簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蕭榮書
Jungshu Hsiao
論文名稱: 永續生態建築設計之關鍵影響因素探討
Discussion of Critical Factors in Sustainably Ecological Architecture Design
指導教授: 施宣光
Shen-Guan Shih
彭雲宏
Yeng-Horng Perng
口試委員: 何明錦
施宣光
阮怡凱
彭雲宏
蔡欣君
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 設計學院 - 建築系
Department of Architecture
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 105
中文關鍵詞: 永續生態生態建築建築設計關鍵因素
外文關鍵詞: sustainable ecology, ecological building, architecture design, critical factor
相關次數: 點閱:213下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 全球暖化引起的極端氣候對人類存續已經成為巨大的威脅,現在若是不及時的展開對於溫室氣體二氧化碳及甲烷排放的控制,隨著時間的消逝風險將越來越高。環境受到的脅迫漸漸反饋在人類生活的社會上,逐漸的引領著建築師構思著甚麼樣的方式可以讓建築永續發展。因此在上個世紀末出現了生態建築這樣的一個新的概念。他是將永續發展與生態學的原理和方法融入建築設計之中,以人、建築、自然和社會平衡發展為理想,在盡可能減少且有完整的計畫之下使用和融入自然環境,來構建最符合人類居住和發展的生態生活空間,並將此一生態生活空間視為一個有機的、具有堅固構造和機能的一個完整的系統來看待。
    本研究針對台灣臺北市建築師公會之主管與員工及會員作為問卷分析對象。本研究問卷發放360份之研究樣本,回收有效問卷244份,回收率68%。研究結果:1.在被評量的四個構面中,最受到重視的構面為「生態」,其次重視之構面分別為「健康」、「減廢」、「節能」。2.在14項評估指標中,最重視的前五項指標分別依序為:(1)綠化量;(2)環保健康建材;(3)生物多樣性;(4)廢棄物減量;(5)綠能設計。並根據結果提出建議,期望能讓我國在永續發展的概念下,協助國內建築模式與理念能逐漸改變,進而有效率的發展生態建築。


    Climate change caused by global warming has resulted in crises in human survival. The situation would get worse when the emission of carbon dioxide is not positively controlled. The threat to the environment gradually reflects on the society that architects constantly explore the sustainable development of buildings. Ecological buildings, a new idea proposed nowadays, aim at the coordinate development of humans, buildings, nature, and societies, according to the principles and methods of ecology, to abstemiously utilise and change the nature, seek for ecological building environment most suitable for human survival and development, and treat building environment as an organic, structural, and functional system.
    Aiming at Taipei Architects Association in Taiwan, the supervisors and employees are distributed 360 copies of questionnaire for this study. Total 244 valid copies are retrieved, with the retrieval rate of 68%. According to the results, suggestions are proposed, expecting to help change domestic building models and ideas and efficiently develop ecological buildings, under the concept of sustainable development.

    目錄 中文摘要 I ABSTRACT II 誌謝 III 目錄 IV 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 VIII 第一章 前言 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 研究範圍與限制 2 1.4 研究流程 2 第二章 文獻探討 5 2.1 永續發展 5 2.2 建築與溫室氣體 11 2.3 生態建築 19 2.4 生態建築設計 26 2.5 綠建材 31 第三章 研究方法 35 3.1 模糊德菲法 ( FDM ) 35 3.2 層級分析法 (AHP) 43 3.3 研究對象 50 3.4 評估指標之建立 51 第四章 資料分析 53 4.1 模糊德菲法資料分析 53 4.2 層次法 (AHP) 資料分析 60 第五章 結論與建議 66 5.1 結論 66 5.2 建議 68 參考文獻 69 參考網站 79 [附錄一] 模糊德菲法問卷調查表 80 [附錄二] AHP法問卷調查表 83

    1. Adle, M., & Ziglio, E. (1996). Gazing into the Oracle: The Delphi Method and its Application to Social Policy and Public Health. London: Jessica Kingsley.
    2. Ali , V.-A., & Abdel, B. H. (2011). Ecological Building Design Determinants. Architectural Engineering and Design Management(6), pp. 111-131.
    3. Alonso, J. A., & Lamata, T. M. (2006). Consistency in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: A new approach. International Journal of Uncertainty, 14(4), pp. 445-459.
    4. Alyami, S. R. (2013). Developing sustainable building assessment scheme for Saudi Arabia: Delphi consultation approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, pp. 43-54.
    5. Architecture2030. (2021, 11). WHY THE BUILDING SECTOR? Retrieved from Architecture2030: https://architecture2030.org/why-the-building-sector/
    6. BCA International Pte Ltd. (2021, 11). BCA GREEN MARK. Retrieved from BCA International Pte Ltd: http://www.bcai.com.sg/green.htm
    7. Blow, A., & Sprenkle, D. (2001). Common factor across theories of marriage and family therapya modified Delphi study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27(3), pp. 385–401.
    8. BREEAM. (2021, 11). BREAM-Sustainability Assessment Method. Retrieved from BREEAM: https://www.breeam.com/
    9. Cha, H., & Lee, D. (2018). Determining Value at Risk for Estimating Renovation Building Projects by Application of Probability-based Fuzzy Set Theory. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 17(1), pp. 63-70.
    10. Chan, P. A., Darko, A., & Ameyaw, E. E. (2017). Strategies for Promoting Green Building Technologies Adoption in the Construction Industry—An International Study. Sustainability, 9(6), pp. 1-18.
    11. Chari , A., & Christodoulou, S. (2017). Building energy performance prediction using neural networks. Energy Efficiency volume, 10, pp. 1315-1327.
    12. Chen, H. P., & Nguyen, C. T. (2017, 5). Integrating web map service and building information modeling for location and transportation analysis in green building certification process. Automation in Construction, 77, pp. 52-66.
    13. Chen, H. P., & Nguyen, C. T. (2019, 2). A BIM-WMS integrated decision support tool for supply chain management in construction. Automation in Construction, 98, pp. 289-301.
    14. Chen, H., Sui, Y., & Zhao, J. (2020). RESEARCH ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF GREEN BUILDING. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 21(2), pp. 561-570.
    15. Choruengwiwat, J. (2010). The Ecological Building Assessment Index for Hot Humid Region. Journal of Renewable Energy and Smart Grid Technology, 5(1), pp. 27-42.
    16. Darko, A., & Chan, P. A. (2018). Strategies to promote green building technologies adoption in developing countries: The case of Ghana. Building and Environment, 130(15), pp. 74-84.
    17. Darko, A., Chan, P. A., Ameyaw, E. E., He, B.-J., & Olanipekun, O. A. (2017, 6). Examining issues influencing green building technologies adoption: The United States green building experts’ perspectives. Energy and Buildings, 144(1), pp. 320-332.
    18. Dudley, N., Ali, N., Kettunen, M., & MacKinnon, K. (2017). Protected areas and the sustainable development goals. Parks, 23(2), pp. 9-12.
    19. Duffield, C. R. (1993). The Delphi technique: a comparison of results obtained using two expert panels. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 30(3), pp. 227-237.
    20. Dulac, J., Da, Y., Hu, S., Yang, Z., Guo, S., Evans, M., . . . Lafrance, M. P. (2021). Tracking Buildings 2020. Retrieved from International Energy Agency: IEA: https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-buildings-2020
    21. Enshassi , A. A., Ahmed, L., Hamra, A., & Al, S. (2018). Studying the Benefits of Building Information Modeling (BIM) in Architecture,. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 12(1), pp. 87-98.
    22. Faherty, V. (1979). Continuing Social Work Education: Result of a Delphi Survey. Journal of Education for Social Work, 15(1), pp. 12-19.
    23. Fang, W., Tang, L., Cheng , P., & Ahmad , N. (2018). Evolution Decision, Drivers and Green Innovation Performance for Collaborative Innovation Center of Ecological Building Materials and Environmental Protection Equipment in Jiangsu Province of China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(11), pp. 1-19.
    24. Gonçalves, J., Mateus, R., Silvestre, J. D., & Roders, A. P. (2020). Going beyond Good Intentions for the Sustainable Conservation of Built Heritage: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 12(22), pp. 1-28.
    25. Green Building Council Australia. (2021, 11). Exploring Green Star. Retrieved from Green Building Council Australia: https://new.gbca.org.au/green-star/exploring-green-star/
    26. Hartman, A. (1981). Reaching consensus using the Delphi technique. Education Leadership, 38(6), pp. 495-497.
    27. Have, H. t. (2021). Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. In M. d. Céu , & P. Neves, Dictionary of Global Bioethics (pp. 51-51). Springer.
    28. Hiermann, G., Hartl, R. F., Puchinger, J., & Vidal, T. (2019). Routing a mix of conventional, plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicles. European Journal of Operational Research, 272(1), pp. 235-248.
    29. Hoang, C. P., Kinney, K. A., Corsi, R. L., & Szaniszlo, P. J. (2010). Resistance of green building materials to fungal growth. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 64(2), pp. 104-113.
    30. Holden, M. C., & Wedman , J. F. (1993). Future issues of computer-mediated communication: The results of a delphi study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41, pp. 5-24.
    31. Hsueh, S. (2015). Assessing the effectiveness of community-promoted environmental protection policy by using a Delphi-fuzzy method: A case study on solar power and plain afforestation in Taiwan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49, pp. 1286-1295.
    32. IBEC. (2021, 11). Comprehensive Assessment System for Built Environment Efficiency (CASBEE). Retrieved from The Institute for Building Environment and Energy Conservation(IBEC): https://www.ibec.or.jp/CASBEE/english/
    33. IEA. (2021). Buildings-A source of enormous untapped efficiency potential. Retrieved from International Energy Agency: https://www.iea.org/topics/buildings
    34. Inogwabini, I. B. (2019). Ecology and Sustainable Development. In W. L. Filho, Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education (pp. 1-14). Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
    35. IPBES. (2019). Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Retrieved from IPBES Work Programme Assessing Knowledge: https://ipbes.net/global-assessment
    36. IUCN. (1980). Global Conservation Program-Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development . IUCN, UNEP, WWF. Retrieved from https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/wcs-004.pdf
    37. Jørgensen, H. T. (2008). Towards more sustainable management systems: through life cycle management and integration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(10), 1071-1080.
    38. Katharina, H. (2020). Materials matter - Application of ecological building design principles in the re-design of a residential building in Mösern, Austria. Harald Herlin Learning Centre. Retrieved from https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/43481
    39. Khorramshahgol, R., & Moustakis, S. V. (1988). Delphic hierarchy process (DHP): A methodology for priority setting derived from the Delphi method and analytical hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 37(3), pp. 347-354.
    40. Li, J., Li, G., & Sun, X. (2019). Environment and Green Brand Authenticity and its Effects towards Brand Purchase Intention: the Case of Green Building Material. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 20(4), pp. 1842-1851.
    41. Linstone , H. A., & Turoff , M. (1975). The Delphi Method : Techniques and Applications. Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
    42. Lu, Y., Wu, Z., Chang, R., & Li, Y. (2017). Building Information Modeling (BIM) for green buildings: A critical review and future directions. Automation in Construction, 83, pp. 134-148.
    43. Maasa, A., & Reniers, G. (2014). Development of a CSR model for practice: connecting five inherent areas of sustainable business. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 104-114.
    44. Marzouk, M., Azab, S., & Metawie, M. (2018). BIM-based approach for optimizing life cycle costs of sustainable buildings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, pp. 217-226.
    45. Montealegre, G. M. (2020). Solutions for the Sustainable Management of a Cultural Landscape in Danger: Mar Menor,Spain. Sustainability, 12(1), pp. 1-16.
    46. Murry Jr., J. W., & Hammons, J. O. (1995). Delphi: A Versatile Methodology for Conducting Qualitative Research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), pp. 423-436,.
    47. Nguyen, T. H., Skitmore, M., Gray, M., Zhang, X., & Olanipekun, O. A. (2017). Will green building development take off? An exploratory study of barriers to green building in Vietnam. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, pp. 8-20.
    48. Pachauri, R., & Meyer, L. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC. Retrieved from The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/
    49. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
    50. Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operation Research, 48(1), pp. 9–26.
    51. Saaty, T. L., & Tran, L. T. (2007). On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7-8), pp. 962-975.
    52. Saleh, S., Farzad , R. P., Ivan, G., & Marc, R. (2018). Machine learning for estimation of building energy consumption and performance: a review. Visualization in Engineering, 6(5), pp. 1-20.
    53. Sérgio , R. M., Tavaresa, F. S., & Bragança, L. (2020). Towards circular and more sustainable buildings: A systematic literature review on the circular economy in the built environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, pp. 1-24.
    54. Shen, L., Yan, H., Fan, H., Wu, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2017). An integrated system of text mining technique and case-based reasoning (TM-CBR) for supporting green building design. Building and Environment, 124, pp. 388-401.
    55. Spiegel, R., & Meadows, D. (2010). Green building materials: a guide to product selection and specification. John Wiley & Sons. INC.
    56. Sun, C., Chen , Y., Wang , R., Lo, S., Yau , J., & Wu , Y. (2019). Construction Cost of Green Building Certified Residence: A Case Study in Taiwan. Massachusetts Technology Collaborative. Sustainability, 11(8), pp. 1-10.
    57. Thacker, S., Adshead, D., Fay, M., Hallegatte, S., Harvey, M., Meller, H., . . . Hall , J. W. (2019). Infrastructure for sustainable development. Nature Sustainability, 2, pp. 324–331.
    58. U.S. Green Building Council. (2021, 11). Why LEED. Retrieved from U.S. Green Building Council: https://www.usgbc.org/leed/why-leed
    59. United Nations. (1972). United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. Retrieved from UnitedNations Conferences | Environment and sustainable development: https://www.un.org/en/conferences/environment/stockholm1972
    60. United Nations. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development - Our Common Future. Retrieved from United Nations Sustainable & Development Knowledge Platform: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
    61. United Nations. (2018). SDGs Goal. Retrieved from United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs: https://sdgs.un.org/goals
    62. Yue, H., Zhu , X., Ye, X., Hu , T., & Kudva , S. (2018). Modelling the effects of street permeability on burglary in Wuhan. Applied Geography, 98, pp. 177-183.
    63. Zavratnik, V., Podjed, D., Trilar, J., Hlebec, N., Kos, A., & Duh, S. E. (2020, 12). Sustainable and Community-Centred Development of Smart Cities and Villages. Sustainability, 12(10), pp. 39-61.
    64. Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Hu, F., & Wang, Y. (2017). Comparison of evaluation standards for green building in China. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 68(1), pp. 262-271.
    65. 內政部. (2014年1月15日). 建築師法. 擷取自 全國法規資料庫: https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=D0070112
    66. 內政部. (2021年10月7日). 建築技術規則建築設計施工編. 擷取自 全國法規資料庫: https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0070115
    67. 王文科. (2001). 教育研究法 (第六版). 臺北市: 五南書局.
    68. 王佳文, 張宇彤, 張喻荃, 邱柏凱, 張齡, 梁景威, & 陳怡靜. (2014). 高齡電子書設計之研究. 科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告.
    69. 台灣建築研究所. (2021年11月30日). 綠建材標章沿革. 擷取自 台灣建築研究所 - 資訊與服務 - 標章申請服務 - -綠建材標章: https://www.abri.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=805
    70. 江佳陵. (2004). 電視新聞台主播形象指標之建構. 世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文, 頁 1-173.
    71. 行政院環保署環管處. (2020年12月06日). 節能減碳政策. 2020年12月06日 擷取自 行政院環保署: https://www.epa.gov.tw/Page/9AF4E3B600088167
    72. 吳吉祥. (2014). 應用模糊德爾菲法評估海岸生態旅遊指標. 農業工程學報, 60(2), 頁 10-20.
    73. 吳秉玹. (2018年01月). 設計策略評量在模組化產品開發之研究. 東海大學工業設計學系碩士學位論文, 頁 1-78.
    74. 吳清山. (2001). 中小學實施校長評鑑的挑戰課題與因應策略. 教育研究, 84, 頁 28-36.
    75. 吳統雄. (1987). 決策與溝通的新技術-大慧調查. 卓越雜誌(29), 143-146.
    76. 李晉豪. (2014年1月). 國內工業用水現況及工業節水推動展望. 中興工程(122), 頁 88-95.
    77. 周頌宜. (2021年11月20日). ESG 是什麼?投資關鍵字 CSR、ESG、SDGs 一次讀懂. 擷取自 經理人雜誌: https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/62727
    78. 林春翔. (2017). 寒地住宅建築微氣候適應性設計策略研究. 河北建築工程學院碩士論文.
    79. 財團法人台灣建築中心 ( TABC ). (2021年11月30日). 綠建材標章沿革. 擷取自 財團法人台灣建築中心 ( TABC ) - 綠建材標章 - 業務說明: http://gbm.tabc.org.tw/modules/pages/main
    80. 財團法人台灣建築中心 ( TABC ). (2021年11月30日). 綠建築解說與評估手冊. 擷取自 財團法人台灣建築中心 ( TABC )-綠建築標章-相關下載: http://gb.tabc.org.tw/modules/pages/download
    81. 張紹勳. (2012). 模糊多準則評估法及統計. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
    82. 張順欽, 蘇國澤, 彭成熹, 呂澄洋, 陳彥君, 陳香宇, . . . 簡瑞清. (2021). 空氣品質監測報告109年年報. 台北市: 行政院環境保護署. 擷取自 https://www.epa.gov.tw/DisplayFile.aspx?FileID=6BB17C4B4AD72C76
    83. 莊修田. (2000). 室內設計專業範圍與內容之研究. 國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學, 11(3), 頁 271-281.
    84. 陳俊良. (2011). 冷氣機水資源回收再利用之研究. 聖約翰科技大學電機工程系碩士學位論文, 頁 1-85.
    85. 陳昭宏. (2001). 亞太港埠競爭力與核心能力指標之研究. 運輸學刊, 13(1), 頁 1-25.
    86. 陸早行. (1985). 疊慧術(DELPHI)在策略趨勢預測上的應用以人身保險理賠策略為例. 國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士學位論文.
    87. 曾國雄, & 鄧振源. (1989). 層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上). 中國統計學報, 27(6), 頁 5-22.
    88. 黃意文. (2006). 應用分析層級程式法(AHP)建立產品設計評價模式之研究-以行動電話為例. 國立臺灣科技大學設計研究所碩士論文.
    89. 溫琇玲, 陳保文, 王秉豐, & 嚴嘉鑫. (2013). 智慧型辦公大樓空調及照明節能實務. 臺灣物業管理學會論文集(7), 頁 81-89.
    90. 葉晉嘉, 翁興利, & 吳濟華. (2007). 德菲法與模糊德菲法之比較研究. 調查研究-方法與應用(21), 頁 31-58.
    91. 維基百科. (2021年11月1日). 四大自由 (羅斯福). 擷取自 維基百科: https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%9B%9B%E5%A4%A7%E8%87%AA%E7%94%B1_(%E7%BE%85%E6%96%AF%E7%A6%8F)
    92. 衛萬里. (2005). 應用分析網路程序法選擇最佳產品設計方案之決策分析模式. Journal of Design, 10(3), 頁 59-80.
    93. 鄭滄濱. (2001). 軟體組織提昇人員能力之成熟度模糊評估模式. 國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理系碩士論文, 頁 1-131.
    94. 盧希鵬. (2011). 為什麼無法控制我的狗. 台北: 商周出版社出版.
    95. 賴姿樺. (2019年06月). 營建專案應用既有實獲值方法選用之研究. 國立中央大學營建管理研究所碩士學位論文, 頁 1-61.
    96. 魏明利、陳銘樹、黃芬芬. (2011). 醫院推動節約能源措施之研究. 健康管理學刊, 9(2), 頁 153-171.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2025/01/25 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 2025/01/25 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 2025/01/25 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE