簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 許名弌
Ming-I Hsu
論文名稱: 我國資本結構決定因素之實證研究─以企業生命週期觀點探討
The Determinants of Capital Structure ─ A Perspective of Business Life Cycle
指導教授: 陳俊男
Chun-Nan Chen
口試委員: 謝劍平
Chien-Ping Shieh
林軒竹
Hsuan-Chu Lin
陳嬿如
Yan-Ru Chen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 94
中文關鍵詞: 資本結構企業生命週期電子產業非電子產業迴歸分析
外文關鍵詞: Capital Structure, Business Life Cycle, Non-Electronic Industry, Electronic Industry, Regression Analysis
相關次數: 點閱:341下載:11
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  •   資金對於企業的發展來說十分重要。根據其獲取途徑,主要可分成內部資金和外部資金,內部資金的來源為公司的保留盈餘;外部資金又可分為負債融資與權益融資,而由負債與權益組成的比例即為公司的資本結構,此比例不僅會影響企業價值之高低,甚至攸關企業的生存發展,是每間公司所必須重視的。因此基於資本結構之重要性,本研究旨在研究資本結構的影響因素,並參考Dickinson(2011)的生命週期劃分方法,將樣本劃分為初創期、成長期、成熟期、動蕩期,以及衰退期,以企業生命週期的角度加以分析2007年至2016年台灣上市上櫃公司的資本結構及其影響因子。而為了同時探究企業生命週期、產業,與各影響因素對於資本結構之相關性,研究過程主要以三個模型分別進行分析。
      根據實證分析結果,發現我國公司資本結構確實具有生命週期特點,依照總負債比率之大小排序為:初創期>成長期和衰退期>成熟期和動蕩期。此外,就產業因素而言,此虛擬變數與總負債比率之間呈現無顯著相關。然而,流動比率、非負債稅盾、獲利能力、利息保障倍數,以及股利支付率等變數則會因為產業特性之不同,在資本結構上呈現顯著差異。針對其他解釋變數而言,本文發現公司流動性、非負債稅盾、獲利能力、研究發展費用比率、股利支付率與總負債比率呈顯著負相關;公司規模、有形資產比率與總負債比率則呈現顯著正相關。公司成長性與利息保障倍數的迴歸結果則接近顯著水準,並同時瞭解到公司成長性與總負債比率呈現正相關,利息保障倍數則呈現負相關。
      本研究亦利用長期負債比率作為敏感性分析之研究,欲探究不同之應變數,是否會改變其資本結構決定因素的顯著程度與影響方向。而實證結果發現:總負債比率和長期負債比率在企業生命週期、產業因素、流動性、獲利能力、公司規模、有型資產比率、股利支付率等變數下,結果差距不大。然而,針對企業成長性、非負債稅盾、研究發展費用率、利息保障倍數則顯示出不同結果,代表著長期負債比率與總負債比率對於某些資本結構影響因素亦有所差異。


      Capital is important for companies to develop. It can be divided into internal capital and external capital. Besides, external capital can be divided into debt financing and equity financing. The ratio of debt and equity represents companies’ capital structure. This ratio will not only affect corporate value, but also be relevant to the development of company. Therefore, every company needs to put great emphasis on it. Based on the importance of capital structure, the article aimed to analyze determinants of capital structure for listed companies in Taiwan from 2007 to 2016. According to Dickinson’s research, this study used cash flow pattern to divide the sample into five stages. In order to consider business life cycle, industry factor, and other determinants simultaneously, the research contained three models.
    Based on the empirical results, the capital structure of companies in Taiwan have the characteristic of business life cycle. In terms of total debt ratio, the results showed that Introductory Stage > Growth Stage and Decline Stage > Maturity Stage and Shake-out Stage. In addition, we could find that industry factor was not significantly relevant to total debt ratio. However, liquidity ratio, NDTS, profitability, TIE, and dividend payout ratio will be affected by industry factor. Liquidity ratio, NDTS, profitability, R&D, and dividend payout ratio existed significantly negative correlation with total debt ratio. Size and tangible asset ratio existed significantly positive correlation with total debt ratio. The results of growth and TIE closed to significant level.
    This study also used long-term debt ratio for sensitivity analysis. The empirical results showed that in terms of empirical results for business life cycle, industry factor, liquidity ratio, profitability, size, tangible asset ratio and dividend payout ratio, there were nearly no difference between total debt ratio and long term debt ratio. However, total debt ratio and long term debt ratio had different empirical results for growth, NDTS, R&D, and TIE, which meant that total debt ratio and long-term debt ratio had different determinants of capital structure.

    摘 要........................................I ABSTRACT.....................................II 致 謝.......................................III 目 錄........................................IV 圖目錄.......................................VII 表目錄.......................................VIII 第壹章 緒論..................................1 第一節 研究動機與背景.........................1 第二節 研究目的..............................2 第三節 研究流程..............................3 第貳章 文獻探討..............................5 第一節 生命週期相關理論.......................5 一、企業生命週期理論概述.......................5 二、企業生命週期劃分標準.......................6 三、企業生命週期與融資之相關研究文獻............9 第二節 資本結構相關理論......................10 一、傳統學派理論.............................10 二、MM資本結構理論...........................11 三、米勒模式.................................12 四、靜態權衡理論.............................13 五、融資順位理論.............................14 第三節 資本結構的決定因素....................16 一、國外文獻整理.............................16 二、國內文獻整理.............................19 第參章 研究方法.............................23 第一節 研究範圍.............................23 一、研究對象與研究期間........................23 二、資料來源.................................23 第二節 變數描述.............................24 一、被解釋變數...............................24 二、企業生命週期劃分結果......................24 三、解釋變數.................................28 第三節 模型架構與研究假設....................32 一、複迴歸模型架構............................32 二、研究假設.................................33 第肆章 實證結果分析..........................38 第一節 敘述性分析............................38 第二節 相關性分析............................40 第三節 模型迴歸結果分析.......................42 一、原始複迴歸模型.............................42 二、含交叉項之複迴歸模型.......................45 三、變異數膨脹因子檢定.........................46 四、檢驗各生命週期之複迴歸模型..................49 第四節 敏感性分析.............................55 一、原始複迴歸模型.............................55 二、含交叉項之複迴歸模型........................58 三、變異數膨脹因子檢定..........................59 四、檢驗各生命週期之複迴歸模型...................61 第伍章 結論與建議..............................66 第一節 研究結論................................66 一、企業生命週期................................66 二、企業成長性..................................67 三、產業別......................................68 四、流動性......................................68 五、非負債稅盾..................................69 六、獲利能力....................................69 七、研究發展費用................................70 八、公司規模....................................70 九、有型資產比率.................................71 十、利息保障倍數.................................71 十一、股利政策...................................72 第二節 研究限制與未來研究建議....................74 一、研究限制與不足...............................74 二、未來研究建議.................................74 參考文獻 一、中文部分.....................................76 二、英文部分.....................................79

    一、中文部分
    1.于克信,2013,西部資源型企業發展戰略轉型與成長研究,中國財政經濟出版社。
    2.王汀汀、丁琳琳,2016,企業生命週期與中小企業資本結構,金融,6(2):p.51-63。
    3.王炳成,2011,企業生命週期研究述評,技術經濟與管理研究第4期,p.52-55。
    4.王雍智、潘家玲,2010,資本結構與公司績效關聯性之研究-臺灣股市的新啟示,企業管理學報第 85 期,p.71-110。
    5.王瑛璋,1994,國內上市公司資本結構決定因素之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    6.古永嘉、鄭敏聰、游佳鈴,2005,台灣資訊電子業上市公司融資決策順位之研究-Ordered-logistic迴歸模式之應用,輔仁管理評論第12卷第3期,p.41-70。
    7.江來成,2005,資本結構影響因素之研究-以台灣上市鋼鐵業為例,銘傳大學管理學院高階經理碩士學程在職專班碩士論文。
    8.李宗政、江瑞峰,2009,中小(微型)企業創業籌融資管道之比較與探討:融資順位假說之應用與實踐,創業管理研究第四卷第一期,p.85-114。
    9.呂昆峰,2012,台灣IC產業資本結構之決定因素,交通大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    10.杜莉,2007,“股東—債權人”的代理衝突對企業投資不足的影響述評,財會通訊第8期。
    11.林祝英、劉正義,2003,企業研發投資對融資、股利政策與成長機會之影響—以電子資訊產業為例,風險管理學報,第5卷第3期,p. 319-339。
    12.洪永昌,2004,企業生命週期與融資策略,台灣科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    13.胡忠仁,2015,台灣肥料公司資本結構影響因素之探討,東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    14.徐于媜,2005,資本結構決定因素之探討-以美國與台灣高科技業與傳統產業為例,成功大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    15.柴玉珂,2015,上市公司資本結構與企業績效關係研究,元華文創出版社。
    16.高立翰,2011,公司生命週期基礎下之資本結構動態調整及波動變幅實證模式,交通大學科技管理研究所博士論文。
    17.徐宗基,2006,公司資本結構決定因素之實證-以台灣資訊電子業上市公司為例,雲林科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    18.夏禹,2017,臺灣高科技產業融資策略與企業生命週期之相關性研究,臺灣科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    19.徐培升,2014,不同生命週期企業員工知覺薪資公平、人力資源管理策略對組織績效影響之研究,高雄應用科技大學人力資源發展所碩士論文。
    20.張文武、賴靜美,2017,企業生命週期對董監事暨重要職員責任保險需求之影響,管理與系統第24卷第2期,p.215-257。
    21.張永霖,2015,財務管理下—公司理財,高點文化事業有限公司。
    22.陳文生、陳丰津,1995,資本結構決定因素之研究-以台灣紡纖業上市公司為實證,國立高雄工商專校學報第25期,p.191-211。
    23.陳天志,2009,不同企業生命週期下融資策略之研究,教專研98P-028,p.345-370。
    24.陳正芳,2009,企業風險評估之研究-以台灣觀光產業上市公司為例,崇右學報第15期,p.161-182。
    25.陳正明,1996,資本結構決定因素之實證研究--以台灣上市公司為例,東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    26.陳金塔,1996,台灣資訊電子業與紡織業之資本結構影響因素及最適資本結構之研究─以上市公司為例,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    27.陳建志,2013,台灣上市、上櫃建設公司資本結構決定因素,東華大學財務金融學系碩士論文。
    28.曹壽民、紀信義、陳光政,2006,企業生命週期對商標權價值攸關性之影響,企業管理學報第69期,p.39-72。
    29.陳蔚彥,2014,資本結構的重要決定變數:動態追蹤模型的實證,大葉大學國際企業管理學系碩士論文。
    30.莊雙喜、吳慶壽,1999,海峽兩岸股票上市公司資本結構之研究比較,第三屆中華文化與管理學術研討會,上海華東理工學院主辦,p.1-14。
    31.黃芝婷,2010,家族創新與生命週期關係之探討:台灣家族企業的觀察,中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    32.曾亭毓,2009,影響資本結構之決定因素-以台灣上市公司為例,高雄應用科技大學商務經營研究所碩士論文。
    33.黃瑞靜,2001,動態資本結構評價模式之分析與應用,中山大學財務管理研究所博士論文。
    34.楊淑媛、廖四郎、黃瑞靜,2000,從動態資本結構模型探討台灣產業最適資本結構,亞太經濟管理評論第3卷第2期,p.41-64。
    35.劉維琪、李怡宗,1993,近代資本結構理論的綜合探討,企銀季刊,第17卷第1期,p.1-26。
    36.謝劍平,2010,財務管理,五版二刷,智勝文化事業有限公司。
    37.蘇士哲,2000,資本結構決定因素之研究-台灣資訊電子業上市公司之實證,中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

    二、英文部分
    1. Acaravci, S. K., 2014, “The Determinants of Capital Structure: Evidence from the Turkish Manufacturing Sector” International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Vol.5, No.1, p.158-171.
    2. Adizes, I., 1989, “Corporate Lifecycles: How and Why Corporations Grow and Die and What to Do about It.”, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    3. Akhtar, S. and B. Oliver, 2009, “The determinants of capital structure for Japanese multinational and domestic corporations” International Review of Finance, Vol. 9, Issue 1‐2, p.1-26.
    4. Anthony, J. H. and K. Ramesh, 1992, “Association between Accounting Performance Measures and Stock Prices: A Test of the Life Cycle Hypothesis”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 15, p.203-227.
    5. Bradley, M., G. A. Jarrell, and E. H. Kim, 1984, “On the Existence of an Optimal Capital Structure: Theory and Evidence”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 39, No. 3, p.857-878.
    6. Barnea, A., R. A. Haugen, and L. W. Senbet, 1980, “A Rationale for Debt Maturity Structure and Call Provisions in the Agency Theoretic Framework”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 35, No. 5, p. 1223-1234.
    7. Barton, S. L. and P. J. Gordon, 1988, “Corporate Strategy and Capital Structure” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, No. 6, p.623-632.
    8. Baskin, J., 1989, “An Empirical Investigation of the Pecking Order Hypothesis”, Financial Management, Vol. 18, No. 1, p.26-35.
    9. Bender, R., 2014, “Corporate Financial Strategy”, 4th edition, Routledge.
    10. Bowen, R. M., D. A. Lane, and J. C. C. Huber, 1982, “Evidence on the Existence and Determinants of Inter-Industry Differences in Leverage”, Financial Management, Vol. 11, No. 4, p.10-20.
    11. Chandler, A. D., 1962, “Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise”, Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
    12. Chang, R. P. and S. G. Rhee, 1990, “The Impact of Personal Taxes on Corporate Dividend Policy and Capital Structure Decisions”, Financial Management Vol. 19, No. 2, p.21-31.
    13. Chen, J. J., 2004, “Determinants of capital structure of Chinese-listed companies”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57, No.12, p.1341–1351.
    14. DeAngelo, H. and R.W. Masulis, 1980, “Optimal Capital Structure under Corporate and Personal Taxation”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.8, No.1, p.3-29.
    15. Deesomsak, R., K. Paudyal, and G. Pescetto, 2004, “The determinants of capital structure: evidence from the Asia Pacific region”, Journal of multinational financial management, Vol. 14, No.4-5, p.387-405.
    16. Dickinson, V., 2011, “Cash Flow Patterns as a Proxy for Firm Life Cycle”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 86, No. 6, p.1969-1994.
    17. Donaldson, G., 1961, “Corporate debt capacity: A study of corporate debt policy and the determination of corporate debt capacity.” Boston: Division of Research, Harvard School of Business Administration.
    18. Durand, D., 1952, “Costs of Debt and Equity Funds for Business: Trends and Problems of Measurement”, National Bureau of Economic Research, p.215-262, Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/chapters/c4790.pdf.
    19. Fama, E. F. and K. R. French, 2002, “Testing Trade-Off and Pecking Order Predictions about Dividends and Debt”, The Review of Financial Studies, Vol.15, No.1, p.1-33.
    20. Fama, E. F. and M. H. Miller, 1972, “The Theory of Finance”, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    21. Ferri, M. G. and W. H. Jones, 1979, “Determinants of Financial Structure: A New Methodological Approach”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 34, No. 3, p.631-644.
    22. Frank, M. Z. and V. K. Goyal, 2009, “Capital Structure Decisions: Which Factors Are Reliably Important?” Financial Management, Vol.38, p.1-37.
    23. Friend, I. and L. H. P. Lang, 1988, “An Empirical Test of the Impact of Managerial Self-Interest on Corporate Capital Structure”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 43, No. 2, p.271-281.
    24. Gardner, J. W., 1965, “How to prevent organizational dry rot”, Rice Thresher, Vol.53, No.5.
    25. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., 1992, “Structure and process of diversification, compensation strategy, and firm performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, p.381-397.
    26. Gort, M. and S. Klepper, 1982, “Time paths in the diffusion of product innovation”, Economic Journal, Vol.92, p.630-653.
    27. Greiner, L. E., 1972, “Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 50, No. 4, p.37-46.
    28. Groen, J. B., 2016, “Capital Structure Determinants: An Inter-industry analysis For Dutch Firms”, Bachelor thesis, University of Twente, Retrieved from http://purl.utwente.nl/essays/70034.
    29. Haire, M., 1959, “Biological Models and Empirical Histories in the Growth of Organizations”, New York: John Wiley, p.1-5.
    30. Jaafar, H. and H. A. Halim, 2016, “Refining the Firm Life Cycle Classification Method: A Firm Value Perspective” Journal of Economics, Business and Management, Vol. 4, No. 2, p.112-119.
    31. Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling, 1976, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.3, No.4, p.305-360.
    32. Kester, W. C., 1986, “Capital and Ownership Structure: A Comparison of United States and Japanese Manufacturing Corporations” Financial Management Vol.15, No.1, p.5–16.
    33. Kim, E. H., 1978, “A Mean-Variance Theory of Optimal Capital Structure and Corporate Debt Capacity”, The Journal of Finance, Vol.33, No.1, p.45-63.
    34. Kimberly, J. and R. Miles, 1980, “The Organizational Life Cycle”, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    35. Kopyakova, A., 2017, “Capital structure determinants: the evidence from listed and unlisted Dutch firms”, Bachelor thesis, University of Twente, Retrieved from http://purl.utwente.nl/essays/72748.
    36. Lourenco, A. and E. C. Oliveira, 2017, “Determinants of debt: Empirical evidence on firms in the district of Santarém in Portugal”, Contaduría y Administración, Vol.62, No.2, p.625-643.
    37. Mazur, K., 2007, “The determinants of capital structure choice: Evidence from Polish Companies”, International Advances in Economic Research, Vol.13, No.4, p.495-514.
    38. Miller, D. and P. H. Friesen, 1984,” A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life Cycle”, Management Science, Vol. 30, No. 10, p. 1161-1183.
    39. Miller, H. M., 1977,”Debt and Taxes”, The Journal of Finance” Vol. 32, No.2, p.261-275.
    40. Modigliani, F. and M. H. Miller, 1958,”The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment” The American Economic Review, Vol. 48, No.3, p.261-297.
    41. Modigliani, F. and M. H. Miller, 1963, “Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 53, No. 3, p.433-443.
    42. Myers, S. C., 1977, “Determinants of Corporate Borrowing”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 5, No.2, p.147-175.
    43. Myers, S. C., 1984, “The Capital Structure Puzzle”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 39, No.3, p.574-592.
    44. Myers, S. C. and N. S. Majluf, 1984, “Corporate Financing Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13, No.2, p.187-221.
    45. Nunkoo, P. K. and A. Boateng, 2010, “The empirical determinants of target capital structure and adjustment to long-run target: evidence from Canadian firms” Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 17, No. 10, p.983-990.
    46. Ozkan, A., 2001,”Determinants of Capital Structure and Adjustment to Long Run Target: Evidence from UK Company Panel Data” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 28, No. 1-2, p.175-198.
    47. Pashley, M. M. and G. C. Philippatos, 1990, “Voluntary divestitures and corporate life cycle: some empirical evidence”, Applied Economics, Vol. 22, No.9, p.1181-1196.
    48. Rajan, R. and L. Zingales, 1995, “What Do We Know about Capital Structure: Some Evidence from International Data”, Journal of Finance, Vol.50, No.5, p.1412-1460.
    49. Raviv, A. and M. Harris, 1990, “Capital Structure and the Informational Role of Debt” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 45, No.2, p.321-349.
    50. Scott, D. F., Jr., 1972, “Evidence on the importance of financial structure.” Financial Management, Vol. 1, No. 2, p.45–50.
    51. Scott, J. H., 1977, “Bankruptcy, Secured Debt, and Optimal Capital Structure” Journal of Finance, Vo. 32, No.1, p.1–20.
    52. Shyam-Sunder, L. and S. C. Myers, 1999, “ Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.51, No. 2, p.219-244.
    53. Smith, C. W. and J. B. Warner, 1979, “On financial contracting: An analysis of bond covenants” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.7, No.2, p.117-161.
    54. Spence, M., 1973, “Job Market Signaling” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 87, No. 3, p.355-374.
    55. Tian, L., L. Han, and S. Zhang, 2015, “Business Life Cycle and Capital Structure: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms” China and World Economy, Vol.23, No. 2, p.22-39.
    56. Titman, S. and R. Wessels, 1988, “The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice” The Journal of Finance, Vol.43, p.1-19.
    57. Torosian, A., 2012, “Inter-Industry differences in capital structure and product market competition: Evidence from Iranian companies” Interdisciplinary journal of contemporary research in business, Vol. 3, No. 9, p.395-402.
    58. Warner, J. B., 1977, “Bankruptcy Costs: Some Evidence” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 32, No. 2, p.337-347.

    無法下載圖示
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE