知之特性:以臉部表情為例。長庚大學臨床行為科學研究所碩士論文。
    邱珮華(2009)。集合包裝功能視覺設計之情緒維度與ERP研究。國立台灣科技大學設計研究所碩士論文。
    李天來 (1998)。新視覺設計文字應用設計。台北:羲之堂文化。
    李紹蘭 & 楊平(2005)。漢字字體設計中的圖形意味。包裝工程 Packaging Engineering,26(4)。
    李尉郎 (2004)。圖像文字中圖像意涵與替換位置對視認性之影響. 國立臺灣科技大學, 台北。
    周穆謙, & 王韋堯 (2007)。設計師與消費者在食品包裝理解力傳達設計之認知差異. 設計學報, 12(4), 21-42。
    林尹 (2007)。文字學概說。台北:中正書局。
    林品章 (1990)。字學。台北:星狐出版社。
    林衢序、裴育晟、鍾佳英、鄭寶釵、陳嘉玲、黃美涓(2005)。正常人之視覺空間注意力事件誘發電位。臺灣復健醫學雜誌,33(1),10。
    邱皓政 (2005)。創造力的測量與共識衡鑑。教育集刊,30,50-73。
    胡劍鋒、熊建英、何科榮(2008)。應用neuroscan腦電紀錄系統評價概念相似漢字與圖片加工的事件相關電位差異。中國組織工程研究與臨床康復,12(30),5896-5899。
    袁之琦、游恆山(1993)。心理學名詞辭典。台北:五南圖書。
    孫漢傑 (1997)。文字設計表現在平面廣告之研究。國立台灣科技大學,台北。
    馬顯彬 (2000)。漢字筆劃定量研究。語文建設通訊,36,21-25。
    陶春麗、羅非(2004)。新異刺激模型和P300。生理科學進展,35(3),265-268。
    張道一 (1996)。美哉漢字。台北:漢聲文化。
    程雅伶(2007)。燈飾造型愉悅性之研究。大同大學工業設計研究所碩士論文。
    黃宇霞、羅躍嘉(2004)。情緒的ERP相關成分與心境障礙的ERP變化。心理科學發展,12(1),10-17。
    黃鎣涓(2008)。在感性消費時代中的創意包裝設計。包裝工程 Packaging Engineering,29(6),3。
    陳汶軍(2008)。包裝插畫喚起之情緒維度與事件相關電位研究。國立台灣科技大學設計研究所碩士論文。
    陳翰平(2001)。商店氣氛對情緒與趨避行為影響之研究。高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理系碩士論文。
    陳俊宏, & 姚村雄 (2001)。品牌文字造型變化對消費者熟悉商品包裝之意象與識別效果影響研究。台中技術學院商業設計學報。
    陳宥升 (2004)。中英文美術字體設計。台北:北星圖書公司.
    陳新華 (2008)。元素與原創:識別設計能力基礎訓練。南京:江蘇美術出版社。
    陳簾伃(2004)。體驗品質對情緒、價值、體驗滿意度、承諾及行為意圖影響之研究─以台灣現代戲劇演出為例。天主教輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
    買曉琴、羅躍嘉(2004)。自然物體分類的ERP研究。心理科學進展,12(2),168-175。
    馮觀富(2005)。情緒心理學。台北市:心理。
    潘永裕(2007)。商店氣氛、消費者情緒、體驗價值對行為意向之影響-以誠品信義旗艦店為例。國立台北大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。
    黃冠豪(2009)。包裝造形設計之情緒維度與ERP研究。國立臺灣科技大學設計研究所碩士論。
    程雅伶(2007)。燈飾造型愉悅性之研究。大同大學工業設計研究所碩士論文。
    蔡登傳 (2001)。應用文字的字形描述值評估其視認度研究。國立台灣科技大學,臺北。
    鄧成連 (1990)。現代包裝設計三版。台北:北星。
    鄧建國、莊明振(2008)。應用情感喚醒的造形聯想設計模式探討。設計學報,13(3),81-88。
    鄭盈吟(2006)。意旁結合度、意旁表意透明度對中文閱讀的影響。中央大學認知神經科學研究所碩士論文。
    盧國屏, & 黃立楷 (2008)。當代文字學概論。
    顏鎮榮 (1998)。設計字法。臺北:全華科技圖書。
    蘇宗雄 (1985)。文字造形與文字編排。臺北:檸檬黃文化事業。

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2015/07/22 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE