簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 盧麗玉
LI-YU LU
論文名稱: 高中職學生手機使用行為對教室行為之影響
The Effects of mobile phone use on vocational high school students' behaviors in classroom
指導教授: 朱如君
Ju-Chun Chu
翁楊絲茜
Sz-chien Wengyang
口試委員: 朱子君
Anita-Zichun Chu
王淑玲
Shu-ling Wang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 數位學習與教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 118
中文關鍵詞: 手機使用行為同儕人際互動關係學習態度學習行為班級經營
外文關鍵詞: mobile phone use behavior, peer interpersonal interaction, learning attitude, learning behavior, classroom management
相關次數: 點閱:457下載:13
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

本研究旨在探討高中職學生手機使用行為對教室行為與教師班級經營之影響。透過混合式研究法,以紙本問卷調查與質性半結構式訪談的方式,取樣一所高中職業學校之學生,受試者問卷發放300份,回收有效樣本263份,問卷回收率為88%。量化之問卷經由項目分析和信度分析之統計方法,刪除不適當之題項,並藉由描述行統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關與同時多元迴歸分析等方法進行統計考驗。質性之半結構式訪談針對三位正式教師進行訪談,以更深入了解高中職學生手機使用行為之情形與對教師班級經營之影響。量化研究結果發現,高中職學生手機使用行為中「手機學習行為」與「一般行為」之子構面對「學習態度」、「學習行為」之構面具有顯著影響。在質性分析結果亦發現,當學生於課堂上呈現正面的手機使用行為時,會表現出較為積極正向的學習態度與學習行為。本研究最後依據分析結果提出結論與建議,供教育工作者、家長、政府教育單位以及未來相關研究者參考。


The objective of this study is to explore the effects of mobile phone use on vocational high school students' classroom behavior and teachers’ classroom management. The study utilized a mixed method, intergrated questionnaire survey with qualitative semi-structured interviews. The samples were collected from 300 students in a vocational high school in the south of Taiwan. The valid returns were 263 and the valid return rate was 88%. First, the questionnaires were analyzed by using reliability analysis and exploratory factor analysis to eliminate the data unsuited for this study. Next, descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, perarson’s product-moment correlation, and simultaneous multiple regression analysis were applied for data analysis. To investigate how mobile phone use behavior affects vocational high school students' classroom behavior, three teachers were also invited to participate in qualitative semi-structured interviews. The result showed that “mobile phone learning behavior” and “normal behavior” of mobile phone use behavior have significant influences on students’ “learning attitude” and “learning behavior”. In addition, the result of qualitative analysis showed that when students are having positive mobile phone use behaviors during classes, their “learning attitude” and “learning behavior” became more positive as well. Finally, according to the results, the study provides suggestions for educators, parants, government educational units, and future research.

論文摘要I AbstractII 誌謝III 第一章 緒論1 第一節研究動機1 第二節研究目的與研究問題4 第三節名詞釋義5 第四節研究範圍與限制6 第五節預期研究貢獻8 第二章 文獻探討9 第一節學生教室行為9 第二節 手機改變學生行為15 第三節 偏鄉─數位落差17 第四節 班級經營19 第三章 研究方法22 第一節 研究架構與研究假設22 第二節 研究設計與研究流程23 第三節 研究對象25 第四節 研究工具26 第五節 預試問卷題項分析30 第六節 資料處理與分析方法41 第四章 研究結果47 第一節問卷回收與信度分析47 第二節 個人基本資料之描述性統計49 第三節 平均數差異檢定與平均數變異分析57 第四節 手機使用行為、同儕人際互動關係、學習態度與學習行為之皮爾森績差相關分析與多元迴歸分析62 第五節 教師班級經營質性訪談資料分析66 第五章 結論與討論77 第一節討論與結論77 第二節未來建議81 參考文獻85 附錄95 附錄一 專家效度問卷95 附錄二 手機使用行為問卷105 附錄三 學習態度問卷108 附錄四 學習行為問卷108 附錄五 同儕人際互動關係問卷109 附錄六 訪談大綱110 圖目錄 圖3-1-1 研究架構圖22 圖3-2-1 研究流程圖24 圖3-6-1 受訪者A之概念圖44 圖3-6-2 受訪者B之概念圖45 圖3-6-3 受訪者A與B共同點之概念46 圖4-5-1 受訪者C之概念圖67 圖4-5-2 受訪者D之概念圖68 圖4-5-3 受訪者E之概念圖69 圖4-5-4 正式受訪者共同點之概念圖70 圖4-5-5 預試與正式受訪者共同點之概念圖71 表目錄 表3-3-1 受訪者個人基本資料26 表3-5-1 預試樣本之個人基本資料摘要表 (n=136)31 表3-5-2 預試樣本之手機使用概況摘要表34 表3-5-2 預試樣本之手機使用概況摘要表(續)35 表3-5-3 預試樣本之手機使用概況描述性統計摘要表35 表3-5-4 預試樣本之手機使用行為之探索性因素分析結果36 表3-5-4 預試樣本之手機使用行為之探索性因素分析結果(續)37 表3-5-5 預試樣本之學習態度之探索性因素分析結果38 表3-5-6 預試樣本之學習行為之探索性因素分析結果39 表3-5-7 手機使用行為、同儕人際互動關係、學習態度、學習行為之題項彙整表40 表3-5-7 手機使用行為、同儕人際互動關係、學習態度、學習行為之題項彙整表(續)41 表4-1-1 總信度與題項摘要表48 表4-1-1 總信度與題項摘要表(續)49 表4-2-1 樣本之個人基本資料摘要表 (n=263)50 表4-2-2 到目前為止使用手機幾年摘要表 (n=263)51 表4-2-3 到目前為止使用過幾支手機摘要表 (n=262)51 表4-2-4 擁有手機的主要理由摘要表 (n=263)52 表4-2-5 手機是如何獲得摘要表 (n=263)52 表4-2-6 如果要自己行購買手機,可以接受的手機價位摘要表 (n=263)53 表4-2-7 平均每個月手機電信費用摘要表 (n=263)53 表4-2-8 每個月手機通話費用,通常是由誰付錢摘要表 (n=263)54 表4-2-9 最常使用手機通話的時段摘要表 (n=263)54 表4-2-10使用手機最常通話的對象之描述性統計摘要表55 表4-2-11 手機使用行為之描述性統計摘要表55 表4-2-12 同儕人際互動關係之描述性統計摘要表56 表4-2-13 學習態度之描述性統計摘要表56 表4-2-14 學習行為之描述性統計摘要表56 表4-3-1 各構面之性別分析t檢定58 表4-3-2 不同就讀年級之各構面差異分析表59 表4-3-3 不同年齡之各構面差異分析表60 表4-3-4 不同手機使用年限之各構面差異分析表61 表4-4-1 手機使用行為與同儕人際互動關係、學習態度、學習行為之相關矩陣表63 表4-4-2 手機使用行為對於一般同儕互動之迴歸分析摘要表64 表4-4-3 手機使用行為對於社群同儕互動之迴歸分析摘要表65 表4-4-4 手機使用行為對於學習態度之迴歸分析摘要表65 表4-4-5 手機使用行為對於學習行為之迴歸摘要表66 表4-5-1 受訪者個人基本資料66

吳清山(1991)。班級經營的基本概念。載於吳清山,班級經營(3-28頁)。台北:心理出版社。
吳清基 (1988)。班級教室管理, 教師天地, 33, 44-49。
吳瓊汝(1998)。國中學生之學習態度。台灣教育,566,44-50。
林慧姿、程景琳(2006)。國小六年級學童自尊、情緒調節與友誼之相關研究。教育心理學報,38(2),177-193。
金車教育基金會(2011a)。青少年使用行動電話調查報告。取自:http://kingcar.org.tw/newsDetail.php?id=32
金車教育基金會(2011b)。教師對校園、教育感觀。取自:http://www.kingcar.org.tw/newsDetail.php?id=50
金武昌(2005)。影響高級職業進修學校學生學習態度之研究。中正高工學報,5,53-62。
秦永悌(2007)。高中職學生手機使用行為、人際互動與社會支持的相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
秦夢群(1992)。高中教師管理心態、學生內外控信念與學生學習習慣與態度關係之研究。教育與心理研究,15,129-172。
翁淑綠、陳惠玉(2004)。同儕對青少年偏差行為之影響。師說,183,54-57。
財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(簡稱:TWNIC)(2011)。台灣無線網路使用調查報告。取自:http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/20121226d.pdf
財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(簡稱:TWNIC)(2012)。台灣寬頻網路使用調查。取自:http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/20121226d.pdf
粘絢雯、程景琳(2010)。國中班級經營與班級氣氛相關因素之探討:關係攻擊與關係受害。教育實踐與研究,23(1),57-84。
陳啟榮(2005)。態度之探究與學習態度。菁莪季刊,17,53-65。
雷庚玲、曾慧芸(1999)。誰說我不聽話,我聽朋友的話─談青少年社會同儕順從行為之發展與成因。測驗與輔導,153,3178-3182。
聯合行銷研究股份有限公司(2011)。100 年個人/家戶數位機會調查報告。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託之調查報告。台北市:行政院研究發展考核委員會。
聯合行銷研究股份有限公司(2012)。101 年個人/家戶數位機會調查報告。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託之調查報告。台北市:行政院研究發展考核委員會。
謝易裕(2003)。因應高職多元升學管道談高職學生學習困擾與學習態度。師說,177,30-33。
謝美英(1998)。青少年同儕關係與倫理。訓育研究,37(3),55-60。
簡紅珠(1996)。國小專家與新手教師班級經營管理實作與決定之研究。教育研究資訊,4(4),36-48。
Allen, J., Robbins, S. B., Casillas, A., & Oh, S. (2008). Third-year college retention and transfer: Effects of academic performance, motivation and social connectedness. Research in Higher Education, 49(7), 647-664.
Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation. (2002). APEC TEL digital divide blueprint for action.2002 Telecommunication and Information Ministerial Meeting. 29-30 May, Shanghai, China. Retrieved March 12, 2005, from http://www.apec.org/apec/documents_reports/telecommunications_information_ ministerial meetings/2002.html
Bagwell, C. L., Schmidt, M. E., Newcomb, A. F., & Bukowski, W. M. (2001). Friendship and peer rejection as predictors of adult adjustment. New Directions for Child & Adolescent Development, 2001(91), 25-50.
Barkatsas, A. N. (2005, July). A new scale for monitoring students’ attitudes to learning mathematics with technology (MTAS). In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D., Gronn, M., Horne, A., McDonough, R,. Pierce., & Roche, A. (Eds.), Building connections: Theory, research and practice (Vol. 1, pp.129-137). Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Group of Australasia. Melbourne: MERGA.
Berk, L. E. (1997). Child development. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Bianchi, A., & Phillips, J. G. (2005). Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 8(1), 39-51.
Campbell, M. A., & Gardner, S. (2004, September). Cyberbullying. Paper presented at the Queensland Guideance and Counselling Association, Brisbane, Australia.
Campbell, S. W. (2006). Perceptions of mobile phones in college classrooms: Ringing, cheating, and classroom policies. Communication Education, 55(3), 280-294.
Carroll, J., Howard, S., Peck, J., & Murphy, J. (2002). A field study of perceptions and use of mobile telephones by 16 to 22 year olds. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Practice, 4(2), 49-61.
Chen, Y. F., & Katz, J. E. (2009). Extending family to school life: College students’ use of the mobile phone. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(2), 179-191.
Cookson, P. S. (1986). A framework for theory and research on adult education participation. Adult Education Quarterly, 36(3), 130-141.
Dowell, E. B., Burgess, A. W., & Cavanaugh, D. J. (2009). Clustering of Internet Risk Behaviors in a Middle School Student Population. Journal of School Health, 79(11), 547-553.
Entwistle, N. J., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluation of teaching and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19(2), 169-194.
Entwistle, N. J., McCune, V., & Hounsell, J. (2003). Investigating ways of enhancing university teaching-learning environments: Measuring students’ approaches to studying and perceptions of teaching. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. J. Entwistle, & J. van Merrienboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimension (pp. 89-108). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Garner, P. W. (2010). Emotional competence and its influences on teaching and learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 297-321.
Gettinger, M., & Seibert, J. K. (2002). Contributions of study skills to academic competence. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 350-365.
Gordon, D. G. (2001). Classroom management: Problems and solutions. Music Educatiors Journal, 88(2), 17-23.
Green, J., Nelson, G., Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. (2006). The causal ordering of self-concept and academic motivation and its effect on academic achievement. International Education Journal, 7(4), 534-546.
Griffiths, M., & Renwick, B. (2003). Misfortune or mismanagement: A study of consumer debt issues. Ourimbah, NSW: Central Coast School of Business, University of Newcastle.
Gudwin, D. M., & Salazar-Wallace, M. D. (2010). Mentor and coaching: A lifeline for teachers in a multicultural setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Hazler, R. J., & Denham, S. A. (2002). Social isolation of youth at risk: Conceptualizations and practical implications. Journal of Counseling & Development, 80(4), 403-409.
Heiman, T. (2000). Friendship quality among children in three educational settings. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 25(1), 1-12.
Hiscock, D. (2004). Cell phones in class: This, too, shall pass? Community College Week, 16(16), 4-5.
Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023-1031.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2002, August 15). High turnover plagues schools. USA Today, 13A.
Ishfaq, A., Tehmina, F. Q., & Khadija, A. P. (2011). Mobile phone to youngsters: Necessity or addiction. African Journal of Business Management. 5(32), 12512-12519.
Katz, J. E., & Aakhus, M. A. (2002). Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
LeBlanc, G., & Bearison, D. J. (2004). Teaching and learning as a bi-directional activity: investigating dyadic interactions between child teachers and child learners. Cognitive Development, 19(4), 499-515.
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Rankin, Macgill, A., & Smith, A. (2007, December). Teens and social media. Washington D.C. : Pew Research Center, Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved 6/27/11 from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2007/Teens-and-Social-Media.aspx
Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184–196.
Ling, R. (2000). “We will be reached”: The use of mobile telephony among Norwegian youth. Information Technology and People, 13(2), 102-114.
Ling, R. (2004). The Mobile Connection: The cell phone's impact on society. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Luckner, A. E., & Pianta, R C. (2011). Teacher-student interactions in fifth grade classrooms: Relations with children's peer behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 257-266.
Magg, J. (2001). Rewarded by punishment: Reflections on the disuse of positive reinforcement in education. Exceptional Children, 67(2), 173-186.
Martin, N. K., & Baldwin, B. (1992). Beliefs Regarding Classroom Management Style: The Differeneces between Pre-Service and Experienced Teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, November 11-13, Knoxville, TN, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED355213.
Martin, N. K., Yin, Z., & Baldwin, B. (1998). Class size and teacher graduate study: Do these variables impact teachers' beliefs regarding classroom management style? Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED 418939)
Martin, N. K., Yin, Z., & Mayall, H. (2006). Classroom management training, teaching experience and gender: Do these variables impact teacher's attitudes and beliefs toward classroom management style? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 494050).
Martin, N. K., Yin, Z., & Mayall, H. (2007). The Attitudes & Beliefs on Classroom Control Inventory-Revised and Revisited: A Continuation of Construct Validation. Journal of Classroom Interaction 42(2), 11-20.
Marzano, R. J. (1992). A Different Kind of Classroom: Teaching with Dimensions of Learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Mathews, R. (2004). The psychosocial aspects of mobile phone use amongst adolescents. InPsych, 26(6), 16-19.
Moran, A. (1997). Managing your own learning at University. A practical guide. University College Dublin Press.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration.. (1999). Falling through the Net: Defining the digital divide. Retrieved January, 14, 2005, from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/digitaldivide/
Ning, H. K., & Downing, K. (2011). The interrelationship between student learning experience and study behaviour. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(6), 765-778.
Norris, P. (2001), Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and The Internet Worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2001). “Understanding the Digital Divide “ O.E.C.D. Retrieved March, 1, 2005, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/57/1888451.
Ozcan, Y. Z., & Kocak, A. (2003). Research note: A need or a status symbol? Use of cellular telephones in Turkey. European Journal of Communication, 18(2), 241-254.
Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Language-minority students: Instructional issues in school cultures and classroom social systems. Elementary School Journal, 96(3), 221-226.
Peters, O., Almekinders, J. J., van Buren, R. L. J., Snippers, R., & Wessels, J. T. J. (2003). Young people's motives for SMS Use. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, San Diego USA.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544-555.
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications, 2, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Proctor, B. E., Prevatt, F., Adams, K., Hurst, A., & Petscher, Y. (2006). Study skills profiles of normal-achieving and academically-struggling college students. Journal of College Student Development, 47(1), 37-51.
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education, Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Reinke, W. M., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Merrell, K. (2008). The classroom check-up: A classwide teacher consultation model for increasing teacher praise and decreasing disruptive behavior. School Psychology Review, 37(3), 315-332.
Reinke, W. M., Sprick, R., & Knight, J. (2009). Coaching classroom management. In J. Knight. (Ed.). Coaching: Approaches & perspective. (pp. 91-112). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Rice, D. (2005). Mobile phone addiction threatens teen health (audio transcript). Retrieved 20 May, 2005, from www.abc.net.au/am/content/2005/s1368547.htm
Rice, F. P. (1993). Adolescent development, relationships, and culture. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Richardson, J. T. E. (2007). Variations in student learning and perceptions of academic quality. In N. Entwistle, P. Tomlinson, & J. Dockrell (Eds.), Student learning and university teaching British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series 2(4), 61-71. Leicester, UK: The British Psychological Society.
Schutz, W. C. (1996). The Interpersonal Underworld. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
Seidman, E., Tseng, V., & Weisner, T. S. (2006). Social setting theory and measurement. In Report and resource guide 2004–2005. New York: William T. Grant Foundation. website:http://www.wtgrantfoundation.org/resources/overview/studying_settings
Selwyn, N. (2003). Schooling the mobile generation: The future for schools in the mobile-networked society. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(2), 131-144.
Shade, L. (2002). The digital divide: From definitional stances to policy initiatives. Retrieved December, 31, 2004, from http://www.fis.utoronto.ca/research/iprp/publications/shade_digitaldivide.
Sharples, M. (2000). The Design of Personal Mobile Technologies for Lifelong Learning. Computers & Education, 34(3-4), 177-193.
Sluis, Lidewey E. C. van der. (1999). The Interaction of Learning Context and Learning Behavior: A Cross-section study of Managerial Learning. In Pepermas, R., Flion, I., Ardts, J. C. A, Jansen, P. G. W. (Eds.), Managerial Behavior Empirical Studies on Management Development and Socialization, Leuven: Acco, 25-42.
Srivastava, L. (2005). Mobile phones and the evolution of social behavior. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24(2), 111-129.
Sydney Morning Herald. (2005, February). Call for tighter controls on phone bills. Sydney Morning Herald.
Taylor, A. S., & Harper, R. (2003). Talking 'activity': Young people & mobile phones. Guildford: Digital World Research Centre.
Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1993). Schools make a difference. New York: Teachers College Press.
Trifonova, A., & Ronchetti, M. (2006). Hoarding content for mobile learning. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 4(4), 459-476.
Tseng, V., & Seidman, E. (2007). A systems framework for understanding social settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39 (3-4), 217-228.
Walsh, S. P., & White, K. M. (2006). Ring, ring, why did I make that call? Mobile phone beliefs and behaviour amongst Australian university students. Youth Studies Australia, 25(3), 49-57.
Wesiner, T. D. (2001). Children investing in their family: The importance of child obligation in successful development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 94, 77-83.
Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 189–205.
Yip, M. C. W. (2007). Differences in learning and study strategies between high and low achieving university students: A Hong Kong study. Educational Psychology, 27(5), 597-606.
Yoon, J. S., Barton, E., & Taiariol, T. (2004). Relational aggression in middle school: Educational implications in development research. Journal of Early Adolescence, 24(3), 303-318.
Young, S. K., & Rodgers, C. R. (1998). The Relationship Between Depression and Internet Addiction. Cyber psychology & Behavior, 1(1), 25-28.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-40). San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1) 166-183.

QR CODE