簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林彥伶
Yen-Ling Lin
論文名稱: 台灣上市櫃公司人力精簡對公司績效的影響 — 企業生命週期觀點
The Impact of Headcount Reduction on Performance in Taiwan Listed Company — A Perspective of Business Life Cycle
指導教授: 陳俊男
Chun-Nan Chen
口試委員: 謝劍平
陳嬿如
林軒竹
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 65
中文關鍵詞: 企業生命週期人力精簡公司績效
外文關鍵詞: Business Life Cycle, Headcount Reduction, Corporate Performance
相關次數: 點閱:362下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 員工乃是公司最珍貴的資產,公司績效表現受員工影響之大,但當公司面臨經濟不景氣,市場競爭壓力大,本身經營績效不佳、財務困境,甚至是欲投入其他方面研發之時,上級管理階層不得已做出「人力精簡」之打算,然而,過往文獻在人力精簡對公司績效之影響不盡相同,因而本研究加入企業生命週期虛擬變數與產業虛擬變數深入探討兩者的關係。
    本研究以員工流動率、員工平均年資、員工平均年齡衡量人力精簡,以分子為稅前息前折舊攤銷前獲利之總資產報酬率、分子為當年度的淨利之總資產報酬率以及托賓Q比率等三項指標衡量公司績效,實證結果發現人力精簡確實對財務績效有顯著的影響,人力精簡之三項指標對不同的產業與不同企業生命週期的企業財務績效的影響都不盡相同,因此,本文的主要貢獻在於提供給不同產業與不同企業生命週期企業一項參考的依據,公司可以根據所屬產業與企業生命週期來訂定人力資源策略,找出適合他們公司狀況的人才,進而提升公司的績效。建議後續研究者可以嘗試在人力精簡變數再加以著墨,使員工流動率分為自願流動率與非自願流動率,將可對本研究有更深入之瞭解,此外,尚可以嘗試加入其它影響公司績效之變數,讓整體模型配適度更佳,研究更完整。


    Employees are the most valuable intangible asset for a company. How they perform will have significant influence on the corporate performance of a company. However, when a company is faced with economic depression, high market competitive pressure, poor performance and financial crisis, or plans to invest in other areas, the administration may have to lay off some staff to lower the costs. Previous research has investigated the influence of headcount reduction on the corporate performance of a company, but different results are found. Therefore, this thesis aimed to investigate the relationship between headcount reduction and business life cycle and industry. For these purpose, T and F test and regression method were used. T and F test was for checking if there was any difference of maturity firm implement headcount reduction strategy between setup, growth, unstable and recession firm, while regression method was used to figure out the relevance between variables and headcount reduction variables in different business life cycle and different industry.
    This study adopted employee turnover, employee average seniority and employee average age to measure headcount reduction, and used EBITDA return on asset ratio, ROA and Tobin's q to measure corporate performance. The empirical results showed that business life cycle and industry have a certain impact of headcount reduction on corporate performance in Taiwan. The different headcount reduction index has effects on different industries and business life cycle. Hence, the important contribution of this thesis provides a basic reference for companies to set their human resource strategy in different industries and business life cycle. Based on different business life cycle and industries, administration can choose the suitable talent to enhance their corporate performance. For further research, researchers can divide the employee turnover ratio into volunteer employee turnover ratio or not and add more other control variables to enhance model explanation of regression to make it more complete.

    摘要...........................................................................................................................I Abstract....................................................................................................................II 致謝..........................................................................................................................III 目錄..........................................................................................................................IV 圖目錄........................................................................................................................V 表目錄.......................................................................................................................VI 第壹章 緒論................................................................................................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機................................................................................................1 第二節 研究問題與目的................................................................................................2 第三節 研究流程..........................................................................................................3 第貳章 文獻探討..........................................................................................................5 第一節 人力精簡..........................................................................................................5 第二節 企業生命週期之理論分析..................................................................................9 第三節 不同產業下員工流動率對公司績效的影響........................................................12 第四節 其他控制變數與公司績效................................................................................13 第參章 研究方法........................................................................................................16 第一節 樣本資料來源、期間與選取標準......................................................................16 第二節 變數定義與說明..............................................................................................16 第三節 實證方法........................................................................................................22 第肆章 實證結果分析.................................................................................................24 第一節 敘述統計分析.................................................................................................24 第二節 相關係數分析.................................................................................................26 第三節 迴歸結果分析.................................................................................................29 第四節 穩健性分析.....................................................................................................41 第伍章 結論與建議.....................................................................................................51 第一節 研究結論.........................................................................................................51 第二節 研究限制與後續建議.......................................................................................52 參考文獻....................................................................................................................53 (一) 中文部分.........................................................................................................53 (二) 英文部分.........................................................................................................55

    1. 王癸元,2002,人力資本、智慧財產與企業價值關係之研究-以資源基礎論之觀點,中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    2. 王曉雯、王泰昌、吳明政,2008。「企業經營型態與研發活動績效」,『管理學報』。25卷,2期,173-193。
    3. 江岷欽,1992,「論組織結構之精簡」,『中國行政評論』,2卷,1期,43-52。
    4. 江岷欽,1994,組織精簡鄒議(上),人事月刊,第19卷第3期,37-41。
    5. 吳秀娟,2000,企業市場價值與淨值差異影響因素之研究-以我國資 訊電子業為例,政治大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    6. 邱垂昌與洪福讚,2008,在不同企業生命週期下智慧資本與企業價值之關聯性,當代會計,第9卷:201-236。
    7. 李婷婷,2009,基層與管理層人力精簡對企業績效的影響,淡江大學商管學院碩士學位論文。
    8. 林美鳳、吳琮璠與吳青松,2008,資訊科技投資與企業績效之關係-從企業生命週期論析,資訊管理學報,第15卷2期:155-183。
    9. 林秋華,2014,人力精簡對企業績效之影響-以產業特性為調節變項,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    10. 林瑜柔,2017,組織人力精簡的策略選擇與績效表現之關聯性研究,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    11. 林揚舜與鍾俊文,2005,員工分紅配股與員工流動率間的關係,貨幣觀測與信用評等,第 52 期:88-90。
    12. 胡邦鼎,2009,R&D投資會影響公司績效嗎?公司裁員決定探討,元智財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    13. 洪愷伶,2017,公司治理對經營績效之影響--以台灣上市公司違例,國立臺灣科技大學財務金融研究所碩士學位論文。
    14. 陳吟愷,2004,企業生命週期與盈餘管理關聯性之研究,國立中山大學企管研究系所碩士學位論文。
    15. 陳正芳,2012,企業風險評估之研究-以台灣觀光產業上市公司為例,崇右技術學院。
    16. 陳美杏,2009,公司治理對經營績效之影響 : 以董事長與總經理是否為同一人之研究,淡江大學國際貿易學系國際企業學碩士在職專班。
    17. 孫本初,1994。「析論組織精簡之執行策略及其影響」,『人事月刊』。19卷,3期,30-36。
    18. 孫本初和葉雅倩,1996,組織精簡對於留任員工組織行為影響之研究,人事月刊,23(2): 26-38。
    19. 夏禹,2017,台灣高科技產業融資策略與企業生命週期之相關性研究,國立台灣科技大學財務金融所碩士論文。
    20. 連緯育,2017,公司治理對財務績效之影響- 以分量迴歸再檢視,國立中正大學財務金融所碩士論文。
    21. 張安,2017,員工流動對公司價值的影響─以台灣上市櫃公司為例,國立台灣大學財務金融所碩士學位論文。
    22. 張嘉玲,2015,研發投入與人力精簡對台灣電子業績效之影響,國立中興大學應用經濟學研究所碩士學位論文。
    23. 曹壽民、紀信義、陳光政,2006,企業生命週期對商標權價值攸關性之影響,企業管理學報,69,69-72。
    24. 曹壽民、連威豪、劉奕孜, 2010,從企業生命週期探討應計項目異常現象,會計評論,第 51期, 107-143。
    25. 黃朝信,2016,以企業生命週期分析企業社會責任對財務績效的影響,中原大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    26. 蔡正飛,2006,負責性組織精簡策略與企業績效中間機制之研究- 動態策略能力與策略性人力資源管理觀點,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文。
    27. 蔡宜庭,2016,企業生命週期對初次上市公司期初報酬影響之探討,國立臺灣科技大學財務金融所碩士論文。
    28. 蔡基德,2001,資訊電子業市場價值與帳面淨值之差異探討,台灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    29. 劉芳君,2003,組織人力精簡對留任員工之態度和行為及組織績效關係之研究,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    30. 劉政淮、陳俊合與張竹淵,2012,以企業生命週期論析盈餘及其組成持續性,台灣管理學刊,第12卷,第2期。
    31. 劉政淮、許永聲與金凱雯,2013,企業生命週期、董事會組成特性對資訊透明度之影響,台灣管理學刊,第13卷第1期,73-94頁。
    32. 盧盈芳,2014,公司治理與企業價值之關聯性-企業生命週期觀點,國立高雄應用科技大學財富與稅務管理系所碩士學位論文。
    (一) 英文部分
    1. Anthony, J. H., & Ramesh, K. (1992). Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices: A test of the life cycle hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and economics, 15(2-3), 203-227.
    2. Aggarwal, R., Schloetzer, J. D., & Williamson, R. (2016). Do corporate governance mandates impact long-term firm value and governance culture?. Journal of Corporate Finance.
    3. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding‐family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. The journal of finance, 58(3), 1301-1328.
    4. Appelbaum, S. H., Simpson, R., & Shapiro, B. T. (1987). The tough test of downsizing. Organizational Dynamics, , 10 (2), 68-79.
    5. Boretsky, M. (1982). The threat to US high technology industries: Economic and national security implications draft. International Administration, US Department of Commerce.
    6. Bradley, M., Jarrell, G. A., & Kim, E. H. (1984). On the existence of an optimal capital structure: Theory and evidence. The journal of Finance, 39(3), 857-878.
    7. Bruton, G. D., Keels, J. K., & Shook, C. L. (1996). Downsizing the firm: Answering the strategic questions. The Academy of Management Executive, 10(2), 38-45.
    8. Bognanno, M. L. (2001). Corporate tournaments. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(2), 290-315.
    9. Bebchuk, L. A., & Cohen, A. (2005). The costs of entrenched boards. Journal of Financial Economics, 78(2), 409-433.
    10. Black, E. L. (1998). Life-cycle impacts on the incremental value-relevance of earnings and cash flow measures. Journal of Financial Statement Analysis, 4, 40-57.
    11. Cameron, K. S. (1994). Strategies for successful organizational downsizing. Human Resource Management, 33(2), 189-211.
    12. Cameron, K. S., Freeman, S. J., & Mishra, A. K. (1993). Downsizing and redesigning organizations. Organizational change and redesign, 19-63.
    13. Cascio, W. F. (1993). Downsizing: What do we know? What have we learned?. The Academy of Management Executive, 7(1), 95-104.
    14. Cascio, W. F., Young, C. E., & Morris, J. R. (1997). Financial consequences of employment-change decisions in major US corporations. Academy of management Journal, 40(5), 1175-1189.
    15. Chow, C. W. (1982). The demand for external auditing: Size, debt and ownership influences. Accounting review, 272-291.
    16. Datta, D. K., & Basuil, D. A. (2015). Does employee downsizing really work?. In Human resource management practices (pp. 197-221). Springer International Publishing.
    17. Davies, J. R., Hillier, D., & McColgan, P. (2005). Ownership structure, managerial behavior and corporate value. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(4), 645-660.
    18. Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of political economy, 93(6), 1155-1177.
    19. DeWitt, R. L. (1993). The structural consequences of downsizing. Organization Science, 4(1), 30-40.
    20. DeWitt, R. L. (1998). Firm, industry, and strategy influences on choice of downsizing approach. Strategic Management Journal, 59-79.
    21. Denis, D. J., & Denis, D. K. (1994). Majority owner-managers and organizational efficiency. Journal of corporate finance, 1(1), 91-118.
    22. Dickinson, V. (2011). Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle. The Accounting Review, 86(6), 1969-1994.
    23. Edvinsson L., Malone M. S. (1999). Intellectual capital. How to identify and calculate the value of intangible assets of your company. Barcelona. Management, 2000.
    24. Edwards, J., & Weichenrieder, A. (1999). Ownership concentration and share valuation: Evidence from Germany. Working paper, University of Cambridge.
    25. Fernández, C., & Arrondo, R. (2005). Alternative internal controls as substitutes of the board of directors. Corporate governance: an international review, 13(6), 856-866.
    26. Grossman, R. J. (2000). Measuring Up: appropriate metrics help HR prove its worth,”Human Resource Magazine. 45(1):28-35.
    27. Han, I., & Chuang, C. M. (2011). The impacts of R&D investment on company performance: US vs. Taiwanese technology-intensive industry. Review of pacific basin financial markets and policies, 14(01), 171-194.
    28. Guthrie, J. P., & Datta, D. K. (2008). Dumb and dumber: The impact of downsizing on firm performance as moderated by industry conditions. Organization Science, 19(1), 108-123.
    29. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
    30. Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial economics, 11(1-4), 5-50.
    31. Johnson, W. B., Magee, R. P., Nagarajan, N. J., & Newman, H. A. (1985). An analysis of the stock price reaction to sudden executive deaths: Implications for the managerial labor market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1-3), 151-174.
    32. Kale, J. R., Reis, E., & Venkateswaran, A. (2009). Rank‐order tournaments and incentive alignment: The effect on firm performance. The Journal of Finance, 64(3), 1479-1512.
    33. Kesner, I. F. (1987). Directors' stock ownership and organizational performance: An investigation of Fortune 500 companies. Journal of Management, 13(3), 499-508.
    34. Kozlowski, S. W. (1993). Organizational downsizing: Strategies, interventions, and research implications. International review of industrial and organizational psychology, 8, 263-332.
    35. Lazear, E. P., & Rosen, S. (1981). Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of political Economy, 89(5), 841-864.
    36. Mentzer, M. S. (1996). Corporate downsizing and profitability in Canada. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 13(3), 237-250.
    37. Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of financial economics, 20, 293-315.
    38. Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Yu, W. (2000). The information content of stock markets: why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements?. Journal of financial economics, 58(1-2), 215-260.
    39. McConaughy, D. L., Walker, M. C., Henderson Jr, G. V., & Mishra, C. S. (1998). Founding family controlled firms: Efficiency and value. Review of Financial economics, 7(1), 1-19.
    40. Palia, D. (2001). The endogeneity of managerial compensation in firm valuation: A solution. The Review of Financial Studies, 14(3), 735-764.
    41. Parrino, R. (1997). CEO turnover and outside succession a cross-sectional analysis. Journal of financial Economics, 46(2), 165-197.
    42. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors (Vol. 267). New York: free press.
    43. Quinn, R. E., & Cameron, K. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management science, 29(1), 33-51.
    44. Selling, T. I., & Stickney, C. P. (1989). The effects of business environment and strategy on a firm’s rate of return on assets. Financial Analysts Journal, 45(1), 43-52.
    45. Song, M. H., & Walkling, R. A. (1993). The impact of managerial ownership on acquisition attempts and target shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28(4), 439-457.
    46. Spence, A. M. (1977). Entry, capacity, investment and oligopolistic pricing. The Bell Journal of Economics, 534-544.
    47. Spence, A. M. (1979). Investment strategy and growth in a new market. J. Reprints Antitrust L. & Econ., 10, 345.
    48. Stulz, R. (1988). Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control. Journal of financial Economics, 20, 25-54.
    49. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2023/06/29 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 2023/06/29 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE