本研究旨在協助研究生進行論文研究的時程規劃，透過研究內容的紀錄、他人分享之知識與資源及交流討論，整理出對於論文研究有助益之內容，順利完成研究所最重要的任務——論文，並拓展自身知識，成為能夠利用自我動機進行學習的人才。論文研究知識管理平台採用自我調整學習、知識管理及網路學習社群理論，萃取適合應用於論文研究管理之內容，再利用系統分析與設計，整理系統概念設計、功能模組及資料庫設計建置出實體系統。
本系統延續陳香澐於2018年的論文研究歷程與知識分享平台建置之研究。以系統原有之認識研究室、個人管理歷程、他人研究歷程及學習資源，另新增研究流程與工作、行事曆、知識分享、專家黃頁及研究方法概念圖功能，期望以更全面之功能，協助研究生掌控研究進度與進行研究規劃，並透過網路學習社群的建立，協助平台使用者分享彼此知識，得到知識性成長。最後，經由研究生的訪談回饋，瞭解系統對其於論文研究學習上之助益及影響。
本研究主要貢獻為：
1. 平台提供研究方法概念圖，幫助研究生初步瞭解論文研究必須經歷之過程，加強對於研究工作之掌握。
2. 平台提供研究目標與時程的訂定，長遠目標與短期目標的交互操作，能加強研究生對於研究進度的掌握度。
3. 建置論文研究知識管理平台：根據文獻的理論依據及系統分析，建置幫助研究生進行論文規劃及學習知識之整合交流平台。
4. 應用知識管理概念，使研究生能夠學習他人經歷及資源，加強研究生對於論文研究之瞭解與掌握。

The research aims at assisting graduate students to manage their research by time-course planning. Transforming the records of the research, the knowledge and resources shared by others, and the exchange of discussions, into useful content, it makes research completed successfully. The research knowledge management platform extracts appropriate content from the theories of self-regulated learning, knowledge management, and web-based learning community, and then uses system analysis and design, organizing system conceptual design, functional modules and database design and construction to build the physical system.
The system bases on Chen’s research on the research management and knowledge-sharing platform in 2018. Therefore, the new system which is developed by this research, contains the original introduction of the lab, personal and others’ research process, and learning resources, additional functions including research processes and tasks, calendar, knowledge sharing, experts page, and concept map of research method, hoping to use comprehensive functions to assist graduate students in managing their process and schedule. Moreover, by constructing a web-based learning community, it makes users able to share and develop their knowledge. By interviewing graduate students, this research also receives information on how well the system affects and benefits to thesis studies.
The main contributions of the research include:
1. The platform provides a research method concept map to make graduate students have a common sense of research process and know every step that they may meet in the future.
2. The platform provides a function for research processes and tasks, which assists graduate students to set long-term and short-term goals to manage the research process efficiently.
3. Constructing Research knowledge management platform: According to literature theory and system analysis, to develop a platform that can help graduate students to plan their research and exchange knowledge.
4. Implementing knowledge management, which enables graduate students to learn from others by sharing ideas and knowledge, in order to handle their research well.

中文參考文獻
1. Cheers編輯部 (2017)。2017企業最愛碩士生大調查。檢自：http://topic.cheers.com.tw/issue/2017/master/article/1.aspx
2. 王千倖 (2003)。以網路同儕教育建構網路學習社群之行動研究。師大學報：科學教育類，48(1)，119-142。
3. 李淑敏 (2002)。證據醫學之應用性研究。國立成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
4. 林宜穎 (2013)。美國研究生教育及其對臺灣研究生教育的啟示。臺灣教育評論月刊，2(3)，35-36。
5. 林建平 (2005)。自律學習的理論與研究趨勢。國教新知，52(2)，8-25。
6. 俞可平(1999)。社群主義。臺北市：風雲論壇。
7. 紀詩瑩 (2002)。企業員工自我導向學習傾向與知識分享意願關係之研究。國立暨南國際大學成人與繼續教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，南投縣。
8. 胡瑋珊譯 (2002)。組織管理-企業組織如何有效運用知識。臺北市：中國生產力。(Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L., 1999)
9. 書林編輯部 (譯) (2010)。MLA論文寫作手冊(第七版)。臺北市：書林。(MLA, 2009)
10. 張基成 (2003)。網路學習社群之經營與管理。T&D 飛訊，8，1-11。
11. 教育部 (2009)。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊(再版)。臺北市：教育部。
12. 梁定澎 (1997)。資訊管理研究方法總論。中華民國資訊管理學報，4(1)，1-6。
13. 梁定澎 (2012)。資訊管理理論。新北市：前程文化。
14. 陳世娟、唐牧群 (2011)。傳播學領域研究生研究歷程中之資訊尋求行為。圖書資訊學刊，9(2)，91-122。
15. 陳柏村 (2005)。知識管理：正確概念與企業實務。臺北市：五南。
16. 陳香澐 (2018)。論文研究歷程與知識分享平台建置之研究。國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
17. 葉佳雯 (2016)。論文研究歷程管理平台建置之研究。國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
18. 管倖生、阮綠茵、王明堂、王蘭亭、李佩玲、高新發、黃鈴池、黃瑞崧、陳思聰、陳雍正、張文山、郭振嘉、楊基昌、楊清田、董皇志、童鼎鈞、鄭建華、盧麗淑 (2010)。設計研究方法。新北市：全華圖書。
19. 潘乃欣、張詩芸 (2017)。Before & After差很大？研究生的9種厭世症狀。檢自：http://topic.cheers.com.tw/issue/2017/master/article/17-3.aspx
20. 潘中道、賴靜宜、王琇婷 (譯) (2016)。怎麼做研究：社會科學研究方法。臺北市：學富文化。(Thomas, G., 2009)
21. 羅清俊 (2007)。社會科學研究方法：如何做好研究。新北市：威仕曼文化。
英文參考文獻
1. Anamika Ray (2015). Planning a Research Project, https://www.slideshare.net/anamikadady1/planning-a-research-project-edited
2. Arthur Andersen and The American Productivity and Quality Center. The Knowledge Management Assessment Tool: External.
3. Arthur Andersen Business Consulting (1999), Zukai Knowledge Management, Toyo Keizai Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
4. Badaracco, J. L. (1991). The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete through Strategic Alliances. Harvard Business Press.
5. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall, Inc.
7. Bodi, S. (2002). How Do We Bridge the Gap between What We Teach and What They Do? Some Thoughts on the Place of Questions in the Process of Research. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(3), 109-114.
8. Boulding, K. E. (1965). The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society. MI: University of Michigan Press.
9. Chi-Cheng Chang (2003). Towards a distributed web-based learning community. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40:1, 27-42,
10. Click, A. B. (2018). International graduate students in the United States: Research processes and challenges. Library & Information Science Research, 40(2), 153-162.
11. Corno, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research. Educational Researcher, 22 (2), 14-22.
12. Council of Graduate Schools and Educational Testing Service. (2010). The Path Forward: The Future of Graduate Education in the United States. Report from the Commission on the Future of Graduate Education in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
13. Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. London: Elsevier Inc.
14. Davenport, T. H., Long, D. W. and Beers M. C. (1998). Successful Knowledge Management Projects. Sloan Management Review, 39(2), 43-57.
15. Fahey, L. and Prusak, L. (1998). The Eleven Deadliest Sins of Knowledge Management. California Management Review, 40(3), 265-276.
16. Gordon, W. I., Lindner, R. W. and Harris, B. R. (1996). A factor analytic study of the Self-Regulated Learning Inventory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
17. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A. and Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of A Global Online Debate and The Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431.
18. Hanna, D. E., Glowaccki-Dudka, M. and Conceicao, S. (2000). 147 practical tips for teaching online groups: Essentials of web-based education. Madison, Wisconsin: Atwood.
19. Harris, K., Fleming, M., Hunter, R., Rosser, B. and Cushman, A. (1999). The Knowledge Management Scenario: Trends and Directions for 1998-2003. Strategic Analysis Report.
20. Hendriks, P. (1999). Why Share Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on the Motivation for Knowledge Sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91-100.
21. Jones, Q. (1997). Virtual-Communities, Virtual Settlements & Cyber-Archaeology: A Theoretical Outline. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(3).
22. Kiraly, G. and Gering, Z. (in press). Editorial: Introduction to ‘Futures of Higher Education’ special issue. Futures.
23. Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners (3rd ed.). UK: SAGE.
24. Kushkowski, J. D., Parsons, K. A. and Wiese, W. H. (2003). Master's and Doctoral Thesis Citations: Analysis and Trends of a Longitudinal Study. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3, 259–276.
25. Liebowitz, J. (2001). Knowledge management and its link to artificial intelligence. Expert Systems with Applications, 20(1), 1-6.
26. Martin A. Kozloff (2011). Steps in Planning Research Projects and Writing Proposals, University of North Carolina Wilmington.
27. Miller, S. M., Moos, W. H., Munk, B. H. and Munk, S. A. (2017). Managing Drug Discovery Process. UK: Woodhead.
28. Modern Language Association (2009). MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers (7th ed.). USA: Author.
29. Molm, L. D. (1997). Studies in rationality and social change. Coercive power in social exchange. NY: Cambridge University Press.
30. Nisar, T.M., Prabhakar, G. and Strakova, L. (2019). Social media information benefits knowledge management and smart organizations. Journal of Business Research, 94, 264-272.
31. Nonaka, I. (2008). The Knowledge-Creating Company. Harvard Business Review, Nov-Dec, 99-104.
32. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. NY: Oxford University Press.
33. Nonaka, I., Umemoto, K. and Semoo, D. (1996). From Information Processing to Knowledge Creation: A Paradigm Shift in Business Management.
34. Palloff, R. M., Pratt, K. and Stockley, Denise (2001). Building learning communities in cyberspace: effective strategies for the online classroom. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 31(3), 175-178.
35. Palvia, P., Leary, T.D., Mao, E., Midha, V., Pinjani, P. and Salam, A.F. (2004) Research Methodologies In MIS: An Update. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 14(24), 526-542.
36. Palvia, P., Mao, E., Salam, A.F. and Soliman, K. (2003) Management Information Systems Research: What’s There in a Methodology? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 11, 289-309.
37. Phillips, E. M. and Pugh, D. S. (2010). How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors. London, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
38. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining slf-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470
39. Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. NY: M.E. Sharp Inc.
40. Ruggles, R. (1998). The state of notion: knowledge management in practice. California Management Review, 49(3), 80-89.
41. Ryu, S., Ho, S. H. and Han, I. (2003). Knowledge sharing behavior of physicians in hospitals. Expert Systems with Applications, 25, 113-122.
42. Senge, P. (1998). Sharing knowledge. Executive Excellence, 15(6),11-12.
43. Smith, B. L. (2001). The challenge of learning communities as a growing national movement. Peer Review, 3-4(4-1), 4-8.
44. Stipek, D. J. (1993). Motivation To Learn: From Theory to Practice(2nd ed.).
45. Thomas, G. (2009). How to Do Your Research Project: a guide for students in education and applied social science. UK: SAGE.
46. Wijnhoven, F. (1998). Knowledge Logistics in Business Contexts: Analyzing and Diagnosing Knowledg Sharing by Logistics Concepts. Knowledge and Process Management, 5(3), 143-157.
47. Wolters, C. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 224-235.
48. Zack, M. H. (1999). Managing codified knowledge. Sloan Management Review, Summer, 45-57.
49. Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Development of self-regulated learning: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 307-313.
50. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81 (3), 329- 339.
51. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000a). Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In M. Boeakaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (13-35). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
52. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000b). Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.
53. Zimmerman, B. J. (2010) Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17.
54. Zimmerman, B. J. a Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (1989). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives. New York: Taylor & Francis.