簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 駱嘉俊
Jia-Jun Luo
論文名稱: 管理者過度自信對企業績效與避稅行為之影響
Effect of Manager Overconfidence on Firm Performance and Tax Avoidance
指導教授: 郭啟賢
Chii-Shyan Kuo
口試委員: 呂志豪
Shih‐Hao Lu
陳崇文
Chung-wen Chen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 46
中文關鍵詞: 兩稅合一稅制改革過度自信避稅行為企業績效
外文關鍵詞: Integrated Income Tax System, Tax reform, Overconfidence, Tax Avoidance, Corporate Performance
相關次數: 點閱:695下載:9
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 過度自信是管理者常有的個人特徵,基於高層梯隊理論,管理者的个人特徵影響到他的行為與決策,從影響到企業績效,同時也影響著企業的各項經營活動,包括避稅行為。
    1998年,台灣實施兩稅合一制度,採用「全額設算扣抵制」,2015年和2018年逐步取消該制度後,增加了企業避稅的動機。
    本研究以2015年至2020年台灣上市上櫃公司為研究對象,以董事長持股異動情況作為管理者過度自信的代理變數,以有效稅率作為避稅行為的代理變數,以托賓Q和ROA作為企業績效的代理變數。
    探究管理者過度自信對於企業績效與避稅行為的影響,同時,在台灣稅制改革後,多數的企業都擁有較強的避稅動機的情況下,進而探究稅制改革對於管理者過度自信的企業避稅行為的影響。
    本研究的主要發現如下。管理者過度自信的企業往往有著更好的企業績效,但有趣的是,過去常常被認為會激進避稅的管理者過度自信的企業卻呈現出相反的態勢,越過度自信越不會從事避稅行為。稅制改革後,企業的避稅行為有所增多,但過度自信的企業並沒有受到稅制改革的影響而改變,仍然沒有較為明顯的傾向去從事避稅。
    過度自信的管理者之所以自信,是因為他們通常擁有常人所不具備的能力與知識,有著更多的方法與能力去達成績效目標,不必去從事需要承擔風險、成本複雜的避稅活動。且過度自信的管理者通常極為執著,很少受到外界的干擾而產生改變,所以即使大環境是趨於避稅的,他們也不會改變。
    之前有學者指出管理層能力與企業的避稅程度呈反比,即管理能力越強,避稅程度則越低。這也從側面證明了本次研究的結果。


    Overconfidence is a common personal characteristic of managers. Based on the Upper Echelons Theory, A manager's personal characteristics affect his behavior and decisions. It not only affects enterprise performance, but also affects various business activities of enterprises, including tax avoidance. In 1998, Taiwan implemented the Integrated Income Tax System, which adopted the "full dividend imputation system". The phasing out of the system in 2015 and 2018 has increased the incentive for companies to avoid tax. This study from 2015 to 2020, Taiwan listed company as the research object. The change of chairman's shareholding was taken as the proxy variable of managers' Overconfidence, ETR (Effective Tax Rate) is taken as the proxy variable of Tax Avoidance, Tobin's Q and ROA were taken as proxy variables of Firm Performance.
    To explore the influence of managerial overconfidence on corporate performance and tax avoidance behavior. At the same time, after the reform of Taiwan's tax system, most enterprises have a strong incentive to avoid tax. And then explore the impact of tax reform on corporate tax avoidance behavior of overconfident managers.
    The main findings of this study are as follows. Companies with overconfident managers tend to have better corporate performance. But interestingly, overconfident companies with managers who used to be thought of as aggressive tax-dodgers showed the opposite trend, the more overconfident you are, the less likely you are to engage in tax avoidance. After the tax reform, the tax avoidance behaviors of enterprises have increased, but the overconfident enterprises have not been affected by the tax reform and still have no obvious tendency to engage in tax avoidance.
    Overconfident managers are confident because they often have skills and knowledge that other people don't have, with more means and ability to achieve performance goals, there is no need to engage in risky and costly tax avoidance activities. And overconfident managers tend to be so obsessive that they have little outside interference to change, so they will not change even if the environment is tax-friendly.
    Previously, some scholars pointed out that the management ability is inversely proportional to the tax avoidance degree of the enterprise, that is, the stronger the management ability is, and the lower the tax avoidance degree is. It also proves the results of this study from the side.

    目錄 摘要 I Abstract II 目錄 III 圖目錄 IV 表目錄 V 壹、緒論 1 一、 研究動機與目的 1 二、 研究背景 2 三、 研究過程 6 貳、文獻回顧 7 一、 避稅 7 二、 企業績效 8 三、 管理者過度自信 9 四、 公司避稅行為與管理者過度自信 10 叁、研究方法 11 一、 研究假說 11 二、 研究樣本 13 三、 變數定義 13 四、 回歸模型 18 肆、研究結果 20 一、敘述性統計分析 20 二、相關性分析 26 三、主測試實證分析 26 伍、結論與建議 33 一、 結論與討論 33 二、 研究限制 35 三、 研究建議與未來研究 35 參考文獻 35 一、 中文文獻 35 二、 英文文獻 36 附錄一 38 一、 變數定義表 38

    一、 中文文獻
    中央研究院(2014),「賦稅改革政策建議書」,中央研究院報告。
    代彬(2016),管理层能力、权力与企业避税行为,財貿經濟,2016年第四期,1002-8102,04-0043-15。
    財政部(1998),「兩稅合一所得稅法疑義解答(增訂版)」。
    財政部賦稅署(2015),「財政健全方案所得稅制改革模擬問答-疑義解答」。
    羅光達等(2014),「我國兩稅合一制度現況檢討與未來改革方向」,財政部102
    年度委託研究計畫。

    二、 英文文獻
    Armstrong, C., J. Blouin, and D. Larcker. 2012. The incentives for tax planning. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania and Stanford University. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 53: 391–411
    Amiram, D., Bauer, A., & Frank, M. (2019). Tax Avoidance at Public Corporations Driven by Shareholder Taxes: Evidence from Changes in Dividend Tax Policy. Accounting. Review. 94 (5): 27–55.
    Bhandari, G., Deaves, R., 2006. The demographics of overconfidence. Journal of Behavioral Finance. 7 (1), 5–11.
    Bamber, L., J. Jiang, and I. Wang. 2010. What’s my style? The influence of top managers and their personal backgrounds on voluntary corporate financial disclosure. Accounting.Review .85 (4): 1131–1162.
    Chen, S., X. Chen, Q. Cheng, and T. Shevlin. Are Family Firms More Tax Aggressive than Non-Family Firms[J]. Journal of Financial Economics.2010, 95: 41-61.
    Desai, M.A., Dharmapala, D., 2006. Corporate tax avoidance and high-power incentives. The Journal of Financial Economics. 79 (1), 145–179.
    Dyreng, S., Hanlon, M., Maydew, E., 2008. Long-run corporate tax avoidance. Account. Review. 83 (1), 61–82.
    Duff, D.G., 2009. Tax avoidance in the 21st century. In: Evans, C., Krever, R., (Eds.), Australian Business Tax Reform in Retrospect and Prospect. Thomson, pp.477–501.
    Dyreng, S., Hanlon, M., Maydew, E., 2010. The effect of executives on corporate tax avoidance. Account. Review. 85 (4), 1163–1190.
    Ferris, S.P., Jayaraman, N., Sabherwal, S., 2013. CEO overconfidence and international merger and acquisition activity. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 48 (01), 137–164.
    Frank, M.M., Lynch, L.J., Rego, S.O., 2009. Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. Account. Review. 84 (2), 467–487.
    Galasso, A., Simcoe, T.S., 2011. CEO overconfidence and innovation. Management Science. 57 (8), 1469–1484.
    Goel, A.M., Thakor, A.V., 2008. Overconfidence, CEO selection, and corporate governance. The Journal of Finance. 63 (6), 2737–2784.
    Graham, J.R., 2003. Taxes and corporate finance: a review. The Review of Financial Studies.16, 1074–1128.
    Graham, J.R., Tucker, A.L., 2006. Tax shelters and corporate debt policy. Journal of Financial Economics. 81, 563–594.
    Halon, M., 2005. The persistence and pricing of earnings, accruals, and cash flows when firms have large book-tax differences. Account. Review. 80 (1), 137–166.
    Hambrick, D.C., Mason, P., 1984. Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review. 9, 193–206.
    Hambrick, D.C., 2016. Upper Echelons Theory. Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_785-1 (accessed 06.02.18).
    Hribar, P., Yang, H., 2016. CEO overconfidence and management forecasting. Contemporary. Accounting. Research. 33 (1), 204–227.
    Hsieh, T.S., Bedard, J.C., Johnstone, K.M., 2014. CEO overconfidence and earnings management during shifting regulatory regimes. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting Conference. 41 (9–10), 1243–1268.
    Hsieh Tien-Shih,2018. Overconfidence and tax avoidance: The role of CEO and CFO interaction. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 37 (2018), 241–253.
    Koester, A., Shevlin, T., Wangerin, D., 2016. The role of managerial ability in corporate tax avoidance. Management. Science. 63 (10), 3285–3310.

    QR CODE